Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 589 590 591 592 593 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
10 May 2017 4:26 pm
10 May 2017 4:26 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 2:59 pm » wrote: You should be thrilled Puss.
The investigation is all over now.
45 saw to that.
Bulls***. The FBI investigation is still ongoing.
Don't you trust the FBI to do its job, you hack?
We're supposed to believe that he fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
WTF are you babbling about? :blink:

He acted in a highly unethical manner in several circumstances, just as Rosenstein's letter said. One of them was going public about the investigation of HRC in the middle of the campaign.

The other, even worse, was bypassing Loretta Lynch and declaring there would be no prosecution. That's not his job.

And other sources in the FBI claimed he interfered in many highly important investigations including into the IRS.

Hopefully that all will be re-visited. :)
Along with that investigation goes the investigation into Russia interfering in our election.
Republicans like you have proven that they don't give a **** about this country.
That's really hilarious coming from a lying leftist whose sude slept through the Cold War, psycho.
Keep laughing like the jackass that you are.
You'll change your tune when the Russians start **** with your guys, and they will.
I'll have the last laugh then.
When have I ever said we shouldn't investigate this and that there shouldn't be appropriate repercussion, liar? Quote me.

If you can't, then go f*** yourself.

But you've been smearing Trump falsely claiming collusion and corruption for many months now.

There is still zero evidence of any of that.
User avatar
Termin8tor
10 May 2017 4:28 pm
10 May 2017 4:28 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 2:53 pm » wrote: There is no pile of dirty socks in my laundry room.
I don't throw dirty clothes on the floor.
Maybe you live like a pig, but I don't.
Look at the Democrat Talking Point Liar pretend she didn't understand what I meant.

After months of lying and smearing and accusing you still have zero evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump or his officials.
User avatar
Termin8tor
10 May 2017 4:29 pm
10 May 2017 4:29 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 2:59 pm » wrote: You should be thrilled Puss.
The investigation is all over now.
45 saw to that.
That's the new Democrat Talking Point Lie.

Just a coincidence that you picked right up on it, right? :\
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 4:30 pm
10 May 2017 4:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 10 May 2017 7:41 am » wrote:Yes, bringing up Nixon is the latest Democrat Talking Point Lie.
Just a coincidence that you picked up on it at the same time, right? :\
I don't need anyone to feed me any talking points about Richard Nixon you jackass.
I was very much alive when that whole Watergate thing and the firing of Archibald Cox went down.
After the AG and the deputy AG refused to fire Cox and both resigned, Nixon got the Solicitor General to fire him.

That just happened to be Robert Bork.
I guess Rosenstein is the new Bork.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Just because you disseminate talking points, doesn't mean everyone else does.
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 4:33 pm
10 May 2017 4:33 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 10 May 2017 4:09 pm » wrote: ROTFLMMFAO!
Just jerking your chain. (Your words) It is all humor, right? Don't get so angry!!!!!!
It takes a lot effort for me to get angry.
And I don't put that much effort into this place.
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 4:39 pm
10 May 2017 4:39 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 10 May 2017 4:28 pm » wrote:Look at the Democrat Talking Point Liar pretend she didn't understand what I meant.
Oh, I'm sorry Pumpkin.
Was the 'pile of dirty socks' supposed to be a metaphor for something else?
I'm afraid I didn't get it.
After all, I'm not a deep thinker like you.
User avatar
Huey
10 May 2017 4:50 pm
10 May 2017 4:50 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 4:33 pm » wrote: It takes a lot effort for me to get angry.
And I don't put that much effort into this place.
And of course you are full of ****. The only reasons people post in the vile manner you do is they are mad, they are are trying to piss people off, or they have mental health issues.

Regardless, butch, when you return into your vile self on real threads, when mad or instigating when posting with me you **** will be flushed and responded to in this thread.

You are a dishonest turd and you gate the fact I kick your *** often. So too hide it you instigate. You are an ugly person ONLINE and deserve whatever POSTING abuse you get from others.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 4:52 pm
10 May 2017 4:52 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 10 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:Speaking of obsessions, how's that Trump-Russia-collaboration-conspiracy-thing-ey going, psycho?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Ask the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Richard Burr.
March 29, 2017: Contradicting what the White House press secretary said on Tuesday, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said he couldn't rule out collusion between President Donald Trump's associates and Russians seeking to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

Sen. Richard Burr on Wednesday said it was too early in the committee's investigation to know whether the two parties colluded.

