Liberal Forum

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 2:26 pm » wrote: Clem's head is on fire because the collusion issue is not exactly the dead issue he said it was.

FBI investigating ties between Trump campaign and Russia

Clem has his Republican talking points down.
Focus on the leaks, forget about the rest.

Clem doesn't even care that the Russians interfered in our election, because they helped his guy.

Repeating the same erroneous post about others, huh?

What really helped his guy jos the candidate you voted for. We found out she is nothing but a power hungrary bitch who cares about no one but herself.

speaking of what helped trump.....

We were supposed to vote for the candidate who represents the party that couldn't protect its server from phishing attack? We were supposed to put them in charge of national security? Remember, this wasn't a hack, this was John podestar falling for a phishing scheme.

And for a pre-emotive strike the same group tried the same with the RNC. They seemed to have their act together. The only thing they got was some very old emails.

Another point to ponder.

We are supposed to believe, to hear some posters tell it, that trump made a conscious effort to just lie about Obama ordering the wiretapping. That he woke up that Saturday morning and while on the crapper decided to just send out that tweet.

Now, in order to believe that STORY, you have to deceptively leave out the fact that there were MSM reports for weeks discussing just that. The Thur. before it was all laid out on fox and was the topic of discussion for a week following. All that report was reading MSM articles. Nothing made up.

So, that is why many of ding trump for being stupid, for reactionary tweeting. And the reason we are attacked for it is the posters in question have a narrative and practice deceptive posting often to protect that narrative.

Another point to ponder.

The only crime that has been established is the leaking of Flynn's name. Another issue that many posters ignore. You would think such government over reach would be discussed.

Another point to ponder. Tweets you won't see on this thread:

Chuck Grassley Goes on Twitter Rant: ‘No Evidence of Trump Collusion w Russia’

March 20, 2017 By Laura Lee Baris
Chairman Grassley Heads Up Senate Judiciary Committee

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, meets with Attorney General nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., on Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016 in Washington. (Photo: AP)
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, went on a rare Twitter rant targeting FBI Director James Comey on Monday. Iowa’s favorite senator has served on the committee every year since he first was elected to the Senate and does not make comments such as these loosely, unlike someone else we all know.

The tweets came during a highly-anticipated hearing before the House Intelligence Committee with both Mr. Comey and NSA Director Mike Rogers.

Mr. Comey took the extraordinary step of confirming a probe into whether there was collusion between Russia and President Trump or his anyone in his campaign. But he would not confirm what he has told lawmakers in closed briefing sessions.

Sen. Grassley also tweeted about Mr. Comey’s refusal to assure the American public that intelligence officials who feloniously leak classified information will be found and prosecuted.

James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, said publicly that there is no evidence of collusion between President Trump, his campaign and Russia.


ChuckGrassley‏ @ChuckGrassley

Leaks need 2 b investigated + Comey needs 2 b transparent about how that is being handled



ChuckGrassley‏ @ChuckGrassley

FBI Dir Comey needs to be transparent + tell the public what he told me about whether he is or is not investigating @POTUS
10:31 AM · Mar 20, 2017



ChuckGrassley‏ @ChuckGrassley

After Comey briefing + doc review I can say @POTUS and Clapper R both right about this No evidence of Trump collusion w Russia
10:08 AM · Mar 20, 2017

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news ... tor-comey/

Wonder why the tweeting crowd missed these?

Trump is using @POTUS to live-tweet at the FBI director as he testifies before Congress

Here’s a real thing that happened today: As the head of the FBI testified before Congress about possible Russian involvement in the 2016 election, the White House took to the @POTUS twitter account to argue with the head of FBI.

And of course he lied about what Comey said.

Two hours after the White House sent out its first tweet about Comey, Rep. Jim Himes asked Comey if a tweet was correct.

Had “the NSA and FBI [told] Congress that Russia did not influence electoral process”?

Comey: “I haven’t been following anybody on Twitter while I’ve been sitting here.”

Himes: “Is that accurate?”

Comey: “We offered no opinion, have no view, have no information on potential impact because it’s never something that we looked at.”

Himes: “So it’s not too far of a logical leap that you have told the Congress that there was no influence on the electoral process is not quite right?”

Comey: “It certainly wasn’t our intention to say that today because we don’t have any information on that subject, and that’s not something that was looked at.”

How cute.
BFFs.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 6:23 pm » wrote:

Lmao! She lies, gets busted, and puts me on ignore. After I apologized for calling her a bitch and ignorant.

I hope those two were able to console each other.
They had a rough day.

Once again it was proven that their Cheeto Jesus is a bald-faced liar.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 6:49 pm » wrote:I hope those two were able to console each other.
They had a rough day.

Once again it was proven that their Cheeto Jesus is a bald-faced liar.

Lmao!

The reality of the situation is that nothing earthshattering, nothing we didn't already know, was released today.

