Liberal Forum

Misty » 04 Apr 2017 6:30 pm » wrote:WOW!
You've wrapped up the whole case already.

LOCK HER UP!
LOCK HER UP!

Since you know exactly what happened, whose names did she leak?
And who else is part of the criminal conspiracy?
Must be a whole lot of people.

LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

psycho?

Breaking Report: Susan Rice Was Not Alone in Unmasking Team Trump Officials
Jim Hoft Apr 5th, 2017 8:59 am Leave a Comment
According to a recent Wall Street Journal report Susan Rice was not alone in unmasking Team Trump officials for political purposes.
Rice admitted to unmasking Trump officials on Tuesday but she was not the Obama official who unmasked General Michael Flynn’s conversations with Russian officials.
That was a different Obama administration official.
It was a coordinated effort by the Obama administration to take down Trump before he entered the White House.
Via Zerohedge and Vessel News:
This is where the WSJ comes in, with the new info that according to a Republican official familiar with deliberations by GOP lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee said that the names of two U.S. citizens who were part of Mr. Trump’s transition team have been unmasked in intelligence reports. One is Mr. Flynn and the other hasn’t been identified. The report involving Mr. Flynn documented phone conversations he had in late December with the Russian ambassador to the U.S.

The WSJ then reports that Rice had requested the unmasking of at least one transition official — not Mr. Flynn — who was part of multiple foreign conversations that weren’t related to Russia.

And the punchline: “The Republican official and others said Ms. Rice wasn’t the administration official who instigated Mr. Flynn’s unmasking
.”
In other words, the story that Susan Rice is the unmasker is incomplete as there is at least one more person exposing the identities of people in Trump’s circle, and that the NSA and other intel agencies have been surveilling, accidentally or otherwise, at least one, so far unnamed individual, from Trump’s circle. It may well be someone that the WaPo and NYT have already published about, or it may be someone who has yet to hit the newswire, delivering the latest twist of the ongoing intelligence-fed news cycle.

For now the answer is unknown, although when Rice testifies under oath before the House Intel Committee, we hope that all outstanding questions will finally get answers.

under oath before the House Intel Committee, we hope that all outstanding questions will finally get answers.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04 ... officials/

Trump on O’Reilly: “I don’t think Bill did anything wrong”



President Trump told the New York Times he doesn't think Fox News host Bill O'Reilly should have settled any lawsuits stemming from the at least five accusations of sexual harassment or inappropriate behavior against him.

Trump's take: I don't think Bill did anything wrong.

Trump also praised O'Reilly for hosting him on his show over the years, and added, "I think he's a person I know well — he is a good person."

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 2:04 pm » wrote:The sexual assaulter defends the sexual harasser.

Ex-Officials: As National Security Advisor, Susan Rice’s Unmasking Requests Not So Routine ‘It’s Never Done’

Cristina Laila
Former National Security Advisor to Obama, Susan Rice has recently pivoted from saying she knew nothing about the unmasking of Trump and his associates to saying it’s all part of her job and normal routine.

Ex-officials who have experience in Intelligence operations at this level are saying quite the opposite. A National Security Advisor is in a managerial position and should not have time to be unmasking individuals having conversations. ‘It’s insane. It’s never done.’

.....“From my direct experience dealing at this level, that is never done,” retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer told Fox News. Shaffer has experience in intelligence operations focused on foreign actors in which U.S. citizens’ involvement could surface.

“The national security adviser person is a manager position, not an analyst position,” he said. “You have analysts in the intelligence community whose job is to sort through who is doing what with what. Susan Rice is a senior manager looking over the entire intelligence community. She should not have time to be unmasking individuals having conversations. It’s insane. It’s never done.”

Ex-CIA analyst Fred Fleitz agreed in a Fox News op-ed.
“Rice’s denials don’t add up,” Fleitz wrote. “It is hard to fathom how the demasking of multiple Trump campaign and transition officials was not politically motivated.”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04 ... ever-done/

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 2:11 pm » wrote:

NO HE DID NOT!

Termin8tor » 05 Apr 2017 2:14 pm » wrote: That leftist CNN hack didn't cover the story. He did his moonbat best to hide the scandal and the felonies, psycho.
Just like the Clinton News Network for to hide Clinton's felonies and impeachable acts

Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

President Trump said on Wednesday that he thought that the former national security adviser Susan E. Rice may have committed a crime by seeking the identities of Trump associates who were swept up in the surveillance of foreign officials by American spy agencies and that other Obama administration officials may also have been involved.

The president provided no evidence to back his claim.

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 3:45 pm » wrote: He did cover the story dingbat.
I saw it.
He devoted a whole segment to it.

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 4:22 pm » wrote:Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

Susan Rice must not be very bright if she committed a crime and left a paper trail of it.
A paper trail that the POTUS has full access to, if he wants to prove she committed a crime.
But it's so much better to just make false accusations.
Red meat for the base.

thinking that Hillary's corrupt Injustice Dept. would bury everything, just like Clinton's Injustice Dept. buried his felonies .

Now they're in a terrible panic.

Misty » 04 Apr 2017 10:36 pm » wrote: To paraphrase a saying from Bill Maher: You don't know for a fact that Obama committed any felonies, you just know that it's true.

Misty » 04 Apr 2017 10:36 pm » wrote: Other than the leaking of Flynn's name, what felonies have been committed?

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 4:22 pm » wrote: Susan Rice must not be very bright if she committed a crime and left a paper trail of it.
A paper trail that the POTUS has full access to, if he wants to prove she committed a crime.
But it's so much better to just make false accusations.
Red meat for the base.

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 4:22 pm » wrote: Susan Rice must not be very bright if she committed a crime and left a paper trail of it.
A paper trail that the POTUS has full access to, if he wants to prove she committed a crime.
But it's so much better to just make false accusations.
Red meat for the base.

Huey » 06 Apr 2017 9:11 am » wrote:
You do understand what the words "thought" and "may" mean?

Hell, with no proof whatsoever you have convicted the trump team of colluding with the Russians to influence the election.

There is more evidence that Rice was the individual who asked to unmask names, which is sorta legal. Additionally, there is coincidental evidence that this, in conjunction with the Jan 3 order that allowed the raw intelligence to be shared with 16 agencies and the Farkas comments about saving as much as possible is a co-ordinated effort to undermine the current administration. Add to that the POSSIBILITY (you know what that means, right?) that the targeted foreign officials who were under surveillance were chosen simply because it was known the trump transition team would speak to them and you have the makings of a grand conspiracy, illegal use of the surveillance program and actions that make watergate look like a jaywalking ticket.

But hell, it is more important to continue to whine about trump claiming Obama ordered his phones tapped.

roadkill » 06 Apr 2017 9:18 am » wrote: It's not legal if there was no justification for it.

Leaking is definitely a crime.

If it is ever proved that Rice did it for political reasons it will be way worse than Watergate.

Huey » 06 Apr 2017 9:23 am » wrote:
Yeah, that's why I said sorta

But anyway Trump said Obama ordered it.

Misty » 05 Apr 2017 10:10 pm » wrote:He finally opens his mouth and what comes out is the dumbest thing that any Secretary of State has ever said.

"North Korea launched yet another intermediate range ballistic missile.
The United States has spoken enough about North Korea.
We have no further comment."