Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Apr 2017 9:32 am
MISTY HAS BLINDED HERSELF TO THE FAILURE OF HER HERO OBAMA!!
THEN SHE IGNORES THE GOOD THINGS TRUMP IS DOING!!!
You keep proving your demented hatred with Democrat Fake News aka LIES!!! His first round of EOs erased the last 60 days of Obama's demented EOs. You are obviously deliberately blinding yourself to the absolute failure of Obama!! Here are several items showing the absolute failure of your demented hero Obama. Facts you deliberately blind yourself to!!!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01 ... orking-on/
By February of 2016 it was clear that Obama had given up on economic growth. Obama’s Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasted in early 2016 that America will never see 3.0% economic growth again.
As a result of his failed economic policies, Obama currently ranks as the fourth worst presidency on record in GDP growth at 1.457%. Only Herbert Hoover (-5.65%), Andrew Johnson (-0.70%) and Theodore Roosevelt (1.41%) currently have lower average annual GDP growth than Barack Obama. In addition, Obama has the lowest annual GDP growth rate of any President since World War II.
Barack Obama will be the only U.S. president in history who did not deliver a single year of 3.0%+ economic growth.
Obama Care kills 300,000 small business jobs
http://www.libertyheadlines.com/report- ... /?AID=7236
Wall Street Journal
The Obama Legacy
Editorial Board
President Obama once said that as President he aspired to be the progressive Ronald Reagan, and as he prepares to leave office he has succeeded in fundamental if ironic ways.
While Reagan left behind a calmer, more optimistic country, Mr. Obama leaves a more divided and rancorous one. While the Gipper helped elect a successor to extend his legacy, Mr. Obama will be succeeded by a man who campaigned to repudiate the President’s agenda. Barack Obama has been a historic President but perhaps not a consequential one.
Mr. Obama was always going to be a historic President by dint of his election as the first African-American to hold the office. His victory affirmed the American ideal that anyone can aspire and win political power. This affirmation was all the better because Mr. Obama won in large part thanks to his cool temperament amid the financial crisis and his considerable personal talents.
Yet his Presidency has been a disappointment at home and abroad, a fact ironically underscored by Mr. Obama’s relentless insistence that he has been a success. In his many farewell interviews, he has laid out what he regards as his main achievements: reviving the economy after the Great Recession, a giant step toward national health care, new domestic regulations and a global pact to combat climate change, the Iran nuclear deal, and a world where America is merely one nation among many others in settling global disputes rather than promoting its democratic values.
Even on their own terms those achievements look evanescent. Congress has teed up ObamaCare for repeal, and Donald Trump will erase the climate rules. The global climate pact is built on promises without enforcement, and Mr. Trump ran against and won in part on the slow economic recovery.
Authoritarians are on the march around the world as they haven’t been since the 1970s, and perhaps the 1930s.
These results flow both from the progressive agenda he pursued and the way he tried to implement it. He took power in 2009 with historic Democratic majorities, and he made the mistake of using them to fulfill 40 years of unmet progressive dreams.
From his first days he let Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi write the stimulus and ObamaCare, to the exclusion of Republicans. “I won,” he famously replied when Eric Cantor asked him to consider Republican economic ideas. The result is that his legislative achievements were built on partisan votes that now make them vulnerable to partisan repeal.
Mr. Obama rejected bipartisanship even after he lost Congress, the House in 2010 and Senate in 2014. He walked away from a budget deal with John Boehner in 2011 at the last minute because he wanted more tax increases. In his second term he all but disdained Congress, preferring to rule by regulation.
This was a gamble that he could elect a Democratic successor to protect his executive orders, but his immigration and other rules can be erased by Mr. Trump or Congress. By rejecting the hard work of building political consensus, Mr. Obama built much of his legacy on sand.
Mr. Obama’s progressive agenda failed most acutely on its core promise of economic “fairness.” The President made income redistribution to address inequality his top policy priority, above economic growth. The result has been the slowest expansion since World War II and even more inequality.
