Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 532 533 534 535 536 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 9:02 am
27 Mar 2017 9:02 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 26 Mar 2017 10:56 pm » wrote: Check the dictionary jackass.
Proof is a synonym for the word evidence, so how is that a weasel word?
No, Dim, evidence and proof are not synonymous.

You're not only dishonest, you're stupid. :rofl:
And I never said I did.
You just admitted that in your last post.

You're not even playing with half a deck any more, are you?
Then your weeks of claiming or implying criminal behavior by Trump and officials were just a dishonest smear, yet another of countless you've made against Repubs.

Thanks for admitting that.
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 9:08 am
27 Mar 2017 9:08 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 26 Mar 2017 10:56 pm » wrote:Oh, why didn't you say so?
If they said it on FOX, it must be true.
:loco:

A source on FOX also said that the British helped Obama wiretap Trump's phones.
That source just got fired.
Thanks very much for showing that Fox is very reliable and that it holds its contributors to account when they are wrong.

That's what you meant to do, right? :)

Oh my, I missed something in Nunes' press conference.
About ten days ago, Nunes said there was evidence that the intelligence community had surveilled Trump’s transition team and possibly the president-elect during the transition after the November election. He said he was aware of about a dozen incidents where that occurred and that those incidents included the “unmasking” of peoples’ names.
https://spectator.org/spy-vs-spy-vs-trump/
So I was right. Many felonies have been committed, almost certainly by Obama officials.

Drip, drip, drip, drip. :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 9:15 am
27 Mar 2017 9:15 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 26 Mar 2017 4:52 pm » wrote: My 'drip, drip drip ****' as you call it is mainly about Trump associates ties to the Russians.
It seems that every day we learn of another Trump associate who has business/financial ties to Russia or has visited Russia.

People like Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Carter Page, Wilbur Ross, Rex Tillerson and now even Devin Nunes all have or had financial ties to Russia.
That is what I have been writing about.
But in your usual manner you are distorting what I have been focusing on to fit your lying narrative.

Are you denying that many Trump associates have ties to the Russians and have traveled to Russia?
Oh my gosh, someone visited Russia? My father visited Russia, so he must be part of this conspiracy too! :o

Imbecile.

When Clinton was being investigated for the many felonies he committed, over 100 witnesses took the 5th fled the country to avoid testifying, yet you told years of lies defending that serial felon.
Carter Page to Nunes and Schiff: Let Me Testify
JEFFREY LORD
....Subject: Leakers, liars and reported illegitimate surveillance in response to false evidence
Dear Congressman Nunes and Congressman Schiff:
I greatly appreciated the important hearings you began on Monday and was further encouraged by the request from Chairman Nunes that anyone who has information about relevant topics come forward and speak to the House Intelligence Committee.1 I would eagerly welcome the chance to speak with the Committee to help finally set the record straight following the false evidence, illegal activities as well as other lies distributed by certain politically-motivated suspects in coordination with the Obama Administration, which defamed me and other Americans.
https://spectator.org/carter-page-to-nu ... e-testify/
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 10:45 am
27 Mar 2017 10:45 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Democrats introduce 'MAR-A-LAGO' Act to force Trump to provide visitor logs.

Democrats are giving Donald Trump a transparency gut check in the form of a new bill with a mouthful of a name — and an acronym that takes an unsubtle dig at the president.

The "Making Access Records Available to Lead American Government Openness Act" — or MAR-A-LAGO Act — would require the Trump administration to disclose the names of anyone who visits the White House or "any other location at which the President or the Vice President regularly conducts official business."

The legislation, introduced in the House and Senate on Friday, calls for the creation of a publicly available database to be updated every 90 days.

Democrats say the move is necessary after a Whitehouse.gov page featuring visitor access records has said "this page is being updated" ever since Trump took office — and remains unchanged.

In addition, they want the public to know who has been visiting Trump's private club in Florida, known as Mar-a-Lago — the namesake of the bill — because he conducts presidential business there.

"He basically moved the office of the presidency," said Richard Painter, the former ethics czar for the George W. Bush administration and vice chair of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW.

"Under those circumstances, in which taxpayers are paying for you to do government work and for your Secret Service protection, they're entitled to know what private parties are moving in and out of there."

CREW introduced the concept of a publicly accessible White House visitor log in 2009, when they sued the Obama administration to create one.

The last White House maintained those logs for the next seven years, jotting down the names of more than 6 million visitors.

According to a CREW spokesman, the organization is currently weighing its options for an administration still in its infancy, as the logs are "a key component of government transparency."

But Trump has shown no indication that he plans to continue the practice in either Washington, D.C., or at Mar-a-Lago — dubbed his "Winter White House" — a place where anyone can gain access with the purchase of a $200,000 membership fee.

Trump has used the Florida country club to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, members of his cabinet and other leaders at a premium cost to taxpayers.

