Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 605 606 607 608 609 1,190
User avatar
Huey
16 May 2017 4:13 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 4:11 pm » wrote: Would those be 'unnamed' sources?

Wheeler was offered to the family by a third party who also paid him.
The Rich family did not seek him out.

The person who paid Wheeler is a millionaire FOX News analyst named Ed Butowsky.
Wheeler is also a FOX News contributor.

BTW, it looks like Wheeler has never actually examined Seth Rich's computer.
So forgive me if I take this story with a huge grain of salt, or should I say a boulder of salt.
That's ok. More is breaking. Oh, could you let us know when you switch back and forth between faux being credible and not being credible? Damn, it gets confusing when you play Sybil like this in the same thread. In the span of three posts you have gone from being not legit to legit to not being legit.

(not an instigation. An observation)
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2017 4:20 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 4:11 pm » wrote: Since you have become a big fan of Fox News......
As you can see by my last post I am not a BIG fan of FOX News.

I do watch Shep Smith, FOX News Sunday and Brett Baier.

If someone held a gun to my head in order to force me to watch Hannity, or those three *** clowns in the morning, they'd have to shoot me.
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2017 4:25 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 4:13 pm » wrote: Oh, could you let us know when you switch back and forth between faux being credible and not being credible?
See my last post.

I guess you think it has to be all or nothing.
I couldn't possibly like some shows on FOX and not others.

Nitpick much?

Image

Right.
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 4:28 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 4:20 pm » wrote:If someone held a gun to my head in order to force me to watch Hannity, or those three *** clowns in the morning, they'd have to shoot me.
Which is exactly why you're such an ignoramus and a Dim.

Hannity breaks ground on a lot of topics, his latest being the huge and expanding Obama Wiretap scandal.

Backed up by evidence and excellent investigative reporting from two reporters from Circa news.
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2017 4:32 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 16 May 2017 4:28 pm » wrote:Which is exactly why you're such an ignoramus and a Dim.
Hannity breaks ground on a lot of topics......
I guess he does that in between the regular tongue baths he administers to 45.
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 4:32 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 10:08 am » wrote:Hey Puss!
You should turn on FOX News right now.
They just reported the FAKE News that 45 revealed classified info to the Russians.
Oh my, Trump warned the Russians that their civilian aviation was in danger from new ISIS methods?

He executed his legal presidential authority to give them classified information in the hopes they'd reciprocate and help us?

Impeach, impeach, impeach, impeach! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Wackjob. :loco:
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
16 May 2017 4:33 pm
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 7:35 am » wrote: McMaster denied things that were not even alleged in the WaPo article.
The article never mentioned anything about 45 disclosing 'methods and sources' or 'military operations.'

What he did NOT say was that 45 didn't disclose any classified info, which is what the article DID allege.

If nothing happened then why the immediate effort to clean up the spill?
Yout might want to check out 45's Tweets this morning.

P.S. You're supposed to blame the people who leaked the story and the Washington Post for publishing it.

They are the ones who put lives in danger, not 45 who gave the highly sensitive info to the two Russian spies.

Those are the talking points straight from FOX News.
Now hurry along and disseminate them.
Is it impossible for you to understand English correctly!! With your plainly stated hatred of Trump it is obvious there is a disconnect in your brain of hearing the truth. You are obviously suffering from cognitive dissonance not allowing anything to disturb your firmly held belief of Trump. That makes your posts very disconnected with reality!! Your disconnect is so bad you are unable to type his name only the number of his presidency!!!
User avatar
Huey
16 May 2017 4:34 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 4:11 pm » wrote: Since you have become a big fan of Fox News, based on your last post, here is something else FOX is reporting. This will also put a huge crimp in your Russia Russia Trump meme:

Fox News: Murdered DNC Staffer Sent 44,053 Internal Emails to WikiLeaks

Fox News is now reporting, based on multiple investigative sources, that Seth Rich -- the Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down in Northwest D.C. near his home last July -- leaked thousands of DNC emails to WikiLeaks in the months beforehand.

