Liberal Forum

Misty » 01 May 2017 7:03 pm » wrote:LOL.....Much like 45 Clem thinks that if he just shouts FAKE News at a story that he doesn't like it will go away.

What part of that was FAKE News jackass?
That he wore the medal, that he has been dogged by controversy since he wore the medal, or that it is the medal of the Hungarian Nazi-linked group Vitezi Rend?

Misty » 01 May 2017 7:03 pm » wrote:LOL.....Much like 45 Clem thinks that if he just shouts FAKE News at a story that he doesn't like it will go away.

What part of that was FAKE News jackass?
That he wore the medal, that he has been dogged by controversy since he wore the medal, or that it is the medal of the Hungarian Nazi-linked group Vitezi Rend?

Gorka’s...father grew up during the Nazi siege of Budapest and later joined the anti-communist resistance.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... mpathizer/

Misty » 01 May 2017 8:10 pm » wrote: Yeah, didn't you also say that I insulted your family when I didn't even know if you had a family?
Sorry. I won't take your word for it.
Post the quote.

Misty » 01 May 2017 9:25 pm » wrote: Oh.
You mean like this?
You posted the words of another, and made no commentary that would lead anyone to believe that you think otherwise.

In fact you said 'cool' which would imply that you agreed.
That's something I didn't even do.

You posted it.
You own it.

Maybe now you can see how absurd the standard that you are trying to hold me to is.

Misty » 01 May 2017 8:12 pm » wrote: That's probably one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard on this forum.

If someone quotes a really long post you seriously expect them to go through it point by point and say exactly which parts they agree with and which parts they don't?

Do you do that?
Does anyone do that?

The only one making yourself look stupid is you, for posting stuff like you just did.

That is a ridiculous standard, that you probably wouldn't hold anyone to except me.
I will be reading your posts with much more attention from here on out and will hold you to the same absurd standard that you expect me to follow.

Misty » 01 May 2017 9:25 pm » wrote: Oh.
You mean like this?
You posted the words of another, and made no commentary that would lead anyone to believe that you think otherwise.

In fact you said 'cool' which would imply that you agreed.
That's something I didn't even do.

You posted it.
You own it.

Maybe now you can see how absurd the standard that you are trying to hold me to is.

Misty » 01 May 2017 8:10 pm » wrote: Yeah, didn't you also say that I insulted your family when I didn't even know if you had a family?
Sorry. I won't take your word for it.
Post the quote.

Misty » 12 Jul 2016 7:56 pm » wrote: Sorry. Dick sucking before the age of consent is not within my field of knowledge.
I can't believe your manufactured phony outrage over the killing of a brown person.

Maybe you should ask Huey about dick sucking before the age of consent.
Something tells me he might have some knowledge about that subject.

Misty » 01 May 2017 11:27 am » wrote: You couldn't find your *** with both hands.
Why does the tanning bed warning label have to lie about everything?
Can't click on a link?
It was written by Tobias Stone who is a British writer, entrepreneur and academic.
And he was right on the money.
45 clearly lies without any sense of shame or fear of being called out.

I'm guessing you believe everything he says.
You fall under the category of people described in the #2 reason why 45 lies.

2. Telling a lie aimed only at your core constituency.

45 doesn't care if most of us know he's lying.
He's talking to his core voters, whom he knows will not see any counter argument and may believe him.

Misty » 01 May 2017 9:25 pm » wrote: Oh.
You mean like this?
You posted the words of another, and commented angrily about it so everyone understands how you feel. .

In fact you said very nasty things. Which strongly demonstrated deep anger with him.
That's something I am too weak to do!

You posted it.
You own it.

Maybe now you can see how great a standard that you are trying to hold me to is.

Sgt Bilko » 02 May 2017 8:45 am » wrote:PS: Misty I look at what he promised to do and the fact that he has been keeping his promises from day 1!!! Something Obama ignored. Obama talked the talk but Trump walked the walk he promised. So who then is the biggest liar??

Huey » 02 May 2017 8:51 am » wrote: The problem is they are not looking at the "promises" and what has been done on their own. The wait for the MSM to tell them and then just regurgitate that.

A key new Trump hire believes in these alternative facts about abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates gained another powerful voice in the Trump administration last week when Donald Trump appointed Charmaine Yoest to serve as assistant secretary of public affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services.

There, she’ll oversee digital communications and coordinate public affairs across Health and Human Services’ regional offices.

But as the former president and CEO of Americans United for Life, an anti-abortion organization that helps states craft legislation to restrict abortion, Yoest was a leading light in the anti-abortion movement, championing extreme views — and sometimes false information.

These are five of Yoest’s more controversial positions:

1. Studies show abortion increases a woman’s risk of breast cancer.
2. Abortion should be prohibited in cases of rape.
3. IUDs have “life-ending properties.”
4. Abortion rates are down because more women are thinking like her.
5. Doctors should be legally obligated to tell patients nonsurgical abortions can be reversed.

TRUMP’S FAMILY PLANNING PICK TERESA MANNING CALLED CONTRACEPTIVES "MEDICALLY IRRESPONSIBLE"

President Donald Trump has reportedly picked an anti-abortion law professor who has called access to contraceptives "anti-family"to run a national program to fight teen pregnancy.

Trump made Teresa R. Manning deputy assistant secretary for population affairs at the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Monday.

As part of the role Manning will help manage the $286 million Title X federal family planning program.

Family planning and contraception advocates have voiced strong criticism at the decision to put Manning in a role that could steer the course of American health policy.

Without Title X, rates of teen pregnancy would have been 30 percent higher across the U.S. in 2014, according to a 2016 study by the Guttmacher Institute, a nonpartisan health policy think tank.

Rates of unintended pregnancy, unplanned birth, and abortion would have been 33 percent higher without publicly funded family planning from Title X centers, the study found.

Created in 1970 by President Richard Nixon, the program helps low-income or uninsured Americans access family planning counseling, contraceptives, and tests and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases.

But Manning has opposed the use of contraceptives for years.

In 2001, she told The Wall Street Journal that giving people easier access to the morning after pill is "medically irresponsible" and "anti-family," while working as a policy and legal analyst for right-to-life issues at the conservative Family Research Council lobbying group in Washington, D.C. Teens (she wrote, under her married name of Wagner) would be able to obtain pills without their parents' knowledge and that access was “promoting promiscuity.”

Sgt Bilko » 02 May 2017 8:55 am » wrote:
You mean the MSM Fake News distributers!!

Misty » 02 May 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:In an interview with NPR in 2003 Manning said “contraception doesn’t work” and that women taking the pill will eventually get pregnant.

Of course that's not true.
When taken correctly the pill is up to 99.9% effective.

Sgt Bilko » 02 May 2017 8:45 am » wrote:PS: Misty I look at what he promised to do and the fact that he has been keeping his promises from day 1!!! Something Obama ignored. Obama talked the talk but Trump walked the walk he promised. So who then is the biggest liar??

Termin8tor » 02 May 2017 1:00 pm » wrote:Her point is that mistakes are often made with contraceptives, Dim.

Misty » 02 May 2017 1:17 pm » wrote:I don't need the 'MSM FAKE News' to tell me that he has not kept many of his promises.
It's fairly obvious.
I watched every one of his televised rallies.
So I know which promises he made, and I know which promises have so far been kept or not.

So far he has signed a bunch of EO's, most of them just meaningless memos commissioning a bunch of reviews.
He has not been able to get one piece of major legislation through Congress.

He's gone back on his word about Mexico paying for his wall, tax cuts that would mostly benefit the middle class, tearing up the Iran nuclear deal, quickly wiping the hell out of ISIS, withdrawing from NAFTA and NATO being obsolete, just to name a few.

you'll lie and downplay them.

Obama's accomplishments after the first 100 days included signing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 relaxing the statute of limitations for equal-pay lawsuits;[7] signing into law the expanded State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), which the White House said provided benefits to 4 million additional working families; winning approval of a congressional budget resolution that put Congress on record as dedicated to dealing with major health care reform legislation in 2009; implementing new ethics guidelines designed to significantly curtail the influence of lobbyists on the executive branch; breaking from the Bush administration on a number of policy fronts, except for Iraq, in which he followed through on Bush's Iraq withdrawal of U.S. troops;[8] supporting the UN declaration on sexual orientation and gender identity; and lifting the 7½-year ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.[9] He also ordered the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, in Cuba, though it remains open, as well as lifted some travel and money restrictions to the island.[8]

And what happened to his HUGE infrastructure plan?
He doesn't even talk about that any more.

The new budget deal has no money for the wall, no provision to remove funding for sanctuary cities, and it leaves the EPA's budget that 45 wanted to cut intact.
It boosts the National Institutes of Health budget, which he also wanted to cut, and does NOT cut funding for Planned Parenthood, which he promised to do.

So far he has caved on more of his promises than he has kept.
Why BTW is perfectly fine with me.
I hope he continues to do that.

Misty » 02 May 2017 1:27 pm » wrote: The only 'point' is the one on the top of your head, Dum.

She said nothing about 'mistakes.'
She flat out says that 'contraception does not work' and that it's 'efficacy is very low.'

That's just not true.

Her view is that family planning is what occurs between a husband and a wife and God, and it doesn’t really involve the federal government.
So why would she take a job in the federal government to oversee a federal family planning program for low-income Americans?

Huey » 02 May 2017 8:51 am » wrote: The problem is they are not looking at the "promises" and what has been done on their own. The wait for the MSM to tell them and then just regurgitate that.