Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 May 2017 12:51 pm
Are you practicing your Sally Yates talking points, Pumpkin?Termin8tor » 05 May 2017 6:15 pm » wrote:Blah, blah, blah......
Even though she has a long history as a respected career prosecutor who has been praised by Republican lawmakers, you're supposed to smear her by painting her as a "Democratic operative who was out to get Trump."
The Terror Of Twitter is already doing his part by implying (not so subtly) that she leaked classified info.
Can you imagine if Obama had constantly tried to interfere in a ongoing investigation by Tweeting that it was a 'hoax' or 'fake news' or by trying to discredit a witness who was about to testify before Congress?
You would have been all over that ****.
8 May 2017 1:26 pm
Other than the many, many, many times he lied through his teeth to American voters.Misty » 08 May 2017 1:57 am » wrote:Congratulations to President Obama for receiving the JFK Profile In Courage award.
He is a decent human being who has always conducted himself with grace and dignity.
Is gross dishonesty what you call "grace and dignity?"
8 May 2017 1:30 pm
She is a partisan hack, who violated her oath of office in refusing to carry out Trump's legal immigration orders.Misty » 08 May 2017 12:51 pm » wrote: Are you practicing your Sally Yates talking points, Pumpkin?
Even though she has a long history as a respected career prosecutor who has been praised by Republican lawmakers, you're supposed to smear her by painting her as a "Democratic operative who was out to get Trump."
Given his position, he's very likely right, just like Peter Hoekstra said he was basically correct that Obama officials had wiretapped him.The Terror Of Twitter is already doing his part by implying (not so subtly) that she leaked classified info.
Obama did exactly that about Hillary's crimes and about the huge IRS scandal, which are far, far, far more important.Can you imagine if Obama had constantly tried to interfere in a ongoing investigation by Tweeting that it was a 'hoax' or 'fake news' or by trying to discredit a witness who was about to testify before Congress?
You would have been all over that ****.
Yates doesn't have much to say.
Never heard a peep out of you.
8 May 2017 1:33 pm
8 May 2017 1:41 pm
Atta-boy. Good job.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:30 pm » wrote:She is a partisan hack, who violated her oath of office in refusing to carry out Trump's legal immigration orders.
You mean his 'legal' orders that have been blocked by the courts?
So why don't you post those Tweets jackass?Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:30 pm » wrote:Obama did exactly that about Hillary's crimes and about the huge IRS scandal, which are far, far, far more important.
Oh wait, you can't because they don't exist.
LIAR.
8 May 2017 1:41 pm
Better that he lie through his teeth to Americans, like Clinton and Obama did.
Never saw you complain about that.
8 May 2017 1:43 pm
You're more delusional than ever.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:41 pm » wrote:Better that he lie through his teeth to Americans, like Clinton and Obama did.
Never saw you complain about that.
He DOES lie through his teeth every **** day.
Never saw you complain about that.
8 May 2017 1:44 pm
The ones so outrageously illegal and unConstitutional that one Fox legal expert predicted they'd be overturned maybe 9-0.Misty » 08 May 2017 1:41 pm » wrote: Atta-boy. Good job.
You mean his 'legal' orders that have been blocked by the courts?
Anyone who knows the law and the Constitution should be appalled by the decisions of leftist Obama-appointed hacks.
Obama said so in public carried on television, Dim. I never meant he tweeter them.So why don't you post those Tweets jackass?
Oh wait, you can't because they don't exist.
LIAR.
Are you so dishonest and desperate you're claiming I'm lying because Obama didn't tweet?
What an utter hack you are.
8 May 2017 1:47 pm
Hey liar, as I have said, I didn't support him during the primary because I was uncomfortable with his character and rhetoric, and I have admitted many times he sometimes lies, so obviously I have complained and criticized him.Misty » 08 May 2017 1:43 pm » wrote: You're more delusional than ever.
He DOES lie through his teeth every **** day.
Never saw you complain about that.
But unlike Clinton and Obama, he's working hard to keep almost every one of his campaign promises.
Almost all of Clinton's and Obama's campaign promises were blatant lies.
Only a hopeless hack like you would castigate Trump while supporting them.
8 May 2017 1:50 pm
No, the truth is, psychopaths like you are lying, taking the smallest dispute and claiming it's a Trump "lie."Misty » 08 May 2017 1:43 pm » wrote: You're more delusional than ever.
He DOES lie through his teeth every **** day.
Never saw you complain about that.
Dishonestly smearing anyone like Peter Hoekstra who support his claims.
Rotsa ruck winning Michigan, Wisconsin, Pa, etc. this way, psycho.
8 May 2017 1:54 pm
I don't do "talking points," liar.Misty » 08 May 2017 12:51 pm » wrote:Are you practicing your Sally Yates talking points, Pumpkin?
Even though she has a long history as a respected career prosecutor who has been praised by Republican lawmakers, you're supposed to smear her by painting her as a "Democratic operative who was out to get Trump."
Yates violated her ethical and legal responsibility. That makes her a political hack.
You’re Fired! Sally Yates Embodies the Left’s Loathsome Arrogance
By Jeremy Carl — January 31, 2017
The left’s smug arrogance is always their undoing. For our latest exhibit, meet former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who, in what should have been her resignation letter in response to her refusal to carry out President Trump’s executive order on immgration, wrote “I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution’s solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right.”
This is exactly the sort of lawless moral preening and grandstanding from the left that is so dangerous. Americans of all political stripes should condemn it. Nobody appointed this woman philosopher-Queen of the country. Nobody appointed her the judge of right and wrong. Would Sally Yates want a conservative in her place ignoring the ruling of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel that an executive order was legal in order to “Take a stand for what is right” from his conservative perspective? Of course not.