Higher taxes and wave after wave of new regulation dampened investment, while expanded entitlements and transfer payments lured more Americans out of the workforce. After the 2009 spending bill failed to spur durable growth, the White House relied almost entirely on the Federal Reserve to prevent another recession. The Fed was able to raise asset prices, which has helped the relatively affluent who own assets, but it couldn’t ignite the broad-based expansion and new business creation to lift average incomes.
The Reagan and Bill Clinton expansions left the public in an optimistic mood. Illegal immigration and trade deficits were larger than during the Obama years, but Americans worried less about both because they could see the tide rising for everyone. The slow-growth Obama years created the dry political tinder for Mr. Trump’s campaign against immigration and foreign trade.
The story is in many ways even worse on foreign policy. When Reagan left office the Soviet Union was in retreat and the Cold War nearing its end. As Mr. Obama leaves office, the gains of the post-Cold War era are being lost as world disorder spreads.
This too flows from Mr. Obama’s progressive worldview. He fulfilled his 2008 campaign promise to reduce America’s global involvement, especially in the Middle East, but his willy-nilly retreat has led to more chaos. He deposed a dictator in Libya but walked away from the aftermath. His decision to leave Iraq let him claim the “tide of war is receding” as he ran for re-election in 2012, but it allowed Islamic State to gestate there and in Syria as he let its civil war burn out of control.
The President’s calls for a world without nuclear weapons have been met by the acceleration of nuclear programs in North Korea and Pakistan. A “reset” with Moscow did nothing to alter Vladimir Putin’s revanchism in Ukraine and beyond. Reductions in U.S. military spending have emboldened China to press for regional dominance in East and Southeast Asia.
Whether his deal with Iran prevents that country from becoming a nuclear power won’t be known for several years, but it has already helped Iran fund its terrorist proxies in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. His outreach to Cuba may be historic but so far it has yielded no benefits for the Cuban people.
Perhaps the most decisive verdict on the Obama era is the sour public mood. While Americans like and respect the President personally, which explains his approval rating, on Election Day they said by nearly 2 to 1 that the country is on the wrong track. Even race relations, which should have improved under Mr. Obama’s leadership and example, seem to have become worse. His polarizing Presidency has now yielded an equally polarizing successor.
Obama's doubling the debt while spending $900 billion average a year in deficit while presiding over a dismal 1.4 average GDP the lowest average of any president. Also having employment drop by 8 million full time jobs and increasing part time jobs. He created Obama Care which he won the prestigious Pinocchio Award for by promising cheaper insurance and keeping your doctor. It cost more and lots of doctors failed to sign up since it didn't pay enough to break even. The results of progressive idiocy. The result is a backlash with the following.
1. President and Congress are Republican.
2. State governors and legislatures in 36 states are Republican.
3. Only 6 states are Democrat.
4. The remaining states went from Democrat to mixed.
The county election map of the country shows a sea of red with two spots of blue in southern California and southern NY.
Thank you Obama!!!
WHAT HAS TRUMP DONE!!!
He erased the last 60 days of Obama EOs and asked Congress to eradicate more of them.
He has initiated requests for tax reform the will put businesses in better position to compete worldwide.
He is starting to get rid of unneeded and counterproductive people in government in his "drain the swamp".
He is digging out the Obama believers in government trying to undermine his administration.
He has the minority Democrats in Congress foaming at the mouth trying to block everything he is accomplishing!
BLIND PROGRESSIVES LIKE MISTY ARE HAVING HISSY FITS OVER THIS!!!
CONSERVATIVES APPLAUD HIS ACTIONS!!
POOR MISTY
THEN SHE IGNORES THE GOOD THINGS TRUMP IS DOING!!!
You keep proving your demented hatred with Democrat Fake News aka LIES!!! His first round of EOs erased the last 60 days of Obama's demented EOs. You are obviously deliberately blinding yourself to the absolute failure of Obama!! Here are several items showing the absolute failure of your demented hero Obama. Facts you deliberately blind yourself to!!!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01 ... orking-on/
By February of 2016 it was clear that Obama had given up on economic growth. Obama’s Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecasted in early 2016 that America will never see 3.0% economic growth again.
