NO SIR!GeorgeWashington » 27 Mar 2017 8:14 pm » wrote: No, the evidence is in the pudding.
So words that are synonymous don't mean the same thing?Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2017 8:07 pm » wrote:I am going to do the unthinkable and say the little darling is right, Misty. There is a REASON Jesus made two distinct words, and that reason is they DON'T mean the same thing.
What I said was that the word proof was a synonym for the word evidence.Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2017 8:07 pm » wrote:Proof is proof and evidence is evidence. If you have ENOUGH evidence, you can prove your case. A little bit of evidence does not constitute proof. At most, it causes us to look for more evidence - to look for proof.
I'm so ashamed - you should peanut gallery this!
You seem to be only taking the legal definition of evidence into consideration.Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2017 8:13 pm » wrote:I disagree.
Proof means people should believe - evidence means they should consider.
Proof cannot be denied. Evidence can be overcome.
Damn you two!Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2017 8:15 pm » wrote:NO SIR!
NO SIR - I CALL FOUL!
THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Cosby apologist - another of the many crimes you are covering up - PSYCHO!
"Tends to prove or disprove" =/= proof.Misty » 27 Mar 2017 8:29 pm » wrote: You seem to be only taking the legal definition of evidence into consideration.
Note that definition #1 defines evidence as proof.
Evidence is subject to counter evidence. Evidence can be overcome.Misty » 27 Mar 2017 8:24 pm » wrote: So words that are synonymous don't mean the same thing?
What I said was that the word proof was a synonym for the word evidence.
Clem said that wasn't true.
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p894361
I provided several sources that say that the word proof is a synonym for the word evidence.
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p894390
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p894423
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 80#p894434
You and Clem can argue with the various Thesauri that say the words are synonymous.
When I saw greenies, I flipped a coin in my brain whether they would be from your or clemjob.Cannonpointer » 27 Mar 2017 8:46 pm » wrote:Cosby apologist - another of the many crimes you are covering up - PSYCHO!




That's not what Gorkov said.Who Is the Russian Banker Who Met With Jared Kushner?
On Monday, newspapers reported that the Senate Intelligence Committee will interview Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s advisor and son-in-law, over meetings he took after the election with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak and a prominent Russian banker, Sergei Gorkov.
Kushner met with Kislyak he was a member of the Trump transition team and still a private citizen.
After that meeting, which took place in early December, Kislyak requested a second, to which Kushner sent a deputy, to whom Kislyak conveyed he wanted Kushner and Gorkov to meet.
Kushner and Gorkov met at a later date.
Gorkov is the head of the Moscow-based Vnesheconombank, a government owned development bank that is sanctioned by the United States for Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.
Vnesheconombank describes itself as funding “major investment projects” — like Russian President Vladimir Putin’s pet project, the 2014 Sochi Olympics — and “provid[ing] support” for Russian enterprises.
It is also the bank at which Evgeny Buryakov worked under “non-official cover” as a banker while actually working for Russian intelligence (the U.S. attorney who announced he pled guilty back in March 2016 was Preet Bharara, whom the White House fired earlier this month).
Russian Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev, whose recently exposed alleged corruption was the impetus for massive protests across Russia on Sunday, sits on the bank’s supervisory board.
Previously, Gorkov was the deputy chairman of the executive board of Sberbank, Russia’s largest state bank, most recently in the news for hiring Trump’s longtime lawyer to defend it in court.
Gorkov graduated from Russia’s Academy of the Federal Security Service — that is, of the FSB — in 1994, and is also a recipient of the Medal of the Order of Merit for Services to the Fatherland, second class.
White House spokesperson Hope Hicks told the New York Times that the meeting, which lasted 30 minutes, “really wasn’t much of a conversation,” but that Gorkov communicated his interest in maintaining an open dialogue.“
So Kushner met with the CEO of a state-owned Russian bank that was under sanctions in his capacity as the chief executive of his family's business while he was also a member of the Trump transition team, and adviser to the then president elect.Mr. Gorkov, who previously served as deputy chairman of the board at Sberbank, Russia’s largest state-owned bank, said in a statement issued by his bank that he met with Mr. Kushner in his capacity as the then-chief executive of Kushner Companies, his family’s sprawling real estate empire.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/us/p ... .html?_r=0
The King Of Cable News Just Got Dethroned By A Queen
This news must have ousted Fox News boss Roger Ailes rolling over in his bed.
At the end of 2016, Bill O’Reilly had hosted the number one rated show in cable news for 16 consecutive years, and loved to brag about it.
On Super Bowl Sunday, O’Reilly was rewarded with an exclusive interview with incoming President Donald Trump.
