Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 564 565 566 567 568 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
24 Apr 2017 11:37 am
24 Apr 2017 11:37 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Huey » 24 Apr 2017 11:06 am » wrote: Will you change your story? Or ignore it and hope it goes away? Schlussel now says what he does not rise to the level of sexual harassment. Or, is hannity guilty and he has to prove his innocence?

Additionally, are you concerned in the least bit about the problems this can cause with his marriage as it seems he his innocent?
Conservatives are always guilty in liberals' eyes, even when they obviously aren't.

Rush made one intemperate comment about some female leftist college student, and little Miss Marxist did her best to drive him off the air, along with the rest of the fascist left munchkins in the country.

But she'll blindly and dishonestly defend Democrat rapists and criminals.
User avatar
Termin8tor
24 Apr 2017 1:20 pm
24 Apr 2017 1:20 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Wow, there's a credible source!

A leftist lunatic. :rofl: :rofl:

Here's what your endless Russia lunacy has wrought, psycho.
Poll: Two-Thirds of Americans Believe Democrat Party Is Out of Touch Today
Jim Hoft Apr 24th, 2017 12:03 pm 10 Comments


Two-Thirds of Americans believe today’s Democrat Party is out of touch today.
That is a 39 percent swing in two years.
Image

The Free Beacon reported:
More Americans say the Democratic Party is “out of touch with the concerns of most Americans” than either the Republican Party or President Trump, according to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll.


According to the survey, 67 percent of those polled said the Democratic Party was “out of touch” with common American concerns, and only 28 percent said the party is “in touch.” Six percent said they had no
Maybe it’s all the Putin’s puppet nonsense. :rofl: :rofl:

.

.
Image

Image
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04 ... rty-touch/
User avatar
Nobody
24 Apr 2017 6:40 pm
24 Apr 2017 6:40 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 24 Apr 2017 1:20 pm » wrote:Wow, there's a credible source!

A leftist lunatic. :rofl: :rofl:
It's news with whole lot of snark injected into it.
Just the way I like it.
Donald Trump Learns About Delicious Space Pee

Donald Trump is having a very exciting day!

No, he did not get to go VROOM VROOM in a big truck, but maybe he will before the day is out.

But he did get to sit in the Oval Office, next to his hot daughter Ivanka, and talk to a real live SPACE LADY who is currently in OUTER SPACE.

And the SPACE LADY talked to him about PEE, which is definitely not his favorite, because He. Is. A. Germophobe. He. Swears.

TRUMP: What are we learning from having you spending your time up there? I know so much research is done, I’m getting a glimpse of some of it right here in the Oval Office.
What are we learning by being in space?

WHITSON: Water is such a precious resource up here that we also are cleaning up our urine and making it drinkable — and it’s really not as bad as it sounds.

TRUMP: Well that’s good. I’m glad to hear that. Better you than me.

Awwwww, you guys, Trump had much fun on his phone call with space lady.

This is the part of presidenting he was looking forward to, just like when he got to go BEEP BEEP DUMP TRUCK!

He needs more of these moments.

Before he was elected, he thought being president was going to be 24/7 pussgrabbing and schmoozing and grifting and golfing, but then he was inaugurated and everybody was like, “You actually have to do work,” and “You suck.”

Plus,he learned that missiles can kill people and also that the United States is a really big country, which means all of a sudden he’s got tons of so-called “responsibility,” which makes him :(

But today he got to talk about space pee with space lady and hot Ivanka was sitting next to him and boy oh boy, it was a good day.

Image
User avatar
Nobody
24 Apr 2017 6:54 pm
24 Apr 2017 6:54 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
I wonder which jackass thought it would be okay to promote Mar-a-Lago on a State Dep't website?
:loco:
State removes post highlighting Trump Mar-a-Lago resort.

A State Department website has removed a blog post about President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort following criticism over ethical concerns.

The blog, initially posted on ShareAmerica, a State Department platform used for sharing what it describes as "compelling stories" detailed the history of Trump’s “Winter White House.”

It immediately led to concerns that the U.S. government was promoting Trump's private resort.

Ethics groups have warned about the potential conflict of interest presented by the private Florida resort.