As a result of his failed economic policies, Obama currently ranks as the fourth worst presidency on record in GDP growth at 1.457%. Only Herbert Hoover (-5.65%), Andrew Johnson (-0.70%) and Theodore Roosevelt (1.41%) currently have lower average annual GDP growth than Barack Obama. In addition, Obama has the lowest annual GDP growth rate of any President since World War II.
Barack Obama will be the only U.S. president in history who did not deliver a single year of 3.0%+ economic growth.
Obama Care kills 300,000 small business jobs
http://www.libertyheadlines.com/report- ... /?AID=7236
Wall Street Journal
The Obama Legacy
Editorial Board
President Obama once said that as President he aspired to be the progressive Ronald Reagan, and as he prepares to leave office he has succeeded in fundamental if ironic ways.
While Reagan left behind a calmer, more optimistic country, Mr. Obama leaves a more divided and rancorous one. While the Gipper helped elect a successor to extend his legacy, Mr. Obama will be succeeded by a man who campaigned to repudiate the President’s agenda. Barack Obama has been a historic President but perhaps not a consequential one.
Mr. Obama was always going to be a historic President by dint of his election as the first African-American to hold the office. His victory affirmed the American ideal that anyone can aspire and win political power. This affirmation was all the better because Mr. Obama won in large part thanks to his cool temperament amid the financial crisis and his considerable personal talents.
Yet his Presidency has been a disappointment at home and abroad, a fact ironically underscored by Mr. Obama’s relentless insistence that he has been a success. In his many farewell interviews, he has laid out what he regards as his main achievements: reviving the economy after the Great Recession, a giant step toward national health care, new domestic regulations and a global pact to combat climate change, the Iran nuclear deal, and a world where America is merely one nation among many others in settling global disputes rather than promoting its democratic values.
Even on their own terms those achievements look evanescent. Congress has teed up ObamaCare for repeal, and Donald Trump will erase the climate rules. The global climate pact is built on promises without enforcement, and Mr. Trump ran against and won in part on the slow economic recovery.
Authoritarians are on the march around the world as they haven’t been since the 1970s, and perhaps the 1930s.
These results flow both from the progressive agenda he pursued and the way he tried to implement it. He took power in 2009 with historic Democratic majorities, and he made the mistake of using them to fulfill 40 years of unmet progressive dreams.
From his first days he let Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi write the stimulus and ObamaCare, to the exclusion of Republicans. “I won,” he famously replied when Eric Cantor asked him to consider Republican economic ideas. The result is that his legislative achievements were built on partisan votes that now make them vulnerable to partisan repeal.
Mr. Obama rejected bipartisanship even after he lost Congress, the House in 2010 and Senate in 2014. He walked away from a budget deal with John Boehner in 2011 at the last minute because he wanted more tax increases. In his second term he all but disdained Congress, preferring to rule by regulation.
This was a gamble that he could elect a Democratic successor to protect his executive orders, but his immigration and other rules can be erased by Mr. Trump or Congress. By rejecting the hard work of building political consensus, Mr. Obama built much of his legacy on sand.
Mr. Obama’s progressive agenda failed most acutely on its core promise of economic “fairness.” The President made income redistribution to address inequality his top policy priority, above economic growth. The result has been the slowest expansion since World War II and even more inequality.
Higher taxes and wave after wave of new regulation dampened investment, while expanded entitlements and transfer payments lured more Americans out of the workforce. After the 2009 spending bill failed to spur durable growth, the White House relied almost entirely on the Federal Reserve to prevent another recession. The Fed was able to raise asset prices, which has helped the relatively affluent who own assets, but it couldn’t ignite the broad-based expansion and new business creation to lift average incomes.
The Reagan and Bill Clinton expansions left the public in an optimistic mood. Illegal immigration and trade deficits were larger than during the Obama years, but Americans worried less about both because they could see the tide rising for everyone. The slow-growth Obama years created the dry political tinder for Mr. Trump’s campaign against immigration and foreign trade.
