Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 2:47 pm » wrote:This investigation will go forward, lots of anti-fraud legislation will result.

You mean lots of voter suppression laws.
Those are Kobach's specialty.

Kris Kobach created a system to purge 1.1 million Americans of color from the voter rolls of GOP controlled states.

Michigan purged 449,922 voters from the rolls.
45's margin of victory in Michigan was 13,107

Arizona purged 270,824 voters from the rolls.
45'so margin of victory in Arizona was 85,257

North Carolina purged 589,393 from the voter rolls.
45's margin of victory in North Carolina was 177,008

Misty » 15 May 2017 3:33 pm » wrote:I dare anyone to call Max Boot a lefty.

He's a member of the Establishment, he didn't cite a single crime, and he didn't explain how Trump acting in a Constitutional manner by firing Comey is impeachable, Dim.

Not that you'll answer the question honestly, how can you obstruct justice without a crime? Got one shred of evidence yet?

Good luck taking the House to start Impeachment.

Anyone who writes the following isn't someone whose opinion I highly respect.

How the 'Stupid Party' Created Donald Trump- The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/01/opin ... trump.html

Misty » 15 May 2017 3:45 pm » wrote:]

You mean lots of voter suppression laws.
Those are Kobach's specialty.

Yes, yes, that's the Democrat Talking Point Lie, and you tell them with such enthusiasm!

Kris Kobach created a system to purge 1.1 million Americans of color from the voter rolls of GOP controlled states.

Michigan purged 449,922 voters from the rolls.
45's margin of victory in Michigan was 13,107

Arizona purged 270,824 voters from the rolls.
45'so margin of victory in Arizona was 85,257

North Carolina purged 589,393 from the voter rolls.
45's margin of victory in North Carolina was 177,008

Hey psycho, states governed by both parties have done this routinely for many, many decades, until Clinton and Democrats passed Motor Voter bill with the intent to make fraud easier.

Purging voter rolls of non-voters isn't controversial at all, except to today's corrupt, dishonest Democrat Party.

So as usual, you have the issue backwards.

And given that roughly 80% of Americans support preventing voter fraud, rotsa ruck running against it.

Misty » 15 May 2017 3:33 pm » wrote:I dare anyone to call Max Boot a lefty.

I have considerable regard for his views on foreign policy, but he's never someone I turned to for domestic or political advice.

Meanwhile, despite all the bleating and the babbling, Trump's and Repubs conservative agenda moves forward.

Preventing enough voter fraud for just 2 or 3 points of the Democrat total crushes its chance of being the majority party, and when enough of Democrats' voter fraud tactics are exposed, you'll lose even more as honest Americans are outraged.

Your party if ****.

Huey » 15 May 2017 3:42 pm » wrote: Not gonna play your reframe game but apparently neither one of you pay attention.

Neither one?
Who is the other person you refer to?

Huey » 15 May 2017 3:42 pm » wrote: You must find better sources.

You might want to Google Max Boot.

Misty » 15 May 2017 3:52 pm » wrote: Neither one?
Who is the other person you refer to?
You might want to Google Max Boot.

The person who wrote your copy and paste.

The issue with the Republican Party is that is that there are republicans standing up to trump policy, to me that is not a problem. Beats the democrat lemming lockstep method.

Misty » 15 May 2017 3:33 pm » wrote:I dare anyone to call Max Boot a lefty.

Unlike you, I didn't smear Boot, no matter how much I disagree with him.

Say, did you see this?

Of course not. You'll avert your eyes.
Were 300,000 Democrats too stupid to get an ID, psycho?

Your party is ****.

WOW! Democrats Lost up to 300,000 VOTES in Wisconsin After Voter ID Law Passed
Jim Hoft May 15th, 2017 11:14 am Leave a Comment

They Can’t Win If They Can’t Cheat—

President Donald Trump won Wisconsin in 2016 by 23,000 votes.

He was the first Republican to win Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan in 1984.
Hillary Clinton forgot to vote there.
Liberals are now crying that they could not push through 300,000 fraudulent votes due to the new voter ID laws.
When Democrats can’t cheat they can’t win — even in Wisconsin....
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... aw-passed/

Huey » 15 May 2017 3:57 pm » wrote: The issue with the Republican Party is that is that there are republicans standing up to trump policy, to me that is not a problem. Beats the democrat lemming lockstep method.

Did one single elected Democrat in Congress vote to hold Bill Clinton accountable for his felonies and impeachable acts, with a mountain of evidence proving them?

Nope, but they'll accuse Trump on the basis of nothing, including you, psycho.

Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 4:00 pm » wrote: Did one single elected Democrat in Congress vote to hold Bill Clinton accountable for his felonies and impeachable acts, with a mountain of evidence proving them?

Nope, but they'll accuse Trump on the basis of nothing, including you, psycho.

Like the guards in the Nuremberg trials she is simply following orders.

Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 3:49 pm » wrote:Purging voter rolls of non-voters isn't controversial at all, except to today's corrupt, dishonest Democrat Party.

Voter rolls are regularly purged of voters that have been inactive for a period of time and there is nothing controversial about that, but that is not what those states did.