"It would be crazy to try to draw conclusions from where we are in the investigation," he said during a press conference with Sen. Mark Warner, the committee's ranking member.

"I think Mark and I have committed to let this process go through before we form any opinions."

http://www.businessinsider.com/senate-i ... ion-2017-3
Burr repeated that to Jim Sciutto of CNN today.
Termin8tor » 10 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:I heard that the evidence proving it was buried in the Marianna Trench by Trump's military. :clap: :clap:
It's not 'Trump's military' you vacuous dolt.
It's our (United States) military.
User avatar
Huey
10 May 2017 4:57 pm
10 May 2017 4:57 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 4:52 pm » wrote: Ask the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Richard Burr.
Burr repeated that to Jim Sciutto of CNN today.
It's not 'Trump's military' you vacuous dolt.
It's our (United States) military.

**** off with the "our military" crap. **** lefties USE the military for political purposes. I have seen it for 35 years. When it is politically expedient they love service members. When it is politically expedient they toss them aside. I don't give a **** if you were or are married to a squid. I have 35 years either serving in or supporting the military.

Cut the ****.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 5:05 pm
10 May 2017 5:05 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 10 May 2017 4:50 pm » wrote:And of course you are full of ****. The only reasons people post in the vile manner you do is they are mad, they are are trying to piss people off, or they have mental health issues.
So which one of those applies to you?
Huey » 10 May 2017 4:50 pm » wrote: Regardless, butch, when you return into your vile self on real threads, when mad or instigating when posting with me you **** will be flushed and responded to in this thread.
Fine if you want to waste your time, but it will go straight to the peanut gallery.
Huey » 10 May 2017 4:50 pm » wrote: You are a dishonest turd and you gate the fact I kick your *** often. So too hide it you instigate. You are an ugly person ONLINE and deserve whatever POSTING abuse you get from others.
Okay, so first you say it's all in humor and then you post that ****.
You have more personalities than Sybill.
:loco:
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 5:17 pm
10 May 2017 5:17 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 10 May 2017 4:57 pm » wrote:**** off with the "our military" crap. **** lefties USE the military for political purposes. I have seen it for 35 years. When it is politically expedient they love service members. When it is politically expedient they toss them aside. I don't give a **** if you were or are married to a squid. I have 35 years either serving in or supporting the military.
Cut the ****.
So I guess you agree with your BFF Clem that it's 'Trump's military.'
Go ahead and hitch your wagon to that star.

Whenever you think that your views are being mischaracterized, by lumping you in with the right, you pitch a childish hissy fit, and yet that is exactly what you just did to me.

You have no idea what my feelings about the military are or how many of my family members either have served or are now serving.

You also have no idea which veterans groups I regularly support.

You just lost the right to complain about your views being mischaracterized ever again.
From now on you get the broad brush treatment.
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 10:50 pm
10 May 2017 10:50 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 10 May 2017 7:15 am » wrote:Where did Sally Yates get her information about Flynn?
I don't even understand why you are asking that question, and what you are suggesting.
Do you believe that she did not have access to classified info?

This is what she said at the hearing about what she told Don McGahn, the WH counsel:

"I told them again that there were a number of press accounts of statements that had been made by the vice president and other high-ranking White House officials about Gen. Flynn's conduct that we knew to be untrue.
And we told them how we knew that this – how we had this information, how we had acquired it and how we knew that it was untrue."

The day before that meeting in the WH she was briefed by the FBI, who had interviewed Mike Flynn the day before that.

Sally Yates Provided a Helpful Timeline of the Mike Flynn Saga

This is from the transcript of her hearing:
WHITEHOUSE: Following the Comey line, the director testified a few days ago in the full committee that the FBI had interviewed Mr. Flynn a day before, or two days before, your meeting at the White House, and you've just testified that you had told the White House counsel that the FBI had interviewed Flynn and he'd asked -- McGahn had asked, how'd he do?

YATES: Right.

WHITEHOUSE: Did you have the 302 with you when you were in the White House? Did you show it to White House counsel? And had you seen it at the time you went up to the White House?

YATES: No. The FBI had conducted the interview on the 24th. We got a readout from the FBI on the 25th, a detailed readout specifically from the agents that had conducted the interview.

But we didn't want to wait for the 302, because we felt that it was important to get this information to the White House as quickly as possible, so we had folks from the national security division who spent a lot of time with the agents, not only finding out exactly how the interview went but how this impacted their investigation.

WHITEHOUSE: So did you take that summary with you? Do you have any document with you that described the FBI interview of General Flynn?

YATES: At the time that I was there, I had notes that described that interview, as well as the individual that was with me -- the senior career official from the national security division -- had been part of all of those discussions with the FBI.

Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference
http://wapo.st/2po7EVI
So it seems that she probably learned it from the FBI, because the day after they briefed her she went to the WH.
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 11:18 pm
10 May 2017 11:18 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Comey’s Firing Came as Investigators Stepped Up Russia Probe

WASHINGTON—In the weeks before President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, a federal investigation into potential collusion between Trump associates and the Russian government was heating up, as Mr. Comey became increasingly occupied with the probe.

Mr. Comey started receiving daily instead of weekly updates on the investigation, beginning at least three weeks ago, according to people with knowledge of the matter and the progress of the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe.

Mr. Comey was concerned by information showing possible evidence of collusion, according to these people.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/james-come ... 1494433061
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 11:30 pm
10 May 2017 11:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
IT'S SUBPOENA TIME!

Grand Jury Subpoenas Have Been Issued For Associates Of Michael Flynn


http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/09/break ... ael-flynn/

Senate Intel Committee Subpoenas Michael Flynn

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/10/senat ... ael-flynn/
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 11:32 pm
10 May 2017 11:32 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Image

Sorry Bilko.
The door is locked.
You can thank Huey's spamming for that.
User avatar
Nobody
10 May 2017 11:44 pm
10 May 2017 11:44 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
So the day after 45 fired the head of the FBI who was investigating Russian interference in our election, the Russian Foreign minister and the Russian Ambassador visited the WH to yuck it up with their president.

Image

When the Russian foreign minister jokes about former FBI director Comey's firing.
User avatar
Nobody
11 May 2017 12:38 pm
11 May 2017 12:38 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
The irony of 45 calling James Comey a 'showboat' and a 'grand-stander' is off the chain.

So 45 tells Lester Holt that it was his decision to fire Comey.

This after he sent his Press Secretary, his Deputy Press Secretary, Kellyanne Conway and the Vice President out to say that Comey was fired due to Deputy AG Rosenstein's recommendation.

45 also admitted to Lester Holt that he personally asked Comey if he was under investigation.

I will now unlock this thread so Clem can tell me that there was nothing improper about that.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 May 2017 1:06 pm
11 May 2017 1:06 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 May 2017 12:38 pm » wrote:So 45 tells Lester Holt that it was his decision to fire Comey.

This after he sent his Press Secretary, his Deputy Press Secretary, Kellyanne Conway and the Vice President out to say that Comey was fired due to Deputy AG Rosenstein's recommendation.

45 also admitted to Lester Holt that he personally asked Comey if he was under investigation.

I will now unlock this thread so Clem can tell me that there was nothing improper about that.
For how many decades have you stonewalled every question I have asked you? :\

I cited National Review saying clearly that Trump is not under investigation. There is a counter-intelligence investigation.

If and when someone comes up with a single shred of evidence against Trump, he will be investigated.

Have you come up with any evidence yet, psycho?
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 May 2017 1:08 pm
11 May 2017 1:08 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 10 May 2017 11:44 pm » wrote:So the day after 45 fired the head of the FBI who was investigating Russian interference in our election, the Russian Foreign minister and the Russian Ambassador visited the WH to yuck it up with their president..
So? It would be nice to make progress with them.

The Russians must be laughing heartily that leftists like you are undermining faith in US democracy with your endless lies and smears. :\
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 May 2017 1:10 pm
11 May 2017 1:10 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 08 May 2017 3:23 pm » wrote:Clem, the White House lap dog doing his job.
More information about your supposed professional non-partisan Sally Yates.
Sally Yates, an Obama appointee, is a perfect representative of the corrupt swamp that the Department of Justice became under Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch. Yates viciously politicized the department, going after political opponents and other targets of convenience with reckless abandon. She was fired for insubordination because, as an Obama holdover, she defied a direct order from her superior. By doing so, she demanded to be fired.


That wasn’t heroism, it was politically-inspired grandstanding. The idea that firing Sally Yates somehow shows that the president “chafes” at “constitutionally mandated constraints on the presidency” is either ignorant or malevolent. Most likely both.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... -comey.php
Ignorant and malevolent applies to you, Dim.
1 589 590 591 592 593 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 6415 users online :: 15 registered, 15 bots, and 6385 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Pinterest, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Googlebot, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search