Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 535 536 537 538 539 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 2:24 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:24 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 1:40 pm » wrote:As usual you ignore the felonies to dishonestly try to mis-direct attention away from them.
The felonies are the leaks, psycho, the unmasking of names.
Get back to me when you find out what 'unmasking' actually means.

Unmasking is not illegal.
Leaking the name of an unmasked person to the press is.

Ask Sean Spicer.
Image
https://apnews.com/040dc31485ae4ebeafe3f7920001ab4c

Notice he refers to the leaking as illegal, not the unmasking.
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 2:28 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:28 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 28 Mar 2017 2:24 pm » wrote: Get back to me when you find out what 'unmasking' actually means.

Unmasking is not illegal.
Leaking the name of an unmasked person to the press is.
Only a limited number of people can unmask a name. If someone unauthorized does it, that is an illegal act.

No matter what Spicer said about this particular case, and he's hardly an expert on intelligence, duuh.
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 2:30 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:30 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 28 Mar 2017 2:24 pm » wrote: Get back to me when you find out what 'unmasking' actually means.

Unmasking is not illegal.
Leaking the name of an unmasked person to the press is.
And even if you are correct, you once again try to mis-direct attention away from the felonies that have been committed, almost certainly by Obama officials.
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 2:32 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:32 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Who really is "Putin's Pet?"

Little Miss Marxist claims Trump is, and she never lies! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
HOW MUCH DO THE RUSSIANS LOVE DONALD TRUMP?

So much that they are afraid he will launch a nuclear attack against them.


This comes from RT, the news source that Democrats tell us is a mouthpiece for Putin’s government:The US’ ABM sites in Europe and on warships patrolling Russia’s borders are creating the potential for America to launch an overwhelming surprise nuclear strike on Russia, the Russian general staff said.....

As we have written before, Russia hailed Barack Obama’s election gleefully, on the ground that he was a man of the world, whereas Republicans always try to advance American interests. Obama and Hillary Clinton proved them right with the reset button, their pro-Iran policy, their anti-American energy policies, the “flexibility” pledge, and supine responses to Russian aggression in Crimea and Ukraine.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... -trump.php
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 2:45 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:45 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 2:28 pm » wrote:Only a limited number of people can unmask a name. If someone unauthorized does it, that is an illegal act.
Was that goalpost very heavy when you moved it?
So what evidence do you have that anyone's name was illegally unmasked?
:?: :?: :?:
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 2:28 pm » wrote:No matter what Spicer said about this particular case, and he's hardly an expert on intelligence, duuh.
And I guess you are.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Spicer speaks for the White House jackass.
So you may as well have said that it's no matter what the WH says.
LOL
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 2:53 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:53 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 2:30 pm » wrote: And even if you are correct, you once again try to mis-direct attention away from the felonies that have been committed, almost certainly by Obama officials.
Probably because he isn't pResident anymore. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 2:55 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:55 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
Misty » 28 Mar 2017 2:45 pm » wrote: Was that goalpost very heavy when you moved it?
So what evidence do you have that anyone's name was illegally unmasked?
:?: :?: :?:

And I guess you are.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Spicer speaks for the White House jackass.
So you may as well have said that it's no matter what the WH says.
LOL
Who are you gonna believe - a cabinet official, or an atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 2:57 pm
28 Mar 2017 2:57 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 2:30 pm » wrote:And even if you are correct, you once again try to mis-direct attention away from the felonies that have been committed, almost certainly by Obama officials.
Of which you have absolutely no proof or evidence, which is why you use the weasel words 'almost certainly' to leave yourself a little wiggle room.

Once again you project your **** onto me.
The only one trying to mis-direct attention is you, with your constant babbling about the Clintons, and with what you claim, with no proof, Obama must have 'almost certainly' done.

Your excuse for constantly talking about the Clintons is that they came close to being back in the White House.
Well newsflash jackass, they didn't make it.
Your Circus Peanut Messiah did.

You voted for him now you are stuck defending him, and because it's such an impossible task, you keep deflecting away from it.

I feel your pain.
It must be hard to defend that dumpster fire that you and your kind inflicted upon this country.
Hopefully the guilt is eating you up inside.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 3:40 pm
28 Mar 2017 3:40 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
This guy makes a lot of sense, IMO. He shares my opinion (not in this video, but other where) that NATO caused Putin to annex Crimea - basically, left him no choice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCMyHJJrdDw
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 4:16 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:16 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 28 Mar 2017 2:57 pm » wrote: Of which you have absolutely no proof or evidence, which is why you use the weasel words 'almost certainly' to leave yourself a little wiggle room.
Hey Dim, it is all but determined that felonies have been committed.

And I have cited extensive evidence, liar, but as usual you stonewall and deny and vilify my sources with zero evidence to support your smear. Hoekstra is a man of high intelligence and good character, not what stupid term you dishonestly called him.

Are you seriously claiming that all of a sudden professional intelligence operatives began committing felonies, psycho?

if not, then it was Obama officials. That's basic logic.

Are you smearing our professional intelligence operatives?
Once again you project your **** onto me.
The only one trying to mis-direct attention is you, with your constant babbling about the Clintons.
It is absolutely relevant that the Clinton's serial felons, and that you for years stonewalled and told lies in their defense.
Your excuse for constantly talking about the Clintons is that they came close to being back in the White House.
Well newsflash jackass, they didn't make it.
Your Circus Peanut Messiah did.
Their criminal behavior is absolutely relevant, and so is your dishonesty in denying it.
It must be hard to defend that dumpster fire that you and your kind inflicted upon this country.
Hopefully the guilt is eating you up inside.
:rofl: :rofl:

I cannot express how thankful I am that Trump and not serial felon HRC is president, psycho.
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 4:18 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:18 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Mar 2017 3:40 pm » wrote:This guy makes a lot of sense, IMO. He shares my opinion (not in this video, but other where) that NATO caused Putin to annex Crimea - basically, left him no choice.w
Yes, a Ukranian (or Crimean) official wrote an oped in the WSJ stating that outsiders had encouraged independence. And it's established that the US was involved in that.

I don't know if that was simply part of the US government on auto-pilot or intentional by Obama, but it was devastatingly stupid.

If someone wanted Putin to invade Crimea, that was the way to inspire it.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 4:20 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:20 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 4:18 pm » wrote:
Yes, a Ukranian (or Crimean) official wrote an oped in the WSJ stating that outsiders had encouraged independence. And it's established that the US was involved in that.

I don't know if that was simply part of the US government on auto-pilot or intentional by Obama, but it was devastatingly stupid.

If someone wanted Putin to invade Crimea, that was the way to inspire it.
Sadly, we find ourselves in agreement yet again, you filthy animal. Take two aspirin and never call me. :ninja:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 4:23 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:23 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Mar 2017 4:20 pm » wrote:Sadly, we find ourselves in agreement yet again, you filthy animal. Take two aspirin and never call me. :ninja:
Asiprin? Quack!
I'll need years of intensive therapy. :loco:
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 4:25 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:25 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 4:16 pm » wrote: Are you smearing our professional intelligence operatives?
tRump called them criminals. Why can't she?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHrhYUoIwpE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdoIbnp3eyc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp17kQAI_S0
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Mar 2017 4:26 pm
28 Mar 2017 4:26 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,865 posts
Termin8tor » 28 Mar 2017 4:23 pm » wrote:
Asiprin? Quack!
I'll need years of intensive therapy. :loco:
:clap: :rofl:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 6:01 pm
28 Mar 2017 6:01 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 26 Mar 2017 4:40 pm » wrote:Well you're always right, and you never lie! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Image
Hey doofus, I posted that image myself along with the full article.
No where in the article does it say that either Trump, or Trump Tower was wiretapped.

I have asked you at least three times to show me where it says that, and you ignore me.

The wiretapped data they are referring to was from foreigners who were being monitored and were talking to Trump aides, NOT Trump.
Misty » 26 Mar 2017 3:09 pm » wrote: Look at how this piece of **** lies.
He keeps babbling about how a NY Times article said that Trump Tower was wiretapped, so I post the full article for him and ask him to point out where in the article it says that, and this is what I get.
Then he posts that image as 'proof' of his lie.
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 6:22 pm
28 Mar 2017 6:22 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 3:40 pm » wrote:Isn't it amazing that she lies over and over in attributing things to us we never said?
More Clem projection.
Did you get struck by lightning when you said that?
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 6:25 pm
28 Mar 2017 6:25 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 20 Mar 2017 4:44 pm » wrote:Something I have never said, but the facts never get in the way of your lies.
You mean like how I never 'smeared' John Fund as a child molester?
User avatar
Nobody
28 Mar 2017 6:33 pm
28 Mar 2017 6:33 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections.

House Republicans voted overwhelmingly Tuesday, by a margin of 215-205, to repeal a set of landmark privacy protections for Web users, issuing a sweeping rebuke of Internet policies enacted under the Obama administration.

It also marks a sharp, partisan pivot toward letting Internet providers collect and sell their customers' Web browsing history, location information, health data and other personal details.

The measure, which was approved by a 50-48 margin in the Senate last week, now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it.

Congress's joint resolution empowers Internet providers to enter the $83 billion market for online advertising now dominated by Google and Facebook.

It is likely to lend momentum to a broader GOP rollback of Obama-era technology policies, and calls into question the fate of other tech regulations such as net neutrality, which was approved in 2015 over strident Republican objections and bans Internet providers from discriminating against websites.

And it is a sign that companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon will be treated more permissively at a time when conservatives control both the executive and legislative branches.
Letting Internet providers collect and sell their customers' Web browsing history, location information, health data and other personal details.
Great.
User avatar
Termin8tor
28 Mar 2017 6:46 pm
28 Mar 2017 6:46 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 28 Mar 2017 6:33 pm » wrote: Letting Internet providers collect and sell their customers' Web browsing history, location information, health data and other personal details.
Great.
Here's a hint, Dim.

Laws should be written by our elected representatives, not by bureaucrats.
1 535 536 537 538 539 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 4968 users online :: 3 registered, 15 bots, and 4950 guests
Registered users: Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator
Bots: CensysInspect, proximic, CriteoBot, LCC, ADmantX, Not, Bolt, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search