Image
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
25 Apr 2017 1:14 am
25 Apr 2017 1:14 am
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty » 24 Apr 2017 6:40 pm » wrote: It's news with whole lot of snark injected into it.
Just the way I like it.
TYPICAL IDIOCY OF THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED HATE TRUMP IDIOTS. YOU NEED TO GET YOUR PSYCHOTIC HATRED OF TRUMP FIXED. YOU NEVER GAVE A COHERENT REASON FOR IT THEREFORE IT MUST BE A MENTAL DEFECT BLINDING YOU TO THE GOOD HE HAS ACCOMPLISHED!!!
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Apr 2017 5:31 am
25 Apr 2017 5:31 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 24 Apr 2017 6:54 pm » wrote:I wonder which jackass thought it would be okay to promote Mar-a-Lago on a State Dep't website?
:loco:
Obviously Putin and the Russians, psycho. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Huey
25 Apr 2017 9:54 am
25 Apr 2017 9:54 am
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 24 Apr 2017 6:40 pm » wrote: It's news with whole lot of snark injected into it.
Just the way I like it.
That's not snark. That's fodder for loinfos, those that make up the progressive base.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
25 Apr 2017 5:39 pm
25 Apr 2017 5:39 pm
User avatar
   
777 posts
Huey » 25 Apr 2017 9:54 am » wrote: That's not snark. That's fodder for loinfos, those that make up the progressive base.
You just defined Misty. For a long time I kept asking her for her reason to hate Trump. She just ignored that leading me to believe it was just her emotional hatred of conservatives. When she finally came up with something it was bogus!!
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 7:21 pm
25 Apr 2017 7:21 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Sgt Bilko » 25 Apr 2017 5:39 pm » wrote:You just defined Misty. For a long time I kept asking her for her reason to hate Trump. She just ignored that leading me to believe it was just her emotional hatred of conservatives. When she finally came up with something it was bogus!!
First of all, I don't HATE Conservatives.
I watched a town hall meeting with John Kasich last night on CNN and was reminded of why I voted for him.

And secondly, I have given you many reasons why I dislike 45.
You just refuse to hear them, or declare them bogus, because you are a partisan hack, and a Trump apologist.

Is it BOGUS that for over 5 years he was the Birther-In-Chief?
Go ahead DILDO, tell me that for over 5 years he did not hound Obama about his Birth Certificate and his College records.
Tell me how that **** is BOGUS?

That alone is more than enough reason for me not to like him, but I have many, many more.

Both you and Huey need to get a life and not spend your time gabbing about me.

Image
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 7:27 pm
25 Apr 2017 7:27 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Watch Paul Ryan’s senior tax counsel blow up Trump’s ‘magic unicorn’ tax plan.

With President Donald Trump working overtime this week to come up with a tax cut wish list for Congress — including a massive cut to the top corporate tax rate — the senior tax counsel for House Leader Paul Ryan (R-WI) declared Trump’s plans dead before it has ever even been submitted.

Speaking at an international finance summit last week, Ryan’s tax law specialist George Callas called out Trump’s plan for a massive tax cut without offsetting cuts to pay for it a “magic unicorn.”

“A plan of business tax cuts that has no offsets, to use some very esoteric language, is not a thing,” Callas patiently explained to the panel and attending crowd.

“It’s not a real thing.

And people can come up with whatever plans they want.

Not only can that not pass Congress, it cannot even begin to move through Congress on day one.
He's got both houses of Congress and he can't get **** done.
What a **** failure.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 9:03 pm
25 Apr 2017 9:03 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Lawmakers Say It Appears Michael Flynn Acted Illegally In Taking Russian Payments

Senior lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee say Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, appears to have violated the law when he took payments from groups associated with foreign governments.

Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and ranking member Elijah Cummings, D-Md., spoke at a news conference Tuesday, after they received a classified briefing.

"I see no data to support the notion that Gen. Flynn complied with the law," Chaffetz said.

As a retired lieutenant general, Flynn was required to obtain permission before receiving foreign payments, Chaffetz and Cummings say.

But the classified briefing they received suggested Flynn neither asked permission nor reported the funds he received for a trip to Moscow .

