Oh, they are going to produce it to the entire world as it watches this enquiry ....
Or recited reasonable doubts written into rule of law typecasting genetic displacements cradle to grave each generation present.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Majik » 14 Sep 2023, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, they are going to produce it to the entire world as it watches this enquiry ....
and there is nothing you can do to stop it ....
go back to china you commie ****...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Remember the American justice system, treat everyone innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Squatchman » 14 Sep 2023, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
If they had it they wouldn't need an inquiry.
There's no evidence just wishful thinking.
More revenge politics
But it will look great at the ballot box next year and there is nothing you can do to stop it......
Just like the last 2 election cycles
circumstantial evidence created by rational thinking beyond evolving never duplicates details twice eternally separating results left changing forms shaped since combined displacements present.razoo » 14 Sep 2023, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ The fake republicans have nothing but BS !!!!!!
Evidence is required before initiating an inquiry and evidence is required to show probable cause ...... this fake party is lying. Matt Gaetz lost his BS on the news this evening BECAUSE he could not provide evidence of his
investigation ------ he said he does not have any records of such in his possession.
The Fake Republicans Pushing This Impeach Biden crap have no evidence nor do they have probable cause. The media should be debunking this nonsense BECAUSE none of them have evidence or probable cause from anyone.
Fake Republican Kevin McCarthy has no evidence neither does Matt Gaetz ............ it is all political rhetoric hoping tp derail the Biden candidacy no matter that TRump cannot run and most likely neither can most fake republican candidates including Pence and Fascist DeSantis because they supported Trump throughout the promotion for Jan 6th. 14th amendment forbids any current republican candidates to run.
So, the position has moved from 'Repubs have no evidence' to 'Repubs have no hard evidence'. We're going to have to wait and see about the evidence, but the step backwards has been noted.
There is nothing to it as we speak ........ it's the fake republican party playing to public opinion which in general is worthless because it lacks standing ............... this fake GOP chit chat has zero foundation.
Wrong ....you **** mental midget .....Squatchman » 14 Sep 2023, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
If they had it they wouldn't need an inquiry.
There's no evidence just wishful thinking.
More revenge politics
But it will look great at the ballot box next year and there is nothing you can do to stop it......
Just like the last 2 election cycles
They have bank transfer data that they've made public.impartialobserver » 14 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ to play Devil's advocate.. getting hard evidence aka video, audio, signed/verified documents is not as easy as it seems. Most of what we call evidence is purely circumstantial. This happened at 10 pm (just an example) and this happened at 8 pm (on the same day) so the logical conclusion (purely subjective ) is that this happened in the middle.
Wrong.....razoo » 14 Sep 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ There is nothing to it as we speak ........ it's the fake republican party playing to public opinion which in general is worthless because it lacks standing ............... this fake GOP chit chat has zero foundation.
Hard evidence of a negative - that the gop is not dead?
Simple way to get hard evidence is to allow everyone corrupted by reasonable doubt using planned obsolescence and plausible deniability to get caught denying the same thing.impartialobserver » 14 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ to play Devil's advocate.. getting hard evidence aka video, audio, signed/verified documents is not as easy as it seems. Most of what we call evidence is purely circumstantial. This happened at 10 pm (just an example) and this happened at 8 pm (on the same day) so the logical conclusion (purely subjective ) is that this happened in the middle.