Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 8:01 am

where did I say that lil feller?

both parties want it gone goober

Oh really...?
If what you say is true.....then show me some recent message traffic in the MSM that states BOTH PARTIES WANT TO ELIMINATE SS  

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 8:34 am

Oh really...?
If what you say is true.....then show me some recent message traffic in the MSM that states BOTH PARTIES WANT TO ELIMINATE SS

I don’t watch MSM goober

walkingstick » 16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm

this would cause a ripple effect for full employment for people under 27 years old. fund the system by having a 50% inheritance on the market value of assets over 5 million dollars. plus. remove the cap on contribution.  congress would scream NO!!!!! whose nation is this? yours or congress?

yeah, and give me my $170000 back pay!

Judging from the average and median retirement account balances for the 55-64 age group, most people don't have a choice but to wait for FRA.

Work another 5 years for a lousy additional $800/month?
**** that!

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 8:39 am

I don’t watch MSM goober

Get this..now that he's talked himself into a corner..he now claims he doesn't get any of his info from the mainstream news media. None.....  

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:38 am

Get this..now that he's talked himself into a corner..he now claims he doesn't get any of his info from the mainstream news media. None.....

nope I dont

what corner is that goober?
 

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:47 am

nope I dont

what corner is that goober?

Show me examples of both parties claiming they want to end SS. This is what you claim.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:50 am

Show me examples of both parties claiming they want to end SS. This is what you claim.

you think I’m gonna waste time with you goober?

if you haven’t seen evidence of it, not sure what to tell you

maybe you haven’t been paying attention 

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:55 am

you think I’m gonna waste time with you goober?

if you haven’t seen evidence of it, not sure what to tell you

maybe you haven’t been paying attention

Well looks like my work is done here.
Another Whipped Libtard notch in my belt.

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:59 am

Well looks like my work is done here.
Another Whipped Libtard notch in my belt.

maybe you would believe tRump goober

https://youtu.be/uFl0K0DxZFU
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 10:59 am

Well looks like my work is done here.
Another Whipped Libtard notch in my belt.

let’s make sure that your work is done here 

another one from 

tRump

https://youtu.be/foYCSYc1fM0
 

Shut up and PAY. At some point the gov. will raise the age for the full benefit. The tax will also rise for everyone. Those that are collecting will still be paid with a COLA every year. The boomers are retiring at a rate of 10,000 a day. They will get their money as they paid into it all their life. Illegals will start to collect too. I think the minimum amount of time to work is 40 quarters. Many illegals already qualify. The qualifying amount of work time to collect may be increased. 20 years sounds good to me. Embrace the tax and diminishing returns for YOU. Pay up and shut up. I bank my check. Thank you.

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 11:19 am

let’s make sure that your work is done here 

another one from 

tRump

https://youtu.be/foYCSYc1fM0

Still waiting to see you prove that both sides are threatening to eliminate SS. 
Are you intelligent enough to know when you've done that..?
If not..then keep posting this weak crap that fails to prove your ridiculous claim.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Aug 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 2:40 pm

Still waiting to see you prove that both sides are threatening to eliminate SS. 
Are you intelligent enough to know when you've done that..?
If not..then keep posting this weak crap that fails to prove your ridiculous claim.

tRump said "all republicans want to do a number on social security"

close enough 

do I really need to show you how dems are just as **** up as republicans?

walkingstick » 16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm

this would cause a ripple effect for full employment for people under 27 years old. fund the system by having a 50% inheritance on the market value of assets over 5 million dollars. plus. remove the cap on contribution.  congress would scream NO!!!!! whose nation is this? yours or congress?

lifting  the cap off social security tax would be a step in the right direction. 

walkingstick » 16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm

t

the only way to save social security is  to lift the cap so that incomes of 170k and over can be taxed for social security.

jerrab » 17 Aug 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 4:43 pm

the only way to save social security is  to lift the cap so that incomes of 170k and over can be taxed for social security.

but but ... they can get by without a SS check

but not the tax cuts

Mrkelly » 17 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm

but but ... they can get by without a SS check

but not the tax cuts

right now anything over 167k is not taxed for social security. in other words a person making a million only pays social security tax on 167k.

jerrab » 17 Aug 2023, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 5:09 pm

right now anything over 167k is not taxed for social security. in other words a person making a million only pays social security tax on 167k.

I know

jerrab » 17 Aug 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 4:43 pm

the only way to save social security is  to lift the cap so that incomes of 170k and over can be taxed for social security.

Every year, roughly 6 percent of covered workers have earnings above the taxable maximum.

That's a lot of pressure put on a small slice of people. It sounds good in theory.