According to Fox News' Malia Zimmerman, these new revelations are consistent with the findings of Rod Wheeler, a former D.C. homicide detective and Fox News contributor. Wheeler told Fox 5 DC that there is evidence on Rich's laptop that confirms he was emailing WikiLeaks prior to his death. Wheeler's law enforcement sources also allegedly claimed they were told to "stand down" on investigating the crime.

Rich's family, however, has denounced Wheeler's claims in a statement, calling them "unsubstantiated."

Via Fox News:

A federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report -- generated within 96 hours after DNC staffer Seth Rich's murder -- detailing the contents Rich’s computer said he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time.
“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

The revelation is consistent with the findings of Rod Wheeler, a former DC homicide detective and Fox News contributor and whose private investigation firm was hired by a third party on behalf of Rich’s family to probe the case. Rich was shot from behind in the wee hours, but was not robbed.

“My investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” Wheeler said. “I do believe that the answers to who murdered Seth Rich sits on his computer on a shelf at the DC police or FBI headquarters.”

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.

Rich left Lou’s City Bar, a couple miles from his home, at about 1:15 a.m. on July 10. His immediate activities after leaving the bar remain a mystery:

He walked home, calling several people along the way. He called his father, Joel Rich, who he missed because he had gone to sleep. He talked with a fraternity brother and his girlfriend, Kelsey Mulka.
Around 4:17 a.m., Rich was about a block from his home when Mulka, still on the phone with him, heard voices in the background. Rich reassured her that he was steps away from being at his front door and hung up.

Two minutes later, Rich was shot twice. Police were on the scene within three minutes. Rich sustained bruising on his hands and face. He remained conscious, but died at a nearby hospital less than two hours later.

Police detectives will not say whether Rich provided them with any clues about the identity of his attackers or their motivation, Wheeler said. However, Wheeler believes Rich could have provided information prior to his death of who was responsible for carrying out his murder.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/05/16 ... wikileaks/
Misty » 16 May 2017 4:20 pm » wrote: As you can see by my last post I am not a BIG fan of FOX News.

I do watch Shep Smith, FOX News Sunday and Brett Baier.

If someone held a gun to my head in order to force me to watch Hannity, or those three *** clowns in the morning, they'd have to shoot me.
1. Just make up your mind.

2. Hannity, or the clowns in the morning, are not reporters or journalists. Hannity will tell you that over and over, so don't confuse the editorialist, opinionists, and hosts with reporters.

3. I am just saying that more news is breaking on DNC staffer story. And it is not all based on unnamed sources.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Huey
16 May 2017 4:36 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 4:13 pm » wrote: That's ok. More is breaking. Oh, could you let us know when you switch back and forth between faux being credible and not being credible? Damn, it gets confusing when you play Sybil like this in the same thread. In the span of three posts you have gone from being not legit to legit to not being legit.

(not an instigation. An observation)
Misty » 16 May 2017 4:25 pm » wrote: See my last post.

I guess you think it has to be all or nothing.
I couldn't possibly like some shows on FOX and not others.

Nitpick much?

Image

Right.
More deception from the queen stooge.

The shows you mentioned in your last post are news shows. So I get her you are ok with the real reporting. With that said, when is the Sybil act going to stop?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
16 May 2017 4:58 pm
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty is so completely biased she doesn't understand that editorial people can tell facts and then comment them! That is what both conservative and liberal (progressive) commentators are supposed to do. The problem is real liberals start with facts while progressives start with lies too often. Combs was a liberal commentator that started with truth. I loved watching Hannity and Combs when they had the combined show. They would debate the issues in a gentlemanly manner. Progressive commentators too often start with lies and attack conservatives with lies!!

Here is liberalism and progressivism defined.

Liberalism vs Progressivism


Liberalism Defined

http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/americas-2nd ... jLZe82l.99

There are those on both the left and right who call for American unity. But these calls are either naive or disingenuous. Unity was possible between the right and liberals, but not between the right and the left.

Liberalism – which was anti-left, pro-American and deeply committed to the Judeo-Christian foundations of America; and which regarded the melting pot as the American ideal, fought for free speech for its opponents, regarded Western civilization as the greatest moral and artistic human achievement and viewed the celebration of racial identity as racism – is now affirmed almost exclusively on the right and among a handful of people who don’t call themselves conservative.


Progressivism defined it rejects the basic liberalism definition about country

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism

Progressivism is a philosophy based on the Idea of Progress, which asserts that advancements in science, technology, economic development, and social organization are vital to the improvement of the human condition. Progressivism became highly significant during the Age of Enlightenment in Europe, out of the belief that Europe was demonstrating that societies could progress in civility from barbaric conditions to civilization through strengthening the basis of empirical knowledge as the foundation of society. Figures of the Enlightenment believed that progress had universal application to all societies and that these ideas would spread across the world from Europe. Sociologist Robert Nisbet defines five "crucial premises" of the Idea of Progress as being: value of the past; nobility of Western civilization; worth of economic/technological growth; scientific/scholarly knowledge obtained through reason over faith; the intrinsic importance and worth of life on Earth. Beyond this, the meanings of progressivism have varied over time and from different perspectives.

The "reason over faith" implies non Christian concepts. Leaving out God is a mistake. That means that it is up to each to create their own morals and ethics. Atheist rulers demonstrate the fallacy of that approach!

Also notice that it rejects the basic concepts of country foundations and melting pot idea where everyone coming here adopts the American ideal.
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 5:53 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 4:32 pm » wrote: I guess he does that in between the regular tongue baths he administers to 45.
As usual, little Miss Marxist hides behind bulls*** and lies.

Circa News is THE SOURCE on the expanding Obama Wiretap scandal.

That increasingly disturbs members of both parties and if exposed would be the biggest scandal of my lifetime.

Got any actual evidence about that huge Russia-Trump-Collaboration-Conspiracy-thing-ey? One single shred?

No, and you never did, psycho.
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 5:57 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 10:08 am » wrote:Hey Puss!
You should turn on FOX News right now.
They just reported the FAKE News that 45 revealed classified info to the Russians.
Oh my! :rofl: :rofl:

Charles Krauthammer, a very serious Trump critic, said tonight that this issue is "far less important" than might have been thought last night.

Another panelist, a former Cameron adviser, said that this was a very routine event that happens to all politicians, but that Trump is being totally differently.

And several Fox people pointed out that the only felony in this matter was the leak.


What aren't you concerned about? The felony.

Funny how that's a pattern in your Democrat Talking Point Lies. :\
User avatar
Huey
16 May 2017 6:04 pm
User avatar
      
36,579 posts
Termin8tor » 16 May 2017 5:57 pm » wrote: Oh my! :rofl: :rofl:

Charles Krauthammer, a very serious Trump critic, said tonight that this issue is "far less important" than might have been thought last night.

Another panelist, a former Cameron adviser, said that this was a very routine event that happens to all politicians, but that Trump is being totally differently.

And several Fox people pointed out that the only felony in this matter was the leak.

What aren't you concerned about? The felony.

Funny how that's a pattern in your Democrat Talking Point Lies. :\
Don't ever call an issue a loinfo beats into the ground as far less important than it was earlier.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 6:05 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 7:35 am » wrote:McMaster denied things that were not even alleged in the WaPo article.
Amazing how almost every claim you make falls apart on a little examination.

They're all just "honest mistakes" on your part, right psycho? :blink:
McMaster: Trump Shared 'Wholly Appropriate' Info with Russians, Wasn't Briefed on Sources
BY BRIDGET JOHNSON

WASHINGTON -- National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster told reporters today that President Trump did share "wholly appropriate" information with the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in the Oval Office, but McMaster wouldn't talk about the classification of the material and added that Trump wasn't aware of the source of the intelligence.


The Washington Post reported Monday that an unnamed ally was burned by the revelation as Trump shared information "provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government," a disclosure that "jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State."


The New York Times story added that, while the president has broad declassification powers, the ally whose intel was shared "has repeatedly warned American officials that it would cut off access to such sensitive information if it were shared too widely."


McMaster told reporters in a brief statement outside the White House on Monday evening that "the story that came out tonight as reported is false."