The story is in many ways even worse on foreign policy. When Reagan left office the Soviet Union was in retreat and the Cold War nearing its end. As Mr. Obama leaves office, the gains of the post-Cold War era are being lost as world disorder spreads.
This too flows from Mr. Obama’s progressive worldview. He fulfilled his 2008 campaign promise to reduce America’s global involvement, especially in the Middle East, but his willy-nilly retreat has led to more chaos. He deposed a dictator in Libya but walked away from the aftermath. His decision to leave Iraq let him claim the “tide of war is receding” as he ran for re-election in 2012, but it allowed Islamic State to gestate there and in Syria as he let its civil war burn out of control.
The President’s calls for a world without nuclear weapons have been met by the acceleration of nuclear programs in North Korea and Pakistan. A “reset” with Moscow did nothing to alter Vladimir Putin’s revanchism in Ukraine and beyond. Reductions in U.S. military spending have emboldened China to press for regional dominance in East and Southeast Asia.
Whether his deal with Iran prevents that country from becoming a nuclear power won’t be known for several years, but it has already helped Iran fund its terrorist proxies in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. His outreach to Cuba may be historic but so far it has yielded no benefits for the Cuban people.
Perhaps the most decisive verdict on the Obama era is the sour public mood. While Americans like and respect the President personally, which explains his approval rating, on Election Day they said by nearly 2 to 1 that the country is on the wrong track. Even race relations, which should have improved under Mr. Obama’s leadership and example, seem to have become worse. His polarizing Presidency has now yielded an equally polarizing successor.
Obama's doubling the debt while spending $900 billion average a year in deficit while presiding over a dismal 1.4 average GDP the lowest average of any president. Also having employment drop by 8 million full time jobs and increasing part time jobs. He created Obama Care which he won the prestigious Pinocchio Award for by promising cheaper insurance and keeping your doctor. It cost more and lots of doctors failed to sign up since it didn't pay enough to break even. The results of progressive idiocy. The result is a backlash with the following.
1. President and Congress are Republican.
2. State governors and legislatures in 36 states are Republican.
3. Only 6 states are Democrat.
4. The remaining states went from Democrat to mixed.
The county election map of the country shows a sea of red with two spots of blue in southern California and southern NY.
Thank you Obama!!!
WHAT HAS TRUMP DONE!!!
He erased the last 60 days of Obama EOs and asked Congress to eradicate more of them.
He has initiated requests for tax reform the will put businesses in better position to compete worldwide.
He is starting to get rid of unneeded and counterproductive people in government in his "drain the swamp".
He is digging out the Obama believers in government trying to undermine his administration.
He has the minority Democrats in Congress foaming at the mouth trying to block everything he is accomplishing!
BLIND PROGRESSIVES LIKE MISTY ARE HAVING HISSY FITS OVER THIS!!!
CONSERVATIVES APPLAUD HIS ACTIONS!!
POOR MISTY
26 Apr 2017 9:32 am
Blah, blah, blah, blah.Misty » 25 Apr 2017 7:27 pm » wrote:He's got both houses of Congress and he can't get **** done.
What a **** failure.
Voter Optimism Under Trump Tops Entire Obama Presidency
Poll finds number of Americans who say U.S. on 'right track' remains highest in years
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/vote ... residency/
26 Apr 2017 11:18 am
Talk about being blind.Sgt Bilko » 26 Apr 2017 9:32 am » wrote:WHAT HAS TRUMP DONE!!!
He erased the last 60 days of Obama EOs and asked Congress to eradicate more of them.
He has initiated requests for tax reform the will put businesses in better position to compete worldwide.
He is starting to get rid of unneeded and counterproductive people in government in his "drain the swamp".
He is digging out the Obama believers in government trying to undermine his administration.
He has the minority Democrats in Congress foaming at the mouth trying to block everything he is accomplishing!
BLIND PROGRESSIVES LIKE MISTY ARE HAVING HISSY FITS OVER THIS!!!
CONSERVATIVES APPLAUD HIS ACTIONS!!
