Liberal Forum

I know this isn't exactly a surprise to anyone. However, it's still worth mentioning. In short, liberals have poorer mental health than conservatives. You don't need to look far to see that.  

Kirkegaard’s analysis found that, overall, liberals tended to report poorer mental health than conservatives. This trend was particularly pronounced for those of both sexes self-labeled as “extremely liberal,” who tended to be noticeably worse off on several measures, not just compared to conservatives, but even compared to those identifying as “liberal” or “slightly liberal." On the other hand, those who identified as “extremely conservative” tended to have similar levels of mental health compared to those identifying as “conservative” and “slightly conservative,” with generally mild differences from “moderate,” “slightly liberal,” and “liberal” respondents. Similarly, in response to the two questions about happiness, conservative respondents in all groups tended to report being happier than liberal groups generally, with extremely liberal men but not women reporting the least happiness. Statistically, differences between the most extreme ideological categories tended to be moderate in size.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... d-ideology

Liberalism is a mental illness.

They delineate liberals vs. conservatives solely based on tending to be more religious.... they need to include more variables in order to make this be of substance. I have done studies like this and so know how it all works.

Vegas » 24 Aug 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2023, 6:50 pm

I know this isn't exactly a surprise to anyone. However, it's still worth mentioning. In short, liberals have poorer mental health than conservatives. You don't need to look far to see that.  

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... d-ideology

so in short, they're stating that liberals are nothing but pantywaists, nancys and karens?

Vegas » 24 Aug 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2023, 6:50 pm

I know this isn't exactly a surprise to anyone. However, it's still worth mentioning. In short, liberals have poorer mental health than conservatives. You don't need to look far to see that.  

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... d-ideology

Is this the guy you are talking about:

“”For ‘age of consent’-fiction (people can consent at any age, even babies consent and disconsent to stuff happening to them!), perhaps a dual approach. Either 13 years old or start of puberty.

 —Emil Kirkegaard, activist for reducing the age of consent to 13 or younger

Emil Ole William Kirkegaard  is a Danish far-right eugenicist, climate change denier,[note 1] homophobe, perjurer[6] and activist for legalising child pornography and incest, as well as lowering age of consent.[7] Kirkegaard controversially argues that homosexuality is a mental illness and has also stated that it is a "good idea to legalize child porn" because he thinks viewing child porn reduces rape rates.

https://encyclopediadramatica.online/Em ... Kirkegaard

Emil Ole William Kirkegaard (born 1989) is a Danish linguist and blogger who has extensively published research in the general field of intelligence (IQ) research, despite not holding a psychology degree or having undertaken any relevant university training in that area. Kirkegaard's work in relation to eugenics and intelligence along with his self-founded, peer reviewed journal OpenPsych has attracted academic and media criticism.

"Perhaps a compromise is having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine). If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they could be harmed, even if it is rape.
 
  —Emil Kirkegaard in his own pedophilia words

"As well as his involvement in neo-Nazi politics, Kirkegaard has written posts that justify the rape of children.
 
  —David Barnes

 
 

A little more on this guy:

"Kirkegaard. He’s one of those anti-semitic ‘white genocide’ lunatics, but that’s not even the worst part of his character: he has a way to justify raping children.
 „
  —PZ Myers  

the most disturbing of part of Kirkegaard’s internet presence, however, is a blog-post in which he justifies child rape
 „
  —Ben van der Merwe, London Student

 One speaker, Emil Kirkegaard, who presented papers three times at the conference, defended pedophilia suggesting that drugging the child before sex might be a “compromise” as they were unlikely to know it had happened and therefore wouldn't be harmed.
 „
  —Toby Young Spoke Alongside Man Who Argued Raping Unconscious children is fine

 Kirkegaard is not an academic. His highest qualification is a Bachelor’s in linguistics.Having dropped out of his Masters degree, instead preferring to be “self-taught in various subjects”, Kirkegaard now runs OpenPsych, a platform for non-peer reviewed psychology papers, along with Davide Piffer of Mankind Quarterly. Piffer is a fellow LCI-speaker, and was praised by Richard Lynn as having done “brilliant work identifying the genes responsible for race differences in intelligence.
 „
  —Exposed: London’s eugenics conference and its neo-Nazi links   
 
 

OdeToJoy » 24 Aug 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2023, 7:41 pm

Is this the guy you are talking about:

“”For ‘age of consent’-fiction (people can consent at any age, even babies consent and disconsent to stuff happening to them!), perhaps a dual approach. Either 13 years old or start of puberty.

 —Emil Kirkegaard, activist for reducing the age of consent to 13 or younger

Emil Ole William Kirkegaard  is a Danish far-right eugenicist, climate change denier,[note 1] homophobe, perjurer[6] and activist for legalising child pornography and incest, as well as lowering age of consent.[7] Kirkegaard controversially argues that homosexuality is a mental illness and has also stated that it is a "good idea to legalize child porn" because he thinks viewing child porn reduces rape rates.

https://encyclopediadramatica.online/Em ... Kirkegaard

Emil Ole William Kirkegaard (born 1989) is a Danish linguist and blogger who has extensively published research in the general field of intelligence (IQ) research, despite not holding a psychology degree or having undertaken any relevant university training in that area. Kirkegaard's work in relation to eugenics and intelligence along with his self-founded, peer reviewed journal OpenPsych has attracted academic and media criticism.

"Perhaps a compromise is having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine). If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they could be harmed, even if it is rape.
 
  —Emil Kirkegaard in his own pedophilia words

"As well as his involvement in neo-Nazi politics, Kirkegaard has written posts that justify the rape of children.
 
  —David Barnes

I didn't know he was a pedo. It came from psychologytoday.com, which is a pretty reliable source. My bad. 
 

impartialobserver » 24 Aug 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2023, 7:20 pm

They delineate liberals vs. conservatives solely based on tending to be more religious.... they need to include more variables in order to make this be of substance. I have done studies like this and so know how it all works.

True. The other variables were: 
1. Most likely to need safe spaces
2. Most likely to believe that free speech and hate speech are the same. 
3. Most likely to believe that they are smarter than they really are. 
4. Most likely to skip bathing. 

Liberals dominated these variables.  

Vegas » 24 Aug 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2023, 8:58 pm

I didn't know he was a pedo. It came from psychologytoday.com, which is a pretty reliable source. My bad.

  Sure you didn't.
Sounds like he's a hero of yours