Liberal Forum

crimsongulf » 15 May 2017 8:15 pm » wrote:Well, till you name them and it is verified it is he said she said. You blue shirts just run with innuendo and fantasy.
Bottomline cupcake, there is not one single verifiable fact in the story. Not one.

Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.

They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.

Unnamed sources are nothing new.
Don't forget, it was an unnamed source called Deep Throat that brought down a president.

P.S. Guess what didn't leak out from that meeting?
The POTUS telling the Russians to stop **** with our elections.
That's what he should have been telling them.

Racetex (RSIG) » 15 May 2017 8:30 pm » wrote:This **** is unbelievable. They still don't realize how they continue to hurt their brand. Every **** thing in the MSM is neg DT **** 24/7. We need to move this country forward and all these fools do is spew nonsense.

It's nice to see that you are concerned with our 'brand.'

You should be more concerned with what 45 is doing to your brand.
Every time he opens his mouth or takes to the Twitter he spews a bunch of nonsense.

You can't blame that on us.

This is a tactic used by Trump supporters.
They can't defend his actions, so instead they have taken to attacking the left.
It's called anti-anti-Trumpism.

I posted a piece on it a few pages back and it was written by a Conservative.

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p906727

Anti-anti-Trumpism has become the new safe space for the right.

Here is how it works: Rather than defend President Trump’s specific actions, his conservative champions change the subject to (1) the biased “fake news” media, (2) over-the-top liberals, (3) hypocrites on the left, (4) anyone else victimizing Mr. Trump or his supporters and (5) whataboutism, as in “What about Obama?” “What about Clinton?”

Misty » 15 May 2017 5:52 pm » wrote:And the Jackass-In-Chief strikes again.
As president he can declassify anything he wants to.
So he chooses to declassify information that is so sensitive we haven't even shared it with some of our allies and he shares it with two Russian spies.

More lies from anonymous sources. Three Trump officials at the meeting said no such thing happened.

McMasters held a one or two sentence press conference a little after 10PM tonight saying that definitively.

As usual, little Miss Marxist sides with the liars.

Misty » 15 May 2017 9:32 pm » wrote:You should be more concerned with what 45 is doing to your brand.
Every time he opens his mouth or takes to the Twitter he spews a bunch of nonsense.

You can't blame that on us.

Last I saw, psycho, Trump's support has risen by roughly 6 points, and he'd win the popular vote.

This is a tactic used by Trump supporters.
They can't defend his actions, so instead they have taken to attacking the left.
It's called anti-anti-Trumpism.

You must have gone blind again.

I've seen a lot of strong support for Trump, and I've cited it here.

Misty » 15 May 2017 6:03 pm » wrote:Hey Puss!
Have you seen the news?
President Bonehead shared some highly classified info with a couple of Russian spies.
So much for your crap about him being tough on Putin/Russia because he launched a few missiles in Syria.

Can't wait to see how you defend this one.

Oh gosh, yet another lie told by anonymous sources to the corrupt liberal MSM?

Shocking!

Three top Trump officials already refuted this story, psycho.

Good luck winning Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the basis of endless lies and smears, as Trump pushes his popular and successful agenda.

Misty » 15 May 2017 9:32 pm » wrote: It's nice to see that you are concerned with our 'brand.'

You should be more concerned with what 45 is doing to your brand.
Every time he opens his mouth or takes to the Twitter he spews a bunch of nonsense.

You can't blame that on us.

This is a tactic used by Trump supporters.
They can't defend his actions, so instead they have taken to attacking the left.
It's called anti-anti-Trumpism.

I posted a piece on it a few pages back and it was written by a Conservative.

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p906727

Look all you guys have done over the past 2 yrs is spew ****. Is he perfect hell no. Does he have a big mouth and a superego, yep. Come on man enough is enough. As for our brand, time will tell. All I know is the left doesn't have **** and has been losing control for the past 10 ys. The Dems havent offered Americans jack **** and voters are letting them know. Keep up ur **** it you will continue to go down the losing path u r own. I don't agree with every con nor do I agree with 100% of what our POTUS says and does. I do back him and believe he will do what is in OUR COUNTRIES best interest.

Misty » 15 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote: Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.

They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.

**** you and your endless lies and ****.

No wonder you suffer from depression. You're psycho.

.

.

Misty » 15 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote: Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.

They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.

Hey Dim, if the details were already know publicly, then he didn't reveal anything, duuuuh!

What a total wackjob you are, geez.

“The story that came out tonight, as reported, is false.”

Fox News ✔ @FoxNews
Natl Security Adviser McMaster made a statement denying a report that @POTUS revealed classified info to Russia.
http://fxn.ws/2rkAYib
7:19 PM - 15 May 2017
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... lse-video/

Misty » 15 May 2017 1:52 pm » wrote: You accuse Democrats of committing 'felonies' all the time, and you use the actual word, so STFU.

It is obvious that you turn a blind eye to why Comey was fired for cause. You ignore the fact that the only way the director of the FBI can be fired is for cause. Your demented irrational hatred of Trump deludes you into ignoring the facts of the case. Take off your blinders of hatred and look at the reality of the situation. Comey's two direct superiors wrote Trump to have him fired for listed causes.

