Liberal Forum

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 11:13 am » wrote:Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, on Meet The Press today:

That's what I keep saying.
People who are being deceptive have something to hide.
If it's not collusion, it could be something else.

Oooh, "something else." Maybe he was having a love affair with Putin.

Maybe they were playing high stakes poker with federal money.

Even honest liberals are calling out liars like you and wackjobs like your idol Rachel Madcow.

Glenn Greenwald called out fellow leftists who have been promoting the unsubstantiated collusion claim. He wrote:

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies.

. .that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence.

(Emphasis added)

To whom was Greenwald referring? By following a link in Greenwald’s piece, we learn that Rachel Maddow is the main media figure he sees as personally benefiting from feeding the base unhinged conspiracies about collusion with Russia. No surprise there.

Republicans dropping like flies in their support of 45.

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 11:38 am » wrote:Republicans dropping like flies in their support of 45.

And exactly who is supposed to be the republican?

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 11:38 am » wrote:Republicans dropping like flies in their support of 45.

That emasculated pseudo-conservative, if he ever was one?

No, the reality is quite the opposite. Many if not most anti-Trumpers have been very pleased with his performance in office.

So your "dropping likes flies" is a lie, like most of your claims.

Republicans/Conservatives turning on Hannity.






If anyone subscribes to the Wall Street Journal, I would much appreciate it if you could please copy and paste that opinion piece by Bret Stephens called, "Deep States And Demogogues."

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 12:24 pm » wrote:Republicans/Conservatives turning on Hannity.






If anyone subscribes to the Wall Street Journal, I would much appreciate it if you could please copy and paste that opinion piece by Bret Stephens called, "Deep States And Demogogues."

Who is the conservative/republican?

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 12:24 pm » wrote:Republicans/Conservatives turning on Hannity.

Joe Scarborough? As that sellout goes, so goes the party.

MS-LSD loves to have Republican sellouts as commentators, so its Dim viewers don't get disturbed by someone confronting them with reality.

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 10:31 am » wrote:TRACKING TRUMP'S PROMISES

Donald Trump made hundreds of promises, pledges and threats on his road to the White House.

This continuously updated interactive feature tracks his progress in delivering on that agenda at the beginning of his term.

Little Miss Marxist Misty doesn't understand that Trumps first day in office he killed all of the last 60 days of Obama idiotic EO's. Then he wrote several keeping his promises that could be done that way. He has asked Congress to start working on bills after they dismantle the horrid Obama Care!!! That probably has Misty's panties in a very tight wad!!! Poor mentally challenged little girl hates Trump so much without any proof she just melts down over all of Trumps very good actions!!!

Termin8tor » 14 Mar 2017 9:18 am » wrote:Hey Dim, what happened to that huge conspiracy that Trump and associates collaborated with the Russians?

Termin8tor » 14 Mar 2017 9:50 am » wrote:Hey Dim, what happened to that huge conspiracy that Trump and associates collaborated with the Russians?

Termin8tor » 14 Mar 2017 1:18 pm » wrote:How's that vast Trump-Russian conspiracy thingey going, Dim?

Termin8tor » 14 Mar 2017 4:44 pm » wrote:Your precious conspiracy theory to which you devoted many weeks is dead, psycho, but you're too dishonest to admit that.
You never had a shred of evidence, yet you shrieked and lied and smeared as if Trump had already been convicted.

Hey Dum you might want to talk to James Comey about that.
Seems like he's still investigating what you call a dead conspiracy theory.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 12:21 pm » wrote: Hey Dum you might want to talk to James Comey about that.
Seems like he's still investigating what you call a dead conspiracy theory.

At least you can no longer play dumb on the existence of these investigations.

Huey » 20 Mar 2017 12:25 pm » wrote: At least you can no longer play dumb on the existence of these investigations.

I'm not really sure what you mean.
Did you know for sure that the subject of collusion was being investigated by the FBI before Comey acknowledged it today?

I didn't.

My point was that it was a little premature for you to declare it a dead issue until all investigations have been concluded, and apparently they have not been concluded.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 12:42 pm » wrote: I'm not really sure what you mean.
Did you know for sure that the subject of collusion was being investigated by the FBI before Comey acknowledged it today?

I didn't.

My point was that it was a little premature for you to declare it a dead issue until all investigations have been concluded, and apparently they have not been concluded.

I never declared it a dead issue. And yes, you played dumb on the issue of investigations. BEFORE I posted the links to what you poo poohed as ring wing sources I also posted numerous articles from MSM sources that you blew off.

Additionally, I never said they were over.

I did say that I was no longer going to offer an opinion on the validity of collusion charges because at this time nothing has been released, and the standard line is still there is no evidence.

Furthermore, there has been not a single smoking gun from these hearings.

Huey » 20 Mar 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: I never declared it a dead issue. And yes, you played dumb on the issue of investigations. BEFORE I posted the links to what you poo poohed as ring wing sources I also posted numerous articles from MSM sources that you blew off.

Really?
That's what you want to argue about?
That I played dumb on the issue of investigations?
Do you have an example of that?

How did your sources know that the FBI was investigating collusion until Comey confirmed it today?
Through the leaks that you hate so much?

Huey » 20 Mar 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: Additionally, I never said they were over.
I did say that I was no longer going to offer an opinion on the validity of collusion charges because at this time nothing has been released, and the standard line is still there is no evidence.

That almost sounds just like what I said.
I wasn't willing to say it was over until any and all investigations were complete including today's hearings, and the upcoming Senate Intel Committee hearings.
Seems to me you criticized me for that.

Huey » 20 Mar 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: Furthermore, there has been not a single smoking gun from these hearings.

Right, but there are a lot of questions that could not be answered in an open forum.
And it could be that there is no smoking gun to be found.

Like Adam Schiff said, there was a lot of circumstantial evidence of collusion, but there was direct evidence of deception.

Huey » 19 Mar 2017 10:59 am » wrote:Misty needs to learn the difference between a lie and foolishly reacting to a news article.

Lies are things like you can keep your plan if you like your plan when you know that 40-70 of Americans would lose their current policy.

That's a lie.

Huey needs to learn the difference between a pathological liar and someone who once 'foolishly reacted to a news article.'

I love that right wingers only have that one lie to point to from the last POTUS.
I could make a list of lies from the current POTUS that would fill a book.

BTW 40-70 what?
Percent? Thousand? Million?

http://www.factcheck.org/2014/04/millio ... insurance/

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 12:42 pm » wrote:My point was that it was a little premature for you to declare it a dead issue until all investigations have been concluded, and apparently they have not been concluded.

Amazing and typical how you babble endlessly about something for which as of today zero evidence exists.

Yet you dishonestly denied for years Clinton's felonies, impeachable acts and serial rapes for which a mountain of evidence exists.

You're a dishonest hack and a smear artist.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 1:38 pm » wrote:Huey needs to learn the difference between a pathological liar and someone who once 'foolishly reacted to a news article.'

I love that right wingers only have that one lie to point to from the last POTUS.
I could make a list of lies from the current POTUS that would fill a book.

I love the way any discrepancy or mistake is claimed to be a lie by psychopathic Democrat Talking Point Liars like you.


If Trump is so dishonest, why is he keeping so many campaign promises?

Unlike Obama who broke most of his, who you never accused of lying.

Not having a good day.

Comey Confirms F.B.I. Inquiry Into Trump Campaign Links to Russian Hackers; Sees No Evidence of Wiretapping

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 12:21 pm » wrote:Hey Dum you might want to talk to James Comey about that.
Seems like he's still investigating what you call a dead conspiracy theory.

It's his job to finish the investigation, about dishonest Democrat accusations for which zero evidence exists.

Say, whatever happened to that FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation, based on massive evidence of millions of dollars in exchange for access and favors?

No, you'll lie and accuse and smear a conservative on the basis of no evidence.

You're a wackjob.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 1:48 pm » wrote:Not having a good day.

What didn't you mention? That at least one official conceded that serious crimes were committed in order to leak classified info about Trump and associates; literal felonies.

What does a Democrat Talking Point Liar babble endlessly about?

Not about the felonies, which absolutely did happen and were likely committed by Obama officials.


No, she babbles about something for which zero evidence exists.

Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 1:45 pm » wrote:I love the way any discrepancy or mistake is claimed to be a lie by psychopathic Democrat Talking Point Liars like you.

I love the way this partisan hack classifies a lie as a 'discrepency' or a 'mistake.'

Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 1:45pm » wrote:If Trump is so dishonest, why is he keeping so many campaign promises?
Unlike Obama who broke most of his, who you never accused of lying.

He's been in office for 60 days.
How did that health care bill and budget proposal go over with his own party?


Is he keeping his promise to the 'forgotten' people that he promised to help?
It looks like his health care plan and his budget would hurt them the most.

DONALD TRUMP ADMITS HIS HEALTH PLAN WILL HURT HIS SUPPORTERS

“A lot of things aren’t consistent” with his campaign message, he told Tucker Carlson.

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/03/ ... -americans

Why Trump's budget may be 'devastating' to his supporters.

Rep. Hal Rogers (R) of Kentucky said his poor, rural district – which voted 80 percent in favor of Trump – would be hit harder than anywhere else in the country.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2 ... supporters