razoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.

razoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.
.
grasping for straws
The Democrat Party is hurting this country.
Question for you .Would you rather have a mean whiney orange men running **** or a bought and paid for Chinese stooge?razoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.
Biden should be executed for receiving money from a potential up and coming military Rival .Notably, on March 1, 2017, less than two months after Vice President Joe Biden left public office, State Energy HK Limited, a Chinese company, wired $3 million to Rob Walker’s company. The next day, the company wired $1,065,000 to a company associated with James Gilliar, another Biden family associate. Afterwards, the Biden family received approximately $1,065,000 in payments over a three-month period in different bank accounts.
Trump has been convicted of ZERO crimes and the indictments all involve legal arguments never before tried.razoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.
Trump cannot run for office because he has violated the 14th amendment article three. This is self enforcingNEILCAR » 05 Sep 2023, 3:33 am » wrote: ↑ ahhh ... there is no gag order to prevent someone from saying "I am running for office because ...."
lol
War for dependency crisis.
None of the opinions in your link have the authority to stop trump from running ......idiot.razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 4:32 am » wrote: ↑ Rep. Schiff: Trump 'should be disqualified' under 14th Amendment
https://www.msnbc.com
INSIDE WITH JEN PSAKI
Trump 'skirting the line' with social media threats
https://www.msnbc.com
AMERICAN VOICES
The tricky legal question at the center of the Trump mug shot cash grab
https://www.msnbc.com
DEAN OBEIDALLAH
Trump’s Georgia trial will be televised — if it stays in state court
JORDAN RUBIN
https://www.msnbc.com
According to whom ?razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑ Trump cannot run for office because he has violated the 14th amendment article three. This is self enforcing
does not need a court decision. Trump is DOA!!!
Thus Trump has duped his worshippers one more time as he takes their money to support his lifestyle of luxury and support his many lawyers that he discards without batting an eye.
razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑ Trump cannot run for office because he has violated the 14th amendment article three. This is self enforcing
does not need a court decision. Trump is DOA!!!
Thus Trump has duped his worshippers one more time as he takes their money to support his lifestyle of luxury and support his many lawyers that he discards without batting an eye.
Arrest Trump and maybe consider all who threatenrazoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.
^^^^^^^^ Proof that Democrats do not support your 1st Amendment Rights to freedom of speech. You asked for proof. You asked for a cite. You asked for references. Now, you have it. Right here. Democrats want to abolish the 1st Amendment.razoo » 31 Aug 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In light of of a person with presidential back ground who just keeps breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is it possible to consider "bundling" some similar casesin an effort to prevent this apparent criminal not getting prosecuted for each broken law? Wealthy law breakers must be taught money cannot buy criminal behavior.
Breaking laws over and above those producing indictments is unusual behavior to say the least. Shouldn't this behavior be met with unusual force to prevent such actions in the future? It appears to me that the former president does not give a damn and continues to interfere with prosecution and the investigation anyway possible.
This is not a precedent we want on the books. The former president and his many cohorts in crime and must be dealt some serious responses from the courts.