Stick your lies where the sun doesn't shine. Pack them in real tight. Then do what comes naturally!!!

Misty » 15 May 2017 7:48 pm » wrote:

You think that is what you did? Your disconnect with reality is complete.

We will go with a failed trolling attempt.

Misty » 15 May 2017 9:32 pm » wrote: It's nice to see that you are concerned with our 'brand.'

You should be more concerned with what 45 is doing to your brand.
Every time he opens his mouth or takes to the Twitter he spews a bunch of nonsense.

You can't blame that on us.

This is a tactic used by Trump supporters.
They can't defend his actions, so instead they have taken to attacking the left.
It's called anti-anti-Trumpism.

I posted a piece on it a few pages back and it was written by a Conservative.

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 60#p906727

If you paid attention to the forum instead of assuming you'll learn two things. Con posters have commented on his Tweeting and we have been posting since he announced his run that he not a con.

If you opened your eyes to what is being posted to the forum you would see discussion about issues.

As far as the yeah but arguments considered it your personal payback for your behavior during the campaign. You whine about spam and trolling. Hell, any comments or threads about Clinton where immediately turned into a meme image fest by you.

Misty » 15 May 2017 5:52 pm » wrote:And the Jackass-In-Chief strikes again.

As president he can declassify anything he wants to.
So he chooses to declassify information that is so sensitive we haven't even shared it with some of our allies and he shares it with two Russian spies.

Somebody said so, therefore it's the gospel truth, eh Misty? People right there during the discussions say it's NOT true, but they're lying, right Misty? To people like you, this is steak, lobster, and crab cakes, with all the additional trimmings, all wrapped up right in front of you and such a pleasurable sight. And it's all because somebody said so.

Huey » 15 May 2017 5:08 pm » wrote:
Where in my Maxine Waters post is the racism?

You posted the truth, negative as it is, about a black person and that makes you a racist, see? Anything negative about Obama was racist, remember? Misty is still in the accusation of racism game. Now, of course, she deflected from your question by saying she didn't "call" you a racist by declaring your post racist. Oh, how hard she tries to look innocent of being a hack filled with hate and slime, but she fails and fails and fails.

larryc12 » 16 May 2017 6:33 am » wrote: You posted the truth, negative as it is, about a black person and that makes you a racist, see? Anything negative about Obama was racist, remember? Misty is still in the accusation of racism game. Now, of course, she deflected from your question by saying she didn't "call" you a racist by declaring your post racist. Oh, how hard she tries to look innocent of being a hack filled with hate and slime, but she fails and fails and fails.

Greenies for you.

Huey » 16 May 2017 6:35 am » wrote:
Greenies for you.

Thanks, but I never use them. I so tire of watching these miserable hacks take delight in their incessant accusations, constantly causing disruption of getting on with what needs doing for the good of the country. To put their own hatred ahead of the country is stunning, but it's true.

So much for the denial.
This is where 45 just knee-capped General McMaster.

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:17 am » wrote:So much for the denial.
This is where 45 just knee-capped General McMaster.

Umm, he did not knee cap anyone. What he tweeted was public knowledge. YOU and yours are making the accusation that he shared classified info. Do you have it? Something than yet another WAPO unnamed source? They haven't been accurate as of late with their unnamed sources.

Here is McMasters statement:

A brief statement for the record. There is nothing that the president takes more seriously than the security of the American people. The story that came out tonight as reported is false. The president of the foreign minister reviewed a range of common threats to our two countries, including threats to civil aviation. At no time, at no time, where intelligent sources or methods discussed. The president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known. Two other senior officials who were present, including the secretary of the state, remember the meeting the same way and have said so. Going on the record should outweigh the anonymous sources. I was in the room. It didn’t happen. Thanks, everybody.

He was there. He went public. And Trumps version is a truncated tweeter version of what McMasters said. Independent research debunks your talking point.

Termin8tor » 15 May 2017 10:01 pm » wrote: More lies from anonymous sources. Three Trump officials at the meeting said no such thing happened.
McMasters held a one or two sentence press conference a little after 10PM tonight saying that definitively.
As usual, little Miss Marxist sides with the liars.

McMaster denied things that were not even alleged in the WaPo article.
The article never mentioned anything about 45 disclosing 'methods and sources' or 'military operations.'

What he did NOT say was that 45 didn't disclose any classified info, which is what the article DID allege.

If nothing happened then why the immediate effort to clean up the spill?

Senior White House officials appeared to recognize quickly that Trump had overstepped and moved to contain the potential fallout. Thomas P. Bossert, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, placed calls to the directors of the CIA and the NSA.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... f78bcf6a0e

Yout might want to check out 45's Tweets this morning.

P.S. You're supposed to blame the people who leaked the story and the Washington Post for publishing it.

They are the ones who put lives in danger, not 45 who gave the highly sensitive info to the two Russian spies.

Those are the talking points straight from FOX News.
Now hurry along and disseminate them.

Those times when 45 blasted HRC over her careless and sloppy handling of classified info.

https://youtu.be/w0x1LNe6FcE

"She put classified information within the reach of our enemies."

"We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word confidential or classified."