"It does not appear to us that [permission] was ever sought," Chaffetz said.

Cummings said they could not discuss the contents of the classified documents they saw. "But we can say this: They are extremely troubling," he said.

"I believe these documents should be declassified to the fullest extent possible."

Cummings also said the White House has refused to release information about Flynn's foreign contacts and connections.

The House Oversight Committee had requested Flynn's security clearance paperwork, references to foreign contacts, receipts for payments from abroad and requests for permission to receive foreign payments.

Each request was denied.

"The White House has refused to provide this committee with a single piece of paper," Cummings said, "and that is simply unacceptable."
Image
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 9:16 pm
25 Apr 2017 9:16 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 24 Apr 2017 11:06 am » wrote:Will you change your story?
Or ignore it and hope it goes away?
It's not my story. It's Debbie Schlussel's story.
Huey » 24 Apr 2017 11:06 am » wrote: Schlussel now says what he does not rise to the level of sexual harassment. Or, is hannity guilty and he has to prove his innocence?
Again, I am not the accuser.
Huey » 24 Apr 2017 11:06 am » wrote: Additionally, are you concerned in the least bit about the problems this can cause with his marriage as it seems he his innocent?
Why?
Does his wife read this forum?
I only posted it here.
I'm not the one who posted it outside of this forum.

FYI, I never believed that Schlussel was telling the truth.
She is a D lister who is always looking for attention.

I don't believe that Hannity sexually harasses women.
Unlike that miserable creep O'Reilly, he actually seems to be able to get a woman without having to threaten her.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 10:59 pm
25 Apr 2017 10:59 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Flynn’s Turkish lobbying linked to Russia.

The Turkish man who gave Mike Flynn a $600,000 lobbying deal just before President Donald Trump picked him to be national security adviser has business ties to Russia, including a 2009 aviation financing deal negotiated with Vladimir Putin, according to court records.

The man, Ekim Alptekin, has in recent years helped to coordinate Turkish lobbying in Washington with Dmitri “David” Zaikin, a Soviet-born former executive in Russian energy and mining companies who also has had dealings with Putin’s government, according to three people with direct knowledge of the activities.

This unusual arrangement, in which Alptekin and Zaikin have helped steer Turkish lobbying through various groups since at least 2015, raises questions about both the agenda of the two men and the source of the funds used to pay the lobbyists.

Although Turkey is a NATO ally, its president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has grown increasingly authoritarian and friendly with Putin.

And the hiring of Flynn by Alptekin came at a time when Flynn was working for Trump’s campaign and Putin’s government was under investigation for interfering with the U.S. election.

Flynn’s lawyer, Robert Kelner, declined to comment.

In a filing with the Justice Department, Flynn said he relied on assurances from Alptekin that he was not directly or indirectly funded by a foreign government.

But shifting explanations and a web of business ties raise questions about the arrangement.

Flynn has offered evolving accounts of his lobbying work for Alptekin.

In September, Flynn reported his client as a Dutch shell company owned by Alptekin.

After being forced to leave the White House — reportedly because he lied to Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations during the transition with the Russian ambassador — Flynn filed new paperwork in March acknowledging that his lobbying work “principally benefitted” the Turkish government.

The revelation of Russian business ties to the man who hired Flynn threatens to complicate the White House’s struggle to escape the shadow of the FBI investigation into whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian agents.

Flynn has been a focus for concerns about Russian ties to both the Trump campaign, for which he was a key adviser and surrogate, and the Trump administration, in which, as national security adviser, he had access to the most sensitive state secrets.

He also has a history of failing to disclose ties to Russia.

His original White House ethics disclosure failed to include payments from Kremlin propaganda network RT and two other Russian companies.

The RT payment was for a paid speech Flynn gave at a Moscow gala where he sat at the same table as Putin.

A White House spokesman declined to comment.

Zaikin declined to be interviewed but said in an email that he wasn’t involved in Flynn’s lobbying and doesn’t know Alptekin.

Alptekin, in an interview, said he hired Flynn with his own money and did not coordinate any lobbying for the Turkish government.

He also denied knowing Zaikin.

