Might want to apply that to sanctuary cities and states.Bruce » 15 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
Bruce » 15 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
It does apply.
.
They'll still go get him there.DeplorablePatriot » 15 Aug 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Yaak MT and Hayden, ID will give him sanctuary. Bet on it.
SCOTUS can.Squatchman » 15 Aug 2023, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ They'll still go get him there.
No question about it and there isn't a thing anyone could do about it.
article IV SECTION 2 CLAUSE 2 DOES NOT COVER SOME ONE WHO DOES NOT APPEAR IN A STATE COURTBruce » 15 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
None of that applies when the government no longer represents the will of the people. Think colonists. They were "treasonous" to the monarchy, weren't they?Bruce » 15 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.