https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/p ... party.htmlIf Mr. Kennedy does decide to leave the party of his famous father and uncles to run in the general election, one potential landing spot may be the Libertarian Party, which at the moment lacks a widely known candidate but has excelled at securing ballot access.
In July, Mr. Kennedy met privately with Angela McArdle, the chair of the Libertarian Party, at a conference they were both attending in Memphis — a meeting that has not previously been reported.
“He emphasized that he was committed to running as a Democrat but said that he considered himself very libertarian,” Ms. McArdle said in an interview, adding that they agreed on several positions, including the threat of the “deep state” and the need for populist messaging. “We’re aligned on a lot of issues.”
“My perspective is that we are going to stay in touch in case he does decide to run,” Ms. McArdle said. “And he can contact me at any time if that’s the case.”
He's a Democrat. Why not just run as a Democrat. The Dems are looking for ANYONE but Joe Biden. Biden is 10 points behind Trump right now.The4thReich » 24 Sep 2023, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ Mr. Kennedy sat down with the party’s chair in July, a previously undisclosed meeting, as Democrats fret about a third party bid.
By Nicholas Nehamas
Sept. 23, 2023
For months, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said he plans to continue his long-shot challenge against President Biden in the Democratic primary rather than dropping out to launch a third-party bid.
But lately Mr. Kennedy’s message has seemed to shift, including publicly telling a voter who asked about his plans that he was keeping his “options open.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/p ... party.html
He should.Skans » 24 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ He's a Democrat. Why not just run as a Democrat. The Dems are looking for ANYONE but Joe Biden. Biden is 10 points behind Trump right now.
Kennedy is the best that the Dems have, yet they are doing everything they can to drown him like a feral cat. I can only surmise that the true communists have completely infiltrated Biden's regime and Kennedy is only "Socialist Lite"; not to their liking.Squatchman » 24 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He should.
But to some Democrats he doesn't quite fit into their anti gun,pro vaccine ideal.
They're idiots.
Kennedy would "Ross Perot" Biden if he ran as a Libertarian. The Dems should just let him challenge Biden in an honest election. Get Kennedy to commit to not running as an a 3rd party or independent and let the votes fall where they may.
You CLEARLY do not understand the dems. They do not exist to run candidates for office. They exist to SCREEN candidates for office. Like the repukes, they want only wall street approved candidates.Skans » 24 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ He's a Democrat. Why not just run as a Democrat. The Dems are looking for ANYONE but Joe Biden. Biden is 10 points behind Trump right now.
They are clinton democrats.Squatchman » 24 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He should.
But to some Democrats he doesn't quite fit into their anti gun,pro vaccine ideal.
They're idiots.
As we learned in 2020, who gets the most votes is meaningless. What matters is who counts them.
Have you MET the democ rat party?Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Kennedy would "Ross Perot" Biden if he ran as a Libertarian. The Dems should just let him challenge Biden in an honest election. Get Kennedy to commit to not running as an a 3rd party or independent and let the votes fall where they may.
he is challenging plugs whats not honest?Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Kennedy would "Ross Perot" Biden if he ran as a Libertarian. The Dems should just let him challenge Biden in an honest election. Get Kennedy to commit to not running as an a 3rd party or independent and let the votes fall where they may.
Deep down, every dick sucking conjob knows full **** well that FDR saved capitalism.Mrkelly » 25 Sep 2023, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ He should have run third party (the people’s party)
it’s unreal how many republicans I see talking about him
even in the deep red little town that I live in
You might be right about the Democrat Party, but not the Republicans. The Republicans usually have a large field of candidates - blacks, whites, females, all quite different from one another and with varying views on issues. This is both the strength and the weakness of the Republican party. It is more grass roots than Democrats and we end up with some questionable "weak" candidates in sharing stage time with candidates who are much more popular. The Democrats don't allow this. In fact, they really don't allow any genuine populous determination of which candidate to run.Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ You CLEARLY do not understand the dems. They do not exist to run candidates for office. They exist to SCREEN candidates for office. Like the repukes, they want only wall street approved candidates.
That is why the repuke party is shot through with **** over trump. No matter how hard he sucks wall street's dick, they will NEVER, EVER approve of him. Hell, they wouldn't let trump buy an NFL team. Told him to **** off. Las Vegas refused to give his hotels a gaming licence - only hotels on the strip with no gambling. The **** GROCERY STORES have gaming licenses - not trump towers.
Uh huh.Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ You might be right about the Democrat Party, but not the Republicans. The Republicans usually have a large field of candidates - blacks, whites, females, all quite different from one another and with varying views on issues. This is both the strength and the weakness of the Republican party. It is more grass roots than Democrats and we end up with some questionable "weak" candidates in sharing stage time with candidates who are much more popular. The Democrats don't allow this. In fact, they really don't allow any genuine populous determination of which candidate to run.
You wrongly think that Dems and Republicans are the same party, they aren't, and that they both operate the same way; they don't.
Shutup Jew ****
Ayn Rand and Rush LimbaughCannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ Deep down, every dick sucking conjob knows full **** well that FDR saved capitalism.
They literally CANNOT PRETEND that investing in America's infrastructure destroys the economy and investing in blowing up other countries rescues the economy, without running as fast as they possibly can for some *** dick, just to get the taste of that *** out of their craven ball washing units.
They know.
They **** know.
You midspelled Lush Rimjob.