Liberal Forum

roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:06 am » wrote:
Relax snowflake...stop seeking dumb stuff and read something important.

"Obama’s Former Asst. Defense Secretary ADMITS ON MSNBC Obama Admin Spied on Trump (VIDEO)"

Just so you know, putting "VIDEO" in parenthesis is not the same as posting the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 11:23 am » wrote:Just so you know, putting "VIDEO" in parenthesis is not the same as posting the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

I have you as an assistant to help drive it home.


P.S. Do me a favor and tell Misty to stop shaking her head. I can hear the BB.

Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 8:07 am » wrote:Oh of course, you were "just asking a question."
"Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?" Sure, that looks perfectly innocent to me!

And I have explained to you 1000 times why I asked that question.
But you have ignored that and clubbed me over the head like a baby seal for years with that ****.

I knew nothing about John Fund when I asked that question, except that there had been some kind of a scandal involving him and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend.

I had no idea how old the daughter was, but when you hear 'daughter' you tend to think that she was young.

Right after I asked the question, I did some research and found out that she was an adult.
And I never used the word 'molested' again.

Any reasonable person would understand that.
But you decided to turn what was a simple mistake into a weapon that you have used against me for years.

You're the one who has smeared the daughter by saying that she is crazy and that she 'seduced' poor
John Fund, who I guess you believe has no control over his own sex organs.

And you defend the man who got his ex-girlfriend's daughter pregnant and forced her to have an abortion,





http://morganpillsburygell.blogspot.com ... child.html

CLEM HAD SMEARED MORGAN PILLSBURY FOR YEARS BY CALLING HER A CRAZY SEDUCTRESS.

roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:06 am » wrote: Relax snowflake...stop seeking dumb stuff and read something important.

"Obama’s Former Asst. Defense Secretary ADMITS ON MSNBC Obama Admin Spied on Trump (VIDEO)"
"Evelyn Farkas also served as an advisor to Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential campaign and was up for a position in the Clinton administration if Hillary became President."
"It’s no big deal that she had access to information on the Trump campaign while advising his opponent, Hillary Clinton, right?"
http://www.thegatewa...el-trump-video/

If I wanted to read something important I wouldn't go to a wingnut website like gatewaypundit.com.

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:27 am » wrote: And I have explained to you 1000 times why I asked that question.
But you have ignored that and clubbed me over the head like a baby seal for years with that ****.

I knew nothing about John Fund when I asked that question, except that there had been some kind of a scandal involving him and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend.

I had no idea how old the daughter was, but when you hear 'daughter' you tend to think that she was young.

Right after I asked the question, I did some research and found out that she was an adult.
And I never used the word 'molested' again.

Any reasonable person would understand that.
But you decided to turn what was a simple mistake into a weapon that you have used against me for years.

You're the one who has smeared the daughter by saying that she is crazy and that she 'seduced' poor
John Fund, who I guess you believe has no control over his own sex organs.

And you defend the man who got his ex-girlfriend's daughter pregnant and forced her to have an abortion,





http://morganpillsburygell.blogspot.com ... child.html

CLEM HAD SMEARED MORGAN PILLSBURY FOR YEARS BY CALLING HER A CRAZY SEDUCTRESS.

Stop shaking your head...I'm a man and I command you!

Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 11:16 am » wrote:I'll play.

1. Yes, he would. Reporters who wish to argue with their interview subjects - whether their position is true or false, whether the subject of the interview is Gandhi or Dahmer - must somehow brave the cruel fate of being told to stop shaking their head.

2. No dude would need to be told that - men are civilized and mannerly, not screeching banshees who belong in the kitchen, making me some pie.

She was not arguing with him.
She was doing her job.

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:33 am » wrote: She was not arguing with him.
She was doing her job.

Mmm hmmm.

Like when she deliberately couched her question about tRump making nice with conti rice inside of a snark.

roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:26 am » wrote:
I have you as an assistant to help drive it home.

P.S. Do me a favor and tell Misty to stop shaking her head. I can hear the BB.

Hey,Misty - stop shaking your **** head!

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:04 am » wrote:Would Spicer say 'stop shaking your head' to a male reporter?

Wow,talk about desperation.

Are these types of silly points poll-tested by the DNC?

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:31 am » wrote:If I wanted to read something important I wouldn't go to a wingnut website like gatewaypundit.com.

Excuse #17,323 to avoid admitting the facts.

gateway sometimes exaggerates or jumps to conclusions, but it's far more trustworthy than some of the wackjob websites you site with a straight face.

Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 11:42 am » wrote:
Wow,talk about desperation.

Are these types of silly points poll-tested by the DNC?

We've seen recently how good their polling is.

Women are equal!

We need to treat them with kid gloves when we pretend they're competent to be reporters.

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:27 am » wrote:
And I have explained to you 1000 times why I asked that question.
But you have ignored that and clubbed me over the head like a baby seal for years with that ****.

Your "explanations" are lies.

You "asked the question" to smear Fund like you smear all sources that get in the way of your dishonest agenda.

That is your modus operandi.

That on the basis of zero evidence is what you're trying to do to Trump even as you ignore felonies, impeachable acts and even rape by Democrats.

I knew nothing about John Fund when I asked that question, except that there had been some kind of a scandal involving him and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend.

A sane person don't smear someones as a child molester on the basis of a 15 second google search, psycho.

I had no idea how old the daughter was, but when you hear 'daughter' you tend to think that she was young.

What a pathetic excuse that is.

Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 11:46 am » wrote: We've seen recently how good their polling is.

Women are equal!

We need to treat them with kid gloves when we pretend they're competent to be reporters.

Racist!

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:27 am » wrote:CLEM HAD SMEARED MORGAN PILLSBURY FOR YEARS BY CALLING HER A CRAZY SEDUCTRESS.

Oh look, another dishonest smear job.

I cited a sworn affidavit by the poor woman in which she admitted here severe emotional problems and admitted she'd told many lies about Fund.

Am I "smearing" her by agreeing with her own statement?

You're severely mentally ill.

Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 11:51 am » wrote:
Racist!

This is the third accusation I'm racist this week. ****.

Now I gotta go to forum admin sensitivity training again. I hate sitting through that.

The leader of the course is a colored.

roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:06 am » wrote:"Obama’s Former Asst. Defense Secretary ADMITS ON MSNBC Obama Admin Spied on Trump (VIDEO)"

I saw that segment on Morning Joe.
No where does Farkas 'admit' that that the Obama administration 'spied on Trump.'

Give it up with that **** already.
45 lied in his Tweet storm and ever since then you pinheads have been willing to turn the whole government upside down to prove that what he said was true.

They were trying to preserve intelligence because they feared that when the new administration came in they would disappear it, and judging by how they are now trying to shut down any investigations starting with the House Intelligence Committee, the Obama people were right.

roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:06 am » wrote:"Evelyn Farkas also served as an advisor to Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential campaign and was up for a position in the Clinton administration if Hillary became President."
"It’s no big deal that she had access to information on the Trump campaign while advising his opponent, Hillary Clinton, right?"

No.
You don't give a **** about all the conflicts going on in the Trump administration, so why should I care about that?

Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 11:58 am » wrote:This is the third accusation I'm racist this week. ****.

Now I gotta go to forum admin sensitivity training again. I hate sitting through that.

The leader of the course is a colored.

They obviously need someone who'll make a lot of noise and break things.


And you're just the guy!

Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 11:40 am » wrote:Mmm hmmm.
Like when she deliberately couched her question about tRump making nice with conti rice inside of a snark.

If Sean Spicer wants to be the spokesperson for the Terror of Twitter, then he needs to put on his big boy pants and stop acting like a snowflake.

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:18 pm » wrote: If Sean Spicer wants to be the spokesperson for the Terror of Twitter, then he needs to put on his big boy pants and stop acting like a snowflake.

Slapping around the nasally broads in the press corp is precisely that. Where's the problem?

Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:08 pm » wrote:They were trying to preserve intelligence because they feared that when the new administration came in they would disappear it, and judging by how they are now trying to shut down any investigations starting with the House Intelligence Committee, the Obama people were right.

Exactly what important intell were they trying to preserve, Dim?

Because as of today, there is zero evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by Trump or associates.

I strongly suspect this is just a cover story for spreading information to undermine Trump, with the expectation that felonies would be committed, as has happened.