

wow. want a test of a person's honesty, ask them what they understand about life equally timing reproductions part as eternally separated in plain sight now.sunburn » 24 Aug 2023, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Not your everyday drug test.
This would be a drug test to see if you're capable of listening to evidence and judging someone.
Sodium pentothal to see if you think someone is guilty before the trial starts.
As divided as the races and political ideas are these days, how else are you gonna get a fair trial?
The media is deliberately misinforming the public. For all the stories of racism and racial hate the facts on the ground do not indicate these are on the rise. Outside of politically manipulated events like George Floyd or the blm summer of love, concerns over race are still at historic lows. It's a very small but vocal segment of society that wouldn't be able to set aside political or racial biases to fulfill the duty of being an impartial juror. I have pretty strong political opinions but was able to set these aside to be the foreman of a jury. Serving on a jury helped restore my faith in the process, at least at a local level.sunburn » 24 Aug 2023, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Not your everyday drug test.
This would be a drug test to see if you're capable of listening to evidence and judging someone.
Sodium pentothal to see if you think someone is guilty before the trial starts.
As divided as the races and political ideas are these days, how else are you gonna get a fair trial?
sorry, I speak with Demonrats everyday and they all say he is guilty. I don't think ANYONE that hates Trump will give one wit about any evidence that will exonerate him or how bad the case is against him.Neo » 25 Aug 2023, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ The media is deliberately misinforming the public. For all the stories of racism and racial hate the facts on the ground do not indicate these are on the rise. Outside of politically manipulated events like George Floyd or the blm summer of love, concerns over race are still at historic lows. It's a very small but vocal segment of society that wouldn't be able to set aside political or racial biases to fulfill the duty of being an impartial juror. I have pretty strong political opinions but was able to set these aside to be the foreman of a jury. Serving on a jury helped restore my faith in the process, at least at a local level.
The ruling, scheduling an Oct. 23 start to Chesebro's trial, came just after Trump's newly appointed attorney said he would move to sever the former president's case from Chesebro or any other defendant who sought an expedited timeline.18 hours agoBuckNaked » 25 Aug 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ An October trial date lol anyone wanna bet that doesn’t happen
In Georgia filing a false one of these is forgery.sunburn » 25 Aug 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ sorry, I speak with Demonrats everyday and they all say he is guilty. I don't think ANYONE that hates Trump will give one wit about any evidence that will exonerate him or how bad the case is against him.

It's different when you are on a jury, or at least that is my experience. The "crimes" Trump is accused of are unproven legal theories. A jury of democrats might not be convinced of their validity.sunburn » 25 Aug 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ sorry, I speak with Demonrats everyday and they all say he is guilty. I don't think ANYONE that hates Trump will give one wit about any evidence that will exonerate him or how bad the case is against him.
yeah, just ask those on DJT's sexual abuse case; no witness, no doctors report, no screams, no police report. Then the transparent extension of the law just so it could be tried. Sounds fair and impartial to me!Neo » 25 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ It's different when you are on a jury, or at least that is my experience. The "crimes" Trump is accused of are unproven legal theories. A jury of democrats might not be convinced of their validity.
The case will be made the first five minutes Mike Pence is on the stand.
I wouldn't want to stake the rest of my life on "democrats might not be convinced".Neo » 25 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ It's different when you are on a jury, or at least that is my experience. The "crimes" Trump is accused of are unproven legal theories. A jury of democrats might not be convinced of their validity.
reality is framed by artistic impression used academically on each arriving replacement of their previous 4 generation gap people.impartialobserver » 25 Aug 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Interesting question. I will say that judging this concept based on what you see online is very misleading. When someone is behind closed doors as part of jury deliberation... its not nearly as biased as what you see online