Liberal Forum

Misty » 18 May 2017 11:07 pm » wrote: If anyone should disappear in embarrassment, it's you.
Unfortunately you have no sense of shame.

Huey » 18 May 2017 8:56 am » wrote: Ok, I will give you that. But I will say as one who has had dealings with all sorts of highly classified systems and locations I do give a **** about a person's credential when we are talking about this particular subject. Where someone like may be getting their information from a second hand source like the media who is mostly inaccurate on the subject some of us actually have working experience concerning the subject meaning we were subject to the rules and laws.

larryc12 » 18 May 2017 9:02 am » wrote:I guess you wouldn't want your experience with an issue on a debating forum to use as backing what you say about it. Credibility counts, does it not?

larryc12 » 18 May 2017 9:10 am » wrote: You don't like the guy so you slap at him about using his experience to make a valid point in a debating forum. That's simple, willful ignorance and typical of the leftist. Find a put down somehow, some way, valid or not.

Huey » 18 May 2017 9:29 am » wrote:
I'll give you an example. If you want advice on how to start a business, run that business, grow that business and create jobs who are you going to listen to? The individuals that have successfully accomplished all of the above OR the person who has listened only to those whose only experience in those areas has been discussing theory in academia?

Who has more credibility?

Huey » 18 May 2017 10:44 am » wrote: Go ahead and lash out. That is what many do when they are caught in the web of their own words. Hell, even I admit when I was mistaken.

Misty » 18 May 2017 7:51 pm » wrote: Where did I say there was anything illegal or anything about the alleged election thing?

It says right in the article that 'the people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia.'

I guess you don't understand that my sarcasm (which is what it was, hence the side eye smiley ) had to do with the fact that we seem to keep finding out that there are more and more undisclosed contacts with the Russians.

That is why I only posted the part of the article that dealt solely with that issue.

Why do you constantly try to ascribe some kind of nefarious motive to me?

Misty » 18 May 2017 7:51 pm » wrote: Where did I say there was anything illegal or anything about the alleged election thing?

It says right in the article that 'the people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia.'

I guess you don't understand that my sarcasm (which is what it was, hence the side eye smiley ) had to do with the fact that we seem to keep finding out that there are more and more undisclosed contacts with the Russians.

That is why I only posted the part of the article that dealt solely with that issue.

Why do you constantly try to ascribe some kind of nefarious motive to me?

Misty » 18 May 2017 10:18 pm » wrote: Much like your buddy Huey, you fail to understand that I was being sarcastic.

If any of those people are now part of the administration, the 'wrongdoing' would be their failure to disclose those contacts.

We already know that Jared Kushner failed to disclose his contacts with the Russian ambassador (and dozens of others) in his security clearance documents.

Misty » 18 May 2017 12:04 pm » wrote: That was not the purpose of the piece.
It's an opinion piece.

Study: Seven Million Voters Registered in Multiple States
Election integrity advocates warn un-scrubbed rolls are 'kindling' for possible fraud
by Brendan Kirby | Updated 19 May 2017 at 6:15 AM

Some 7.2 million people are registered to vote in more than one state, according to data obtained this month by a voter-integrity law firm called the Public Interest Legal Foundation.

The data come from the Interstate Crosscheck system, a 28-state consortium run by Kansas. The numbers largely are unchanged from 2014, when the database had 7.3 million double-registered voters.

“Let’s check. If that’s the case, at least we’ll have appropriate measures to make such a statement.”

Considering that nearly half of the states — including the three most populous — do not participate in the voluntary system, Public Interest Legal Foundation spokesman Logan Churchwell said the total number of people in America registered to vote in more than one state could be twice as high or greater.

“It could be 20 million,” he said....

President Donald Trump last week appointed a commission to examine voter fraud, naming as vice chairman Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who created the Interstate Crosscheck system.
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/stud ... le-states/

Misty » 19 May 2017 11:57 am » wrote:I long for the day that Roe. Vs. Wade is sent to the ash heap of history.

Global warming is a myth.

Misty » 18 May 2017 11:07 pm » wrote:If anyone should disappear in embarrassment, it's you.
Unfortunately you have no sense of shame.

Democrat Campaign Worker Recorded Bragging about His Voter Fraud Schemes


The Dallas County Elections Department knew it had a major problem on its hands when residents started went to their mailboxes and noticed they had received “mail-in ballots” they never requested. Dr. Pat Stephens had that very thing happen to her. Then, a few days, later, she had an unwanted visitor. "I got a knock on my door and the guy was saying that he was coming to pick up the mail-in ballots and I told him, 'Well I didn’t order one.'”

So far, over 700 "mail-in-ballots" are linked to applications assisted by a person called "Jose Rodriguez” that have been deemed “suspicious.” Who is this mysterious man? That’s been one of the biggest enigmas in Texas. Until now.

PJ Media reports:

Before the election, Sidney Williams, 33, made secret audio recordings of his interactions with Jose Barrientos, a campaign worker who suggested on tape that he pay off someone inside the county elections office to find out when mail-in ballots get sent out. "He's not supposed to but yeah," Barrientos told Williams. "But then you've got to drop a hundred or two or three. Whatever it is. He can't do it for free."

Barrientos also suggested in a phone call with Williams that he was the mysterious Jose Rodriguez, admitting that the signatures on the absentee ballots look just like his own. "You're talking to the master, bro," he boasted.

The most disturbing thing about this is that the corruption extends all the way up into the Elections Office, where “someone on the inside” gives out information for anywhere between $100 and $300.

So now you know that Democrats are literally buying and selling votes in Dallas, Texas.


.

.
https://youtu.be/SrS4yXlRzD4
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/democra ... ud-schemes

Huey » 19 May 2017 5:45 am » wrote: It is not a matter of not understanding sarcasm. It is a matter of you crying "I was using sarcasm" or humor when caught in your words.

Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote: I'm sure they were just telling the Russians to knock off interfering in our election.

Misty » 09 May 2017 9:19 pm » wrote: Much of what I post here is either humor, sarcasm or sometimes just plain old hyperbole.

Looks like Sheriff David Clarke’s “army” medals might be B.S.

At almost all of his public appearances, Clarke either wears a pristine cowboy hat with a natty suit or, more famously, a uniform festooned with shiny military medals.

On Thursday, Twitter user Charles Clymer, an army veteran, pointed out that those military medals might not be all that legit.

“Look at this **** guy’s uniform,” Clymer said, in the second of a long string of tweets on the subject.

"You see all that **** pinned all over his dress uniform jacket? That's not supposed to be there."

Clymer went on to break down each individual medal, their placement and their apparently spurious provenance.

Clymer acknowledged that legitimate medals are earned, and should be worn with pride, but accuses Clarke of “stolen valor” and calls Clarke’s collection, “a sloppy assortment of badge replicas arranged neatly, [that] looks imposing.”

Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner get rabbinical pass to fly to Saudi Arabia on Shabbat

Not the first time the couple have managed to circumvent the rules.

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump will fly aboard Air Force One to Saudi Arabia with President Donald Trump on Friday, after receiving a rabbinical dispensation to travel on Shabbat.

President Trump’s daughter and her husband, Mr Kushner, as Orthodox Jews, typically observe Shabbat, but have made occasional exceptions.

They received a rabbinical pass to travel by car on President Trump’s inauguration celebrations.

It is not clear on what grounds permission was given on this occasion, to accompany the president on his first international trip.

During the presidential campaign, Mr Kushner broke Shabbat during the “Access Hollywood” tape scandal, in which the then-Republican nominee was shown to have bragged about groping women without their consent.

Worldwide effort set to keep Trump happy on 1st trip abroad.

When President Donald Trump sits down for dinner in Saudi Arabia, caterers have ensured that his favorite meal - steak with a side of ketchup - will be offered alongside the traditional local cuisine.

At NATO and the Group of 7 summits, foreign delegations have gotten word that the new U.S. president prefers short presentations and lots of visual aids.

And at all of Trump’s five stops on his first overseas trip, his team has spent weeks trying to build daily downtime into his otherwise jam-packed schedule.

It’s all part of a worldwide effort to accommodate America’s homebody president on a voyage with increasingly raised stakes given the ballooning controversy involving his campaign’s possible ties to Russia.

For a former international businessman, Trump simply doesn’t have an affinity for much international.

Even before Trump’s trip morphed from a quick jaunt to Europe into a nine-day behemoth, White House aides were on edge about how the president would take to grueling pressures of foreign travel: the time zone changes, the unfamiliar hotels, the local delicacies. Two officials said they feared that a difficult trip might even lead the president to hand off future traveling duties to Vice President Mike Pence.

Termin8tor » 18 May 2017 10:02 pm » wrote:Do you have one single shred of evidence of any wrongdoing, psycho?

Trump Told Russians That Firing ‘Nut Job’ Comey Eased Pressure From Investigation

President Trump told Russian officials in the Oval Office this month that firing the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, had relieved “great pressure” on him, according to a document summarizing the meeting.

“I just fired the head of the F.B.I.

He was crazy, a real nut job,” Mr. Trump said, according to the document, which was read to The New York Times by an American official.

“I faced great pressure because of Russia.

That’s taken off.”

Mr. Trump added, “I’m not under investigation.”

The conversation, during a May 10 meeting — the day after he fired Mr. Comey — reinforces the notion that Mr. Trump dismissed him primarily because of the bureau’s investigation into possible collusion between his campaign and Russian operatives.

Mr. Trump said as much in one televised interview, but the White House has offered changing justifications for the firing.

The White House document that contained Mr. Trump’s comments was based on notes taken from inside the Oval Office and has been circulated as the official account of the meeting.

One official read quotations to The Times, and a second official confirmed the broad outlines of the discussion.

Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, did not dispute the account.

In a statement, he said that Mr. Comey had put unnecessary pressure on the president’s ability to conduct diplomacy with Russia on matters such as Syria, Ukraine and the Islamic State.