Today, in the White House briefing room to discuss Trump's first overseas trip, McMaster said "the premise of that article is false, that in any way the president had a conversation that was inappropriate or that resulted in any kind of lapse in national security."


The general said he wouldn't "discuss what is and what isn't classified," but "in the context of that -- that -- that discussion, what the president discussed with the foreign minister was wholly appropriate to that conversation and is consistent with the routine sharing of information between the president and any leaders with whom he's engaged."


He added that he was "not concerned at all" that allies would be hesitant to intelligence-share with the United States out of concern for the security of that information.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/2 ... n-sources/
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 6:05 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 6:04 pm » wrote:
Don't ever call an issue a loinfo beats into the ground as far less important than it was earlier.
There's always the next lie and the next smear! :\
User avatar
Inglorious
16 May 2017 8:27 pm
User avatar
  
209 posts
Misty » 11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm » wrote:This thread is more like a blog, where I post the stuff that maybe doesn't warrant a whole thread, but is of interest to me, and where I vent about it.
It also serves as a sort of a journal for someone like me with a notoriously bad memory.
Skip to the end of the thread for the most recent issues that got my attention.



************************************************************************
NH GOP Senator Says The Mentally Ill Are Defective People That Should Be Shipped Off To Siberia
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/ ... r-siberia/ :wave:
hon......most of your news you believe has been 90% fake your whole life

you believe in UNNAMED SOURCES......people CLOSE to the story....all horse **** your whole life believing this garbage

if you can't name your source...it is ****

if you won't be named..it is all ****...why hide?????????

i only believe in NAMED SOURCES for info...quoted...verified....PERIOD

all else is ****
User avatar
crimsongulf
16 May 2017 8:52 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
Misty » 15 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote: Well, so far I've read that the WH asked WaPo to hold back certain details from the story because they were too sensitive.
And they didn't deny that 45 gave the Russians classified info.

They said “at no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

The article did not allege those things.
They call that a none denial denial.

Unnamed sources are nothing new.
Don't forget, it was an unnamed source called Deep Throat that brought down a president.

P.S. Guess what didn't leak out from that meeting?
The POTUS telling the Russians to stop **** with our elections.
That's what he should have been telling them.
And still not a verifiable source. TDS gone wild
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2017 9:38 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Huey » 16 May 2017 4:06 pm » wrote: Good for you. Let us know when you have a name and something that contradicts what McMaster said. Then I will join the condemnation. Until then you got nothing.
As usual.
That's funny because you didn't hold Rod Wheeler to the same standard.
You were willing to believe his story based on unnamed 'sources.'
Huey » 16 May 2017 3:32 pm » wrote: When we asked Wheeler if his sources have told him there is information that links Rich to Wikileaks, he said, “Absolutely. Yeah. That's confirmed."
Stay tuned because my next post will be about how Rod Wheeler's story just crumbled.
User avatar
Nobody
16 May 2017 9:56 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 16 May 2017 2:16 pm » wrote:How do you know the story is fake, psycho?
This is how, jackass.
Story on DNC staffer's murder dominated conservative media -- hours later it fell apart.

It took only hours for one of the biggest stories in conservative media this week, which some outlets had chosen to focus on over news that President Trump disclosed classified information to senior Russian officials, to fall apart.

On Monday night, Rod Wheeler, a private investigator and Fox News contributor, put things in motion during an interview with WTTG-TV, a Fox affiliate in Washington.

Wheeler, who was under contract with the family of Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee staffer who was fatally shot in July, told WTTG-TV evidence existed that proved Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks before his death.

For months, right-wing media outlets have floated unproven theories that Rich was the person who provided Wikileaks thousands of internal DNC emails, and that his death might have been connected with the supposed leak.

No real evidence has been provided to support such claims and Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, which continues to investigate the murder, says there is evidence to suggest he may have been the victim of a botched robbery.

Nevertheless, a handful of right-wing media outlets have latched on to the theory -- and Wheeler's remarks on Monday allowed the narrative to once again ricochet throughout the conservative media universe.

