Liberal Forum

Mama was crying on the phone to her brother Gerald pleading Oh Jiggs you can’t kill him, think of Bobbie and your girls and it would just kill our mother!

My cousin Jennifer’s husband Norm had ran off with another girl to Texas after stealing a lot of Uncle Jigg’s guns and he had credible I formation where Norm was in Texas.

Jiggs didn’t kill Norm, but Norm never knew the issue was in doubt for awhile.

Jennifer cried her eyes out, then Uncle Ben came by and said Safeway needed more drivers, and taught Jennifer how to drive a semi tractor trailer truck.

That was nearly fifty years ago and Jennifer’s baby son is the President of the local Teamsters today.

Every time I see her she reminds me what piss poor Republicans, we all used to be.

Whoever heard of a Republican that gave two **** about union families?

https://youtu.be/FS8zCFN1h1g?si=tLFCOK181JmohU4h
https://youtu.be/FS8zCFN1h1g?si=tLFCOK181JmohU4h
 

A 40% pay increase over 4 years? Wtf

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:03 pm

Here's one, I think...

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/a ... -spotlight

Well I had no idea that the Border Patrol has a union.
Yeah..I would guess the Union Boss might be a tiny  bit critical of the Democrat's  Illegal Alien Invasion Agenda...  
......but at least his Border Patrol Agents shouldn't have to worry that Illegal Alien Scabs   will be taking their jobs away from them...?

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Sep 2023, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:43 pm

Well I had no idea that the Border Patrol has a union.
Yeah..I would guess the Union Boss might be a tiny  bit critical of the Democrat's  Illegal Alien Invasion Agenda...  
......but at least his Border Patrol Agents shouldn't have to worry that Illegal Alien Scabs   will be taking their jobs away from them...?

 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:06 pm

Do you disagree with this statement by the president of the UAW?

Nope.  Someone needs to ask him...and you should feel free to offer an answer if you have the courage...exactly, and specifically, what billionaires are doing to keep him personally from amassing wealth.  The fact there are billionaires in the world doesn't keep anyone from getting rich.  They only thing stopping Fain from amassing wealth is Fain.
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm

To bootlickers and craven ideologues, you mean?

I concur.

Who needs pensions when we have social security.
 

Where did I say they don't need a pension?  If the UAW wants their members to have a pension, they are free to establish one for their members...it's perfectly legal.

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:09 pm

Who the **** do they think they are, trying to offset inflation? They have some nerve.

They can ask for whatever they want.  If it were my decision, they would strike till Hell freezes over before I would agree to their request/demand.  What's the name of that Rolling Stones song?  Oh, "You Can't Always Get What You Want".
 
 

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:06 pm

Do you disagree with this statement by the president of the UAW?

Nope.

Have you told your mouth?

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm

Someone needs to ask him...and you should feel free to offer an answer if you have the courage...exactly, and specifically, what billionaires are doing to keep him personally from amassing wealth.  The fact there are billionaires in the world doesn't keep anyone from getting rich.  They only thing stopping Fain from amassing wealth is Fain.

Apparently you are confused about whether you agree or disagree with fain's statement.

You should try to think really hard until you can either agree or disagree with your agreement or disagreement.

But before you think about what you think - which needs doing, - think about this. The American Dream did not used to be "amassing wealth" before the republican party and all of its members (ESPECIALLY those who think they are "libertarians") became overtly homosexual. It USED to be owning your home and getting your kids through college or trade school as appropriate to their native abilities.

You didn't need to "amass wealth" to pull that off. You just needed to put in an honest day's work every day for a few decades. That is, until you all became ideological cock suckers and started treating billionaires like they "earned" that **** - Mammon worshiping **** that you are.

Anyway, good luck deciding whether you agree with Fain or not - being a confused sissy has to suck.
 

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:05 am

I love that they think they should work 20% less hours, but get paid for the hours they didn't work at a higher hourly rate.

Can you say "Go **** yourself"?

THIS.

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:55 pm

Have you told your mouth?

Apparently you are confused about whether you agree or disagree with fain's statement.

You should try to think really hard until you can either agree or disagree with your agreement or disagreement.

But before you think about what you think - which needs doing, - think about this. The American Dream did not used to be "amassing wealth" before the republican party and all of its members (ESPECIALLY those who think they are "libertarians") became overtly homosexual. It USED to be owning your home and getting your kids through college or trade school as appropriate to their native abilities.

