Liberal Forum

Misty » 11 May 2017 12:38 pm » wrote:The irony of 45 calling James Comey a 'showboat' and a 'grand-stander' is off the chain.

So 45 tells Lester Holt that it was his decision to fire Comey.

This after he sent his Press Secretary, his Deputy Press Secretary, Kellyanne Conway and the Vice President out to say that Comey was fired due to Deputy AG Rosenstein's recommendation.

45 also admitted to Lester Holt that he personally asked Comey if he was under investigation.

I will now unlock this thread so Clem can tell me that there was nothing improper about that.

Can the rest of us get the ability to lock threads or is that a moderator privilege to be abused?

Misty » 10 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote:I don't need anyone to feed me any talking points about Richard Nixon you jackass.
I was very much alive when that whole Watergate thing and the firing of Archibald Cox went down.
After the AG and the deputy AG refused to fire Cox and both resigned, Nixon got the Solicitor General to fire him.

That just happened to be Robert Bork.
I guess Rosenstein is the new Bork.

Look at the Democrat Talking Point Liar smear a non-partisan career employee on the basis of nothing. What a complete low life you are.

But you're claiming there's a cover up of something for which there is zero evidence!

That's believable.

Huey » 11 May 2017 1:11 pm » wrote:Can the rest of us get the ability to lock threads or is that a moderator privilege to be abused?

I am not in charge of which posters get mod abilities, but if I were I certainly would not give those abilities to a hothead like you.

Again, if you think that I have abused my mod powers feel free to report that to the administrators of this forum.

Misty » 10 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote:Just because you disseminate talking points, doesn't mean everyone else does.

I have never spread talking points and never will, liar.

So what's next, are you going to smear Napolitano again, like you smear any and all sources that refute your lies and stonewalling?

The number of unmaskings went up by 400% the year before the election.

Either there was a huge increase in the number of Americans involved in suspicious national security matters or the Obama administration was surveilling opponents.

Misty » 11 May 2017 12:38 pm » wrote:I will now unlock this thread so Clem can tell me that there was nothing improper about that.

For how many years have you stonewalled every single one of my questions?

Why did Comey usurp the legal role of the Loretta Lynch and the Justice Dept when he declared that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted?

Why did he lie that "no reasonable prosecutor" would prosecute?

Termin8tor » 11 May 2017 1:24 pm » wrote:Look at the Democrat Talking Point Liar smear a non-partisan career employee on the basis of nothing. What a complete low life you are.

So you think I'm smearing Rosenstein by comparing him to Robert Bork?
Don't you like Robert Bork Puss?

I didn’t even say anything bad about Bork.
I just said that he was the one who fired Cox.
Is that not true?

Termin8tor » 11 May 2017 1:24 pm » wrote:But you're claiming there's a cover up of something for which there is zero evidence!
That's believable.

I never 'claimed' any such thing, but as John Dean (who knows a little something about cover-ups) says, they are acting like people engaged in a cover-up.

Misty » 11 May 2017 1:25 pm » wrote: I am not in charge of which posters get mod abilities, but if I were I certainly would not give those abilities to a hothead like you.

Again, if you think that I have abused my mod powers feel free to report that to the administrators of this forum.

Hothead? LMAO! You haven't figured out yet I treat other posters exactly how they treat me? You have abused your mod powers. You are too dishonest to admit it.

You want to post attacks then have the ability to run away and hide. If I had admin powers there is no way a vile, instigating turd like you would have mod powers. In my case, I don't want them. In your case you lack the honesty and integrity to properly perform the duties.

Huey » 11 May 2017 1:35 pm » wrote:Hothead? LMAO! You haven't figured out yet I treat other posters exactly how they treat me? You have abused your mod powers. You are too dishonest to admit it.
You want to post attacks then have the ability to run away and hide. If I had admin powers there is no way a vile, instigating turd like you would have mod powers. In my case, I don't want them. In your case you lack the honesty and integrity to properly perform the duties.

Again, If you think that I am abusing my mod powers, then instead of just whining about it, bring it to the attention of the forum admins.

Misty » 11 May 2017 1:21 pm » wrote: My childish behavior?
Obviously you do because you have been childishly spamming my two regular threads with a bunch of posts that you are copying and pasting from other threads.
And you have been childishly trying to challenge me to some kind of a fight.
Oh look. What is that?
Some kind of a threat?
Should I be all skeered now?

Your childish behavior. Since the weekend I have either replied to your political comments with no animosity OR waited for you to be you. When you did that is when I took your dung heap of posts and moved them to your cesspool. The other day when you lied about me posting I had not posted to your thread. You very nicely proved my point that you start the ****. I thank you for that. Anyone can click the comments here, see your reposted comments,and see exactly what happened. But of course you continue to lie. I simply refuse to enter into the diversions you create on real threads. So again, thanks!

Again, if you are truthful, which you almost never are, the comments I am posting are YOUR attacks in real threads where you wish to attack a poster. So instead of answering your diviersions, your instigations, I put YOUR COMMENTS, and the response, in your **** dump of a thread.

Are you saying that YOUR POSTS are spam? That you have nothing important to say? If you don't want your comments posted here YOU STOP SPAMMING OTHER THREADS WHITH YOUR **** POSTS. LMAO!

No, it is not a threat. I created. Flying monkeys cesspool thread where any one can respond to trolls without **** up a regular thread. Particularly for when you abuse your privileges, issue an attack, and then lock the thread like a chicken ****. Remember, you get what you give.

