This is not about a Trump problem necessarily. It's a matter of having every vote count nothing more nothing less.Bruce » 27 Aug 2023, 12:14 am » wrote: ↑ Electing our Presidents by popular vote would require 38 states to approve a constitutional amendment and would still not solve the Trump problem.
We have a constitutional republic of fifty states that conduct federal elections for President.
I propose Congress provides a federal law for the death penalty by public hanging for any attempted election fraud of substitution of fake electors for authorized electors.
That would make Christians out of all future Trumps.
Then quit whining and get off your lazy liberal *** and change the Constitution.razoo » 27 Aug 2023, 12:05 am » wrote: ↑ It's time to abolish the Electoral College
https://www.brookings.edu › articles › its-time-to-abol...
In most elections, the Electoral College has operated smoothly. State voters have cast their ballots and the presidential candidate with the most votes in a ...
You still don't understand the people have never elected a President...the states elect the President (and now Vice-president).razoo » 27 Aug 2023, 12:18 am » wrote: ↑ This is not about a Trump problem necessarily. It's a matter of having every vote count nothing more nothing less.
A majority vote wins should be the rule of law.
Evermore reason to ditch the Electoral College and make make majority popular vote the rule of law ............ConsRule » 27 Aug 2023, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ You still don't understand the people have never elected a President...the states elect the President (and now Vice-president).
The get off your whiny liberal *** and force a Constitutional Amendment through Congress.razoo » 27 Aug 2023, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ Evermore reason to ditch the Electoral College and make make majority popular vote the rule of law ............
WE can put this on the ballot and let we the people decide ................
Sounds like you guys can't compete without a handicapConsRule » 27 Aug 2023, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ You still don't understand the people have never elected a President...the states elect the President (and now Vice-president).
NO ****, a "popular vote" would result in ONLY THE STATES where winning the popular vote would be CAMPAIGNED IN!!razoo » 27 Aug 2023, 12:07 am » wrote: ↑ The Popular Vote would most likely drive presidential candidates spend more time in all states as opposed to
focusing only on the states with the largest Electoral College numbers.
You're another republican that's afraid of heads up competition because you know you'll lose.Beekeeper » 27 Aug 2023, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ NO ****, a "popular vote" would result in ONLY THE STATES where winning the popular vote would be CAMPAIGNED IN!!
States like NY, ILLINOIS, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, FLORIDA AND TEXAS. NO other states would ever see a candidate.
You're a **** IDIOT and nothing more than another COMMIE MOUTHPIECE POS!!
Sounds like YOU COMMIES want to have POWER AND CONTROL and want to DESTROY your enemy!!Squatchman » 27 Aug 2023, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Sounds like you guys can't compete without a handicap
Heads up competition isn't for republicans apparently.
What are you scared of? I thought America loves trump?
Voters live in the states ..............ConsRule » 27 Aug 2023, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ You still don't understand the people have never elected a President...the states elect the President (and now Vice-president).
No, ****, REPUBLICANS ARE NOT THE MINORITY!!Squatchman » 27 Aug 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ You're another republican that's afraid of heads up competition because you know you'll lose.
Because you're a minority.


WRONG AGAIN, room temp!!Squatchman » 27 Aug 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ You're another republican that's afraid of heads up competition because you know you'll lose.
Because you're a minority.
No comment being a minority that needs help to even be close in elections?Z09 » 27 Aug 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Squatchman...
Remember the good old days when interest rates were in the 3's..?
And inflation and energy prices were lower?