POOR MISTY
Those are what you consider accomplishments?
He promised that on his first day in office he would repeal and replace the ACA, tear up the Iran nuclear deal, cancel federal funding to sanctuary cities, start work on the border wall, and suspend immigration from terror-prone countries.
Beyond that, he has promised to fix America’s inner cities, double America’s rate of economic growth, put millions of people to work and rebuild the country’s highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, schools and hospitals, and wipe out ISIS.
Face it DILDO, he **** his way through the campaign and now he's trying to **** his way through the presidency.
But you right wing flying monkeys are still willing to accept the few crumbs he is offering you.
26 Apr 2017 11:31 am
That's all you have to say? LOLTermin8tor » 26 Apr 2017 9:32 am » wrote:Blah, blah, blah, blah.
So you know I'm right then, huh?
Rasmussen.....the most biased poll in America.
26 Apr 2017 11:53 am
Educate yourself before parroting the opinions of others:Misty » 26 Apr 2017 11:31 am » wrote: That's all you have to say? LOL
So you know I'm right then, huh?
Rasmussen.....the most biased poll in America.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... he_numbers
Obama Approval: Comparing the Numbersin PoliticsFacebook
Email this
ShareThis
Monday, November 25, 2013
So how does America view President Obama these days? It depends on how you ask the question and whom you ask.
Rasmussen Reports in our daily Presidential Tracking Poll gives respondents four options – Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove and Strongly Disapprove - as opposed to just two - Approve/Disapprove. We are also the one major national pollster who asks this question only of likely U.S. voters, those who tell us they are likely to vote in the next election.
Other major pollsters regularly monitored by the nationally recognized Real Clear Politics website ask their presidential approval questions of registered voters only (CNN/Opinion Research, The Economist/YouGov, ABC News/Washington Post, Fox News and Quinnipiac) or of all Americans (Gallup and CBS News).
All of these polls also with the exception of The Economist/You Gov ask only approve/disapprove and don’t give the respondents the “somewhat” options. Gallup and Rasmussen are the only ones who ask every day.
What we have found over the years is that our standards – asking likely voters only and offering the somewhat approve/somewhat disapprove options – lead to fewer surprising highs and lows than other pollsters find. These dramatic changes, however, aren’t always long-lasting or a realistic measure of how Americans will vote. Still, we often see similar trends developing over time, but we believe our daily findings are a more accurate representation of where the country’s attitudes are at - and are a more accurate reflection of voting outcomes.
Because our daily numbers are less likely to produce dramatic surprises, some of those opposed to President Obama, for example, think that we are not as reliable as pollsters who show him with a higher disapproval rating. Those opposed to President Bush complained about the same thing five or six years ago.
To help our readers understand the differences, we ran parallel presidential approval surveys over the past week, and this is what we found:
-- Americans tend to be more negative overall than likely voters.
-- Not giving respondents the “somewhat” options leads to higher overall disapproval numbers, even among identical sets of likely voters.
See for yourself:
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
26 Apr 2017 12:34 pm
You know, I'm getting really tired of you telling me to educate myself and accusing me of spouting the opinions of others.Huey » 26 Apr 2017 11:53 am » wrote:Educate yourself before parroting the opinions of others.
That is MY opinion and I base it on the fact that when it comes to polling, Rasmussen always seems to be an outlier and always in favor of Republicans/Conservatives.
26 Apr 2017 12:42 pm
LMAO!Misty » 26 Apr 2017 12:34 pm » wrote: You know, I'm getting really tired of you telling me to educate myself and accusing me of spouting the opinions of others.
That is MY opinion and I base it on the fact that when it comes to polling, Rasmussen always seems to be an outlier and always in favor of Republicans/Conservatives.
Well thanks for giving me the opportunity to straighten you out on why Rasmussen is different.
Prove your ****. Go to Rassmussen and go to their methodology. I also just showed you why Rasmussen is an outlier, particularly around election time. Rasmussen only polls likely voters. Not registered, or those who are not registered voters.
