^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Beekeeper » 16 Sep 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Just so you know, ****, the M1A2 Abrams tank has NEVER been defeated in ANY BATTLE it's ever been in including 2 wars in Iraq and in several OTHER minor skirmishes. Fact is, it's never been DISABLED in any battle either by ANYTHING.
NOTHING Russia can throw at it will be effective as they haven't penetrated it's armor yet!!
Sucks for your Ruskies, huh, ****??

Awwww gee. I didn't know they had CAMELS in UKRAINE!!Sumela » 16 Sep 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
FLOATING ON COPIUM......Murica!
Abrams...vs...Camels.......?
what a **** retard. Neocons are dumber that liberals.
US hasn’t fought a war like this since Korea. We lost that one.Beekeeper » 16 Sep 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Awwww gee. I didn't know they had CAMELS in UKRAINE!!
Guess you LWNJs are "smart":, huh?
Russia will end up destroying these within a week. These are our **** tanks!Sumela » 16 Sep 2023, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ The *** is an overly heavy, gas guzzling, tranny death machine.
10.....over a 900 mile front.![]()
But CUCKIES LOVE COPIUM![]()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lord Bebo@MyLordBebo
The US will soon send more than ten Abrams tanks to Ukraine “As for the delivery of Abrams, the heaviest tanks in the world, which weigh 80 tons, they will soon arrive in our country. Our strategic partners - the United States - do not let us down in this case. In the near future, these tanks will defend our country” Said the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Alexey Danilov in a commentary to Ukrainian Radio.
We did NOT lose the Korean war. It ended with a cease fire since we were kicking the NORKO's and CHINESE'S ASSES at the time they capitulated.Tempest62 » 16 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ US hasn’t fought a war like this since Korea. We lost that one.
COL MacGregor has already pointed out allVegas » 16 Sep 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Russia will end up destroying these within a week. These are our **** tanks!
Shut up old moron.Beekeeper » 16 Sep 2023, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Awwww gee. I didn't know they had CAMELS in UKRAINE!!
Guess you LWNJs are "smart":, huh?
23 M1A1'S WERE DAMAGED AND DESTROYED IN DESERT STORM.Beekeeper » 16 Sep 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Just so you know, ****, the M1A2 Abrams tank has NEVER been defeated in ANY BATTLE it's ever been in including 2 wars in Iraq and in several OTHER minor skirmishes. Fact is, it's never been DISABLED in any battle either by ANYTHING.
NOTHING Russia can throw at it will be effective as they haven't penetrated it's armor yet!!
Sucks for your Ruskies, huh, ****??

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Beekeeper » 16 Sep 2023, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑ We did NOT lose the Korean war. It ended with a cease fire since we were kicking the NORKO's and CHINESE'S ASSES at the time they capitulated.
OBVIOUSLY history isn't your strong suit either, *******!!

A veteran site says most were damaged by friendly fire or done intentionally.righteous » 16 Sep 2023, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ 23 M1A1'S WERE DAMAGED AND DESTROYED IN DESERT STORM.
IN 2005, IRAQI WAR, 80 ABRAMS,( M1A2'S WHICH WERE UPGRADED M1A1'S), WERE FORCED OUT OF ACTION BY ENEMY ATTACKS, 63 SHIPPED BACK TO THE U.S. FOR REPAIRS, 17 DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR.
IN 2006, MORE THAN 530 WERE SHIPPED BACK TO THE U.S. FOR REPAIRS.
THE TURBINES ENGINES WERE DISATROUS. VERY HIGH FUEL CONSUMPTION. 2 GALLONS PER MILE.
THE HIGH-SPEED, HIGH TEMPERATURE JET BLAST EMITTED FROM THE REAR OF M1 ABRAMS TANKS MAKES IT HAZARDOUS FOR INFANTRY TO TAKE COVER OR FOLLOW BEHIND THE TANK IN URBAN COMBAT.
THE SOVIET RPG-29, A THREAT TO THE ABRAMS ARMOR, TOOK OUT AN M-1 IN 2008
DeezerShoove » 20 Sep 2023, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ A veteran site says most were damaged by friendly fire or done intentionally.
Also that the worst thing is their expense to operate. It is otherwise a very good tank.
Depends where you look.

I just repeated a different source.