Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 May 2017 10:41 am » wrote:Stay tuned for The Comey Memos on the next episode of Celebrity Apprentice - White House Edition.

How many pseudo-scandals based on lies and false accusations have there been, psycho?

This is just the next one, and it's already collapsing, which is why you didn't make any accusation.

Is there a cover up in this murder?

Something strange is going on here...


http://video.foxnews.com/v/543720728900 ... show-clips

Misty » 17 May 2017 10:41 am » wrote:Stay tuned for The Comey Memos on the next episode of Celebrity Apprentice - White House Edition.

I look forward to them.

Misty » 17 May 2017 10:50 am » wrote: But wait, anything 45 told the Russians is automatically declassified, so how can you say someone leaked classified info?

No, it is not declassified. IF it truly was classified information (not proven) the president has the authority to decide who to share it with. The information is STILL classified.

Misty » 17 May 2017 10:41 am » wrote:Stay tuned for The Comey Memos on the next episode of Celebrity Apprentice - White House Edition.

Hey, we're tuned and in great suspense, psycho.

So where are the new revelations?


Where's this massive scandal?

Hello?

Hello?

Misty » 16 May 2017 10:51 pm » wrote:Right. They offered their resignations, and the pResident backed down

I doubt very much if 45 would have backed down had Yates offered her resignation.

Why should he back down, psycho? He's almost certainly correct that his EO is legal and Constitutional.

85% of the world's Muslims are entirely unaffected by this, snicker, "Muslim ban."


Is Yates stupid or just lying about it?

And why didn't she resign, or at least offer her resignation? Answer; because she's a political hack eyeing a future in elected office and appealing to the ignorant moonbat left.

Misty » 16 May 2017 10:33 pm » wrote: Believe it or not I do know the difference between hard news and opinion shows.

Then why do you attack and reject blogs I cite when they cite factual information from the news, liar?

Huey » 17 May 2017 12:27 pm » wrote: No, it is not declassified. IF it truly was classified information (not proven) the president has the authority to decide who to share it with. The information is STILL classified.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiHN3IJ_j8A

indago » 17 May 2017 1:56 pm » wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiHN3IJ_j8A

On this specific case you need to check the law. Then get back to me.

Don't care about nixon

Termin8tor » 17 May 2017 10:52 am » wrote:McMaster said a felony was committed.

What felony?

As soon as 45 blurts classified stuff out of his mouth it's declassified.

Termin8tor » 17 May 2017 11:04 am » wrote:How many pseudo-scandals based on lies and false accusations have there been, psycho?
This is just the next one, and it's already collapsing, which is why you didn't make any accusation.

So who do you think people are going to believe Puss?
Comey or the Liar-In-Chief?

There isn't one person with a shred of credibility left in that WH.
They blew it on day one with that ridiculous lie about something so stupid as the size of the inaugural crowd.
They told us to believe something that we could see with our own eyes was not true.

Then of course there was the 'Obama tapped my phones' fiasco.

roadkill » 17 May 2017 12:20 pm » wrote:Is there a cover up in this murder?
Something strange is going on here...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/543720728900 ... show-clips

There is no cover up.
It's just a bunch of shameless Hillary haters using the death of a young man to advance yet another wingnut conspiracy theory.
Like I said, they should all burn in hell for doing that to that poor family.
And that includes Hannity.

Misty » 17 May 2017 4:09 pm » wrote: There is no cover up.
It's just a bunch of shameless Hillary haters using the death of a young man to advance yet another wingnut conspiracy theory.
Like I said, they should all burn in hell for doing that to that poor family.
And that includes Hannity.

Some robbery, huh? They forgot his wallet and watch.

Just after he had contact with wiki leaks.

Misty says "nothing to see here folks, move along".

Huey » 17 May 2017 12:27 pm » wrote: No, it is not declassified. IF it truly was classified information (not proven) the president has the authority to decide who to share it with. The information is STILL classified.

OIC, so he shared classified info with the two Russian (spies) guys and the guy from TASS.

BTW, was it his to share?
Did he have permission from the country who gave us that intel to share it with Russia?

Misty » 17 May 2017 4:07 pm » wrote: So who do you think people are going to believe Puss?
Comey or the Liar-In-Chief?

There isn't one person with a shred of credibility left in that WH.
They blew it on day one with that ridiculous lie about something so stupid as the size of the inaugural crowd.
They told us to believe something that we could see with our own eyes was not true.

Then of course there was the 'Obama tapped my phones' fiasco.

