.Misty » 19 May 2017 1:29 pm » wrote:Polarizing Sheriff David Clarke Says He’ll Take a Top Homeland Security Job
Of course he will.
He'll fit right in.
Speaking of Fake News, have you got one shred of evidence for the endless babbling, false accusations and insinuations that have filled the corrupt liberal MSM papers and networks for months?
indago » 18 May 2017 5:35 pm » wrote: Bilko is a KNOWN hallucinatory: KNOWN
He could easily hallucinate up "credentials". And you swallowed...
Misty the Troll says:Misty » 19 May 2017 12:41 pm » wrote: If you don't understand when something I say is sarcasm, even when I use the sarcasm smiley, that's not my fault.
Perhaps, since you seem to believe that you know my intentions better than I do, you can tell me what the purpose of the smiley was in this post, if not to denote sarcasm?
I await your explanation.
I don't cry sarcasm AFTER the fact.
I have told you BEFORE the fact that a lot of what I post here is sarcasm.
Yet you still continue to pretend that I never said it.
I'm not going to point it out every time I use sarcasm just to satisfy you.
If you don't get it, you don't get it.
Maybe my siggy will help.
Misty » 18 May 2017 6:48 pm » wrote: I'm sure they were just telling the Russians to knock off interfering in our election.
She will go into a deep depression if it is determined that there was no collusion or reuseia did not realease the Clinton emails. It will be back to the ward for her:Sgt Bilko » 19 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You a die hard hater of Trump saying this idiocy. It is obvious you left your mind behind somewhere and you need to go find it. Seek and you shall find. Knock and the door will be opened to you. Hurry and find it!!!

Huey » 19 May 2017 4:54 pm » wrote: She will go into a deep depression if it is determined that there was no collusion or reuseia did not realease the Clinton emails. It will be back to the ward for her:
I also find it odd that she's whines to high heaven about the possibility that Russia tried to influence the election you she has verifiable proof that in fact Clinton herself did in fact influence the election and she remains strangely silent. She even voted for Clinton.
It was the monthly visitation day. That was just after the election. They picked her up after making this video:
Poor Misty. Such a sad case!!Huey » 19 May 2017 9:03 pm » wrote: It was the monthly visitation day. That was just after the election. They picked her up after making this video:
https://youtu.be/9yMgOshXaYM
They figure the stress of posting thousands of anti trump Facebook memes drove her over the edge. The official diagnosis is Trump Derangement Syndrome coupled with Clinton Adulation Disorder.
Could take years to get her mind right.
The true problem is financial. She did have an Obamacare plan but went broke trying to reach the deductible. She was on the street selling her blood for a while but that didn't work out because they found hepatitis c.Sgt Bilko » 19 May 2017 9:21 pm » wrote: Poor Misty. Such a sad case!!
"the difference between SCADA and IRIG" One has five letters, and the other has four!Sgt Bilko » 19 May 2017 3:13 pm » wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Poor wee little mentally challenged indago is having another bad case of brain flatulence producing smelly posts.
Do you understand the difference between SCADA and IRIG?
YOU WILL FAIL THIS TEST!!!
THAT IS BECAUSE YOU KEEP EXPOSING YOUR IGNORANCE!!
INDAGO ONLY PRODUCES BRAIN FLATULENCE!!
I WILL EXPLAIN AFTER YOU RANT IDIOCY!!
YUCK WHAT A HORRIBLE SMELL!!!
You two are truly hallucinatory...Huey » 19 May 2017 9:24 pm » wrote: The true problem is financial. She did have an Obamacare plan but went broke trying to reach the deductible. She was on the street selling her blood for a while but that didn't work out because they found hepatitis c.
Says the guy who is a disgrace to this country.Cannonpointer » 18 May 2017 11:22 pm » wrote:^Blanket put down - typical conjob.
What experience do YOU have with classified info, loinfo? An ad hominem attack via someone's declared experience is over the top, but you don't give a **** about that because YOU don't like him. You're an absolute disgrace.Cannonpointer » 18 May 2017 11:21 pm » wrote:Bilko **** himself, *******.
- there goes his "credibility."
Yeah, well so you say. Who spews an ad hominem relative to real experience when discussing a pertinent issue? You did.indago » 18 May 2017 9:12 am » wrote:
I don't dislike anybody here...
Demonstrating your ignorance as I expected. I worked for EMR Telemetry for over 35 years.indago » 20 May 2017 3:03 am » wrote: "the difference between SCADA and IRIG" One has five letters, and the other has four!
Once actual experience with any given topic or issue defeats a leftist's "statement of fact", they have nowhere else to go besides the old standby, ad hominem. We see that time after time. I've had them thrown at me for both my military experience and my teaching experience. And, in every case, the person attacking had no work or professional experience with the issue whatsoever.Sgt Bilko » 20 May 2017 7:56 am » wrote:
You are such a fool to try and make me look foolish in an area I am a complete expert in.
S C A D A... Five letters... Count 'em 1 2 3 4 5Sgt Bilko » 20 May 2017 7:56 am » wrote: Demonstrating your ignorance as I expected... (and other and sundry aberrations, ramifications, fixations, lamentations, prevarications, hallucinations, and incantations)
That's it, psycho? Undisclosed contacts?Misty » 18 May 2017 10:18 pm » wrote: If any of those people are now part of the administration, the 'wrongdoing' would be their failure to disclose those contacts.
We already know that Jared Kushner failed to disclose his contacts with the Russian ambassador (and dozens of others) in his security clearance documents.
Indago is a champion of that kind of attack. I always enjoy feeding him facts to make him look foolish after setting him up about it. He falls for it every time!!!larryc12 » 20 May 2017 8:12 am » wrote: Once actual experience with any given topic or issue defeats a leftist's "statement of fact", they have nowhere else to go besides the old standby, ad hominem. We see that time after time. I've had them thrown at me for both my military experience and my teaching experience. And, in every case, the person attacking had no work or professional experience with the issue whatsoever.