You sound panic stricken like your reality fell apart and you are demanding everyone that lost faith to believe again or you will take your world stage somewhere else in space and time.razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ Constitution DOES NOT provide any protection from arrest any elected or former elected official from after being indicted and/or charged a crime.
He is violating his gag order.............
Gag orders equate to hush money to keep victims quiet, making them unconstitutional.razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ Constitution DOES NOT provide any protection from arrest any elected or former elected official from after being indicted and/or charged a crime.
He is violating his gag order.............
At least with hush money, ya get something outta the deal.Bob » 05 Sep 2023, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑ Gag orders equate to hush money to keep victims quiet, making them unconstitutional.
New executive order: Government and or corporation group workers shall not infringe on the speech of an individual citizen or compel citizens to do anything that is not constitutionally legal.
If I were you, I wouldn't be advocating for a gag order.razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ Constitution DOES NOT provide any protection from arrest any elected or former elected official from after being indicted and/or charged a crime.
He is violating his gag order.............
Two which side? two ends played against silenced majority, so minority rules regardless dictatorship or democracy.Deezer Shoove » 05 Sep 2023, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ At least with hush money, ya get something outta the deal.
Certainly, it's way more respectable...
Really now.razoo » 05 Sep 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ Constitution DOES NOT provide any protection from arrest any elected or former elected official from after being indicted and/or charged a crime.
He is violating his gag order.............