This Comey:

Senate Democratic leader-in-waiting Chuck Schumer said Wednesday he’s lost confidence in FBI Director James Comey over his handling of the most recent disclosure in the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation -- a tough rebuke to a man Schumer has long admired.

“I do not have confidence in him any longer,” said the New York Democrat, who has criticized as “appalling” Comey’s decision to send a letter to lawmakers 11 days before the election disclosing the bureau’s new review of e-mails potentially pertinent to the investigation of Clinton’s private server.

“To restore my faith, I am going to have to sit down and talk to him and get an explanation for why he did this,” Schumer said in an interview.

Or this Comey:

Washington (CNN)House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that FBI Director James Comey is perhaps "not in the right job" given how he has handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email use.

Pelosi declined to say in an interview with CNN's Jamie Gangel that Comey should resign or be removed, but did not rule it out in the future.

"Maybe he's not in the right job," Pelosi said. "I think that we have to just get through this election and just see what the casualties are along the way."

The former House speaker said Comey had made a "mistake" by sending a letter to Congress about the new review of emails potentially related to Clinton's private server after not recommending prosecution earlier this summer. She alleged that he had a "double standard" given reports that Comey at other points did not want to use his agency to interfere in the election, adding that the new investigation is interfering in the race.

Misty » 17 May 2017 4:19 pm » wrote: OIC, so he shared classified info with the two Russian (spies) guys and the guy from TASS.

BTW, was it his to share?
Did he have permission from the country who gave us that intel to share it with Russia?

Oh my gosh, Trump didn't say "please, may I!"

Israel has said it's no big deal.

A former Cameron adviser among many have said, if anything, this is a routine error made by politicians and aides.

Shrieking and babbling won't make it bigger.

Misty » 17 May 2017 4:19 pm » wrote: OIC, so he shared classified info with the two Russian (spies) guys and the guy from TASS.

BTW, was it his to share?
Did he have permission from the country who gave us that intel to share it with Russia?

It has yet to be proven he did share classified info. What is off on this story is President are generally not briefed on how intel was gathered. This is done purposely so they don't inadvertently leak what they don't know.

Once it is in his hands it his to share. Again, for the hard headed, the president is the ultimate authority on what can be shared.

Now, when you prove that he shared something other than a general threat that ISIS is planning to blow up jets with laptops, something known to the public, let me know. You may be surprised by the answer.

And even if he did leak the info impeachment is out of the question because he did not break any laws. It will be an embarrassment and will give you meme fodder, but the story will be over.

Since you are upset about this I suppose you are also upset that someone in government leaked that Israel is the source with an embed undercover agent and the NYT published it? Are we going to see posts from you condemning the leaker and the press with the same zeal that you condemn trump? Or is this yet another partisan hack issue for you?

Misty, some day you will learn I have all the bases covered.

Termin8tor » 17 May 2017 4:26 pm » wrote: Oh my gosh, Trump didn't say "please, may I!"

Israel has said it's no big deal.

A former Cameron adviser among many have said, if anything, this is a routine error made by politicians and aides.

Shrieking and babbling won't make it bigger.

Let's see if little miss classified material condemns the leaker and the press.

Misty » 17 May 2017 4:07 pm » wrote: So who do you think people are going to believe Puss?
Comey or the Liar-In-Chief?

There isn't one person with a shred of credibility left in that WH.

Hey, great job at totally bypassing the fact that another of your fake scandals has collapsed.

That Comey's leak has also collapsed his crooked reputation.

Given the lies, **** and hooey carried in the Fake Media, some people might have lost faith.

But in two years with a stronger economy, many accomplishments and the exposure of your endless Democrat Talking Point Lies, your party is going to take a serious hit in the Senate.

They blew it on day one with that ridiculous lie about something so stupid as the size of the inaugural crowd.
They told us to believe something that we could see with our own eyes was not true.

Oh, so now we're back to the crowd size mega scandal. That really tops the fake Trump-Russia-Collaboration-Conspiracy-Thing-ey.

Then of course there was the 'Obama tapped my phones' fiasco.

Oh yeah, who cares about those felonies! Not little Miss Marxist.


See you at the hearings, psycho.

Members of both parties are quite pissed at this abuse of power.

Huey » 17 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote: Let's see if little miss classified material condemns the leaker and the press.

No, no, felonies are to be covered up, if committed by Dems, and celebrated if committed against Repubs.

Proved by her years and years and years of doing exactly that.