Now, only two months later, Reilly has fallen into a Trump slump.
Last week the number one show in cable news belonged to Rachel Maddow on MSNBC.
O’Reilly wasn’t even number one in his time period.
That honor went to Chris Hayes on MSNBC.
Even CNN with about 482,000 total viewers beat O’Reilly last Friday after Trump’s health care bill went from the halls of Congress to intensive care.
Maddow on Friday attracted about 690,000 viewers at 9 p.m. compared to 450,000 for O’Reilly at 8 pm, where Chris Hayes on MSNBC was drawing 466,000.
So not only was O’Reilly no longer on top; he wasn’t even number three for the night in cable TV news.
Maddow was not atop the heap in the total viewership.
She also was number one in the key 25-to-54 year old demographic that advertisers covet – for the first time in history.
Nunes cancelling hearings and refusing to meet with his own committee.House Intel Committee cancels meetings amid calls for Nunes to step down.
The House Intelligence Committee has scrapped the rest of its meetings this week as calls intensify for Chairman Devin Nunes to step down following his admission that he met with a secret source at the White House to review intelligence reports.
The decision to cancel the meetings was confirmed on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" by Rep. Jim Himes — among the Democrats on the committee demanding that Rep. Nunes recuse himself from the inquiry into alleged Russian meddling in last year's election.
Himes said an intelligence committee meeting Monday was canceled, as well as an open hearing set for Wednesday and an unrelated meeting Thursday.
"Not only has this investigation sort of had a shadow cast on it, but the committee's been put into suspended animation," Himes said.
On Monday, Nunes' spokesman confirmed that the chairman met with a source at the White House grounds to look at reports purportedly showing President Donald Trump or his aides were "incidentally" swept up in foreign surveillance by American spy agencies.
Nunes, a California Republican who was a member of the Trump transition team, initially told reporters last week that he had seen such reports, but didn't elaborate on the source.
He's now under criticism for failing to tell the top Democrat on the intelligence committee about his White House visit.
It's also unclear why Nunes would even go to the White House to seek a secure location to view classified material when he can do that at the Capitol.
White House spokesman Sean Spicer refused to comment Monday when asked why Nunes was on White House grounds.
Congress is investigating Trump's unverified claim earlier this month that Trump Tower was wiretapped and a larger probe into whether Russia interfered in the presidential election and may have colluded with members of the Trump campaign.
Nunes' visit to the White House has clouded the already complicated inquiry.
Sen. Lindsey Graham said Tuesday on TODAY that Nunes at the very least has "put his objectivity in question" and "lost his ability to lead."
"He's gone off on a lark by himself, a sort of Inspector Clouseau investigation here," Graham said, referring to the bumbling detective of "The Pink Panther" series.
Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on "Morning Joe" that Nunes has compromised the investigation by not properly sharing information.
Termin8tor » 27 Mar 2017 9:08 am » wrote:Oh my, I missed something in Nunes' press conference.
So I was right. Many felonies have been committed, almost certainly by Obama officials.
Drip, drip, drip, drip.


I guess you missed the part of your own source that quoted Nunes saying that the surveillance was perfectly legal.Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 12:45 pm » wrote:Why didn't little Miss Marxist respond to this?
We all know how concerned she is with wrongdoing and the truth aboupt it!![]()
![]()
![]()
As usual you ignore the felonies to dishonestly try to mis-direct attention away from them.Misty » 28 Mar 2017 1:09 pm » wrote:
I guess you missed the part of your own source that quoted Nunes saying that the surveillance was perfectly legal.
You also ignore the fact that Nunes walked back his original claims.
Nunes now says he doesn't know if Trump was monitored, or just 'mentioned' in reports.
]OH MY! What a scandal!
Two foreigners discussing the winner of the US election.
No, your stonewalling, evasions and lies smell of desperation. You have nothing at all on Trump, despite your bleating and shrieking and empty insinuations.Unmasking inside the intelligence community is NOT illegal and is done all the time
Leaking unmasked names to the press is what's illegal.
Nunes did not say that any of the unmasked names he saw in those reports were leaked to the press.
You reek of desperation, Puss.
That's **** hilarious. Beat him on the demos AND on the raw numbers. LMAO.
That's what the coats are for!Misty » 28 Mar 2017 12:20 pm » wrote:The guys in the white coats just came and dragged away the crazy guy who was screaming about the Clintons.
The Pink Panther has struck again!Misty » 28 Mar 2017 12:35 pm » wrote: Nunes cancelling hearings and refusing to meet with his own committee.
Looks like he's out on a limb all by himself.