I wonder why you have numerous posts on the forum since you called me a racist and I asked you about it.Misty » 15 May 2017 5:20 pm » wrote: Hmm. I wonder why they don't want to talk about it?
Now how did I know would say that?Huey » 15 May 2017 5:08 pm » wrote: Lmao! Child, you seem to forget the very first post between us today was you calling me a racist. Anything thereafter is on you.
If you don't understand that, I'm not going to help you.Huey » 15 May 2017 5:08 pm » wrote: Where in my Maxine Waters post is the racism?
Lmao!Misty » 15 May 2017 5:28 pm » wrote: Now how did I know would say that?
I did not call you a racist.
I said you posted a racist image.
And according to your standard, we are responsible for everything we post, even if it's something we copied and pasted.
If you don't understand that, I'm not going to help you.
I know this may be hard for you to believe, but I don't just sit around in anticipation of your next post.Huey » 15 May 2017 5:22 pm » wrote: I wonder why you have numerous posts on the forum since you called me a racist and I asked you about it.
Why are YOU ducking that?
I find it kind of sad that you don't see the racism in that image.Huey » 15 May 2017 5:31 pm » wrote: Lmao!
And I knew you would say that. So, like a troll you instigated, as usual, and run like a ****** when asked to back up your assertion.
Just because she a black woman doesn't make criticism racist.
Back to the loinfo lockstep bin for you.
I know, you are just following orders.
Lmao!Misty » 15 May 2017 5:33 pm » wrote: I know this may be hard for you to believe, but I don't just sit around in anticipation of your next post.
I stopped answering my notifications long ago, because if I answered them, then all of my time here would be spent responding to you and Clem, so if I happen to see one of your posts then I'll answer you.
I can't reply to something I haven't seen.
As you can see, I did reply to your post.
Misty » 15 May 2017 5:34 pm » wrote: I find it kind of sad that you don't see the racism in that image.
Misty » 15 May 2017 5:34 pm » wrote: I find it kind of sad that you don't see the racism in that image.
Huey » 14 May 2017 7:52 am » wrote:
‘Impeach Maxine Waters’ street art appears near Inglewood town hall meeting
May 14, 2017
By Kyle Olson
Not-so-friendly street art greeted California Congresswoman Maxine Waters to a Inglewood town hall meeting on Saturday.
Famed artist Sabo posted several works around the venue and posted photos on his Unsavory Agents Facebook page.
A bench sign highlighted the Time magazine report this week that President Trump gets two scoops of ice cream while White House guests receive one.
“Impeach Trump!” the poster says near Inglewood High School.
A bus shelter poster blares “Impeach Maxine Waters” with Waters’ face superimposed over James Brown’s mugshot.
“Race baiter, old & out of touch, poverty pimp,” the poster reads.
“End this abusive marriage by divorcing yourself from the Democratic Party.”
Meanwhile, a Trump supporter attending the event was told to “go back to Europe” by a Waters’ supporter.
“Go back to England– and Irish, too. That’s where you’re going to go back,” the man said, waving at the camera.
“I’m not from England,” the man filming responded.
“Pilgrim,” the man declared before walking away.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/impeac ... l-meeting/
Misty » 15 May 2017 5:34 pm » wrote: I find it kind of sad that you don't see the racism in that image.
As president he can declassify anything he wants to.Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador.
President Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week, according to current and former U.S. officials, who said Trump’s disclosures jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State.
The information the president relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said.
The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State.
After Trump’s meeting, senior White House officials took steps to contain the damage, placing calls to the CIA and the National Security Agency.
“This is code-word information,” said a U.S. official familiar with the matter, using terminology that refers to one of the highest classification levels used by American spy agencies.
Trump “revealed more information to the Russian ambassador than we have shared with our own allies.”
The revelation comes as the president faces rising legal and political pressure on multiple Russia-related fronts.
Last week, he fired FBI Director James B. Comey in the midst of a bureau investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Moscow. Trump’s subsequent admission that his decision was driven by “this Russia thing” was seen by critics as attempted obstruction of justice.
One day after dismissing Comey, Trump welcomed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak — a key figure in earlier Russia controversies — into the Oval Office.
It was during that meeting, officials said, that Trump went off script and began describing details of an Islamic State terrorist threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft.
For almost anyone in government, discussing such matters with an adversary would be illegal.
As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secrets, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law.
“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting.
“At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”
The CIA declined to comment, and the NSA did not respond to requests for comment.
But officials expressed concern about Trump’s handling of sensitive information as well as his grasp of the potential consequences.
Exposure of an intelligence stream that has provided critical insight into the Islamic State, they said, could hinder the United States’ and its allies’ ability to detect future threats.
Sorry Huey.Huey » 15 May 2017 5:41 pm » wrote: Come Misty. Answer.
Hey Puss!Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 4:34 pm » wrote:Yadda, yadda, yadda......
Translation:Misty » 15 May 2017 5:53 pm » wrote: Sorry Huey.
No lessons on racism or racial insensitivity today.
I was taught that kind of stuff growing up.
I can't help it if you were not.
So McMasters comes out and issues a very brief and very carefully worded statement denying things that were not even asserted in the article, and runs away without taking any questions.Misty » 15 May 2017 5:52 pm » wrote:And the Jackass-In-Chief strikes again.
As president he can declassify anything he wants to.
So he chooses to declassify information that is so sensitive we haven't even shared it with some of our allies and he shares it with two Russian spies.
Huey » 15 May 2017 6:09 pm » wrote:Translation:
Misty really says "my master told me wat to say. I have no independent thought process. I am simply following orders".
Yes Misty, we know. How sad you have the right to vote.
Snicker all you want.crimsongulf » 15 May 2017 6:07 pm » wrote:I saw the news, WAPO and more "unnamed" sources. Pardon me while I snicker at yet another liberal masturbatory fail.
Well, till you name them and it is verified it is he said she said. You blue shirts just run with innuendo and fantasy.Misty » 15 May 2017 7:50 pm » wrote: Snicker all you want.
Every news organization uses unnamed sources.
If not for unnamed sources the newspapers would be blank.
Besides that I don't believe one word that comes out of this WH.
They have no credibility at this point.
This **** is unbelievable. They still don't realize how they continue to hurt their brand. Every **** thing in the MSM is neg DT **** 24/7. We need to move this country forward and all these fools do is spew nonsense.crimsongulf » 15 May 2017 8:15 pm » wrote:
Well, till you name them and it is verified it is he said she said. You blue shirts just run with innuendo and fantasy.
Bottomline cupcake, there is not one single verifiable fact in the story. Not one.
Here we go with the Gentle Giant fiasco again.
They continue to commit political suicide but think they are winning.Racetex (RSIG) » 15 May 2017 8:30 pm » wrote:
This **** is unbelievable. They still don't realize how they continue to hurt their brand. Every **** thing in the MSM is neg DT **** 24/7. We need to move this country forward and all these fools do is spew nonsense.