And also remember, this is all in humor. Just jerkin' your chain. When you stop spamming I will stop putting your spam posts where they belong.

In your cesspool.

Misty » 11 May 2017 1:39 pm » wrote: Again, If you think that I am abusing my mod powers, then instead of just whining about it, bring it to the attention of the forum admins.

I'm not whining about it. I took action. I am not like you Progs. I indentify a problem and then fix it. I don't whine to a higher authority about it.

Misty » 11 May 2017 1:35 pm » wrote: So you think I'm smearing Rosenstein by comparing him to Robert Bork?
Don't you like Robert Bork Puss?

I didn’t even say anything bad about Bork.
I just said that he was the one who fired Cox.
Is that not true?

I didn't write that post, psycho. You did, and I doubt very, very, very much that you like Robert Bork.

So you're being disingenuous, as usual.

I never 'claimed' any such thing, but as John Dean (who knows a little something about cover-ups) says, they are acting like people engaged in a cover-up.

Look at the psycho hide behind semantics. Of course you're claiming a cover up. Be honest, for once.

There is still zero evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump or his officials, despite your months of babbling and accusing.

John Dean is a liar and a sellout who betrayed Nixon to keep himself out of jail.

No wonder a liar like you would cite him.

Where did little Miss Marxist go?

Hiding from my questions, as usual.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2017 1:33 pm » wrote:For how many years have you stonewalled every single one of my questions?

Why did Comey usurp the legal role of the Loretta Lynch and the Justice Dept when he declared that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted?

Why did he lie that "no reasonable prosecutor" would prosecute?

Misty » 11 May 2017 1:35 pm » wrote:I never 'claimed' any such thing, but as John Dean (who knows a little something about cover-ups) says, they are acting like people engaged in a cover-up.

What did Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch talk about when they met in what they hoped was a secret meeting?


Why would the AG meet the husband of someone whose wife is under investigation?

Answer: you'll refuse to answer the question.

Termin8tor » 11 May 2017 1:54 pm » wrote:What did Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch talk about when they met in what they hoped was a secret meeting?
Why would the AG meet the husband of someone whose wife is under investigation?
Answer: you'll refuse to answer the question.

I have several times commented that the meeting was highly inappropriate, and I don't believe that they just talked about golf and grandkids, but you keep lying about how I will refuse to answer that question.

45 said today that he asked James Comey over dinner if he was under investigation and he discussed that subject with him three times, initiating one of the phone calls himself.

So what say you about that Pumpkin?
Was it proper of him to ask the director of the FBI that question?

Misty » 11 May 2017 2:27 pm » wrote: I have several times commented that the meeting was highly inappropriate, and I don't believe that they just talked about golf and grandkids, but you keep lying about how I will refuse to answer that question.

45 said today that he asked James Comey over dinner if he was under investigation and he discussed that subject with him three times, initiating one of the phone calls himself.

So what say you about that Pumpkin?
Was it proper of him to ask the director of the FBI that question?

Since you asking the question whether or not it was appropriate you must be.ieve that he actually did and the answer was he was not under criminal investigation.
pumpkin.

Misty » 11 May 2017 2:27 pm » wrote:I have several times commented that the meeting was highly inappropriate, and I don't believe that they just talked about golf and grandkids, but you keep lying about how I will refuse to answer that question.

It wasn't "inappropriate." It was very highly unethical, and almost certainly involved criminal activity.

There was absolutely no legitimate reason for them to meet secretly.

I'm not lying about you not answer. I forgot, and I'm in deep shock that you actually gave an answer.

45 said today that he asked James Comey over dinner if he was under investigation and he discussed that subject with him three times, initiating one of the phone calls himself.

So what say you about that Pumpkin?
Was it proper of him to ask the director of the FBI that question?

Depends on the exact question and the answer. Trump is not under investigation.

It is a counter-intelligence investigation. If Trump asked about that, and that was the answer he was given, Trump was correct to assume he's not, unless there's that giant conspiracy of collaboration or something that you've been babbling about without evidence.

Misty » 11 May 2017 2:27 pm » wrote:So what say you about that Pumpkin?
Was it proper of him to ask the director of the FBI that question?

And this?

Termin8tor » 11 May 2017 1:33 pm » wrote:For how many years have you stonewalled every single one of my questions?

Why did Comey usurp the legal role of the Loretta Lynch and the Justice Dept when he declared that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted?

Why did he lie that "no reasonable prosecutor" would prosecute?

Trump said Sally Yates and James Clapper started 'to choke like dogs' during their Senate testimony.

President Donald Trump described former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates as starting "to choke like dogs" during their recent Senate testimony as a part of an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The comments were made to Time reporters who joined him in watching recorded clips from the Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Monday.

He also said, "I don’t want to necessarily blame, but there’s a great meanness out there that I’m surprised at.”

Awww. Poor baby.
People are being mean to him.

Misty » 11 May 2017 3:01 pm » wrote:He also said, "I don’t want to necessarily blame, but there’s a great meanness out there that I’m surprised at.”

Awww. Poor baby.
People are being mean to him.

It's absolutely despicable that people lie and smear a sitting president with false accusations.

Like you have done for months.

Psycho.

Misty wasn't so defensive of Comey back in November:

Misty » 02 Nov 2016 3:42 pm » wrote: Does it stink any more than the timing of what Comey did?

People have less than a week to dump everything they have.
I highly recommend wearing a HAZMAT suit for the next 6 days.
I'm not so sure. LOL