Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 9:06 am » wrote:
That's very, very impractical. All we need are some leaders to give the rest a little spine.

There have to be some drones in a hive.

I can imagine it's very intimidating to see a lot of careers ruined by people who did cross the liberal MSM at some point and were later attacked and ruined, while truly corrupt criminal Democrats like Bill Clinton were given a free pass.

Gingrich should have been speaker for a lot longer than he was, but overwhelmingly negative media wore his reputation down.

That's all true, but all of the Congress has been shown - directly by the American people - what they want in leadership. And what they DON'T want. If they have no faith in the American people themselves for doing what is right by and for them, how will they ever lead?

Report: Melania Trump doesn't think too highly of Sean Spicer's performance.

Though first lady Melania Trump has remained mostly in New York during her husband's first few months as president, she has reportedly been keeping a close eye on the media's portrayal of Donald Trump and his administration.

According to Politico, "She has raised concerns that some on his communications and press team aren't doing enough to defend him, according [to] aides and sources close to the president."

Melania has specifically pointed to the inadequate performance of White House press secretary Sean Spicer, indicated one source.

The piece adds that "She's been especially troubled by background quotes in which West Wing aides criticize the president, and she's called the president to discuss it."

In fact, on Friday, the Daily Beast quoted a person described as a "senior administration official who also worked on Trump's campaign" as saying about Trump, "Every day he looks more and more like a complete moron.

I can't see Trump resigning or even being impeached, but at this point I wish he'd grow a brain and be the man that he sold himself as on the campaign."

It's not Spicer's fault that every day 45 looks more and more like a complete moron.

Misty » 21 May 2017 1:14 pm » wrote:It's not Spicer's fault that every day 45 looks more and more like a complete moron.

Well gosh, he's sure being received with high regard in the Middle East.

But I'm sure you really miss having two sociopathic liars in the White House, and almost a 3rd.

Birds of a feather.

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 1:27 pm » wrote:Well gosh, he's sure being received with high regard in the Middle East.

Too bad he doesn't live there.

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 8:56 am » wrote:On the basis of unresolved evidence, I think it's worth reading about and considering, until refuted. What's wrong with that?

Unresolved evidence?
How about NO evidence?
The so-called private detective has admitted that he has seen NO evidence.

What's wrong with a couple of wingnuts hurting a family whose young son was murdered just so they could promote a wacky conspiracy theory?
If you really have to ask that question, then WTF is wrong with you?

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 8:56 am » wrote:I think it's worth reading about and considering, until refuted.

So does that same standard of guilty until proven innocent apply to anything about 45, or does it only apply to Dems/Libs?
Do you believe that any suspicions about wrongdoing by him are worth reading about and considering 'until refuted?'
Hypocrite.

Huey » 21 May 2017 2:31 pm » wrote:Is Ivanka SoS?

No.
She's only a top advisor to the POTUS, who also happens to be her father, so no conflict there, right Huey?
It's not like she advises him on policy or anything.[/sarcasm]

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: No.
She's only a top advisor to the POTUS, who also happens to be her father, so no conflict there, right Huey?
It's not like she advises him on policy or anything.[/sarcasm]

Let me know when you have evidence of corruption.

Thanks!

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:28 pm » wrote:

Hillary accepted donations into the Clinton Foundation 90% of which goes to the Clintons.
Ivanka Trumps proposed foundations will be run by people independent from the Trumps.

Misty is lying again. She is irrational in her mind addled dementia!!!

Huey » 21 May 2017 2:40 pm » wrote:Let me know when you have evidence of corruption.
Thanks!

I guess you fail to see the hypocrisy.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:
Hillary accepted donations into the Clinton Foundation 90% of which goes to the Clintons.
Ivanka Trumps proposed foundations will be run by people independent from the Trumps.

Misty is lying again. She is irrational in her mind addled dementia!!!

I forgot about that.

Misty says oops

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:46 pm » wrote: I guess you fail to see the hypocrisy.

What YOU forgot is Ivanka is not running the foundation

.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:Hillary accepted donations into the Clinton Foundation 90% of which goes to the Clintons.
Ivanka Trumps proposed foundations will be run by people independent from the Trumps.
Misty is lying again. She is irrational in her mind addled dementia!!!

I'm lying?
Prove that **** you just posted that 90% of the money collected by the Clinton Foundation went to the Clintons.
You can't because that is a filthy lie.

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: No.
She's only a top advisor to the POTUS, who also happens to be her father, so no conflict there, right Huey?
It's not like she advises him on policy or anything.[/sarcasm]

So now you descend to denigrating his daughter. What evidence do you have against her except for your irrational hatred of her father. This speaks volumes about your hatred.

MISTY FAILS TO UNDERSTAND THAT HARDLY ANYONE ON THIS SITE BELIEVES HER LIES!!!

SHE PROVIDES NO REASONABLE PROOF!!!

Huey » 21 May 2017 2:46 pm » wrote:What YOU forgot is Ivanka is not running the foundation
.

OIC, you mean like how none of them are 'running' their businesses?
Wink, wink.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 2:49 pm » wrote: MISTY FAILS TO UNDERSTAND THAT HARDLY ANYONE ON THIS SITE BELIEVES HER LIES!!!

SHE PROVIDES NO REASONABLE PROOF!!!

Prove that 90% of the funds donated to the Clinton Foundation went into the Clinton's pockets or STFU.

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:50 pm » wrote: OIC, you mean like how none of them are 'running' their businesses?
Wink, wink.

Actua,,y no, Ivanka Trump is not running that foundation. She does raise money for it but the fund is administered by the awkrld Bank, not Ivanka Trump. This was discussed on the forum, probably the last time you whined about it.

Saudi Arabia, UAE pledge $100 million to women entrepreneurs fund proposed by Ivanka Trump

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates will reportedly pledge $100 million toward a fund for women entrepreneurs that was built by Ivanka Trump.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the World Bank’s Women Entrepreneurs Fund, an idea that the president's elder daughter proposed, will work to help women in the Middle East who want to start their own businesses.

The donation from Saudi Arabia and the UAE was set to be announced at a Sunday event with President Trump’s daughter, according to the report.

The first daughter spoke with Saudi women who are civil leaders, businesswomen and elected government officials during the president’s first foreign trip.

The State Department has noted problems with human rights in Saudi Arabia, including “citizens’ lack of the ability and legal means to choose their government; restrictions on universal rights, such as freedom of expression, including on the Internet, and the freedoms of assembly, association, movement, and religion; and pervasive gender discrimination and lack of equal rights that affected most aspects of women’s lives,” the Washington Post reported.

In the conservative Islamic country, women are not allowed to drive and require permission from a male guardian to travel in public. Women are also required to cover themselves in public.

In 2016, then-Republican candidate Trump criticized Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation for accepting donations from Saudi Arabia.

“Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!” Trump wrote on Facebook in June 2016.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... neurs-fund

Her name is not on the fund, she does not run the fund.

Move along folks, non story.

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:46 pm » wrote: I guess you fail to see the hypocrisy.

Oh my, hypocrisy!

Once again little Miss Marxist is ignoring the crimes and the massive corruption of Pay-for-Play by the deeply corrupt Clinton's.

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:48 pm » wrote: I'm lying?
Prove that **** you just posted that 90% of the money collected by the Clinton Foundation went to the Clintons.
You can't because that is a filthy lie.

The foundation was closed when it was going to be audited. Why would they do that? As Secretary of State there was the accusation of influence for sale with donations to the foundation. This was part of what the audit was going to look at. Keep in mind there were 2 seperate foundations. The more public one is legitimate while the other one that is closed is very questionable. Who got the money when that one was closed???