You didn't need to "amass wealth" to pull that off. You just needed to put in an honest day's work every day for a few decades. That is, until you all became ideological cock suckers and started treating billionaires like they "earned" that **** - Mammon worshiping **** that you are.

Anyway, good luck deciding whether you agree with Fain or not - being a confused sissy has to suck.

So I misread your question...big **** deal.  If you aren't smart enough to figure out my position, learn to live with the disappointment.

Personally, I don't give a **** what you think of me...you aren't even close to important enough to worry about.
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:55 pm

Have you told your mouth?

Apparently you are confused about whether you agree or disagree with fain's statement.

You should try to think really hard until you can either agree or disagree with your agreement or disagreement.

But before you think about what you think - which needs doing, - think about this. The American Dream did not used to be "amassing wealth" before the republican party and all of its members (ESPECIALLY those who think they are "libertarians") became overtly homosexual. It USED to be owning your home and getting your kids through college or trade school as appropriate to their native abilities.

You didn't need to "amass wealth" to pull that off. You just needed to put in an honest day's work every day for a few decades. That is, until you all became ideological cock suckers and started treating billionaires like they "earned" that **** - Mammon worshiping **** that you are.

Anyway, good luck deciding whether you agree with Fain or not - being a confused sissy has to suck.
 

I could care less if they earned it or not...I'm not jealous of what others have, it didn't impact my ability to build what I have and doesn't hamper me from building upon it.

Geez...you're a whiny little ****.
 

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 8:58 pm

So I misread your question...big **** deal.  If you aren't smart enough to figure out my position, learn to live with the disappointment.

Personally, I don't give a **** what you think of me...you aren't even close to important enough to worry about.

         

You seem upset. I know a lot of gay people are very emo - and I know for sure you're extremely gay.
 

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm

I could care less if they earned it or not...I'm not jealous of what others have,

So, you imputed that Fain was JEALOUS, when he opined that a society which produces billionaires is probably unfriendly to the working man?

That's extremely gay - the knee jerk reaction of a gay ideologue.

ConsRule » 15 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm

it didn't impact my ability to build what I have and doesn't hamper me from building upon it.

Not a worker, obviously. Probably one of those jack off boys who lives in mom's basement and dreams of being rich.
 

roadkill » 15 Sep 2023, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 5:13 am

"The United Auto Workers (UAW) union will go on strike against all of Detroit’s big three automakers at the same time for the first time in the union’s history, after General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis failed to reach a labor agreement with the union before their contracts expired Thursday night." 

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2023/ ... n-history/

Fun fact - If you talk about "the big three" to a person under thirty, they don't know what you mean by that term.
 

Bruce » 15 Sep 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 7:14 am

https://youtu.be/6G4bxA2Gfnc?si=ohCSLQhhDjvQlYp7

Never cross a picket line, my folks always said.

My Uncle Ben was a Teamster, and hauled Hostess bread and pastry goods.

**** the teamsters. You too, phony.

Cannonpointer » 15 Sep 2023, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 9:18 pm

Fun fact - If you talk about "the big three" to a person under thirty, they don't know what you mean by that term.

Yep...same with another term. I was in the store a few years ago and someone asked me how I was doing and I said "Fair to Middling".

Some young girls were in line ahead of me and they turned to me and asked me what it meant.   lol

I guess "fair to middling" is not hip with the younger generation.     
 
 

Z09 » 16 Sep 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2023, 9:18 am

Yeah ..
The Dems want all EV...
And it takes less workers to assemble a EV...

And working less hours a week and getting a 40% increase in wages is just dumb.

That's not a starting point...

And if you're complaining about about CEOs making $$$ just remember....
AOC makes $180,000 a year which sickens me

  180K

thats the same as a CEO making 29 million?

Mrkelly » 16 Sep 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2023, 10:22 am

  180K

thats the same as a CEO making 29 million?

It's relative in this comparison. 

Here's what those big three need to do. Shut down their factories where they're on strike and reopen them in South Carolina free of the UAW.

Big fat UAW leader/mob boss, pounding shoe on table: **** you! We created the middle class!

Union stooge, sitting next to UAW mob boss: Yeah, **** you! I can’t spell my name but I make $150k a year! Haha!