Liberal Forum

Here is a link to the fund:

http://projects.worldbank.org/P122764/w ... ct?lang=en

Where the REAL hypocrisy is occurring is with Misty. Misty, in the past has promoted herself as a champion for women. Everything from the right to chose, victims rights, employment, etc. She would attack any poster who she perceived as being against her agenda. Apparently it was all for politics. Remember, she voted for Kasich, with a zero NARAL rating and claimed she liked him. She is now attacking a fund that was created to help women all over the world start businesses. Why? Because Ivanka Tump raises money for it. It is not her fund, nor does she run it.

Misty would rather see women suffer so score political points.

Misty » 21 May 2017 2:50 pm » wrote: OIC, you mean like how none of them are 'running' their businesses?
Wink, wink.

Misty is once again proving her lack of cognitive ability to discern fact from fiction. When a person controls a foundation that they create corruption is an issue. Bill controlled the second foundation.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:03 pm » wrote:The foundation was closed when it was going to be audited. Why would they do that? As Secretary of State there was the accusation of influence for sale with donations to the foundation. This was part of what the audit was going to look at. Keep in mind there were 2 seperate foundations. The more public one is legitimate while the other one that is closed is very questionable. Who got the money when that one was closed???

That's your proof?


Last I read the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), which is an offshoot of the Clinton Foundation was downsizing.
I can't find anything about it being completely shut down.

As a matter of fact, I found this in Foreign Policy Magazine The Clinton Global Initiative Isn’t Really Dead

They still have a small group of people at CGI to help those who have made commitments keep them.

And I can't find anything about this audit you talk about that was supposed to take place right before they were shut down.
Maybe that's because they have not shut down.

You're the one always screaming about me being a liar, when I back up my stuff with sources.
You gotta do better than that Bilko.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 2:43 pm » wrote:Hillary accepted donations into the Clinton Foundation 90% of which goes to the Clintons.

Prove it.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:22 pm » wrote:Misty is once again proving her lack of cognitive ability to discern fact from fiction. When a person controls a foundation that they create corruption is an issue. Bill controlled the second foundation.

I'm sure that none of these countries or corporations will donate money to Ivanka's foundation slush fund to curry favor with the POTUS.[/sarcasm]
If the Clintons were in the WH right now, and they did half the stuff the Trump's are doing, you would be screaming bloody murder, and you know it, so don't even try to lie about it.

Bill was in control of the second foundation that was closed when an audit was proposed. Why was the audit proposed and where did that money go? Does Misty have answers to these questions?? Somehow I think not!!!

Misty » 21 May 2017 3:31 pm » wrote: I'm sure that none of these countries or corporations will donate money to Ivanka's foundation slush fund to curry favor with the POTUS.[/sarcasm]
If the Clintons were in the WH right now, and they did half the stuff the Trump's are doing, you would be screaming bloody murder, and you know it, so don't even try to lie about it.

Massive difference between Clinton's second foundation and Ivanka's proposed foundations. Clinton's had absolute control while Ivanka's proposed foundations would be under control of independent people not related to the Trumps. The Clinton financial doings are tainted by accusations of corruption while Ivanka's proposed ones are independant of the Trumps. When Billy Graham was starting out there was found to be fraud with donated money of some Evangelical preachers. His father-in-law gave him the advice to set up a foundation that he would only receive a salary and expenses rrom. Because of this his reputation is unblemished. This was a failure of the Clintons. They controlled the one foundation.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 3:50 pm » wrote:Bill was in control of the second foundation that was closed when an audit was proposed. Why was the audit proposed and where did that money go? Does Misty have answers to these questions?? Somehow I think not!!!

The CGI has never fully closed, so that's one lie.
You've posted no proof (nor could I find any proof) of this supposed audit, so that's two.
Shall we go for the trifecta?



I post sources to back up my ****.
You back up your **** with more ****.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 4:02 pm » wrote:Massive difference between Clinton's second foundation and Ivanka's proposed foundations. Clinton's had absolute control while Ivanka's proposed foundations would be under control of independent people not related to the Trumps.

Just like his businesses.
I guess Uday and Qusay NEVER talk to the old man about business.

Misty » 21 May 2017 4:13 pm » wrote: The CGI has never fully closed, so that's one lie.
You've posted no proof (nor could I find any proof) of this supposed audit, so that's two.
Shall we go for the trifecta?



I post sources to back up my ****.
You back up your **** with more ****.

And you can provide that the factual information on who actually owns, runs and adminsiters the Women Entrepreneur Developement Program Is Ivanka Trump.

http://projects.worldbank.org/P122764/w ... ct?lang=en

So exactly where is this conflict of interest?

Huey » 21 May 2017 4:17 pm » wrote:And you can provide that the factual information on who actually owns, runs and adminsiters the Women Entrepreneur Developement Program Is Ivanka Trump.

http://projects.worldbank.org/P122764/w ... ct?lang=en

So exactly where is this conflict of interest?

I guess you don't understand that foreign countries and corporations will be donating money to curry favor with the president.
The same thing you complained about with Hillary is now a non-issue.

Misty » 21 May 2017 3:31 pm » wrote:I'm sure that none of these countries or corporations will donate money to Ivanka's foundation slush fund to curry favor with the POTUS.[/sarcasm]
If the Clintons were in the WH right now, and they did half the stuff the Trump's are doing, you would be screaming bloody murder, and you know it, so don't even try to lie about it.

As usual, little Miss Marxist is ignoring the massive scandal, wrongdoing and felonies from the Clinton's and their corrupt cronies.

While making baseless or false accusations against a Trump.

Do I sense a pattern here?

Misty » 21 May 2017 4:16 pm » wrote: Just like his businesses.
I guess Uday and Qusay NEVER talk to the old man about business.

Misty can't seem to understand the difference between business and foundations.

People go into business to make money. Is this simple enough to understand?

Foundations are set up for specific purposes. Charity foundations provide money to those providing help to those in need. Each foundation has bylaws for the foundation. It would be illegal to set up a foundation to receive money to hide it from the IRS. That is one problem with the now closed second Clinton Foundation. The other one is influence peddling while she was SOS. There was found to be a correlation between some donations and later actions as SOS.

Misty's heroine!!!

Here is a quote from a closed thread.


I have never seen you post anything about being against female genital mutilation, so I guess I should assume that you are in favor of it.

Explain why it is OK to circumsize men but not women?? Have fun with explaining that one!! I know the answer but do you!!!

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 4:26 pm » wrote: As usual, little Miss Marxist is ignoring the massive scandal, wrongdoing and felonies from the Clinton's and their corrupt cronies.
While making baseless or false accusations against a Trump.
Do I sense a pattern here?

I sense a pattern of your stuff ending up in the Peanut Gallery.

Misty » 21 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote: I sense a pattern of your stuff ending up in the Peanut Gallery.

Most likely by you. Easiest way to get rid of questions you are unable to answer!!!

Misty » 21 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote: I sense a pattern of your stuff ending up in the Peanut Gallery.

Of course.

Liberals detest the truth.

Misty » 21 May 2017 4:23 pm » wrote: I guess you don't understand that foreign countries and corporations will be donating money to curry favor with the president.
The same thing you complained about with Hillary is now a non-issue.

Donating money to whom, Misty? No, it is not the same thing as Clinton. Go argue Clinton with bilko. I a, looking for a fight though. I want you to back up your assertion. Again, here is where the money is going.

http://projects.worldbank.org/P122764/w ... ct?lang=en

It is incumbent join you to show that this benefits Ivanka to the point that you are whining it is a conflict of interest. All you have shrieking rhetoric.

Have more than half of Ivanka's or the Presidents official visitors been donors to this fund? I mean, you shrieked this is just like Clinton.

Proof it.

Ps. This is not like your typical attack Mistyunlike your 5th grade Facebook memes you actually have to prove your point.

I don't think you are aremed intellectually for it.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 4:30 pm » wrote:Yadda, yadda, yadda.

Nothing?

Termin8tor » 21 May 2017 4:26 pm » wrote:As usual, little Miss Marxist is ignoring the massive scandal, wrongdoing and felonies from the Clinton's and their corrupt cronies.

Which felonies have they been convicted of?
Isn't that the standard you apply to 45 and his cronies?
No convictions, no felonies.

Sgt Bilko » 21 May 2017 4:34 pm » wrote:Most likely by you. Easiest way to get rid of questions you are unable to answer!!!

You mean like this?

Misty » 21 May 2017 3:27 pm » wrote: That's your proof?


Last I read the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), which is an offshoot of the Clinton Foundation was downsizing.
I can't find anything about it being completely shut down.

As a matter of fact, I found this in Foreign Policy Magazine The Clinton Global Initiative Isn’t Really Dead

They still have a small group of people at CGI to help those who have made commitments keep them.

And I can't find anything about this audit you talk about that was supposed to take place right before they were shut down.
Maybe that's because they have not shut down.

You're the one always screaming about me being a liar, when I back up my stuff with sources.
You gotta do better than that Bilko.
Prove it.

You ignored what I said. There were two (2) Clinton foundations. The one you referenced is the legitimate charity Foundation under seperated control. I referred to the second one that Bill controlled. Can't you understand there were two (2) of Them!!! Obviously you need a memory diagnostic like there is for computers.