Liberal Forum

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:36 pm » wrote: A reasonably credible hacker?
You know hackers are criminals right?

That's like saying a plausible con-artist.

Name that 'reasonably credible' hacker Puss.

Termin8tor » 23 May 2017 6:43 am » wrote:Witnesses like James and Susan McDougal and Webb Hubbel were clearly terrified of crossing the Clinton's.

James McDougal held out for a long time, but once he started cooperating with Starr, he was immediately indicted in Arkansas.

Once convicted and sentenced, his heart medicine was taken away, and he died out crying pitifully for guards to get it back.

Termin8tor » 23 May 2017 2:45 pm » wrote:Oh, I absolutely will.

Termin8tor » 23 May 2017 2:45 pm » wrote:As soon as you cite one single bit of evidence of that vast Russia-Trump-Collaboration-Conspiracy-thing-ey you shrieked about for so many months.

Huey » 23 May 2017 6:55 am » wrote: As it applies to today's news and events there is credible circumstantial evidence, just as much if not more as in the Trump Russia Front, to investigate the Seth Rich Murder. But since it involves the DNC, the Clintons, and election influencing in a primary it will be silenced

Misty » 23 May 2017 1:59 pm » wrote: Prove it.
Post that 'credible circumstantial' evidence.

Misty » 23 May 2017 3:01 pm » wrote: Of course you won't.

That's right.
Keep telling that lie, that for months what I wrote about was collusion regarding the election and NOT the financial ties between Trump associates and Russia.
And keep telling the lie that I ever said that I KNEW that there was collusion regarding the election.

But since you brought up the 'Russia-Trump-Collaboration-Conspiracy-thing-ey ' did see how Trey Gowdy’s effort to throw cold water on Trump-Russia collusion backfired on him spectacularly today?

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:50 pm » wrote: You should write soap operas Puss.

about your dog's death?

That reminds me of.....

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:50 pm » wrote:The plagiarism sure isn't an issue for the Trumps, and everything about them is fake anyway.
Fake charity, fake university etc.

Huey » 23 May 2017 3:08 pm » wrote:Julian assange interview
Kim dotcom (check today's statement}
What was robbed from Seth Rich?
Shot at 4am in a secluded park shortly after the first release

Huey » 23 May 2017 3:08 pm » wrote:So how is the Russia Russia Trump thingy coming along?

Huey » 23 May 2017 3:08 pm » wrote:Another appearance on the hill today where the statement no evidence was made.

Fox News retracts online Seth Rich report while Hannity keeps pushing the conspiracy.

Fox News has retracted an online story promoting conspiracy theories about the murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, saying the May 16 article “was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting.”

Despite the online retraction and objections from Rich’s family, leading Fox News host Sean Hannity and other personalities at the network continue to aggressively promote conspiracies about Rich’s death.

FoxNews.com originally posted a May 16 piece headlined “Slain DNC staffer had contact with WikiLeaks, investigator says.”

The story relied on a report by D.C.'s Fox 5 and Rod Wheeler, a former D.C. homicide detective and Fox News contributor, for its sourcing.

The Fox 5 story soon fell apart and Wheeler backtracked -- according to CNN, he told the network “he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death.”

Through a spokesperson, Rich’s family asked on May 17 for “a retraction and an apology from Fox News and from the Fox 5 DC affiliate for inaccurate reporting and damaging the legacy of their son."

Six days later, Fox News has finally retracted its story.

For the past week, Hannity and his colleagues have repeatedly pushed the evidence-free conspiracy theory that former Democratic staffer Seth Rich was murdered for providing WikiLeaks with emails from the Democratic National Committee.

This afternoon, Rich’s brother sent a letter to Hannity’s executive producer calling on Hannity to stop pushing the conspiracy, writing in part: "As the family, we would hope to be the first people to learn about any such evidence and reasons for Seth's death. …

It is a travesty that you would prompt false conspiracy theories and other people's agendas rather than work with the family to learn the truth."

As of Tuesday afternoon, Hannity was still promoting the conspiracy on Twitter.

Misty » 23 May 2017 3:22 pm » wrote: Julian Assange is credible now? LOL

I have already posted answers to all of that stuff.
There had been a lot of muggings in the area where Rich was killed.
Two other people were robbed at gunpoint that same night.
His wallet and cell phone were not taken, but the strap on his watch was torn as if someone had tried to rip it off of him, which is probably why police think it was a robbery gone bad.
You mean the one that only you and Clem keep talking about?
That's not quite what Brennan said.
He said they saw enough to warrant further investigation.

Misty » 23 May 2017 3:22 pm » wrote: Julian Assange is credible now? LOL

I have already posted answers to all of that stuff.
There had been a lot of muggings in the area where Rich was killed.
Two other people were robbed at gunpoint that same night.
His wallet and cell phone were not taken, but the strap on his watch was torn as if someone had tried to rip it off of him, which is probably why police think it was a robbery gone bad.
You mean the one that only you and Clem keep talking about?
That's not quite what Brennan said.
He said they saw enough to warrant further investigation.

larryc12 » 22 May 2017 8:50 am » wrote: We're dealing with a person who is not well.

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:05 pm » wrote: I didn't make up that 90 number.
It comes from right wing websites.

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:05 pm » wrote: Here's another historical fact, people die all the time. It's part of life.

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:05 pm » wrote:I know many people who have died throughout the course of my life.
Some of them may even have inconvenienced me.
Does that mean that I killed them?

Misty » 23 May 2017 2:05 pm » wrote:I get that you hate the Clintons, and there is good reason for that, but these wacky conspiracy theories don't help you make your case.

Sgt Bilko » 23 May 2017 4:28 pm » wrote:And she is a moderator!!!

Cannonpointer » 23 May 2017 8:04 pm » wrote:I notice that you STILL have failed to address the three points I raised. It would be honest to acknowledge they are true. It MIGHT be honest to argue they are not - I'm open to hearing that case.
Just ignoring it, hoping it will go away? Not so much. That's sketchy.

Misty » 23 May 2017 3:01 pm » wrote:Keep telling that lie, that for months what I wrote about was collusion regarding the election and NOT the financial ties between Trump associates and Russia.
And keep telling the lie that I ever said that I KNEW that there was collusion regarding the election.

Misty » 23 May 2017 9:52 pm » wrote: If you are talking about the three points in post #12446, I don't see what any of that has that I with all these so-called murders.

I haven't researched them and I'm not about to, so for the sake of argument, I will concede that they are true.

Still don't see what that has to do with the Clinton kill list.

I get it.
You don't know for a fact that the Clintons have murdered a whole bunch of people.
You just know it's true.

Me, I prefer to live in a world where if someone killed anywhere from 33 to 90 people (depending on which right wing website you want to go with) they would be brought to justice.

Misty » 23 May 2017 9:36 pm » wrote:**** you Sean Hannity.
The Rich Family has begged you to stop using their son's death to advance your political agenda.





https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... story.html