****!
as I said, I didn't and don't read his gibberish. all I replied is that reasonable doubt only needs to be "established"; not conquered or defeated.
My gibberish isn't hypotheses practiced 400 generation gaps either. I describe my species down to each replacement alive.You define people saving ideas that always create more havoc than social civility.
So the answer is neither, reasonable doubt needs to be ignored...Nostradamus'omh » 25 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The actual answer isn't in the title. History is the result of the two working against each other ancestrally since dawn of civilization creating alternate realities of what if, what about, could have, would be, should have been another way, and evolving in plain sight as genetic compounding of chromosomes eternally separates the reproductions left alive now in their specific generation gaps since conceived to occupying time now.
the only thing preventing ancestors from understanding self evident time evolving is the reality they are willing to die for.
Reasonable doubt exists because people ignore how living actually happens and manifest rule of law to protect what if scenarios, defend what about those people results, debating would, could, should happen before, during, next generation only born in the moment here changing population ne at a time in plain sight.Jantje_Smit » 26 Aug 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ So the answer is neither, reasonable doubt needs to be ignored...
Did I win something?
:faint:
I know, but the reasonable doubt must have come from somewhere, you say it's a problem that started 300 ancestors ago but the human race has been around for much longer then that so there must have been a first reasonable doubt, I wonder what that was and where it came from..Nostradamus'omh » 26 Aug 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Reasonable doubt exists because people ignore how living actually happens and manifest rule of law to protect what if scenarios, defend what about those people results, debating would, could, should happen before, during, next generation only born in the moment here changing population ne at a time in plain sight.
Not by clock and calendar formating linear statistical averaged facts to mislead all generation gaps left evolving forward now. 5 dimensions of ancestry siblings not becoming parents and parenting a next generation of separate lifetimes unlike any before, but in the image of those added them.
Stop clowning around Jantje. You protect corruption doing what you have done playing semantics with me. I stand against humanity, not ancestries or ancestors. Ideas not people. people of character won't admit the difference.
Dead giveaway inan arena of ideas like this website in cyberspace connecting every corner of this atmosphere to defy 24/7 relative time logistics in plain sight.
It is how I broke the codes of silencing ancestries each generation gap alive along with a little origami to visualize event horizons in different scenarios.My avatar is 6 degrees of separating actually existing into relative time realities where everyone pretends nobody knew genetics eternally separates the active reproductions occupying time now.
Abusing the power of suggestion created the eternal war between ancestors adapting in real time and characters manifesting relative time logistics to stand against natural time displaced. It is the good vs evil debate in disguise of hiding understanding of one's time evolving here now.Jantje_Smit » 26 Aug 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ I know, but the reasonable doubt must have come from somewhere, you say it's a problem that started 300 ancestors ago but the human race has been around for much longer then that so there must have been a first reasonable doubt, I wonder what that was and where it came from..
Oh, and you're wrong about the defying of the relative time logistics, I tried but the timed apart won't go away..
:blink:
Well, huh,sunburn » 25 Aug 2023, 11:20 pm » wrote: ↑ as I said, I didn't and don't read his gibberish. all I replied is that reasonable doubt only needs to be "established"; not conquered or defeated.
Wow, that is completely accurate, shame you used it in absolute sarcasm like it doesn't happen.
I'm not pretending I don't know it, I know but I just don't care, I like having fun with reasonable doubt.. and you're evading the question again but that's ok, I would like to know how reasonable doubt started but I guess you don't know either..Nostradamus'omh » 26 Aug 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ Abusing the power of suggestion created the eternal war between ancestors adapting in real time and characters manifesting relative time logistics to stand against natural time displaced. It is the good vs evil debate in disguise of hiding understanding of one's time evolving here now.
temptation to believe now isn't eternity is easier when existing ancestries demand their last arrivals obey rule of law or else.
guess who becomes the tyranny in every reality, a person's previous generation gaps regardless the village beliefs. Genetics function one way, realities promise anything else is possible and all anyone has to do is silence opposition by any means necessary setup by social consensus of previous 4 generation gaps administering human rights to their replacements.
Stop pretending you didn't know this. Your efforts to keep reasonable doubt in play shows you won't stop corrupting every great great grandchild ever born forward now.
Define your interpretation of evil, I just gave you mine that I survived in so far.
part oneJantje_Smit » 27 Aug 2023, 2:50 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not pretending I don't know it, I know but I just don't care, I like having fun with reasonable doubt.. and you're evading the question again but that's ok, I would like to know how reasonable doubt started but I guess you don't know either..
I have another one though.. abusing the power of suggestion.. that would imply that the power of suggestion can be used without abusing it, but if now is eternity there can be no doubt and no suggestion so why did you use those words, are you suggesting something?
:faint: