Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
29 Mar 2017 12:25 pm
You mean sites like The Hill, Politico, Business Insider and Forbes?Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 11:44 am » wrote:Excuse #17,323 to avoid admitting the facts.
gateway sometimes exaggerates or jumps to conclusions, but it's far more trustworthy than some of the wackjob websites you site with a straight face.
I know they're not as reliable as Pajamas Media, or WorldNUTDaily.
29 Mar 2017 12:32 pm
That they weren't collecting?Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:08 pm » wrote: They were trying to preserve intelligence
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Mar 2017 12:37 pm
I didn't cite WND, and PJ Media is a sound source.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:25 pm » wrote: You mean sites like The Hill, Politico, Business Insider and Forbes?
I know they're not as reliable as Pajamas Media, or WorldNUTDaily.
You have cited wackjob sources, so your point is bulls*** as usual.
29 Mar 2017 12:39 pm
If he did, would it gin up the outrage machine?Misty » 29 Mar 2017 11:04 am » wrote:Would Spicer say 'stop shaking your head' to a male reporter?
And if not, does this suggest maybe a woman's place is somewhere besides in the WH Press Room, where her delicate feelings might get bruised?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Mar 2017 12:45 pm
You really are not very bright.Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 11:50 am » wrote:Your "explanations" are lies.
You "asked the question" to smear Fund like you smear all sources that get in the way of your dishonest agenda.
That is your modus operandi.
That on the basis of zero evidence is what you're trying to do to Trump even as you ignore felonies, impeachable acts and even rape by Democrats. A sane person don't smear someones as a child molester on the basis of a 15 second google search, psycho. What a pathetic excuse that is.
I did the Google search AFTER I asked the question, not before jackass.
I have explained this to your over and over and over, and you still refuse to accept my explanation and accuse me of deliberately smearing your boyfriend John Fund.
Well hold on to your hat Pumpkin, because if you are going to constantly accuse me of smearing him based on my asking a question about him, ****'s about to get real up in here.
Watch this space.
29 Mar 2017 12:49 pm
I don't know, here's a wild guess, maybe things like Michael Flynn talking to the Russians about sanctions?Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 12:24 pm » wrote:Exactly what important intell were they trying to preserve, Dim?
Or a bunch of other Trump associates talking to people from the country that hacked the DNC in order to **** with our election?
29 Mar 2017 12:57 pm
Of course they were collecting it.Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 12:32 pm » wrote:That they weren't collecting?
Many Trump associates were communicating with foreigners who were being monitored.
But roadkill was using that as proof that what the Terror of Twitter said about Obama tapping his phones in Trump Tower BEFORE the election was true.
Farkas was talking about what they did AFTER the election.roadkill » 29 Mar 2017 11:06 am » wrote:"Obama’s Former Asst. Defense Secretary ADMITS ON MSNBC Obama Admin Spied on Trump (VIDEO)"
29 Mar 2017 1:06 pm
Oh, so something that isn't a particularly big deal.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:49 pm » wrote:
I don't know, here's a wild guess, maybe things like Michael Flynn talking to the Russians about sanctions?
Or a bunch of other Trump associates talking to people from the country that hacked the DNC in order to **** with our election?
And then the usual wild speculation for which there is zero evidence.
Just about what I expected from a hack like you.
29 Mar 2017 1:12 pm
So you admit that Obama wire tapped tRump tOwer!Misty » 29 Mar 2017 12:57 pm » wrote: Of course they were collecting it.
THANK YOU.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Mar 2017 1:23 pm
Yes no big deal that he was discussing sanctions with them on the very day that President Obama imposed those sanctions because of what they did to interfere in our election.Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 1:06 pm » wrote:Oh, so something that isn't a particularly big deal.
Yeah, you really need to stop doing that.Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 1:06 pm » wrote:And then the usual wild speculation for which there is zero evidence.
There is tons of 'evidence' that Trump associates were talking to people from the country that was **** with our election and then lied about it.
If those contacts were all perfectly innocent, then why did they lie?
You may not care to find out about that, but I do.
Don't worry your pretty little head about it my little Pumpkin.
You just keep your blinders on and go back to shrieking about the Clintons.
Let the adults handle it.
29 Mar 2017 1:25 pm
You sure as hell didn't get that from my post.Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 1:12 pm » wrote:So you admit that Obama wire tapped tRump tOwer!
THANK YOU.
29 Mar 2017 2:55 pm
I think you took my head shaking comment in a much more serious way than the tongue in cheek manner in which it was intended.Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 12:19 pm » wrote:Slapping around the nasally broads in the press corp is precisely that. Where's the problem?
I was picturing in my mind how Mellissa McCarthy was going to portray it on SNL.
LOL
29 Mar 2017 3:08 pm
Yeah, if you're a wingnut.Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 12:37 pm » wrote:PJ Media is a sound source.
You've gone from sources like The Weekly Standard and National Review to Pajamas Media.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Like what? Name one.Termin8tor » 29 Mar 2017 12:37 pm » wrote:You have cited wackjob sources, so your point is bulls*** as usual.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/
29 Mar 2017 3:22 pm
Only a moron would use a source that is agenda driven in his own direction.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 3:08 pm » wrote: Yeah, if you're a wingnut.
You've gone from sources like The Weekly Standard and National Review to Pajamas Media.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Like what? Name one.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/
The only time I use agenda sources is against someone of the same agenda, tosay, "See, even your buddies agree with me." Otherwise, I stick to neutral sources.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Mar 2017 3:43 pm
A history lesson on Clem's John Fund obsession.
Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:54 pm » wrote:Don't bother.
I'll post what I said for you.
In 2008 someone on the old forum mentioned John Fund, and I remembered hearing something about a scandal involving him and the daughter of his girlfriend, but I didn't know any of the details, so I asked the question:
And for 8 over years this maniac has been accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'
Note that I did not use the word 'child' in my question.
Once I researched the story I found out that Fund had a relationship with the adult daughter of his long time girlfriend, and I said as much on the forum.
But if you do a search of the word 'molester' in this thread, you will see pages and pages of Clem still accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'
Unfortunately my thread at the old forum is gone, because it was filled with the same accusations.
It looks like Clem (in his new name) is now going to pick up right where he left off.
That is one sick puppy.
My only mistake was asking a question about something I wasn't sure about.
And he has been clubbing me over the head with it since 2008.
29 Mar 2017 3:44 pm
I do the same thing.Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 3:22 pm » wrote:Only a moron would use a source that is agenda driven in his own direction.
The only time I use agenda sources is against someone of the same agenda, to say, "See, even your buddies agree with me." Otherwise, I stick to neutral sources.
I love when I can find something from one of their own favorite sources that contradicts what they say, so they can't just dismiss it for having a liberal bias.
LOL
I'm still waiting for Clem to name one of the many 'wackjob websites' that I use as sources.
29 Mar 2017 4:00 pm
Figures you'd cite leftist bulls***. It claims that the wackjob left Nation Institute is moderately liberal. Same for moonbat left Rolling Stone.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 3:08 pm » wrote: Yeah, if you're a wingnut.
You've gone from sources like The Weekly Standard and National Review to Pajamas Media.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
PJ Media: Extreme
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/
I mean, every media outlet I copied from its list is hopelessly liberal biased to the point of ethical and even financial corruption in many cases. The Clinton News Network covered up Clinton's crimes and impeachable acts, it's so partisan and corrupt.
What a complete joke you are, geez.
From your source:
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. .....
ABC News
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
(The)Atlantic
Baltimore Sun
BBC
BillMoyers.com
Boston Globe
Brookings Institute
Business Insider
Buzzfeed
CBS News
CNN
Harpers
NBC News
Newsweek
New Left Review
New York Daily News
NPR
New York Times
PBS News Hour
Philadelphia Inquirer
Rolling Stone
San Francisco Chronicle
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
The Nation Institute
Time
Washington Post
29 Mar 2017 4:01 pm
The last one, Dim.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 3:44 pm » wrote:I'm still waiting for Clem to name one of the many 'wackjob websites' that I use as sources.
29 Mar 2017 4:03 pm
Yeah, I get quite angry when decent people are dishonestly smeared.Misty » 29 Mar 2017 3:43 pm » wrote:A history lesson on Clem's John Fund obsession.
So who's crazy, the person who gets angered by smears?
Or the person who commits them and has for many years?
29 Mar 2017 4:25 pm
If it's citing factual information that supposedly "objective" sources in the corrupt liberal MSM will refuse to cover, only a moron would not use partisan sources.Cannonpointer » 29 Mar 2017 3:22 pm » wrote:Only a moron would use a source that is agenda driven in his own direction.
The only time I use agenda sources is against someone of the same agenda, tosay, "See, even your buddies agree with me." Otherwise, I stick to neutral sources.
I could go on for literally days about massive amounts of information the MSM either hid or just refused to cover.
So what should I do, pretend that information doesn't exist?
BREAKING – New Huma Abedin Emails Reveal Hillary Emailed Classified Info on Unsecured Server, Favors for Clinton Donors
Cristina Laila Mar 29th, 2017 3:38
(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch today released 1,184 pages of State Department records, including previously unreleased Hillary Clinton email exchanges, revealing additional instances of Abedin and Hillary Clinton sending classified information through unsecured email accounts and contributors being given special access to the former secretary of state.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03 ... on-donors/
Who is online
In total there are 4921 users online :: 3 registered, 15 bots, and 4903 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, proximic, CriteoBot, LCC, ADmantX, Not, Bolt, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot