Liberal Forum

So you claim there is "consensus"?? Seems that LIE just got kicked in the nuts!!


There is no climate emergency

 Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

 Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

 The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

 Warming is far slower than predicted

 The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

 Climate policy relies on inadequate models

 Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

 CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

 CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

 Global warming has not increased natural disasters

 There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

 Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

 There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works
whatever the causes are.”

 Growing skepticism

 Nobel Laureate in Physics Dr John F. Clauser also signed the manifesto.The message is clear: there is no climate crisis. The number of critical scientists who no longer submit to the dogma of the alleged man-made climate catastrophe is growing.
 

Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am

So you claim there is "consensus"?? Seems that LIE just got kicked in the nuts!!

There is no climate emergency

 Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

 Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

 The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

 Warming is far slower than predicted

 The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

 Climate policy relies on inadequate models

 Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

 CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

 CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

 Global warming has not increased natural disasters

 There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

 Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

 There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works
whatever the causes are.”

 Growing skepticism

 Nobel Laureate in Physics Dr John F. Clauser also signed the manifesto.The message is clear: there is no climate crisis. The number of critical scientists who no longer submit to the dogma of the alleged man-made climate catastrophe is growing.

The climate elites sure don't deny themselves far more than their fair share of fossil fuels.  

roadkill » 17 Aug 2023, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 6:44 am

The climate elites sure don't deny themselves far more than their fair share of fossil fuels.

They never will since they too don't really believe the HYPE being spewed on the people.

But they use it for more power and control, like ANY illegitimate politico will do.

Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am

So you claim there is "consensus"?? Seems that LIE just got kicked in the nuts!!

There is no climate emergency

 Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

 Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

 The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

 Warming is far slower than predicted

 The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

 Climate policy relies on inadequate models

 Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

 CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

 CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

 Global warming has not increased natural disasters

 There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

 Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

 There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works
whatever the causes are.”

 Growing skepticism

 Nobel Laureate in Physics Dr John F. Clauser also signed the manifesto.The message is clear: there is no climate crisis. The number of critical scientists who no longer submit to the dogma of the alleged man-made climate catastrophe is growing.

some great "scientific" info here
https://nov79.com/gbwm/gbwm.html

Dinosaur Era Had 5 Times Today's CO2
https://www.livescience.com/44330-juras ... oxide.html
 

Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2023, 6:19 am

So you claim there is "consensus"?? Seems that LIE just got kicked in the nuts!!

There is no climate emergency

 Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

 Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

 The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

 Warming is far slower than predicted

 The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

 Climate policy relies on inadequate models

 Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

 CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

 CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

 Global warming has not increased natural disasters

 There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

 Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

 There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works
whatever the causes are.”

 Growing skepticism

 Nobel Laureate in Physics Dr John F. Clauser also signed the manifesto.The message is clear: there is no climate crisis. The number of critical scientists who no longer submit to the dogma of the alleged man-made climate catastrophe is growing.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=79768