Liberal Forum

Sgt Bilko » 12 Mar 2017 10:29 pm » wrote:Poor Misty obviously has no understanding of how footnotes work. They point out where direct quotes come from making them NOT PAGIERISM!!
CNN modified the document in order to create the lie that the document was plagiarized in order to discredit Crowley!!

MSM very biased reporting creating a lie to try and discredit conservative people!!!

POOR DELUDED MISTY!!!

After the plagiarism incidents were revealed, HarperCollins—the publisher of her book, What the (Bleep) Just Happened?: The Happy Warrior's Guide to the Great American Comeback—announced it was pulling the book from store shelves, withdrawing the e-book version, and ceasing the printing of new copies
until “the author has the opportunity to source and revise the material.”

#ShePersisted » 12 Mar 2017 11:31 pm » wrote:Pelosi

#ShePersisted » 12 Mar 2017 11:47 pm » wrote: What document would that be Dildo?
Her book, her PhD dissertation or the Op-Ed she plagiarized in the 1999?

There are no FOOTNOTES in an Op-Ed piece jackass.

Why do you think her publisher did this?
Are they part of the biased MSM?

Cannonpointer » 13 Mar 2017 2:24 am » wrote:Well, we know that moron didn't plagierise the word plagierism.

#ShePersisted » 12 Mar 2017 11:31 pm » wrote:It is a naked abuse of the legislative process.
You have to pass their bill to find out what’s in it.

#ShePersisted » 12 Mar 2017 11:31 pm » wrote:

When asked about her boss’s allegations that he’d been wiretapped by Barack Obama—allegations which were made with zero evidence and have been regarded as baseless—Kellyanne Conway responded thusly:

"What I can say is there are many ways to surveil each other now, unfortunately.

There was an article this week that talked about how you can surveil someone through their phones, through their—certainly through their television sets, any number of different ways, and microwaves that turn into cameras, et cetera.

Kellyanne Conway: We Can Be Watched By 'Microwaves That Turn Into Cameras'

Sgt Bilko » 13 Mar 2017 7:39 am » wrote:I watched the video of Pelosie making that idiot statement in the middle of promoting the bill. It was a very long and detailed bill that was rushed through Congress and Republicans complained they didn't have time to read and understand the bill.

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:02 pm » wrote:Obama spied on Trump through his microwave.

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:05 pm » wrote: They had a year.

The Democratic leadership, fearful that momentum for Obamacare was fading as it continued to poll poorly, decided to rush a bill through the Senate before Christmas 2009. On November 18, Majority Leader Harry Reid merged two separate pending bills into a bill to be voted on by the Senate…. To meet the self-imposed Christmas deadline, Reid provided only six days for debate [on the final version of the bill]. The Senate bill passed on a strict party line vote, 60-39.
Few people, including Senators and their staffs, had time to read the whole 2,700 page bill, much less note any possible weaknesses, flaws, or ambiguities. Reid and other Senate Democrats weren’t terribly worried about this. The bill was set to go to the House, then back to the Senate, then to “reconciliation” between the House and the Senate versions, and then to the president for his signature. Everyone thought there would be plenty of opportunities to make changes.
But a major impediment arose soon after the Senate bill passed. Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy had died that past summer, and the January special election to replace him was won by Republican Scott Brown, who ran as a strong opponent of Obamacare. This deprived the Democrats of their filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, and meant that the Senate would not be able to pass a revised bill. The only way to pass Obamacare at this point was to have the House vote on identical legislation to the Senate bill, while engaging in legally dubious procedural maneuvering. And that’s what the Democrats did.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/vol ... 0acec023fb

Termin8tor » 13 Mar 2017 7:39 am » wrote:Your source is lying, like you do so often.

Repubs wrote the first version in secret, but they will go through a long process to both Congress and the public has a chance to understand it and voice their opinions.

It will be amended and go through the full legislative process.

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:17 pm » wrote: Ryan wants to pass it by mid April.
What's the rush?
You pinheads complained that the ACA, which took a year to pass, was rushed.
Now you pretend that they are not trying to fast-track this bill.
Liar.

