Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 Apr 2017 1:37 pm
Where does he admit his source was in the White House, Dim?Misty » 07 Apr 2017 1:36 pm » wrote: That's not what he told the New Yorker.
He was quoted directly in that article.
Bungle clear English much?
7 Apr 2017 1:38 pm
Hey, she cites Wonkette!Huey » 07 Apr 2017 1:34 pm » wrote:
Sources? Of course she did. Facebook and twitter memes.
I mean, who would put the WSJ, National Review, IBD, etc. over a great source like that?
7 Apr 2017 1:54 pm
I don't cite Wonkette as a serious source you jackass.Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 1:38 pm » wrote: Hey, she cites Wonkette!
I mean, who would put the WSJ, National Review, IBD, etc. over a great source like that?
Of course not having a sense of humor, you wouldn't understand that it's sarcasm.
Just like Huey doesn't understand how Twitter works.
I post screenshots of people's Tweets along with the link to whatever news story they happen to be Tweeting about.
That's not a 'meme.'
And as far as Facebook goes, I have two accounts.
One for friends and family, where I never talk politics, and one for online friends where I do talk politics, but I hardly ever go on that account anymore.
So I have no idea what Facebook memes he's talking about.
FYI I did cite a National Review article about Mike Chenovich, which you promptly ignored.
The White House Should Not Be Promoting Mike Cernovich
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... nald-trump
7 Apr 2017 1:59 pm
Hey Dim, as I specifically noted, I do not have huge confidence in Cernovich, but you have zero evidence that his source was in the White House.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 1:36 pm » wrote:
So you believe everything that a purveyor of FAKE News tells you.
Good for you.
So in fact you are the one spreading Fake News.
Not to mention his claim about Susan Rice was true.
7 Apr 2017 2:36 pm
Here's your Putin's pet, psycho.Misty » 21 Oct 2016 12:32 pm » wrote:Putin's pet! Putin's pet!
TRUMP STRIKES ASSAD!
DOZENS OF MISSILES INTO SYRIA...
DEATHS REPORTED...
Airbase 'Almost Completely Destroyed'...
WSJ: President Shows He's Willing to Act Forcefully, Quickly...
National Security Team All Agreed On Strike...
NYT: SPEED INTENDED TO MAXIMIZE ELEMENT OF SURPRISE...
RUSSIA RAGES... BOLSTERS SYRIA SUPPORT...
KREMLIN: 'Aggression Against Sovereign State'...
Came 'within inch' of military clash...
Moscow Suspends Deconfliction Channel With USA...
Pentagon probes possible Russian role in gas attack...
http://drudgereport.com/
7 Apr 2017 3:40 pm
You mean that she was doing her job?Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 1:59 pm » wrote: Hey Dim, as I specifically noted, I do not have huge confidence in Cernovich, but you have zero evidence that his source was in the White House.
So in fact you are the one spreading Fake News.
Not to mention his claim about Susan Rice was true.
Do you understand what it takes to unmask a name, and that there is a paper trail of who asked for the name to be unmasked and why?
Do you really believe this was some kind of a vast criminal conspiracy and they were stupid enough to leave a paper trail of their crimes?
7 Apr 2017 3:44 pm
It isn't the job of a president's top NSC adviser to be personally going over unmasked names, liar.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 3:40 pm » wrote: You mean that she was doing her job?
The White House doesn't do analysis. The White House doesn't do investigations.
They give those assignments to the professionals in the appropriate agencies.
Given that top Democrats have gotten away with felonies for decades and that she believed HRC would win and her Injustice Dept. would cover it all up like they did for her and her fake husband, yeah, I think she was that stupidly confident.Do you understand what it takes to unmask a name, and that there is a paper trail of who asked for the name to be unmasked and why?
Do you really believe this was some kind of a vast criminal conspiracy and they were stupid enough to leave a paper trail of their crimes?
7 Apr 2017 3:48 pm
No thanks.Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 2:36 pm » wrote: Why did your make up a quote?
The post that links back to had nothing to do with Putin.
I wouldn't read The Sludge Report if you held a gun to my head.
7 Apr 2017 3:51 pm
Made up quote? You've lied for months that Trump is Putin's pet.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 3:48 pm » wrote: Why did your make up a quote?
The post that links back to had nothing to do with Putin.
So what the link didn't go to the right place.
Yes, you are reality averse.I wouldn't read The Sludge Report if you held a gun to my head.
7 Apr 2017 3:55 pm
When are you going to admit you were wrong in claiming his source was in the White House, liar?Misty » 07 Apr 2017 1:36 pm » wrote: So you believe everything that a purveyor of FAKE News tells you.
Good for you.
More evidence of a huge scandal, utterly dwarfing Watergate.
What was Obama's top NSC adviser doing personally going over the names of Trump officials and classified information about them?
That absolutely is not "her job" as you lied.
1) Information was collected on the Trump team by Obama administration agencies.
2) This information had no reason to be shared in intelligence reports to Obama officials.
3) Obama officials may have flouted legally required attempts to minimize and mask personal identifying information.
4) This had nothing to do with Russia.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/03/23/her ... -big-deal/
7 Apr 2017 3:58 pm
ROFL, your own source Eli Lake said that "Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law."Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 3:44 pm » wrote:It isn't the job of a president's top NSC adviser to be personally going over unmasked names, liar.