Name aside, the DOJs job isn’t about seeking some left-wing (or right-wing) politico’s view of justice. It’s about making sure that the duly-passed laws of the United States are enforced. If Yates felt that what she were doing were fundamentally violative of the Constitution, then she should have explained why and resigned. Otherwise, her personal views are irrelevant. — she’s a functionary with a job to do. If she refuses to do the job, she should have the dignity to quit.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/44 ... arroagance
8 May 2017 2:00 pm
Which FOX 'legal expert' might that be?Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:44 pm » wrote:The ones so outrageously illegal and unConstitutional that one Fox legal expert predicted they'd be overturned maybe 9-0.
The one they fired for lying about British intelligence wiretapping Trump Tower at the behest of Obama?
Is that why you didn't use his name?
Clem, self appointed expert on everything including economics, the law, the Constitution, religion and even women's shoe designs.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:44 pm » wrote:Anyone who knows the law and the Constitution should be appalled by the decisions of leftist Obama-appointed hacks.
I was specifically talking about 45's Tweets and you said Obama did the same thing.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:44 pm » wrote:Obama said so in public carried on television, Dim. I never meant he tweeter them.
Are you so dishonest and desperate you're claiming I'm lying because Obama didn't tweet?
What an utter hack you are.
But since you moved the goalpost, cite me a source where Obama went on TV and said that the investigations into Benghazi or the IRS were a 'hoax' or were 'fake news.'
I won't hold my breath for that source, because we both know that you will never prove what you said.
You pull **** out of your *** and throw it up on the forum, hoping some of it will stick.
8 May 2017 2:43 pm
It wasn't Napolitano, who wasn't fired, who didn't claim it was at the behest of Obama, but who was correct in his claim.Misty » 08 May 2017 2:00 pm » wrote: Which FOX 'legal expert' might that be?
The one they fired for lying about British intelligence wiretapping Trump Tower at the behest of Obama?
Is that why you didn't use his name?
Any other lies you'd like to tell, hack?
Every source I've read opines that this appalling legal decision will be overturned.
Unlike you, I actually have some knowledge about subjects.Clem, self appointed expert on everything including economics, the law, the Constitution, religion and even women's shoe designs.
You lie and smear, and copy and paste propaganda.
As usual, you're being intellectually dishonest.I was specifically talking about 45's Tweets and you said Obama did the same thing.
I never claimed he used those words, liar, but he never corrected Susan Rice and HRC lies that Benghazi was caused by a video.But since you moved the goalpost, cite me a source where Obama went on TV and said that the investigations into Benghazi or the IRS were a 'hoax' or were 'fake news.'
I won't hold my breath for that source, because we both know that you will never prove what you said.
You pull **** out of your *** and throw it up on the forum, hoping some of it will stick.
He himself personally lied about the IRS scandal, as he's lied about almost every major issue before the country.
And those weren't small mistakes or lies like the size of the crowd at Trump's inauguration, but huge lies about huge issues.
And you never complained, hack.
8 May 2017 2:49 pm
Cite one single time I've cited a dishonest Talking Point, liar.Misty » 08 May 2017 12:51 pm » wrote: Are you practicing your Sally Yates talking points, Pumpkin?
Say, how's that huge Russia-Trump-Conspiracy-thing-ey going?
.
.
8 May 2017 2:54 pm
Here's your "respected career prosecutor," liar.Misty » 08 May 2017 12:51 pm » wrote: Are you practicing your Sally Yates talking points, Pumpkin?
Even though she has a long history as a respected career prosecutor who has been praised by Republican lawmakers, you're supposed to smear her by painting her as a "Democratic operative who was out to get Trump."
Funny how often the truth is the exact opposite of what you claim.
Yates was mentioned in a Podesta-Hillary email released by WikiLeaks before the election as one of four known loyalists of candidate Hillary Clinton.
.
https://twitter.com/RepublicanChick/sta ... -russia%2F
8 May 2017 3:06 pm
She's 'a partisan hack' that the United States Senate voted 84–12 to confirm as Deputy Attorney General in 2015, and 'a partisan hack' that 45 asked to stay on as his acting AG.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 1:30 pm » wrote:She is a partisan hack, who violated her oath of office in refusing to carry out Trump's legal immigration orders.
So your efforts to paint her as 'a partisan hack' fall flat.
Curious that she was fired right in the middle of her dealings with White House counsel Doug McGhan about Michael Flynn.
8 May 2017 3:12 pm
Good sources Puss.Termin8tor » 08 May 2017 2:54 pm » wrote:Here's your "respected career prosecutor," liar.
Somebody on Twitter called 'Republican Chick' and Wikileaks.
The White House will attack Sally Yates as a partisan hack. Here's why that won't work.
8 May 2017 3:21 pm
How did Yates get the information on Flynn that she used to alert the Whitehouse?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
8 May 2017 3:23 pm
8 May 2017 3:31 pm
The source doesn't matter, because it's an image of an actual email, psycho.Misty » 08 May 2017 3:12 pm » wrote: Good sources Puss.
Somebody on Twitter called 'Republican Chick' and Wikileaks.
And everything that has come out of Wiki has been accurate; not one single thing has been denied by Democrats.
So as usual, you're full of crap.
.
.
Who is online
In total there are 4379 users online :: 15 registered, 19 bots, and 4345 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: TTD-Content, SiteLockSpider, Pinterest, LCC, MicroMessenger, Baiduspider, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, Bolt, CriteoBot, Adsbot, YandexBot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot