Liberal Forum

On Tuesday, the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight held a hearing titled, “Oversight of United States Capitol Security: Assessing Security Failures on January 6, 2021.”Rep. Barry Loudermilk heads the subcommittee. Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven A. Sund testified before the committee.Chief Steven Sund has been outspoken of Nancy Pelosi and her failures to secure the US Capitol that day.It has been widely reported that President Trump asked for the National Guard three days in advance of January 6. But Pelosi turned him down.  She refused to call in the National Guard despite numerous warnings of possible violence.

 Pelosi then refused to turn over information about her culpability in the security breakdown during the Jan. 6 riot for over a year to congressional investigators.Steven A. Sund, the Capitol Police chief on that fateful day, not only confirms her culpability along with the rest of the Democratic leadership. Sund reported that Pelosi utilized him as a scapegoat and forced him to step down as Police Chief. We all know now she was just trying to obfuscate her own responsibility for the attack.The day after January 6, Nancy Pelosi blamed Chief Sund for the security failures that day.  Pelosi insisted she never spoke with Chief Sund the entire day.

On Tuesday Chief Steven Sund refuted Pelosi. Sund told the subcommittee he spoke with Pelosi three times on January 6 (while she was running the building with her film crew.)
continued at .....

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... testifies/

Trump lied to the nation and summoned a hundred thousand good citizens that believed the rotten bastard.

He was the Commander in Chief.

His **** duty was to protect the damned Capitol.

What would Harry Truman say?

Bruce » 19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm

Trump lied to the nation and summoned a hundred thousand good citizens that believed the rotten bastard.

He was the Commander in Chief.

His **** duty was to protect the damned Capitol.

What would Harry Truman say?

1. You can never prove the elections were fair and secure because Democrats spent millions in lawyers to keep ALL ballots and machines from being investigated. This means YOU'RE the liar.

2. The Commander in Chief is NOT responsible for Capitol security you dumb **** piece of ****. https://www.uscp.gov/the-department/oversight

The United States Capitol Police (USCP) is overseen by the Capitol Police Board and has Congressional oversight by appropriations and authorizing committees from the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. This oversight affords the Department the support and opportunity to continually ensure that the USCP meets the safety and security needs of the Congress, the staff, and the many visitors who come to the United States Capitol each day.

Congress has oversight over the Capitol Police, not the president, MORON.
 

Nancy can’t even secure her house in San Fran

Bruce » 19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm

Trump lied to the nation and summoned a hundred thousand good citizens that believed the rotten bastard.

He was the Commander in Chief.

His **** duty was to protect the damned Capitol.

What would Harry Truman say?

Your and your party of treasonous  tyranny that rigged an election and Jan. 6th  is now being exposed for your crimes against America

......BREAKING BIG: Via House Judiciary Committee Republicans – FBI LOST COUNT of How Many Paid Informants They Had in the Trump Crowd on January 6! The House Judiciary Republicans sent out an explosive letter on Tuesday night that CHANGES EVERYTHING!The House Judiciary Republicans sent out a letter Tuesday that includes transcribed testimony from former Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Washington Field Office (WFO) Steven D’Antuono.D’Antuono testified that the FBI had numerous confidential human sources (CHS) in the Trump crowd on January 6.In fact, they had so many FBI operatives in the crowd they they had no idea how many were actually there that day!
 From the document.

D’Antuono explained that due to the large number of CHSs present at the Capitol, the WFO asked FBI Headquarters “to do a poll or put out something to people saying w[ere] any CHSs involved” so the FBI could try to ascertain how many CHSs had been in attendance.5 D’Antuono stated after the outreach from Headquarters was “when we started getting responses back.”6 As one example, he recalled that a CHS from the Kansas City Field Office was on site at the Capitol and had allegedly been in contact with his handler while at the event.7 The CHS reported to his handler “while they were in the crowd, I think, saying that they were going in. They were trying to stop some of the action happening and they left or whatnot.”8This new information is extremely concerning. It suggests that the FBI cannot adequately track the activities and operations of its informants, and that it lost control of its CHSs present at the Capitol on January 6. These revelations reinforce existing concerns, identified by Special Counsel Durham, about the FBI’s use of, and payment to, CHSs who have fabricated evidence
and misrepresented information. 9 The Justice Department Inspector General also identified critical problems in the FBI’s CHS program, including the FBI’s failure to fully vet CHSs and the FBI’s willingness to ignore red flags that would call into question an informant’s reliability.10

Here is the document released Tuesday night by the House Judiciary Republicans.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... -fbi-lost/

 
 

Bruce » 19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm

Trump lied to the nation and summoned a hundred thousand good citizens that believed the rotten bastard.

He was the Commander in Chief.

His **** duty was to protect the damned Capitol.

What would Harry Truman say?

You are a **** clown.

It was a planned photo op. Those pulling the strings hoped the magats brought their guns and the event would allow democrats to demonize Republicans at large. Fortunately this failed as the Trump crowd left their guns at home. Instead of the engineered mass casualty event, they got tourists largely staying inside the velvet ropes.

Majik » 19 Sep 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2023, 8:10 pm

On Tuesday, the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight held a hearing titled, “Oversight of United States Capitol Security: Assessing Security Failures on January 6, 2021.”Rep. Barry Loudermilk heads the subcommittee. Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven A. Sund testified before the committee.Chief Steven Sund has been outspoken of Nancy Pelosi and her failures to secure the US Capitol that day.It has been widely reported that President Trump asked for the National Guard three days in advance of January 6. But Pelosi turned him down.  She refused to call in the National Guard despite numerous warnings of possible violence.

 Pelosi then refused to turn over information about her culpability in the security breakdown during the Jan. 6 riot for over a year to congressional investigators.Steven A. Sund, the Capitol Police chief on that fateful day, not only confirms her culpability along with the rest of the Democratic leadership. Sund reported that Pelosi utilized him as a scapegoat and forced him to step down as Police Chief. We all know now she was just trying to obfuscate her own responsibility for the attack.The day after January 6, Nancy Pelosi blamed Chief Sund for the security failures that day.  Pelosi insisted she never spoke with Chief Sund the entire day.

On Tuesday Chief Steven Sund refuted Pelosi. Sund told the subcommittee he spoke with Pelosi three times on January 6 (while she was running the building with her film crew.)
continued at .....

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... testifies/

Lugosi and company wanted the protest to turn into a riot...hence bussing in blantifa agitators along with John Sullivan...
 

Bruce » 19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2023, 9:37 pm

Trump lied to the nation and summoned a hundred thousand good citizens that believed the rotten bastard.

He was the Commander in Chief.

His **** duty was to protect the damned Capitol.

What would Harry Truman say?

Harry's dead...NEXT!

ROG62 » 20 Sep 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 8:23 am

Lugosi and company wanted the protest to turn into a riot...hence bussing in blantifa agitators along with John Sullivan...

She and the Dems manipulated the whole situation in conjuction with all of those undercover FBI agents dressed as MAGA agitating the crowd ......
and in my opinion she didn't want a riot ....
She wanted the building burned to the ground like her predecessors did when they perpetrated their Reichstag moment so many decades ago......


 

Neo » 20 Sep 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 8:12 am

It was a planned photo op. Those pulling the strings hoped the magats brought their guns and the event would allow democrats to demonize Republicans at large. Fortunately this failed as the Trump crowd left their guns at home. Instead of the engineered mass casualty event, they got tourists largely staying inside the velvet ropes.

She definitely miscalculated the response which is why she ordered the killing of babbitt....
hoping for an armed response .....