A senior White House official told NBC News that Trump plans to host Chinese President Xi Jinping at the club next month.

But under current rules, he wouldn't have to disclose that.

"If the Trump administration isn't going to continue a practice that was widely lauded by leaders across the political spectrum, Congress should mandate disclosure to guarantee public access to the visitor log records," said John Wonderlich, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, a government transparency watchdog group.

And mandating disclosure is what the MAR-A-LAGO Act intends to do, say the Democrats who introduced it: Sens. Tom Udall of New Mexico, Tom Carper of Delaware, and Sheldon Whitehouse and Jack Reed, both of Rhode Island, as well as Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois.

Earlier this month, the four senators and other Democratic colleagues wrote an official letter to the president demanding the publication of the visitor logs.

In February, Udall and Whitehouse also inquired about who was buying access to Trump through the purchase of a Mar-a-Lago membership.

But there's been no response from the White House, they say.

A White House spokeswoman and the National Republican Senatorial Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the bill.

"The American people need to know who has access to the White House if we're going to 'drain the swamp'.

So far, all we've seen from the President is murk," Whitehouse said in a statement.

"His Administration has stonewalled congressional requests for information about his advisors and appointees' conflicts of interest."
Shades of Dick Cheney who never wanted anyone to know who he was meeting with.

Everything is a secret with this guy.
He ditches his press pool and won't tell us who he's meeting with.

The White House visitor logs should always be available to the public.
That's a no brainer.

And if he's going to call Mar-a Lago the 'winter White House' and hold meetings with foreign dignitaries and others there, then the public should have access to those visitor logs as well.
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 10:55 am
27 Mar 2017 10:55 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 9:15 am » wrote:Oh my gosh, someone visited Russia? My father visited Russia, so he must be part of this conspiracy too! :o
Was he part of the Trump campaign?
You used the word 'conspiracy' not me.
Jackass.
Carter Page to Nunes and Schiff: Let Me Testify
JEFFREY LORD
....Subject: Leakers, liars and reported illegitimate surveillance in response to false evidence
Dear Congressman Nunes and Congressman Schiff:
I greatly appreciated the important hearings you began on Monday and was further encouraged by the request from Chairman Nunes that anyone who has information about relevant topics come forward and speak to the House Intelligence Committee.1 I would eagerly welcome the chance to speak with the Committee to help finally set the record straight following the false evidence, illegal activities as well as other lies distributed by certain politically-motivated suspects in coordination with the Obama Administration, which defamed me and other Americans.
https://spectator.org/carter-page-to-nu ... e-testify/
Jeffrey Lord is a riot on CNN.
He's a huge Trump bootlicker.

Did you see the Carter Page interview on Chris Hayes' show?
It was a classic.
Must see TV.

https://youtu.be/ffmYUwM-up8
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 11:01 am
27 Mar 2017 11:01 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 9:02 am » wrote:No, Dim, evidence and proof are not synonymous.
You're even more ignorant than I thought.

Image

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/evidence
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 11:55 am
27 Mar 2017 11:55 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Senate Committee to Question Jared Kushner Over Meetings With Russians

Senate investigators plan to question Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and a close adviser, as part of their broad inquiry into ties between Trump associates and Russian officials or others linked to the Kremlin, according to administration and congressional officials.

The White House Counsel’s Office was informed this month that the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, wanted to question Mr. Kushner about meetings he arranged with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, according to the government officials.

The meetings included a previously unreported sit-down with the head of Russia’s state-owned development bank.

Until now, the White House had acknowledged only an early December meeting between Mr. Kislyak and Mr. Kushner, which occurred at Trump Tower and was also attended by Michael T. Flynn, who would briefly serve as the national security adviser.

Later that month, though, Mr. Kislyak requested a second meeting, which Mr. Kushner asked a deputy to attend in his stead, officials said.

At Mr. Kislyak’s request, Mr. Kushner later met with Sergey N. Gorkov, the chief of Vnesheconombank, which drew sanctions from the Obama administration after President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia annexed Crimea and began meddling in Ukraine.

A White House spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, confirmed those meetings, saying in an interview that nothing of consequence was discussed and that they went nowhere.

Mr. Gorkov, who previously served as deputy chairman of the board at Sberbank, Russia’s largest state-owned bank, could not be reached for comment.
So Jared Kushner met with the CEO of Russia's state-owned Vnesheconombank.
Hmmm.
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 11:58 am
27 Mar 2017 11:58 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 27 Mar 2017 11:01 am » wrote:
You're even more ignorant than I thought.

Image

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/evidence
.

Well let's apply a little common sense. Every prosecutor presents evidence in a trial.

If "evidence" is the exact synonym as proof, then EVERY defendant will be found guilty, because every prosecutor has presented "proof."

Is that what you're claiming, Dim?

You're dumber than a freaking rock. :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 11:59 am
27 Mar 2017 11:59 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Here, here.

