Liberal Forum

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:09 am

all ****.  you cannot prove any of that.

To you? Probably not. I have seen the evidence and find it compelling.  
 

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:09 am

all ****.  you cannot prove any of that.

A true believe life isn't self contained to evolving forward now will never accept their own body is eternally separated while genetically here. Whose fault is that actually?
Factually it is the honest soles reproductively defending their time evolving get labeled insane, stupid, dumb, foolish, selfish, antisocial, evil, sub human lifetimes without an eternal intellectual soul.

Neo » 13 Sep 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:13 am

To you? Probably not. I have seen the evidence and find it compelling.

if you have seen it, then you should be able to provide a link so that I can see what you found so compelling.

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am

if you have seen it, then you should be able to provide a link so that I can see what you found so compelling.

Behavioral patterns of typecast people thinking their reality should inherit tomorrow more than anyone else 's governed so far.

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 9:45 am

security held the doors open after the battle had been lost and the mob had overrun the battle space.  Do you think that officer Byrd broke that window himself and invited her to climb through it before shooting her>

Hey ASSWIPE, just FOR the record, if she had climbed "through the window" as you claim, HOW did she fall BACK BEHIND THE DOORS that this PIG SHOOTER shot her through??

Yeah, *******, she fell BACK BEHIND THE LOBBY DOORS as a TOTALLY UNARMED PERSON!! So take your LIES and spread them on SOME OTHER FORUM as YOU GET YOUR *** KICKED BY ME ON EVERY **** POST YOU MAKE!! Which is WHY you IGNORE FACTS AND ME, ASSHOLE!!

 

Squatchman » 13 Sep 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 9:05 am

  It was glorious too.
That "unarmed" woman **** around and found out.
Now her kids don't have a mother because of her poor choice and not complying with orders from law enforcement.
 No different than that unarmed woman shot by a racist cop for shoplifting last week.

Same thing will happen to your mutt

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am

if you have seen it, then you should be able to provide a link so that I can see what you found so compelling.

https://www.npr.org/2021/01/11/95554891 ... -during-ri
 
https://www.gop.gov/news/documentsingle ... mentID=102

FJB » 13 Sep 2023, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 11:19 am

Same thing will happen to your mutt

same thing could happen to him   
 
 

@Neo    Here was your claims:

"The facts support parties were interested in January 6th becoming a mass casualty event and took actions to make this outcome more likely. It wasn't just a failed photo op, it was an attempt to create and then capitalize on mass death. This is nazi Reichstag fire level evil but with more loss of innocent lives." 

"Newspapers had headlines ready to print. There were government agents in the crowd along with left wing agent provocateurs. Pelosi and pals turned down additional national guard security, saying they were concerned about optics and a remote chance Trump would use them in a military coup."

Neither of your links supports any of that other than the fact that the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and the House Sergeant-at-Arms jointly denied Chief Sund's request to have the National Guard assist with security on 1/6.  And just so you know, Pelosi and Mitch McConnell are anything but "pals".  Chief Sund notified General Walker at the DC National Guard of that denial and the General and Chief talked about the guard's ability to provide 125 response troops on standby.  Nobody says anything about "optics" or that they were worried about a coup. Nothing about Trump offering ten thousand guardsmen twice.  No mention of headlines ready to print... nothing about "left-wing provocateurs"  And, I don't know about you, but I am PLEASED AS **** PUNCH we had agents embedded in the crowd. That's their **** job.  Nothing about anyone in the Democratic party wanting to "create and then capitalize on mass death."  More **** you made up.  

You're **** delusional and, unfortunately, delusional people are incapable of rationally extracting themselves from their own delusions.  Peddle you crackpot conspiracy **** somewhere else.  I've had my fill, thank you.

**** you MM you fake pis asshole

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 12:38 pm

@Neo    Here was your claims:

"The facts support parties were interested in January 6th becoming a mass casualty event and took actions to make this outcome more likely. It wasn't just a failed photo op, it was an attempt to create and then capitalize on mass death. This is nazi Reichstag fire level evil but with more loss of innocent lives." 

"Newspapers had headlines ready to print. There were government agents in the crowd along with left wing agent provocateurs. Pelosi and pals turned down additional national guard security, saying they were concerned about optics and a remote chance Trump would use them in a military coup."

Neither of your links supports any of that other than the fact that the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and the House Sergeant-at-Arms jointly denied Chief Sund's request to have the National Guard assist with security on 1/6.  And just so you know, Pelosi and Mitch McConnell are anything but "pals".  Chief Sund notified General Walker at the DC National Guard of that denial and the General and Chief talked about the guard's ability to provide 125 response troops on standby.  Nobody says anything about "optics" or that they were worried about a coup. Nothing about Trump offering ten thousand guardsmen twice.  No mention of headlines ready to print... nothing about "left-wing provocateurs"  And, I don't know about you, but I am PLEASED AS **** PUNCH we had agents embedded in the crowd. That's their **** job.  Nothing about anyone in the Democratic party wanting to "create and then capitalize on mass death."  More **** you made up.  

You're **** delusional and, unfortunately, delusional people are incapable of rationally extracting themselves from their own delusions.  Peddle you crackpot conspiracy **** somewhere else.  I've had my fill, thank you.

The links weren't meant to be all encompassing. Media compared January 6th to 911 and pear harbor. A failed sit in protest compared to mass casualty events. Seems evident their handlers told the media to expect something far more significant than yet another of 600 riots that occurred in the previous 8 months. Only this time with conservatives vs the usual city block burning malcontents. 
 
 
 

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am

if you have seen it, then you should be able to provide a link so that I can see what you found so compelling.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots : Capitol Insurrection Updates : NPR

Trump did call for Nat'l Guard troops before Jan. 6, ret. Gen. Kellogg says (americanmilitarynews.com)

What We Know About Security Response At Capitol on January 6 : NPR

Neo » 13 Sep 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 1:58 pm

The links weren't meant to be all encompassing. Media compared January 6th to 911 and pear harbor. A failed sit in protest compared to mass casualty events. Seems evident their handlers told the media to expect something far more significant than yet another of 600 riots that occurred in the previous 8 months. Only this time with conservatives vs the usual city block burning malcontents.

"a failed sit-in protest"????

wait...  WHAT????

I saw a lot of sit-ins in my day and I NEVER saw one that involved beating police officers with pikes, breaking windows, and smashing doors.

Did you type that with a straight face?  

 
 

maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2023, 2:33 pm

"a failed sit-in protest"????

wait...  WHAT????

I saw a lot of sit-ins in my day and I NEVER saw one that involved beating police officers with pikes, breaking windows, and smashing doors.

Did you type that with a straight face?

Did you miss the anti police violence just a few weeks earlier? Jan 6th was downright fluffy compared to hundreds of blm riots. I'm sure it was more violent than some but there were hundreds of worse riots just a few months prior. Save your crocodile tears for law enforcement. They are obviously in support of an agenda.