It was actually a bad dY for morons like you. First, after weeks of being told that investigations have been occurring since last summer it was confirmed today. You ignore it. After weeks of you ignoring intelligence leaks it was also confirmed today.

Pretty bad day for dishonest twitter twits afraid to admit they were wrong. Particularly after they whine about it when others do it to them. And some of us apologize for it.

It also pretty ****** like to put people on ignore because they bust you the. Continue to talk about. A real coward this ****** is.

Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 4:42 pm » wrote:So when you asked,"Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter," that was just an innocent question, not a dishonest smear?

We've gone over this 1000 times.
Someone on the forum mentioned John Fund and I had vaguely remembered hearing something about John Fund having sex with his girlfriend's daughter, but I didn't know any of the details.

So that's why I asked the question, "Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?"

I had no idea how old she was, but when you hear that he had sex with someone's 'daughter' it's only natural to think that it was a child.

As soon as I looked into it and found out she was an adult I never used the word 'molest' again, but for years you have still accused me of 'smearing him' as a child molester.

He may not be a child molester, but he's still a piece of **** for sleeping with his girlfriend's daughter.
And so are you for blaming her and defending him by saying that she seduced him.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:From the opening statement of the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee at today's hearings:
Nunes didn't say a word about how Trump praised Putin throughout the campaign and constantly talked about wanting to have a good relationship with Russia.

I wonder why?

Because Trump has appointed tough-on-Russia officials and has done absolutely nothing in favor of Russia.

Because Obama's actual policies were appallingly accommodating to Russia.

Figures that you'd put words over actual pro-Russia policies, Dim.

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 9:42 pm » wrote:
We've gone over this 1000 times.
Someone on the forum mentioned John Fund and I had vaguely remembered hearing something about John Fund having sex with his girlfriend's daughter, but I didn't know any of the details.

So that's why I asked the question, "Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?"

I had no idea how old she was, but when you hear that he had sex with someone's 'daughter' it's only natural to think that it was a child..

F*** you, psycho.

Your immediate response to anyone whose opinion or policies are inconvenient is to smear them. That's your years-long Modus Operandi.

No reasonable, honest, normal person smears someone as a child molester in a gosh, how could I have known? manner. That's just a lie.

You're a deeply ugly person and psychopathic liar.

Huey » 20 Mar 2017 3:54 pm » wrote: 1. Lie number one was claiming I said the investigations were a dead issue.

2. Lie number two was saying I don't care if the Russians tried to influence our elections.

1. As usual you want to make this an argument about semantics.
Did you use the exact words 'dead issue?'

Maybe not, but you might want to do a search of your posts and see how many times you said that there was 'no evidence' of collusion found (past tense) as if all investigations were over.

So forgive me if I didn't word it EXACTLY the way you would have liked me to.

2. You seem to care a lot more about the leaks than you do the fact that Russia interfered in our election.

I could be wrong, but I haven't seen you talking about that much, but if you do a search of your posts with the word 'leaks' in them, you get a lot of results like this:

Huey » 07 Mar 2017 12:09 pm » wrote: And the real issue that is being totally ignored is the amount of leaks of classified surveillance that has occurred since Obama left office.

You said the leaks were the 'real issue' not the fact that Russia meddled in our election.

Now about today.
You acted like a little brat, needy and demanding, and when you didn't get what you wanted, you resorted to insults.

I told you that I was watching the hearings and talking to my husband at the same time that I was posting here, so you had only a sliver of my attention.

And the next thing I know you're calling me a **** liar, ignorant and telling me how you and your friend are having a really good laugh over my posts.

And then you teamed up with Clem and the both of you started ripping me apart.

Aside from all the other stuff that was going on while I was posting, I have a medical condition that affects both my short term memory and my concentration, and I believe I told you that.

So I may not quote you exactly, I may get things mixed up sometimes, and I may not respond to you as quickly as you would like, or the way that you would like.

So many times when people here are arguing with me lately , I can't even remember what the argument was about.

Do you think that's fun for me?

Do you think it's fun to walk into a room and forget why you walked into that room?
Or trying to read something and having to keep rereading the same line over and over, because you have no concentration?

Maybe I shouldn't even be posting here anymore because the problem seems to be getting worse, and I already feel bad enough about my condition without having peope like you call me a **** liar or making fun of me because of it.

Huey » 11 Mar 2017 11:37 am » wrote:I suggest, before you embarrass yourself further, you read my posts on this thread:

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... lls-to-4-7

I am nice like that. You admitted your memory is bad.

Huey » 11 Mar 2017 12:25 pm » wrote: What is wrong with your reading skills?

Lmmfao!

So funny.

Misty » 19 Mar 2017 12:24 pm » wrote:Republicans/Conservatives turning on Hannity.






If anyone subscribes to the Wall Street Journal, I would much appreciate it if you could please copy and paste that opinion piece by Bret Stephens called, "Deep States And Demogogues."

Poor. Misty doesn't understand the difference between Republicans and RINO's!!!