But Alptekin acknowledged that he has attended events and met with leaders of the Turkish Heritage Organization, a Washington-based group of Turkish-Americans loyal to Erdogan.

The organization was started when Zaikin asked a Washington-based international political consultant named John Moreira to help set it up, Moreira told POLITICO.

Asked why Zaikin — who is not Turkish and has no apparent ties to Turkey — would be organizing a Turkish heritage organization, Moreira said he thought Zaikin had Turkish friends and business associates.

“I don’t know who David was working for. He just asked me to do this,” Moreira said.

Moreira said he was paid to help manage the heritage organization but would not say by whom.

Moreira said he gave Zaikin weekly updates on the organization’s activities and that Zaikin visited Washington about every other month.

On at least one occasion, Alptekin, who was born in Turkey and grew up in the Netherlands, met with communications consultants working for the Turkish Heritage Organization, he said.

But three people with direct knowledge of the situation said it was more than just one meeting; Zaikin and Alptekin worked together to help coordinate pro-Turkish lobbying.

For his part, Zaikin said, “I introduced [the Turkish Heritage Organization] to a few companies who I believed were industry professionals in good standing. I was present at a few meetings.”

Zaikin, 49, was born in Ukraine and grew up as a citizen of the Soviet Union.

He said in emails that doctors excused him from the Soviet military draft because of an injury, and that his family left the Soviet Union in 1990.

He subsequently became a Canadian citizen and now lives in London.
Flynn's lawyer and the White House declined to comment.
Oh well.
They probably would have commented in Russian anyway.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Apr 2017 11:37 pm
25 Apr 2017 11:37 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Judge Blocks Trump's `Sanctuary City' Order -- Even If It Is A`Toothless Threat'

A federal judge in California issued a nationwide injunction against President Trump's executive order threatening `sanctuary cities' with the loss of federal grants, even as he acknowledged both the government and its opponents agree the order can't be applied to the bulk of federal funding.

In an impassioned, 49-page ruling, U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick said the order, if read broadly, threatened billions of dollars in federal aid flowing to San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties in California and would cause immediate harm if allowed to remain in place.

He rejected arguments by Trump administration lawyers in court that the order issued Jan. 25 was essentially a bluff, an exercise of the President's "bully pulpit" to announce changes in federal immigration policy.

“It is heartening that the Government’s lawyers recognize that the Order cannot do more constitutionally than enforce existing law,” wrote Judge Orrick, an Obama appointee.

But in public comments Trump called it a “weapon” against cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials and other Trump administration officials warned the order would be used to cut federal funding.
LOL, the Trump administration lawyers argued that the EO was essentially a bluff, and just an exercise of the President's "bully pulpit."

The EO threatened to cut funds from 'sanctuary cities' but it contained no definition of the term 'sanctuary cities' as the Trump administration has yet to clarify what exactly it considers a 'sanctuary city' to be.

Justice Department lawyers argued in papers filed last month, that the order need not be applied as broadly as its literal language might permit, since the secretary of Homeland Security has not yet designated any city a “sanctuary jurisdiction."

Like most of his EO's, not worth the paper it was printed on.
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
26 Apr 2017 12:18 am
26 Apr 2017 12:18 am
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 7:21 pm » wrote: First of all, I don't HATE Conservatives.
I watched a town hall meeting with John Kasich last night on CNN and was reminded of why I voted for him.

And secondly, I have given you many reasons why I dislike 45.
You just refuse to hear them, or declare them bogus, because you are a partisan hack, and a Trump apologist.

Is it BOGUS that for over 5 years he was the Birther-In-Chief?
Go ahead DILDO, tell me that for over 5 years he did not hound Obama about his Birth Certificate and his College records.
Tell me how that **** is BOGUS?

That alone is more than enough reason for me not to like him, but I have many, many more.

Both you and Huey need to get a life and not spend your time gabbing about me.

Image
YOU IGNORE THE FACT THAT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE WAS BOGUS BECAUSE THE FORM USED WHEN HE WAS BORN HAD SOME DIFFERENT ITEMS ON IT. OTHER SAME DATED BIRTH CERTIFICATES WERE SHOWN TO BE DIFFERENT.