They purged voters whose names were similar to voters in other states, or similar to the name of a convicted felon.

The names did not even have to be identical.
They could have had different middle names, or could have been a father and son (senior & junior).

And they purged the names of voters who were registered in two different states.
Being registered in two states is not illegal.

When people move from one state to another, unless they remove their name from the rolls in the state they are leaving, they remain on the rolls in that state until they are removed for being inactive in that state.

I did not remove my name from the voter rolls when I moved from NY to PA, so I am probably still registered to vote in NY.

As long as I don't vote in both states, that's not an issue.

BTW, several members of both 45's campaign and his family are registered to vote in more than one state.

More than one Republican has admitted that suppressing the vote helps them to win elections, so I don't know why you try to deny it.

Misty » 15 May 2017 4:14 pm » wrote: Voter rolls are regularly purged of voters that have been inactive for a period of time and there is nothing controversial about that, but that is not what those states did.

They purged voters whose names were similar to voters in other states, or similar to the name of a convicted felon.

The names did not even have to be identical.
They could have had different middle names, or could have been a father and son (senior & junior).

And they purged the names of voters who were registered in two different states.
Being registered in two states is not illegal.

When people move from one state to another, unless they remove their name from the rolls in the state they are leaving, they remain on the rolls in that state until they are removed for being inactive in that state.

I did not remove my name from the voter rolls when I moved from NY to PA, so I am probably still registered to vote in NY.

As long as I don't vote in both states, that's not an issue.

BTW, several members of both 45's campaign and his family are registered to vote in more than one state.

More than one Republican has admitted that suppressing the vote helps them to win elections, so I don't know why you try to deny it.

I know what a liar you are, so I cannot believe a single thing you wrote.

But in any case, if what they are doing is wrong, it will be stopped by the courts or corrected by voters.

And frankly, given how much Democrat voter fraud is committed and how routinely, going right into Obama's office, I'd rather see a little excessive action than none at all.

Here's a video of Obama doing exactly that; encouraging illegals to commit felonies and vote illegally.

.

https://youtu.be/nfgEvgVC6Qs

Misty » 15 May 2017 4:14 pm » wrote: Voter rolls are regularly purged of voters that have been inactive for a period of time and there is nothing controversial about that, but that is not what those states did.

They purged voters whose names were similar to voters in other states, or similar to the name of a convicted felon.

The names did not even have to be identical.
They could have had different middle names, or could have been a father and son (senior & junior).

And they purged the names of voters who were registered in two different states.
Being registered in two states is not illegal.

When people move from one state to another, unless they remove their name from the rolls in the state they are leaving, they remain on the rolls in that state until they are removed for being inactive in that state.

I did not remove my name from the voter rolls when I moved from NY to PA, so I am probably still registered to vote in NY.

As long as I don't vote in both states, that's not an issue.

BTW, several members of both 45's campaign and his family are registered to vote in more than one state.

More than one Republican has admitted that suppressing the vote helps them to win elections, so I don't know why you try to deny it.

The last sentence is idiotic. It is the talking point the Dems used to fight voter ID laws. Fact of the matter is some of the largest minority voter turnout historically occurred in states where Voter ID laws were instituted. So the talking point point did not apply.

Next, if you show up to the polls and are denied the right to cast an official ballot you request a provisional ballot. You then have time to get the situation squared away and your vote will be counted.

Just bits and pieces of the story you won't hear from democrats or their minions.

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:12 pm » wrote: Like the guards in the Nuremberg trials she is simply following orders.

Huey » 12 May 2017 11:45 pm » wrote: This will end when you stop instigating. We'll see what tomorrow brings.

As usual I will not start in on you. I will only respond to what you instigate.

So I guess you don't consider comparing someone to a murderous Nazi 'instigating.'

Or saying that what someone wrote is 'idiotic.'

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote: The last sentence is idiotic.

You never instigate it, do you Huey?
I don’t believe that I compared you to a Nazi or called you an idiot today.

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote:The last sentence is idiotic. It is the talking point the Dems used to fight voter ID laws.

It's just a coincidence that little Miss Marxist is spouting Democrat Talking Point Lies right after they're written and poll tested.

For years now.

Fact of the matter is some of the largest minority voter turnout historically occurred in states where Voter ID laws were instituted. So the talking point point did not apply.

Not only that, but a lot of minorities are bitterly angry that their Reform candidates are crushed by the corrupt Democrat Machine including with voter fraud.

What's racism, according to Democrat Talking Point Liars? Anything that's controversial in the slightest regarding race.


What's actual racism? Decades of leaving large numbers of minorities in poor, dangerous, jobless neighborhoods with rotten schools and corrupt politicians.

Try to get a liberal to admit that.

Misty » 15 May 2017 4:24 pm » wrote: So I guess you don't consider comparing someone to a murderous Nazi 'instigating.'.

You didn't have the slightest problem comparing me to a Nazi years ago.


Whine much?

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote: Next, if you show up to the polls and are denied the right to cast an official ballot you request a provisional ballot. You then have time to get the situation squared away and your vote will be counted.
Just bits and pieces of the story you won't hear from democrats or their minions.

FYI many people are busy working and do not have time to square the situation away.
They probably had to take time off from work to vote, and now they have to take more time off to prove that they had a right to vote after their name was wrongly purged from the rolls.

A high number of provisional ballots cast never end up getting counted.
Just bits and pieces of the story you won't hear from Republicans or their minions.

Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 4:34 pm » wrote: You didn't have the slightest problem comparing me to a Nazi years ago.
Whine much?

Maybe you should go back and re-read my post before you react in a knee jerk fashion.
I wasn't whining about him comparing me to a Nazi.

I was pointing out the fact that he insists that he is never the one who instigates or attacks me first, and that is not true.

I did not instigate anything today by comparing him to a Nazi or calling his writings idiotic.
He can't say the same.

I have had the most horrible things said about me on this forum and the old one over the years.
Believe me, I can take it.

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote: The last sentence is idiotic. It is the talking point the Dems used to fight voter ID laws. Fact of the matter is some of the largest minority voter turnout historically occurred in states where Voter ID laws were instituted. So the talking point point did not apply.

Next, if you show up to the polls and are denied the right to cast an official ballot you request a provisional ballot. You then have time to get the situation squared away and your vote will be counted.

Just bits and pieces of the story you won't hear from democrats or their minions.

Misty » 15 May 2017 4:39 pm » wrote: FYI many people are busy working and do not have time to square the situation away.
They probably had to take time off from work to vote, and now they have to take more time off to prove that they had a right to vote after their name was wrongly purged from the rolls.

A high number of provisional ballots cast never end up getting counted.
Just bits and pieces of the story you won't hear from Republicans or their minions.

A couple of things. Polls are open in most states from early in The morning to later at night. FYI.

FYI I work 5, sometimes 6 days a week, 60 plus hours on a 5 day week, and still find the time to vote. Additionally, since I moved just before the election I was not on the voters roles. FYI I was able to find time to get my issue take care of.

FYI many states have early voting. If you work, FYI, you have ample opportunity to get to the polls if you wish to do it in person OR most states have absentee balloting. FYI If you wish to vote but your work schedule does not allow it you not only have early voting but you can go the absentee routs. Early voting includes Saturday's.

FYI, your are guanteed the right to vote by the constitution. FYI it doesn't guarantee that you will not have to put forth effort to do so. FYI, it doesn't guantee it will be effortless.

FYI if a person wants to vote they damn sure will find a way to get it done.

FYI many votes to include provisional do not get counted before results are public. They are before the vote is certified days later. Mostly because on the initial counts once a candidate gets to a certain point no amount of votes left will change that.

I am also well aware of how democrats treat provisional and absentee ballots. Was a big fight for Al Gore when he tried to have thousands of military votes tossed out in 2000.

FYI Your counter points from your masters are weak and talking points.

Huey » 15 May 2017 4:12 pm » wrote: Like the guards in the Nuremberg trials she is simply following orders.

Misty » 15 May 2017 4:24 pm » wrote: So I guess you don't consider comparing someone to a murderous Nazi 'instigating.'

Or saying that what someone wrote is 'idiotic.' You never instigate it, do you Huey?
I don’t believe that I compared you to a Nazi or called you an idiot today.

Lmao! Child, you seem to forget the very first post between us today was you calling me a racist. Anything thereafter is on you.

Just for the record I have yet to call you an idiot today. I said the sentence was idiotic. But since I am a firm believer in following thru after an "idiot" accuses me of something I didn't do I will give you something to bitch about.

You and Maxine Waters have a lot in common. You are both idiots. With you, it is your POSTING PERSONA that is an idiot. I don't know you personally and I hope to God, for your sake, you are not this stupid in real life.

The only difference between you and Watters is she has managed to convince millions of your loinfo brethern that she is not an idiot worthy of elected office.. Anyone who has spent any time in one of your threads where you post as Misty would never make that mistake.

So, back to the question you are slinking away from like the snake you are, are like the Nazi Guard following orders.

Where in my Maxine Waters post is the racism?

Spicer dodged questions about Trump's 'tapes' 7 times.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer repeatedly refused to say Monday whether President Donald Trump is secretly recording his conversations.

Since Friday, the White House has refused to clarify Trump's morning tweet: "James Comey better hope that there are no 'tapes' of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press."



Trump told Fox News on Friday that he "won't talk about that."

Spicer said four times on Friday that Trump had "nothing further to add on that."

The White House spokesman again avoided reporters' questions Monday -- claiming seven more times that Trump, and therefore the White House, had nothing more to say.

Here are the seven times Spicer dodged reporters' questions Monday about whether the President of the United States is secretly recording private conversations he has with US officials and others:

1) "I think I made it clear last week that the President has nothing further on that."

2) "I was very clear that the President would have nothing further on that last week."

3) "I made it clear what the President's position is on that issue."

4) "The President has made it clear what his position is."

5) "I've answered the question over and over again the same way."

6) "That's his position. He said that he has nothing further to add"

7) "There's nothing further to add."

Hmm. I wonder why they don't want to talk about it?