Liberal Forum

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 12:47 pm » wrote: So he made up that lie about Obama tapping his phones because he saw a lot of THINGS.

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 12:47 pm » wrote: The reason that people want to see his returns is not so much to see how much he paid in taxes, but more about who he's doing business with and who he owes money to, so we can know if there are any conflicts of interest.

Of course, you don't give a **** about any of that because he has an R after his name and not a D.

Termin8tor » 16 Mar 2017 1:26 pm » wrote: I do have a problem getting worked up over accusations for which there isn't one shred of evidence.
And unlike your lie, I apply that standard to members of both parties, Dim.

Termin8tor » 16 Mar 2017 1:24 pm » wrote:Oh, so it can't be true because you don't like his choice of vocabulary.
Imbecile.

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: My 7 year old grandson has a much more extensive vocabulary than the POTUS.

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 2:52 pm » wrote: What a bunch of horse ****.

I'm sure that if Obama had refused to release his returns, you would have been fine with that.

We have a right to see Trump's tax returns just like we have seen the returns of every POTUS going back to Nixon.

Do you deny that?

And do you think that this should be the new precedent?

That no future POTUS should release their returns?

Even if that POTUS is a Democrat?

Sgt Bilko » 16 Mar 2017 7:07 am » wrote: And you never ever except for 1 failed time proved your assertions. You just post assertions and never prove them. Thus you are a liar!!!

Assertion without proof equals a lie!!!

Huey » 16 Mar 2017 9:54 am » wrote:
It is run by the same guy who not only said that taking trump literally on the obama charge is probably not true but also said that there is no evidence of collusion between the russians and the trump campaign.

Just sayin'....

Termin8tor » 16 Mar 2017 10:57 am » wrote: If he's so dishonest, why is he keeping most of his campaign promises, Dim?

Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2017 4:48 pm » wrote:He promised massive federal infrastructural projects - he's giving us none. Not one. Instead, he's opening a slush fund which can only be applied for by CURRENTLY EXISTING AND OPERATING PROJECTS - nothing new.

He promised to punish the chinese for currency manipulation. Instead, he's letting them off the hook after the ten year long attempt to get 38 trademarks awarded was suddenly, out of thin air, a success - and after his son in law received hundreds of millions from the chinese in a deal that smells like bad fish.

Termin8tor » 16 Mar 2017 4:53 pm » wrote: Oh my, a couple months and promises haven't been kept.

What a huge disappointment.

As well as a psychotic accusation with zero evidence cited.

Imbecile.

Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2017 4:44 pm » wrote:No PROOF, you mean. There is clearly evidence - that's why they held hearings.

There's no PROOF.

I think the revolving door between the top russian spy and most of tRump's staff counts as evidence - as do the earlier (now known to be false) denials. Just not proof.

Judge Napolitano: Obama 'Went Outside Chain of Command,' Used British Spy Agency to Surveil Trump

On "Fox & Friends" this morning (3-14) Judge Andrew Napolitano said that even if the Obama administration did spy on Trump, there may never be a way to prove it.

He explained that the statutes allow the president to order the surveillance of any person in the U.S., without suspicion, probable cause or a warrant, but that would leave "fingerprints."

In this case, the alleged surveillance was reportedly ordered in a way that left no record, he said.

"Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command," Napolitano said. "He didn't use the NSA, he didn't use the CIA, he didn't use the FBI, and he didn't use the Department of Justice."

Instead, Napolitano said, Obama used GCHQ, a British intelligence and security organization that has 24-7 access to the NSA database.

"There's no American fingerprints on this," Napolitano said. "What happened to the guy who ordered this? Resigned three days after Donald Trump was inaugurated."

In a statement to Fox News, a UK government spokesperson responded, saying that "no part of this story is true."

British intelligence slaps down Trump spying claim.

GCHQ says surveillance allegations repeated by White House are ‘nonsense.'

British intelligence officials angrily slapped down claims that President Donald Trump had been under surveillance by GCHQ during his election campaign, after they were repeated by the White House.

The UK’s usually tight-lipped electronic intelligence agency broke with its convention of not formally commenting on intelligence matters after Sean Spicer, Mr Trump’s press secretary, repeated the claims of a Fox News analyst that Barack Obama, the former president, had used GCHQ to do his dirty work.

“There’s no question that there were surveillance techniques used,” Mr Spicer said from the White House briefing room podium as he read aloud a series of media reports, which he argued backed up the president’s claims.

Huey » 16 Mar 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: Tax returns schmax returns. He is going to build a wall!

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 9:19 am » wrote: Yup. That's exactly what he did.
More lies and a bunch of incoherent ****.

Donald Trump gives rambling and incoherent explanation for claim Barack Obama wiretapped his home.

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 8:25 pm » wrote:Joe Biden — 'Don't tell me what you value, show me your budget, and I'll tell you what you value.'

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 8:07 pm » wrote:FOX News' Judge Andrew Napolitano is now accusing our closest ally of conspiring with Obama to tap Trump's phones, and WH Press Secretary Sean Spicer echoed Napolitano's accusations in today's WH press briefing.

Seriously?
How far are Trump defenders willing to take this ****?.

Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2017 4:55 pm » wrote:1. Learn how to use the quote function.

2. Never let a demand for sourcing escape you hypocritical dick kissers.

3. If you claim you didn't watch the state of the union address, you're a liar. You DID watch it, and you still don't understand what was revealed, because you're an idiot.

Misty » 16 Mar 2017 8:25 pm » wrote: Except he promised that Mexico was going to pay for it.

Now he's paying for it with money he's taking from school lunch programs and Meals on Wheels.

So nevermind if kids and old and sick people go without the only meal some of them get each day.

We will have a big beautiful wall to look at.

Joe Biden — 'Don't tell me what you value, show me your budget, and I'll tell you what you value.'