Liberal Forum

I've seen leftist liars like you smear conservative public figures for decades. You can't win on the merits of your philosophy, so you lie and smear.And I see right wing liars like you do the same to Liberal public figures every single day, but I don't go on some kind of a stupid crusade against them.I detest that. On this board, I can do something about it.Deal with it.What can you do about it?You haven't been able to shut me up in five years, and not for lack of trying.The very definition of insanity, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.You're not going to get any different results.I will say whatever I want about any public figure I want.I don't care if you 'detest' it or not.Deal with it.

I've seen leftist liars like you smear conservative public figures for decades. You can't win on the merits of your philosophy, so you lie and smear.And I see right wing liars like you...... You're not capable of being honest, are you.The very definition of insanity, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.What kind of psychotics would portray innocent people as child molesters? I will say whatever I want about any public figure I want.Yes, you'll be as ugly as you want to be.Since you seem to think that sex is only for procreation, why would you suppose that Rush Limbaugh was traveling to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra?Was he going there to start a family? Isn't it curious that a man of Rush's means can't get laid here in the United States?I wonder what he can find in the DR, that he can't get here?I'm just sayin'.....The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector.Get some help, psycho.

And I see right wing liars like you ....Could a sane ,honest person really believe the following? I guess they prefer to penetrate a woman's vagina without her consent.Kind of like you.What kind of psychotic wackjob would falsely accuse someone of being a rapist?Other than a dishonest defender of an actual, real-life rapist?

More important news about liberal-left moonbat-ism that you'll ignore.I pretty much ignore everything you lie about, so why would this be any different?I cited a source, moonbat. Was the source lying, too? Geez, what a total wackjob you are. Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?For 50 years, the Russians tried to destroy this nation.Now, within a couple of years, the Tea Party is succeeding.

Does the liberal-left get much of anything right? Well, they got the election right.BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Loser.

Does the liberal-left get much of anything right? Well, they got the election right. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Loser. Oh yeah, you moonbats suckered enough people to vote for a president running a $1 trillion annual deficit. With an 11% and still rising real unemployment rate. With incomes plummeting. That's what you call "winning?" The country's losing. Imbecile.

Hell he's off his meds again.

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. So this will my new home. Grisly Abortion Clinic Trial Is 'Peek Into The World Before Roe v. Wade' Ilyse Hogue is exactly right. Denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care will only drive the practice underground, and create more butchers like Kermit Gosnell. And still not one single word of concern about the babies who were killed. Say, why would the, snicker, "corporate media" black out this trial? "You support rape," she'll bleat in cowardly, evasive response. Yes, There Is a Gosnell Trial Cover-up by Major News Organizations by Kirsten Powers Apr 16, 2013 4:45 AM EDT Suddenly, the press is insisting it has been covering the “House of Horrors” trial. But that’s easily disproved, writes Kirsten Powers. Has there been enough national mainstream media coverage of the trial of abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell? The local press has extensively covered the shocking testimony about the Philadelphia "House of Horrors" where Gosnell allegedly killed seven babies and one woman since the trial began on March 18, nearly a month ago. But while it seems obvious that the national media has mostly ignored the story, a bevy of left-wing journalists and activists have loudly disagreed in recent days—asserting that the big three networks and the major newspapers have appropriately covered a trial that none sent a reporter to cover. .... if you search “Gosnell” at The Nation, there’s not a single story on the trial. A search at Salon showed one story: a set-up piece about the “looming” trial. Before today, search The American Prospect for “Gosnell,” and all you find on the trial is a story in January. The problem is that the media apologists are battling a straw man. The column that started the firestorm over the media blackout didn’t claim that the mainstream press had “never” covered Kermitt Gosnell. I know, because I wrote it. ....The column, and the ensuing outrage—and much of the outrage came from people with vaginas despite Carmon’s egregious and divisive claim that it was just the patriarchy rearing its ugly head—was specific to the fact that the mainstream media had not covered the trial of Kermit Gosnell, which started March 18, 2013. I am going to repeat this, because a starling number of people on the left, including New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, either cannot grasp this or are intentionally ignoring it. Repeat after me: “The problem is that the trial has not been covered.” That the Times ran one story about Gosnell in January is hardly relevant to the trial that started in March. It is the trial that has included spectacular and headline-grabbing testimony from Gosnell’s former assistants and workers. It is the trial that has been largely ignored outside of local media and activists on the right and left. This, despite the normal obsession with murder trials (Good Morning America has done a 10-part series on the Jody Arias trial). It is the trial—rife with grisly details about an abortion doctor who maimed and killed women and babies—that was ignored, despite The Washington Post’s, The New York Times's, and network evening news’s usual obsession with all things abortion related. .....I can only think of a handful of times in my eight years as a Fox News contributor that I’ve discussed abortion. The people who obsessively cover it and anything vaguely related to it are those in the mainstream media and in the left-wing media, which is why their silence on this is so remarkable. Mollie Hemingway did yeoman’s work chronicling how faithfully The Washington Post’s health reporter, who covered Todd Aiken, the Susan G. Komen controversy, and the murder of abortion doctor George Tiller, didn’t write a single story on the Gosnell trial. No abortion regulation is too small for the mainstream media to cover; no stupid comment about abortion by any Republican goes unnoticed. So her disinterest in this trial is inexplicable. But while the left has alternately attacked the right for its alleged lack of interest and for paying too much of the “wrong sort” of attention, I haven’t heard a lot about the near silence from the feminist organizations that lecture us endlessly about how they stand for women’s health. I find the claims now that feminists were deeply upset about poor minority women being abused and killed along with their babies a little tough to believe. A search for “Gosnell” on NOW's website yielded only two hits, both from 2011. Search for “Gosnell” on the League of Women Voters website and you will find nothing. The same search on the NARAL and Planned Parenthood sites returned the same number of hits: zero. But that’s probably Fox News’s fault. http://www.thedailyb...anizations.html

. . Wow, another long essay of sympathetic concern for those murdered babies. Little Miss Marxist is Liberalism as its best.

Ilyse Hogue is exactly right. Denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care will only drive the practice underground, and create more butchers like Kermit Gosnell.......I'm ignoring you. Yeah, well make sure you close your eyes. Pro-abortion groups made sure abortion clinics were rarely, if ever inspected or regulated, even in cases of wrongdoing resulting in death. They want animals regulated more than abortion clinics. Gosnell himself, whose history the AP sanitizes by describing him as a "gifted student" who "put his medical school education to work as a 1970s-era champion of drug treatment and legal abortions."Apparently the AP reporter didn't read deep enough into the grand-jury report to learn of the "Mother's Day Massacre" of 1972. A young Philadelphia doctor “offered to perform abortions on 15 poor women who were bused to his clinic from Chicago on Mother’s Day 1972, in their second trimester of pregnancy.” The women didn’t know that the doctor “planned to use an experimental device called a ’super coil’ developed by a California man named Harvey Karman. A colleague of Karman’s Philadelphia collaborator described the contraption as “basically plastic razors that were formed into a ball. . . . They were coated into a gel, so that they would remain closed. These would be inserted into the woman’s uterus. And after several hours of body temperature, . . . the gel would melt and these . . . things would spring open, supposedly cutting up the fetus.” Nine of the 15 Chicago women suffered serious complications. One of them needed a hysterectomy. The following year, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade. It would be 37 more years before the Philadelphia doctor who carried out the Mother’s Day Massacre would go out of business. His name is Kermit Gosnell. http://www.nationalr...snell-ed-whelan http://online.wsj.co...IDDLETopOpinion

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. And still not one single word of concern about the babies who were murdered. Nor will she ever write one. Oh gosh, Obama's been caught lying AGAIN. Who'da thunk? ObamaCare Taxes Will Increasingly Bite Middle Class By JOHN MERLINE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY When President Obama was selling his signature health care reform bill back in early 2010, he described it as the "largest middle-class tax cut for health care in history." http://www.investors..._130417.png.cms But a closer examination finds that ObamaCare's three biggest taxes — a Medicare surcharge, the so-called Cadillac tax and an insurance premium fee — will increasingly hit the middle class because of how the law indexes them for inflation and medical costs. Over the next decade, the Medicare surcharge will raise $318 billion, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. But these taxes, commonly described as targeting the rich, will soon hit middle-income families. That's because the Democrats who wrote the law did not index the income thresholds for inflation. So more and more families will end up paying these "wealthy" taxes simply because they are getting cost-of-living increases — a phenomenon known as "bracket creep." http://news.investor...s-over-time.htm

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. So this will my new home. And still not one single word of concern or sympathy for the murdered babies. A procedure Obama voted to allow while a state Senator in Illinois. Gosh, why would the "corporate media" almost totally black out a story as dramatic as this? The New York Times has finally produced a second news story on the murder trial of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell--almost a month after its other story, which briefly recapped the trial's first day. Like the Times's first story, which we cited in yesterday's column, this one appears deep inside the paper (on page A12). You almost get the impression the Times doesn't want to be there. More than almost: The paper's editors make it explicit with their headline: "Online Furor Draws Press to Abortion Doctor's Trial." What an amazing headline that is. The editors of the New York Times declare that they're covering the trial under protest, yielding their news judgment to an angry online mob. It's probably the most honest thing they've ever published. (As an aside, the "online furor" was sparked by a Kirsten Powers op-ed in USA Today. Although USA Today is a website, it is also a newspaper with a circulation of 1.8 million, second only to The Wall Street Journal.) http://online.wsj.co...IDDLETopOpinion

How many times are you going to reply to my OP?

How many times are you going to reply to my OP? He's been arguing with himself for the past seven or eight posts. Kind of entertaining actually.

Misty, on 18 Apr 2013 - 15:54, said: How many times are you going to reply to my OP? He's been arguing with himself for the past seven or eight posts. Kind of entertaining actually. Not that you'll admit it, but it speaks volumes that you two will bleat about how no one answered. Meaning liberals have no answers. You're afraid to. Deal with that. Babies were murdered, yet you lack the character to address that.

Not that you'll admit it, but it speaks volumes that you two will bleat about how no one answered. Meaning liberals have no answers. You're afraid to. Deal with that. Babies were murdered, yet you lack the character to address that. Dude, look at my posts, I'm a conservative. I just think your relentless pursuit of her is a little extreme.

He's been arguing with himself for the past seven or eight posts. Kind of entertaining actually.If by entertaining, you mean **** crazy, then yes, it is very entertaining. LOLDude, look at my posts, I'm a conservative. I just think your relentless pursuit of her is a little extreme.He's so blinded by hate, he can't see straight.

Dude, look at my posts, I'm a conservative. I just think your relentless pursuit of her is a little extreme. My bad. She's a very ugly smear artist. It's a long, long grudge match, with lots of detail I won't bore you with.

Hey Puss! Why was this thread on page 7?I put so much time and energy into this thread for over two years.I hand it over to you and it's DOA in a week.Good job thread killer.