Liberal Forum

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:42 am » wrote:Those times when 45 blasted HRC over her careless and sloppy handling of classified info.

https://youtu.be/w0x1LNe6FcE

"We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the words confidential or classified."

Huey » 16 May 2017 7:45 am » wrote: Cool. Taking into account my last post how does this pertain to the current issue?

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:52 am » wrote: It's called irony.

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:17 am » wrote:So much for the denial.
This is where 45 just knee-capped General McMaster.

Huey » 16 May 2017 7:55 am » wrote:How is it ironic considering he discussed public information?
You Promoting fake news again?

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:59 am » wrote: That's right Huey.
You go with the FAKE News defense.
It's all you have.

Was the name of the city in the Islamic State’s territory where our U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat public knowledge?

Our allies are not going to want to share any more intelligence with us if they know that 45 is disclosing it to the Russians, and that is going to cost lives.

That's right Huey.
You go with the FAKE News defense.
It's all you have

Was the name of the city in the Islamic State’s territory where our U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat public knowledge?

Our allies are not going to want to share any more intelligence with us if they know that 45 is disclosing it to the Russians, and that is going to cost lives

larryc12 » 16 May 2017 7:58 am » wrote: How, for Christ's sake????

Huey » 16 May 2017 8:44 am » wrote:
Because an UNNAMED source says so and the left has a script to follow.

It may very well turn out something was said. But at this point there is nothing.

Racetex (RSIG) » 16 May 2017 8:53 am » wrote: Stop wasting ur time. She has become another wharfAss.

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:35 am » wrote: McMaster denied things that were not even alleged in the WaPo article.
The article never mentioned anything about 45 disclosing 'methods and sources' or 'military operations.'

What he did NOT say was that 45 didn't disclose any classified info, which is what the article DID allege.

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:59 am » wrote: That's right Huey.
You go with the FAKE News defense.
It's all you have.

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:42 am » wrote:Those times when 45 blasted HRC over her careless and sloppy handling of classified info.

"She put classified information within the reach of our enemies."

"We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word confidential or classified."

Termin8tor » 16 May 2017 9:39 am » wrote:After ignoring Clinton felonies and felonies and gross abuse of power under Obama, you will shriek and babble about minor issues under Trump.

Misty » 16 May 2017 9:45 am » wrote:
Anti-anti-Trumpism has become the new safe space for the right.

Here is how it works: Rather than defend President Trump’s specific actions, his conservative champions change the subject to....

“The story that came out tonight, as reported, is false.”

Fox News ✔ @FoxNews
Natl Security Adviser McMaster made a statement denying a report that @POTUS revealed classified info to Russia. http://fxn.ws/2rkAYib
7:19 PM - 15 May 2017
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... lse-video/

Misty » 16 May 2017 9:45 am » wrote:Here is how it works: Rather than defend President Trump’s specific actions....

Misty » 16 May 2017 9:45 am » wrote: Anti-anti-Trumpism has become the new safe space for the right.

Here is how it works: Rather than defend President Trump’s specific actions, his conservative champions change the subject to

(1) the biased “fake news” media,
(2) over-the-top liberals,
(3) hypocrites on the left,
(4) anyone else victimizing Mr. Trump or his supporters and
(5) whataboutism, as in “What about Obama?” “What about Clinton?”

Termin8tor » 16 May 2017 10:01 am » wrote:Yadda, Yadda, yadda......

Misty » 16 May 2017 7:35 am » wrote:Those are the talking points straight from FOX News.
Now hurry along and disseminate them.

The Latest ‘Just Like Watergate’ Idiocy
The ‘obstruction of justice’ claim is phony.
By Andrew C. McCarthy — May 16, 2017
There is so much legal ignorance in the reporting and commentary about the “Russia investigation,” it is hard to keep up. The latest is that we need a special prosecutor because the firing of FBI director James Comey could amount to Watergate-type obstruction of justice....


As we have repeatedly pointed out, and as former director Comey stated in congressional testimony, the FBI is conducting a counterintelligence investigation. It is not a criminal investigation. The subject of the investigation is not an American (specifically, Trump) suspected of committing a crime. The subject of the investigation is Russia. The purpose of the investigation is not to develop a prosecutable offense. The purpose is to gather intelligence of the Putin regime’s actions and intentions so that our government can develop countermeasures.


Intelligence gathering is not a judicial proceeding. It is an executive-branch security function. In point of fact, there is no evidence that President Trump has impeded the Russia investigation (a point we’ll expand on momentarily). But even if the president had taken such a measure, that would not be obstruction of a judicial proceeding, or of a law-enforcement investigation aimed at bringing a court prosecution.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ce-charged

Misty » 16 May 2017 10:08 am » wrote: Hey Puss!
You should turn on FOX News right now.
They just reported the FAKE News that 45 revealed classified info to the Russians.