Image

Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 12:04 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:04 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 27 Mar 2017 10:55 am » wrote:
Jeffrey Lord is a riot on CNN.
He's a huge Trump bootlicker.
Lies the psychopath.

I don't recall that you have EVER accepted an honorable, time tested source I've cited.

Because you're a liar and a smear artist.

Why didn't you answer my question, psycho?

What did the Clinton's get for the many millions of dollars they received from foreign governments and Special Interests, including millions from the Russians?
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 12:06 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:06 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
He volunteered to testify.

When Clinton was being investigated for the many felonies he committed, over 100 witnesses took the 5th fled the country to avoid testifying, yet you told years of lies defending that serial felon
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 12:09 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:09 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Trump’s boyhood home fetches premium from mystery buyer.

Image

President Donald Trump’s boyhood home in Queens has sold for $2.14 million, a 54 percent jump from its sale price in December and a premium for the neighborhood.

The buyer took title to the house under the name Trump Birth House LLC.

The 2,000-square-foot house was flipped by a real estate speculator, Michael J. Davis of Wareham Holdings LLC, who paid $1.39 million for the Jamaica Estates property before Trump was inaugurated.

Davis made a 50 percent profit on the deal, according to Paramount Realty USA, the company that sold the house at auction.

“This property is so much more than just real estate,” Paramount’s Misha Haghani said. “Special properties are appropriately sold by auction, just like art is.

As they say, beauty is truly in the eyes of the beholder.”

While on the campaign trail, the president had expressed an interest in buying his old home, which was built by his father, Fred Trump, in 1940.

“I want to buy it,” Trump told Jimmy Fallon. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on last week's sale.
Nice house, but there are much nicer houses in Jamaica Estates that have a lot more land around them.

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Huey
27 Mar 2017 12:11 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:11 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Only cowards use peanut gallery
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 12:30 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 11:58 am » wrote:Well let's apply a little common sense. Every prosecutor presents evidence in a trial.

If "evidence" is the exact synonym as proof, then EVERY defendant will be found guilty, because every prosecutor has presented "proof."

Is that what you're claiming, Dim?

You're dumber than a freaking rock. :rofl: :rofl:
Clem arguing with a Thesaurus.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Just admit you were wrong jackass.

Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 12:33 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:33 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 27 Mar 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:Clem arguing with a Thesaurus.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Just admit you were wrong jackass.
Oh well gosh, they never get anything wrong, do they?

Why did you dodge my point, Dim?

Because you're a liar, a fool and a coward.

let's apply a little common sense. Every prosecutor presents evidence in a trial.

If "evidence" is the exact synonym as proof, then EVERY defendant will be found guilty, because every prosecutor has presented "proof."

Is that what you're claiming, Dim?

You're dumber than a freaking rock. :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 12:35 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:35 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 27 Mar 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:
Clem arguing with a Thesaurus.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Just admit you were wrong jackass.

Image
.

Look at your own source, Dim.

"Tends to prove or disprove."

Here's a hint. "Proof" is just that.

Evidence might or might not prove something.
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 12:44 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:44 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 27 Mar 2017 12:11 pm » wrote:Only cowards use peanut gallery
FYI, I did not enable Peanut Gallery for this thread.
I am however very grateful for the gift.

I didn't even know that was an option as this thread was dragged over from the old forum.

I have not used it yet, but I will if Clem keeps stinking up the place by posting the same old tired lies, smears and accusations that he has hurled at me for 9 years.

How much of that would you be willing to put up with?

Do you think that if someone kept asking you a question for years that you have already answered many times, continued to mischaracterize things you said or accused you of saying things that you never said, or holding positions that you don't hold, you might get tired of it after 9 **** years?

I have been more than patient with that numskull for way too long.
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 12:50 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:50 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 12:35 pm » wrote:Look at your own source, Dim.
"Tends to prove or disprove."
Here's a hint. "Proof" is just that.
Evidence might or might not prove something.
Why did you cherry pick that one phrase and ignore the last word in #1 which is 'proof?'

Or the part of #3 that says 'data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
27 Mar 2017 12:54 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:54 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 27 Mar 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: Why did you cherry pick that one phrase and ignore the last word in #1 which is 'proof?'

Or the part of #3 that says 'data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Because I wrote this, Dim.

let's apply a little common sense. Every prosecutor presents evidence in a trial.

If "evidence" is the exact synonym as proof, then EVERY defendant will be found guilty, because according to you, every prosecutor has presented "proof."
User avatar
Nobody
27 Mar 2017 12:56 pm
27 Mar 2017 12:56 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 12:54 pm » wrote:If "evidence" is the exact synonym as proof, then EVERY defendant will be found guilty, because according to you, every prosecutor has presented "proof."
Image

Image

Image

Image
1 532 533 534 535 536 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 5739 users online :: 5 registered, 15 bots, and 5719 guests
Bots: okhttp, MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, CriteoBot, proximic, YandexBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search