Liberal Forum

Exclusive: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians: sources.

Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.

The previously undisclosed interactions form part of the record now being reviewed by FBI and congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election and contacts between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote: I'm sure they were just telling the Russians to knock off interfering in our election.

Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote: I'm sure they were just telling the Russians to knock off interfering in our election.

Misty » 18 May 2017 10:38 am » wrote: Collapsed? Looks to me more like the noose is tightening around his neck.
Members of his own party seem to be turning on him now.

Democrat Alan Dershowitz: I Don’t See Any Evidence of Collusion – Even if There Was That’s Not a Crime

Alan Dershowitz: Well first of all I don’t see any evidence of collusion, and second even if there was major collusion, that’s not a crime. Even hypothetically if the administration or the candidate got together with the Russians and said, “Please help me become president. Do whatever you can to help me.” That wouldn’t be a crime… The most serious condemnations that have been made have nothing to do with criminal conduct. Collusion with the Russians is not criminal conduct.”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... ime-video/

Huey » 18 May 2017 6:05 pm » wrote: He could. But you can easily said he did. Which you did. So you got proof? ****, you name certain claims about yourself. We do not know if they are true.

Didn't think so.

****, you make certain claims about yourself. We do not know if they are true.

Are you my new troll?

Huey » 18 May 2017 6:51 pm » wrote: Where is the illegal part or the alleged election thing?

Just Askin'

Annoyed Liberall » 11 Mar 2011 1:49 pm » wrote:Wow. What a dick.

The Liberal Advocate News

Website : www.liberaladvocate.com


Write for The Liberal Advocate News.Learn how to become a Liberal Advocate today!</p>

Huey » 18 May 2017 7:14 pm » wrote:Hi Misty, I know you like it when people say stupid **** so I am surprised you missed this. Mrs. James Brown, Maxine Waters:

When asked what the standard by which Trump should be impeached, Waters said, “I am talking about strategies that were developed working with the Trump campaign. I really do believe that much of what you saw coming out of Trump’s mouth was a play from Putin’s playbook. I think that when you saw him absolutely calling Hillary crooked, the, “lock her up, lock her up” all of that was developed. I think that was developed strategically with people from the Kremlin, with Putin, and I think it’s more than bank records

liberaladvocate » 18 May 2017 8:09 pm » wrote:Agreed but that will apply to just about every conservative.

Misty » 18 May 2017 9:22 pm » wrote: I'm not a big fan of Maxine Waters.
She tends to get a little carried away with her rhetoric.

crimsongulf » 18 May 2017 9:27 pm » wrote:Waters is an Einstein compared to Sheila Jackson Lee.

Misty » 18 May 2017 9:33 pm » wrote: It's a close contest.

Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote:

Mr. Medvedchuk, who was the longtime chief of staff to former President Leonid D. Kuchma, is a polarizing figure in Ukraine, known for his ruthlessness in politics and for his checkered past as a young lawyer in the Soviet Union.

His role in a Soviet crackdown on dissidents ahead of the 1980 Olympics is widely believed to have contributed to the death of a Ukrainian poet and human rights activist, Vasyl Stus.

Mr. Stus, exercising one of his few rights as a dissident defendant, tried to refuse representation by Mr. Medvedchuk, his state-appointed lawyer.

Mr. Medvedchuk, however, insisted on speaking at the trial anyway, declaring his client guilty and saying he deserved to be punished.

Five years later, Mr. Stus, who had been nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature, died at the age of 47 in a forced labor camp in Russia.

“He acted more like a prosecutor than a defense lawyer,” Yevhen Sverstiuk, an essayist and author who knew Mr. Stus, said in an interview last year.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/12/worl ... .html?_r=0

crimsongulf » 18 May 2017 9:42 pm » wrote:You have to wonder about some of the idiots we elect, be them red or blue. sometimes I think we get what we deserve.

liberaladvocate » 18 May 2017 8:09 pm » wrote: Agreed but that will apply to just about every conservative.

Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote:Exclusive: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians: sources.

I'm sure they were just telling the Russians to knock off interfering in our election.

Democrat Alan Dershowitz: I Don’t See Any Evidence of Collusion – Even if There Was That’s Not a Crime

Alan Dershowitz: Well first of all I don’t see any evidence of collusion, and second even if there was major collusion, that’s not a crime. Even hypothetically if the administration or the candidate got together with the Russians and said, “Please help me become president. Do whatever you can to help me.” That wouldn’t be a crime… The most serious condemnations that have been made have nothing to do with criminal conduct. Collusion with the Russians is not criminal conduct.”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05 ... ime-video/

Termin8tor » 18 May 2017 10:02 pm » wrote:Do you have one single shred of evidence of any wrongdoing, psycho?
No, just lies, false accusations, insinuations and smears.

When Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, sought the top-secret security clearance that would give him access to some of the nation’s most closely guarded secrets, he was required to disclose all encounters with foreign government officials over the last seven years.

But Mr. Kushner did not mention dozens of contacts with foreign leaders or officials in recent months.

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2017/ ... nce-forms/

When filling out the Questionnaire for National Security Positions (SF-86) there is a section right after the instructions that you have to acknowledge as having read.

It states: “I have read the instructions and I understand that if I withhold, misrepresent, or falsify information on this form, I am subject to the penalties for inaccurate or false statement (per U.S. Criminal Code, Title 18, section 1001), denial or revocation of a security clearance, and/or removal and debarment from Federal service.”

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/04/ ... stigation/

Termin8tor » 18 May 2017 9:58 pm » wrote:Oh look, another liberal moonbat who will bleat stupidly for a while, then disappear in embarrasment like all the rest who came before him.