"NOT RUSSIA, BUT AN INSIDE JOB?" asked Breitbart, the far-right website previously led by White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, which said that "if proven, the report has the potential to be one of the biggest cover-ups in American political history, dispelling the widespread claim that the Russians were behind hacks on the DNC."

"DEAD DNC STAFFER 'HAD CONTACT' WITH WIKILEAKS," declared the headline of the Drudge Report, the highly-trafficked conservative news destination.

Fox News on Tuesday morning joined in the chorus, publishing a lead story on its website about the "DC MURDER MYSTERY." The story said Wheeler had made the claim Wikileaks had been in contact with Rich.

It added that a federal investigator, who it said had spoken on the condition of anonymity, corroborated it.

But Tuesday afternoon, Wheeler told CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death.

Wheeler instead said he only learned about the possible existence of such evidence through the reporter he spoke to for the FoxNews.com story.

He explained that the comments he made to WTTG-TV were intended to simply preview Fox News' Tuesday story. The WTTG-TV news director did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

"I only got that [information] from the reporter at Fox News," Wheeler told CNN.

Asked about a quote attributed to him in the Fox News story in which he said his "investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and Wikileaks," Wheeler said he was referring to information that had already been reported in the media.

A Fox News spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

Earlier Tuesday, Brad Bauman, a spokesman for the Rich family, released a statement in which he said the family had "seen no evidence" to suggest Seth Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks.

Bauman told CNN the outlets that had run with the story "have shown over and over again that they are willing to lie and manipulate the facts" to further "their own political end."

"I think it's important for everyone at Fox News to be careful with this information and how this story breaks because using the legacy of a murder victim in such an overtly political way is morally reprehensible," he said.

Bauman also said the Rich family was reviewing possible legal action against Wheeler for speaking about the case publicly.

A contract between Wheeler and the Rich family prohibited from speaking to the media about his ongoing investigation, Bauman said.


"It is possible that this private investigator is in breach of a non disclosure contract," Bauman told CNN, adding that the private investigator's public comments have "seriously impeded the ability of the Metropolitan Police Department to investigate."

Asked whether he was in breach of a contract, Wheeler said, "I don't know, it's hard to say."

"I think that's something I will have to work out with [the family]," he added.

Wheeler was put in touch with the Rich family through Dallas businessman Ed Butowsky, who told CNN he had offered to pay any bills associated with the investigation.

"You have a family who can't afford a PI. Their son was killed. So I offered to help out," Butowsky said.

Butowsky, a financial adviser, has provided commentary to Fox News on a number of occasions.

He has also written columns for Breitbart, and was critical of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.


Speaking with NBC News, Butowsky had denied his involvement with Wheeler and the Rich family.

Asked why, he told CNN, "I didn't want to talk to NBC."

Butowsky also said that, thus far, he hasn't "paid any money to anybody."

He said Wheeler was investigating the Rich murder at no cost.
I hope they sue his sorry *** up the wazoo.
Is their hatred for Hillary really so bad that they could do something that grotesque to a grieving family?
Anybody who could do that to a family who lost their son should roast in hell on a spit.
User avatar
Termin8tor
16 May 2017 10:15 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 16 May 2017 9:56 pm » wrote: This is how, jackass.


I hope they sue his sorry *** up the wazoo.
Is their hatred for Hillary really so bad that they could do something that grotesque to a grieving family?
Anybody who could do that to a family who lost their son should roast in hell on a spit.
The Clinton News Network, that covered up Clinton's felonies and impeachable acts?

You're kidding, right, Dim? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I saw Wheeler on Fox tonight, and he was very credible, not going beyond what he knew and what he didn't.

And CNN was very disingenuous. From your source:
But Tuesday afternoon, Wheeler told CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death.
True, he had no personal direct evidence, but he had a source that saw the computer and the files. No, the source wasn't a Fox reporter.

CNN deceitfully spun the story to, as it almost always does, cover up for the corrupt Democrat Party.
1 605 606 607 608 609 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 4470 users online :: 8 registered, 16 bots, and 4446 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Baiduspider, TTD-Content, NING, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Bolt, ADmantX, proximic, DuckDuckBot, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search