IT WAS STUPID FOR HIM TO SHOW THAT BECAUSE IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE WHERE HE WAS BORN. HE WAS AUTOMATICALLY A CITIZEN BECAUSE HIS MOTHER WAS!!!


MISTY IS VERY IGNORANT AND MENTALLY DEFECTIVE!!

YOU DESECRATE THE IMAGE OF A PUG WITH YOUR USING IT AS YOUR AVATAR. PUGS ARE KNOWN AS LOVEABLE BUSYBODIES. YOU ARE THE POLAR OPPOSITE!!!
User avatar
Huey
26 Apr 2017 4:08 am
26 Apr 2017 4:08 am
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 9:16 pm » wrote: It's not my story. It's Debbie Schlussel's story.
Again, I am not the accuser.
Why?
Does his wife read this forum?
I only posted it here.
I'm not the one who posted it outside of this forum.

FYI, I never believed that Schlussel was telling the truth.
She is a D lister who is always looking for attention.

I don't believe that Hannity sexually harasses women.
Unlike that miserable creep O'Reilly, he actually seems to be able to get a woman without having to threaten her.
Sure misty, we believe you. :rolleyes:
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Termin8tor
26 Apr 2017 8:36 am
26 Apr 2017 8:36 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 9:16 pm » wrote:It's not my story. It's Debbie Schlussel's story.

Again, I am not the accuser.

Why?
Does his wife read this forum?
I only posted it here.
I'm not the one who posted it outside of this forum.

FYI, I never believed that Schlussel was telling the truth.
She is a D lister who is always looking for attention.

I don't believe that Hannity sexually harasses women.
Unlike that miserable creep O'Reilly, he actually seems to be able to get a woman without having to threaten her.
It's not little Miss Marxist's fault that she spreads so many lies and smears on behalf of her party. She's just "asking questions." :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
26 Apr 2017 8:38 am
26 Apr 2017 8:38 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 7:27 pm » wrote:He's got both houses of Congress and he can't get **** done.
What a **** failure.
Did you label Nobama a failure when it took over a year to pass Obamacare?

No, so you're full of crap and pro-Democrat Disinformation as usual.
User avatar
Termin8tor
26 Apr 2017 8:43 am
26 Apr 2017 8:43 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 7:21 pm » wrote: First of all, I don't HATE Conservatives.
Oh, so the reason you spend so much time smearing and attacking them is that you don't hate them.
That's believable. :loco:
And secondly, I have given you many reasons why I dislike 45.
You just refuse to hear them, or declare them bogus, because you are a partisan hack, and a Trump apologist.

Is it BOGUS that for over 5 years he was the Birther-In-Chief?
Go ahead DILDO, tell me that for over 5 years he did not hound Obama about his Birth Certificate and his College records.
Tell me how that **** is BOGUS?

That alone is more than enough reason for me not to like him, but I have many, many more.

Except that you attack and smear almost all conservatives, including the honorable and decent Dubya.

Dick Cheney, John Fund, Peter Hoekstra, Judge Napolitano, David Schippers, a Democrat, to name just a few.


The smears and lies never end.


If you don't hate conservatives, you're severely mentally ill. :loco:
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
26 Apr 2017 9:04 am
26 Apr 2017 9:04 am
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty » 25 Apr 2017 11:37 pm » wrote: LOL, the Trump administration lawyers argued that the EO was essentially a bluff, and just an exercise of the President's "bully pulpit."

The EO threatened to cut funds from 'sanctuary cities' but it contained no definition of the term 'sanctuary cities' as the Trump administration has yet to clarify what exactly it considers a 'sanctuary city' to be.

Justice Department lawyers argued in papers filed last month, that the order need not be applied as broadly as its literal language might permit, since the secretary of Homeland Security has not yet designated any city a “sanctuary jurisdiction."

Like most of his EO's, not worth the paper it was printed on.
You keep proving your demented hatred with Democrat Fake News aka LIES!!!
1 564 565 566 567 568 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 4420 users online :: 13 registered, 17 bots, and 4390 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, LCC, ADmantX, TTD-Content, proximic, DuckDuckBot, GPTBot, Not, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot, Applebot, curl/7
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search