Misty » 20 Mar 2017 10:42 pm » wrote: 1. As usual you want to make this an argument about semantics.
Did you use the exact words 'dead issue?'

Maybe not, but you might want to do a search of your posts and see how many times you said that there was 'no evidence' of collusion found (past tense) as if all investigations were over.

So forgive me if I didn't word it EXACTLY the way you would have liked me to.

2. You seem to care a lot more about the leaks than you do the fact that Russia interfered in our election.

I could be wrong, but I haven't seen you talking about that much, but if you do a search of your posts with the word 'leaks' in them, you get a lot of results like this:
You said the leaks were the 'real issue' not the fact that Russia meddled in our election.

Now about today.
You acted like a little brat, needy and demanding, and when you didn't get what you wanted, you resorted to insults.

I told you that I was watching the hearings and talking to my husband at the same time that I was posting here, so you had only a sliver of my attention.

And the next thing I know you're calling me a **** liar, ignorant and telling me how you and your friend are having a really good laugh over my posts.

And then you teamed up with Clem and the both of you started ripping me apart.

Aside from all the other stuff that was going on while I was posting, I have a medical condition that affects both my short term memory and my concentration, and I believe I told you that.

So I may not quote you exactly, I may get things mixed up sometimes, and I may not respond to you as quickly as you would like, or the way that you would like.

So many times when people here are arguing with me lately , I can't even remember what the argument was about.

Do you think that's fun for me?

Do you think it's fun to walk into a room and forget why you walked into that room?
Or trying to read something and having to keep rereading the same line over and over, because you have no concentration?

Maybe I shouldn't even be posting here anymore because the problem seems to be getting worse, and I already feel bad enough about my condition without having peope like you call me a **** liar because of it.

Get a brain!!!

Sgt Bilko » 20 Mar 2017 10:58 pm » wrote:

Get a brain!!!

I have a brain, it just doesn't work so good any more.
I'm glad you find that so amusing.

Tell me again what a good Christian you are.
Christ made fun of the sick too, didn't he?

Exclusive: Tillerson plans to skip NATO meeting, visit Russia in April - sources.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson plans to skip a meeting with NATO foreign ministers next month in order to stay home for a visit by China's president and will go to Russia later in April, U.S. officials said on Monday, disclosing an itinerary that allies may see as giving Moscow priority over them.

Tillerson intends to miss what would have been his first meeting of the 28 NATO allies on April 5-6 in Brussels so that he can attend President Donald Trump's expected April 6-7 talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, four current and former U.S. officials said.

Skipping the NATO meeting and visiting Moscow could risk feeding a perception that Trump may be putting U.S. dealings with big powers first, while leaving waiting those smaller nations that depend on Washington for security, two former U.S. officials said.

"It feeds this narrative that somehow the Trump administration is playing footsie with Russia," said the former U.S. official on condition of anonymity.

"You don’t want to do your early business with the world's great autocrats. You want to start with the great democracies, and NATO is the security instrument of the transatlantic group of great democracies," he added.

I'm sure he's just going to return the Order of Friendship medal that Putin gave him.

Under the Affordable Care Act, every health insurance plan must cover the following services:

•Ambulatory services (care you get without being admitted to the hospital)
•Emergency services
•Hospitalization (like surgery and overnight stays)
•Pregnancy, maternity and newborn care
•Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment (this includes counseling and psychotherapy)
•Prescription drugs
•Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
•Laboratory services
•Preventive care and chronic disease management
•Pediatric services, including oral and vision care (but adult dental and vision coverage aren't essential health benefits)

Even without those things, the bill wasn't mean enough for the so-called 'Freedom' Caucus.

So it looks like foreign agent Michael Flynn who was just a 'volunteer' on the Trump campaign was plotting with Turkish officials to essentially kidnap a Muslim cleric and return him to Turkey.

Ex-CIA Director: I Was at Meeting Where Michael Flynn Spoke to Turkish Officials About Erdogan Foe

A former director of the Central Intelligence Agency has just revealed that he was at a meeting where Michael Flynn spoke to members of the Turkish government about removing an opponent of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan from the U.S. and taking him to Turkey.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that James Woolsey has told them that he attended the meeting on September 19th.

At that time, Flynn — the former National Security Adviser who resigned last month over communications with the Russian ambassador — was an adviser to Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign.

Woolsey said he was shocked about the topic of the discussion and felt it could be illegal.

Retired Army Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, while serving as an adviser to the Trump campaign, met with top Turkish government ministers and discussed removing a Muslim cleric from the U.S. and taking him to Turkey, according to former Central Intelligence Agency Director James Woolsey, who attended, and others who were briefed on the meeting.

The discussion late last summer involved ideas about how to get Fethullah Gulen, a cleric whom Turkey has accused of orchestrating last summer’s failed military coup, to Turkey without going through the U.S. extradition legal process, according to Mr. Woolsey and those who were briefed.

So Woolsey knew about this since last September and sat on it until now.