You read that, right? Or did I waste my time?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
26 Apr 2017 12:52 pm
You wasted your time.Huey » 26 Apr 2017 12:42 pm » wrote:You read that, right? Or did I waste my time?
26 Apr 2017 1:00 pm
What does "biased" mean to a moonbat? Accurate.
.
Here you go, Dim.
.
.
Rasmussen calls itself most accurate pollster of 2016
BY JOE CONCHA - 11/18/16 10:01 AM EST 117
Rasmussen Reports says it was the closest of all major pollsters in predicting the presidential election’s popular vote, pointing to final results posted by RealClearPolitics.
On its final poll released Nov. 7, the day before Election Day, Rasmussen had Hillary Clinton up 2 points on Donald Trump. Clinton won the popular vote by 1 percentage point, even though Donald Trump beat her on electoral votes.
No other pollster tracked by RealClearPolitics came as close to the final results.
http://thehill.com/media/306721-rasmuss ... er-of-2016
26 Apr 2017 1:00 pm
Kinda figured I did. You sources have told you what to think and nothing like facts will change your mind.Misty » 26 Apr 2017 12:52 pm » wrote: You wasted your time.
Go jerk off your hubby clem and lover bilko.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
26 Apr 2017 1:04 pm
Never annoy a liberal with reality.Misty » 26 Apr 2017 12:34 pm » wrote: You know, I'm getting really tired of you telling me to educate myself and accusing me of spouting the opinions of others.
That is MY opinion and I base it on the fact that when it comes to polling, Rasmussen always seems to be an outlier and always in favor of Republicans/Conservatives.
26 Apr 2017 1:07 pm
Yeah. Why not?Shep Smith: It looks like the White House is trying to ‘cover up’ the ‘unprecedented’ Flynn scandal.
Fox News host Shepard Smith on Tuesday said the White House’s actions made it look like it was engaged in a “cover up.”
The leaders of the House Oversight Committee said earlier in the day that former national security adviser Mike Flynn appeared to have violated federal law by receiving payments from Russian organizations and the government of Turkey.
“The situation is unprecedented,” Smith said.
“Never in American history has a man so close to the president, on his cabinet, the national security advisor no less, been accused of committing a crime by taking money from a foreign entity, much less one connected to the Russians.”
The White House has refused to provide the House Oversight Committee with documents related to Flynn.
The congressional panel is investigating possible Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including potential collusion between the Trump campaign and foreign operatives.
“At the core of all this is the Russians interfered with our elections,” Smith said.
“General Flynn received money through an entity that was from the Russians.
And what they want to know is was there collusion?
The White House at least is giving the appearance, according to these congressional leaders, of a lack of cooperation, which could give an overall appearance that they’re trying to cover something up.
Why not quit with all the semantic juggling and stuff and get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible?”
26 Apr 2017 1:10 pm
Again with that 'my sources' crap?Huey » 26 Apr 2017 1:00 pm » wrote:Kinda figured I did. You sources have told you what to think and nothing like facts will change your mind.
They don't need me.Huey » 26 Apr 2017 1:00 pm » wrote:Go jerk off your hubby clem and lover bilko.
They can take care of each other.
Why don't you join in and make a regular circle jerk?
I'm sure larryc12 will be happy to round out the group.
You can all jerk off while you chant my name.
26 Apr 2017 1:15 pm
How many days did Flynn work for Trump? Zero?
Did Trump and officials know what Flynn did? No.
So where's the beef, psycho?
26 Apr 2017 1:16 pm
Misty » 26 Apr 2017 1:10 pm » wrote: Why don't you join in and make a regular circle jerk?
I'm sure larryc12 will be happy to round out the group.
You can all jerk off while you chant my name.
What does a leftist wackjob call good judgment and informed opinion?
A "circle jerk."
You're freaking demented.
26 Apr 2017 1:35 pm
No need. You aren't worth it. Beating you up with facts is much better. Plus, you put too much stock in your importance. Anyone can cut and paste. You do that well. But it is no big accomplishment.Misty » 26 Apr 2017 1:10 pm » wrote: Again with that 'my sources' crap?
They don't need me.
They can take care of each other.
Why don't you join in and make a regular circle jerk?
I'm sure larryc12 will be happy to round out the group.
You can all jerk off while you chant my name.
So you continue on with your ignorant bliss believing whatever your sources tell you. As far as what has you hyped up now it is basically a dead issue. Like the proverbial horse I can lead you to water (facts) but I can't make you drink (read).
Not the first time you have admitted this.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
26 Apr 2017 7:12 pm
Of course.Republicans exempt their own insurance from their latest health care proposal.
Republican legislators want to keep popular Obamacare provisions for themselves and their staff.
House Republicans appear to have included a provision that exempts members of Congress and their staff from their latest health care plan.
The new Republican amendment, introduced Tuesday night, would allow states to waive out of Obamacare’s ban on preexisting conditions.
This means that insurers could once again, under certain circumstances, charge sick people higher premiums than healthy people.
Republican legislators liked this policy well enough to offer it in a new amendment.
They do not, however, seem to like it enough to have it apply to themselves and their staff.
A spokesperson for Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), who authored this amendment, confirmed this was the case:
Members of Congress and their staff would get the guarantee of keeping these Obamacare regulations.
26 Apr 2017 7:56 pm
Misty » 26 Apr 2017 11:18 am » wrote: Talk about being blind.
Those are what you consider accomplishments?
He promised that on his first day in office he would repeal and replace the ACA, tear up the Iran nuclear deal, cancel federal funding to sanctuary cities, start work on the border wall, and suspend immigration from terror-prone countries.
Beyond that, he has promised to fix America’s inner cities, double America’s rate of economic growth, put millions of people to work and rebuild the country’s highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, schools and hospitals, and wipe out ISIS.
Face it DILDO, he **** his way through the campaign and now he's trying to **** his way through the presidency.
But you right wing flying monkeys are still willing to accept the few crumbs he is offering you.
What a progressive like you would consider good is doubling the debt, raising taxes to 50% or more, massively increasing welfare, and more insane progressive idiocy!!! You think conservative values like living within our means is just foolishness!!
THE INSANITY OF PROGRESSIVISM IS ASTOUNDING!!!
26 Apr 2017 8:42 pm
Certain people on this forum can't seem to reply to a post without calling the person whose post they are replying to stupid, or loinfo, or telling telling them that they need to to educate themself.
They lack the empathy, imagination or analytical skills to attempt even a basic understanding of the people who disagree with them.
These people think of themselves as superior moral beings and can not even entertain the thought that someone might disagree with them.Only Stupid People Call People Stupid
Calling people stupid is simply a performance for the fellow travelers in your audience.
It's a way that we can all come together and agree that we don't have to engage with some argument, because the person making it is a bovine lackwit without the basic intellectual equipment to come in out of the rain.
So the first message it sends -- "don't listen to opposing arguments" -- is a stupid message that is hardly going to make anyone smarter.
The second message it sends is even worse: "If he's stupid, then we, who disagree with him, are the opposite of stupid, and can rest steady in the assurance of our cognitive superiority."
Feeding your own arrogance is an expansive, satisfying feeling.
It is also the feeling of you getting stupider.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... ple-stupid
They lack the empathy, imagination or analytical skills to attempt even a basic understanding of the people who disagree with them.
26 Apr 2017 8:47 pm
Were you able to pull all of that garbage out of your *** in one shot, or did you have to double dip?Sgt Bilko » 26 Apr 2017 7:56 pm » wrote:What a progressive like you would consider good is doubling the debt, raising taxes to 50% or more, massively increasing welfare, and more insane progressive idiocy!!! You think conservative values like living within our means is just foolishness!!
THE INSANITY OF PROGRESSIVISM IS ASTOUNDING!!!
I've been living within my means all my life, so I guess I have conservative values.
Who is online
In total there are 4725 users online :: 12 registered, 16 bots, and 4697 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Plum Hollow, ROG62, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole
Bots: LCC, ADmantX, TTD-Content, DuckDuckBot, GPTBot, Not, MicroMessenger, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot