Liberal Forum

Misty » 02 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote: Oh, excuse me.
It is me that you were talking to wasn't it?
Who should I think it's about then?

I may be the meaningless troll, but you are the person who seems to spend hours a day in this meaningless troll's threads, so what does that make you?

Oh! Oh! Oh!

I know! I know!

You're the skunk at the garden party.
And you sure do a good job at stinking up my threads.

This is what they call hook, line and sinker!

You stink up your own threads very well. No one does that as well you do!!!

Misty » 02 May 2017 9:35 pm » wrote: I'd be shocked if you weren't struck by lightning after saying that.
Have you ever read your own posts?



I just had too.

Of course you had too. Your attempts at legimate posts generally go down in flames.

Huey » 02 May 2017 8:43 pm » wrote: Remember I told you I would post to you in the exact manner you post to me?

Have you seen me calling you a 'twit' a 'meaningless troll' or a 'deceptive poster?'
Do I constantly insult your intelligence by calling you 'ignorant' and say that you need to 'educate yourself?'

You are NOT posting to me in the 'exact manner' that I am posting to you.

You are posting to me in the manner that you post to most people you disagree with, which is condescending and childish.

Huey » 02 May 2017 9:36 pm » wrote:This is what they call hook, line and sinker!
You stink up your own threads very well. No one does that as well you do!!!

Well, you must enjoy the stink, because you have been squatting in here for years.

Misty » 02 May 2017 9:49 pm » wrote: Have you seen me calling you a 'twit' a 'meaningless troll' or a 'deceptive poster?'
Do I constantly insult your intelligence by calling you 'ignorant' and say that you need to 'educate yourself?'

You are NOT posting to me in the 'exact manner' that I am posting to you.

You are posting to me in the manner that you post to most people you disagree with, which is condescending and childish.

You admitted to trolling, have claimed I am deceptive, so please, you really shouldn't be a whiny bitch (Your words) about this!



Trust me, is another progs was here tonight posting intelligent discussion I wouldn't be here where you stank it up!

Misty » 02 May 2017 9:52 pm » wrote: Well, you must enjoy the stink, because you have been squatting in here for years.

I have been known to lower my standards. When in here. Am with friends in low places.

Termin8tor » 01 May 2017 12:05 pm » wrote:
Oh my, more "Nazis" in the Trump administration.
What, is the Race Card worn out, psycho?

Is there any ugly smear you won't be involved in?

Some of his closest friends are said to be cannibals.

I'm not saying it's true - but the gravity of the charges demands an investigation.

Misty » 01 May 2017 7:03 pm » wrote: LOL.....Much like 45 Clem thinks that if he just shouts FAKE News at a story that he doesn't like it will go away.

What part of that was FAKE News jackass?
That he wore the medal, that he has been dogged by controversy since he wore the medal, or that it is the medal of the Hungarian Nazi-linked group Vitezi Rend?

It would have been a tad difficult to be active in an anti-communist organization in southeastern europe in the 30s and NOT find political amity with the nazis. Can you imagine trying to fight both, at the same time?

Misty » 01 May 2017 8:12 pm » wrote: That's probably one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard on this forum.

If someone quotes a really long post you seriously expect them to go through it point by point and say exactly which parts they agree with and which parts they don't?

Do you do that?
Does anyone do that?

I do that.

Do an advanced search for the term, "tldr," and you'll find it in response to several of my posts doing that.

Termin8tor » 01 May 2017 10:35 pm » wrote: Vitezi Rend was started after WWII, moonbat.

No, son. That's false - AND a statement against your own interests.

If it were started AFTER WWII, any nazi sympathies would be harder to overlook.

The argument that there was anything wrong with nazi allegiances prior to the perpetration of the holocaust fraud against the German nation is much harder to make. MANY people in the west were very happy to have a force like the nazis as a bulwark against Stalin - and if a weaker nation like Hungary had any chance to stay out of stalin's bed, they were probably going to have to share a pillow with the Reich.

Misty » 02 May 2017 6:53 pm » wrote: What else would you expect to see on FOX News?
Criticism of 45?

Oh gosh, one cable news network is moderately supportive of Trump?

What else would you expect to see on all the network and cable news and almost every newspaper in the country; criticism of Obama?

Is that subtle enough for you?

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2017 10:37 pm » wrote:No, son. That's false - AND a statement against your own interests.

If it were started AFTER WWII, any nazi sympathies would be harder to overlook.

The argument that there was anything wrong with nazi allegiances prior to the perpetration of the holocaust fraud against the German nation is much harder to make. MANY people in the west were very happy to have a force like the nazis as a bulwark against Stalin - and if a weaker nation like Hungary had any chance to stay out of stalin's bed, they were probably going to have to share a pillow with the Reich.

Typo; after WWI.

Misty » 02 May 2017 8:57 pm » wrote: I have criticized Dems over the years.
But I guess that doesn't count, because they weren't the ones that you wanted me to criticize.

You never criticized the felons or the rapists, at least not the head felon/ rapist.

No, you told years of lies in his defense.

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2017 10:20 pm » wrote: Some of his closest friends are said to be cannibals.

Do they have good taste?

Termin8tor » 02 May 2017 10:54 pm » wrote:
Do they have good taste?

They're not after people with good taste, Charlie.

They're after people that taste good!

Termin8tor » 02 May 2017 10:50 pm » wrote:
Typo; after WWI.

Ah. Then you're on the money.

Judging people for "collaborating with" the German state during those years is tantamount to damning them for not swapping spit with Stalin. Much like the cold war era, the fate of "unaligned" nations was a coin toss. Nations in that region had to choose a side, and given that Germans weren't STARVING TO DEATH, siding with Stalin would have been kind of STUPID.

You might be surprised to learn that the SS (an ALL volunteer, multinational unit) had quite a few black officers, by the way - and Hitler never disrespected that black fellow at the olympics, as certain historians lie.

Huey » 02 May 2017 9:57 pm » wrote: Trust me, is another progs was here tonight posting intelligent discussion I wouldn't be here where you stank it up!

So what's your excuse for all the time you spend in this thread and my other thread every day?

Good grammar there BTW.

Huey » 02 May 2017 9:59 pm » wrote: I have been known to lower my standards. When in here. Am with friends in low places.

WTF?
Dancing on the grapes tonight, are we?

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2017 10:28 pm » wrote:It would have been a tad difficult to be active in an anti-communist organization in southeastern europe in the 30s and NOT find political amity with the nazis. Can you imagine trying to fight both, at the same time?

Okay, but what does that have to do with Gorka wearing the medal in 2017?

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2017 10:31 pm » wrote:I do that.
Do an advanced search for the term, "tldr," and you'll find it in response to several of my posts doing that.

The advanced search feature works like **** for me here.
Always has.
I can see the first page of results and when I try to go to the next page I get this:

Termin8tor » 02 May 2017 10:52 pm » wrote: You never criticized the felons or the rapists, at least not the head felon/ rapist.
No, you told years of lies in his defense.

Not true.
I have criticized him for his inappropriate behavior with Monica Lewinsky, for some of his policies and for the bone headed move to board Loretta Lynch's plane that day on the tarmac in Arizona among other things.

Your beef is that I won't say that I am 100% sure that he raped Juanita Broaddrick.
The only two people who know for sure if that happened are the two people who were present in that room.
And you, I'm assuming were not one of them.

Anyway, you have no room to criticize me.
Not only do you defend every criminal, racist and pervert with an R after their name, but you praise them as people of 'high integrity.'