Whoopi Goldberg Suing Over Fake News Story – Watch “The View” Video

Whoopi Goldberg revealed on Monday’s “The View” that she’s suing over a fake news story she says endangered her and her family. Check out the video below.

During “Hot Topics” on the ABC talk show, Goldberg announced, “Something came out in a fake news website about me.

It endangered my family’s life and it endangered my life.”

She explained that the untrue story falsely claimed she slammed the Navy Seal widow who was featured in Donald Trump’s speech to Congress.

As Gossip Cop reported, “The View” co-hosts did discuss that part of the president’s address, but Goldberg never said a bad word about the woman.

The fake news story, she said, was “created by a guy who just wanted to see how quickly stories he made up would spread.”

And spread this did, apparently to the point where people who believed it began threatening Goldberg and her loved ones.

She angrily said, “I know you’re in Costa Rica, sir, because you said where you were.

If I hadn’t been made aware of this, I could’ve found out about this at the end of a barrel of a gun.”

Goldberg vowed to “get some kind of legislation going” to combat the problem of fake news.

“Clearly, you don’t care what could’ve happened to me or to my family,” she said of the unnamed perpetrator, going on to reveal, “Man, I’m telling you, you cost me money because I had to protect my family… Costa Rica’s not big enough for this lawsuit that’s coming your way.”

The show’s moderator also acknowledged that Trump himself is also a victim of fake news.

“Just so we’re clear, just so we’re really clear, I want these protections in place for the current president, for his family, for my family,” Goldberg insisted.

She went on to say, “Sir, the fact that you don’t give a crap that it endangered me is unconscionable, and I’m going to get my lawyer and I’m coming for you.”

Fake news website starts as joke, gains 1 million views within 2 weeks

"I was surprised by how gullible the people in the Trump groups were, but as I continued to write ridiculous things they just kept getting shared and I kept drawing more viewers," McDaniel told PolitiFact.

"I saw how many fake ridiculous stories were making rounds in these groups and just wanted to see how ridiculous they could get."

Huey » 13 Mar 2017 12:26 pm » wrote:Again, that is a false statement.

Huey » 13 Mar 2017 12:26 pm » wrote: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/vol ... 0acec023fb

In December of the year in question Reid took two separate bills and merged them together then gave members 6 DAYS to read it.

Huey » 13 Mar 2017 12:26 pm » wrote: With that said I (1) am not sold on this replacement bill and (2) do not want it to follow the same rush that Obamacare was subject to.

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:02 pm » wrote:When asked about her boss’s allegations that he’d been wiretapped by Barack Obama—allegations which were made with zero evidence....

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:17 pm » wrote: Ryan wants to pass it by mid April.
What's the rush?
You pinheads complained that the ACA, which took a year to pass, was rushed.
Now you pretend that they are not trying to fast-track this bill.
Liar.

#ShePersisted » 12 Mar 2017 11:47 pm » wrote: What document would that be Dildo?
Her book, her PhD dissertation or the Op-Ed she plagiarized in the 1999?

There are no FOOTNOTES in an Op-Ed piece jackass.

Termin8tor » 13 Mar 2017 1:29 pm » wrote:Why are you so upset about that, psycho?

Termin8tor » 13 Mar 2017 1:29pm » wrote:You and Dems have accused Trump of collaborating with the Russians with zero evidence to support your claims.

#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 1:27 pm » wrote: Again? So they hadn't read the two separate bills and they and their staff couldn't read the combined bill in six days?
I agree.
This is too important to rush.

Huey » 13 Mar 2017 1:58 pm » wrote:2700 pages.
But it wasn't too important in 2010.

Huey » 13 Mar 2017 1:58 pm » wrote: Gotta pass it to see what it is in it, right nancy?

In a speech touting the bill, Nancy Pelosi argued that the atmosphere had prevented the public from understanding what the bill actually did, and expressed her hope that the vote would put an end to the fevered atmosphere and give away to a calm analysis of its actual impact:
Conservatives made a part of the last sentence — “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” — famous, possibly the most famous line from the entire health-care debate.

Conservatives turned that sentence fragment into an emblem for their claim that Obamacare was passed in the dead of night through a secretive, rushed, undemocratic process.

They claim this even now.