The White House doesn't do analysis. The White House doesn't do investigations.
They give those assignments to the professionals in the appropriate agencies.
Given that top Democrats have gotten away with felonies for decades and that she believed HRC would win and her Injustice Dept. would cover it all up like they did for her and her fake husband, yeah, I think she was that stupidly confident.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... s-in-intel
7 Apr 2017 3:59 pm
Misty » 07 Apr 2017 1:28 pm » wrote: Let's just pretend that I have never repeatedly said that my concerns about Trump and Russia have more to do with financial ties than they do about the election.
If I go back to your Flying Monkeys thread during last year's campaign, did you cite lots of sources about the tens of millions of dollars the Clinton's and their cronies got from the Russians?
Did you raise questions about their corruption and cite evidence of it?
if not, why not?
7 Apr 2017 4:03 pm
Yes, he and Levin want to be very cautious and be entirely factual. But they both said this is a massive and expanding scandal, with the clear implication that many felonies have been committed.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 3:58 pm » wrote:
ROFL, your own source Eli Lake said that "Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law."
And reading between the lines it was clear both believed Rice to be involved.
Why did Rice have the names and classified information of Trump officials, including information not related to Russia and including personal information?to have broken federal law, national security experts told The Daily Signal, Rice would have had to purposefully leak such information to the media or knowingly place it in the hands of someone not entitled to possess it.
http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/06/what- ... officials/
7 Apr 2017 4:51 pm
You can believe the guy who makes up FAKE News if you want to.Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 3:55 pm » wrote:When are you going to admit you were wrong in claiming his source was in the White House, liar?
I prefer not to.
I guess it's just a coincidence that the both Counselor to the President and the president's son promoted Chenovich.
I would bet money that his source was Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the same guy who leaked White House info to Devin Nunes, who then briefed the president on the stuff that came from the WH.
How did that little stunt work out, Puss?
It was not Cohen-Watnick's job to go digging through those intelligence reports.Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 3:55 pm » wrote:That absolutely is not "her job" as you lied.
He only started doing it to find some justification for 45's lying Twitter storm about Obama tapping his phones.
He's another wingnut hired by conspiracy theorist Michael Flynn, who McMaster tried to get rid of.
7 Apr 2017 5:21 pm
Actually I do.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 3:40 pm » wrote:
Do you really believe this was some kind of a vast criminal conspiracy and they were stupid enough to leave a paper trail of their crimes?
7 Apr 2017 6:01 pm
Do you believe in the Tooth Fairy as well?Cedarswamp » 07 Apr 2017 5:21 pm » wrote: Actually I do.
Nice to see you in my thread.
7 Apr 2017 6:03 pm
You don't? Are you calling my mother a liar?
7 Apr 2017 6:08 pm
If it was pertinent to the Russia investigation, had crimes been commited she wouldn't have had to ask, it would have already been unmasked, the issuing agency had already determined the names were not pertinent.Misty » 07 Apr 2017 6:01 pm » wrote: Do you believe in the Tooth Fairy as well?
Nice to see you in my thread.
7 Apr 2017 6:09 pm
Because the Russians were not trying to help get her elected you stupid jackass.Termin8tor » 07 Apr 2017 3:59 pm » wrote:If I go back to your Flying Monkeys thread during last year's campaign, did you cite lots of sources about the tens of millions of dollars the Clinton's and their cronies got from the Russians?
Did you raise questions about their corruption and cite evidence of it?
if not, why not?
And she was not the one praising Putin all over the place.
Two facts that are quite relevant when it comes to my concerns about Trump and Russian ties.
BTW, Pumpkin......how about those anemic jobs numbers for March?
98,000 jobs were added last month.
Economists had been anticipating a gain of about 180,000.
It's Obama's fault, right?
7 Apr 2017 6:59 pm
The Trump administration trying to unmask the identity of a Twitter user.Twitter alleges Trump administration tried to unmask critical account.
Twitter filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday alleging that U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials had tried to get the company to reveal the identity of an anonymous account that has been critical of the agency.
The lawsuit alleges CBP agents issued an administrative summons to Twitter asking it to reveal the identity of the user @ALT_uscis, an account that has been critical of the administration and specifically the US Citizenship and Immigration Services and claims to be run by a government employee.
Both CBP and USCIS are part of the Department of Homeland Security, which is named in the lawsuit.
Shortly after the news broke, @ALT_uscis posted a screenshot of the First Amendment.
According to the lawsuit, CBP agents Adam Hoffman and Stephen Caruso sent the administrative summons to Twitter on March 14, saying that the company was "required to turn over "[a]ll records regarding the [T]witter account @ALT_USCIS to include, User names, account login, phone numbers, mailing addresses, and I.P. addresses."
"The purpose of this request appears to be, and the effect of Twitter's complying with it likely would be, to enable or help to enable Defendants to pierce the anonymity of the person or persons who established and use the @ALT_USCIS account," the lawsuit reads.
The summons allegedly said that failure to comply would result in Twitter being dragged to federal court.
Ironic.
Who is online
In total there are 4619 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 4593 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, michaelf, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: SiteLockSpider, ADmantX, CensysInspect, NING, DuckDuckBot, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot