Liberal Forum

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 8:48 am » wrote: And here's more. First, Misty didn't quote any of my words other than me saying she is not well, which is what YOU picked out to try to be right, but were dishonest, and then you dishonestly left out my acknowledgement - TO HER - that I indeed said that. She was **** LYING when she said I was backing Bilko's argument about the foundation, when I said not one single thing backing his position on the foundation. I TOLD her that my "position" was a wait and see position. She, being the little butt hurt flower she is, cannot abide anyone else getting involved, in any way, shape, or form, with an argument she is having with someone. She was OFFENDED - OMG!!...and then lied about me backing Bilko's arguments with her. We conservatives are not standing for your leftist methods - twisting what was said, leaving context out of your **** accusations, innuendo, inference, and blatant, unashamed lying.

Was that a snivel?

indago » 03 Jun 2017 10:12 am » wrote: Was that a snivel?

No. The only sniveling I am aware of is Misty curled up in her safe place with cocoa and a fluffy bunny. , did the thread just get locked again? LMAO!

indago » 03 Jun 2017 10:12 am » wrote:
Was that a snivel?

Butt hurt? Being the loon leftist you are, I rather doubt you give a rat's *** about lies either. After all, it's all the left has to keep itself together.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 10:18 am » wrote: Butt hurt? Being the loon leftist you are, I rather doubt you give a rat's *** about lies either. After all, it's all the left has to keep itself together.

Was that a YES, or a NO to the query?

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 8:48 am » wrote:
And here's more. First, Misty didn't quote any of my words other than me saying she is not well, which is what YOU picked out to try to be right, but were dishonest, and then you dishonestly left out my acknowledgement - TO HER - that I indeed said that. She was **** LYING when she said I was backing Bilko's argument about the foundation, when I said not one single thing backing his position on the foundation.

Lying little queer, when you pile on with dogs, cosigning their ****, white people are going to take that as agreement.

What **** skinned dick suckers like you think it means is irrelevant, lyin lar.

I posted another example of your screeching, you dishonest little *** - when you aid Jesus sanctified memorial day, then called me a liar for saying so.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 7:39 am » wrote:
Christ Almighty, man - two posts up from where I asked him for the quote is this:


And when you click on it, there are several posts from me, which is why I asked him in the first place. Why don't YOU provide the quote as to whom I was allegedy referring since he won't? Or are you content to just lie some more?

It goes directly to you publicly cosigning bilko's position on the foundation, lyin lar - and saying misty isn't well.

Just like you lied you didn't.

You also lied that you didn't say Jesus sanctified memorial day - and I quoted proof of that lie, too, lyin lar.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 7:56 am » wrote:
Like how you "quoted" me saying I don't want healthy lunches? Like how you "quoted" me saying I want torture chambers? Like how you "quoted" me saying I want to do the same **** as the troglodytes? Like how you "quoted" me saying the girl was at fault because she is a "***"?

Yes, lyin lar - and like how you hedged and panty danced and denounced the meaning o words in each of those cases.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 8:48 am » wrote:...She was OFFENDED - OMG!!...and then lied about me backing Bilko's arguments with her.

You bakced bilko's play, cock jockey - the you tried to wiggle out of it.

We liberals are not standing for your cheap conjob tricks, cosigning a position then calling your own words lies when we say them back, you panty dancing potty perv.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 8:17 am » wrote:
This is what I ACTUALLY said, and being the lying **** you are, what you left out:

No, it wasn't, you **** liar! Here you are, yet AGAIN, putting something in there that you decide to put in there because you're dishonest as the day is long. I said exactly what my position has always been and continues to be, and that is the foundation **** will either be investigated or it will not be investigated. And yeah, I said you're not well, which you aren't.

Now tell me where I denied saying she isn't well or that she was lying about that. You just keep cherry-picking to try to be right and in so doing bust yourself. Fine with me.

You cosigned bilko's position, you screeching, panty dancing flaggot. You own it.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 8:08 am » wrote: Call it what you want, but I didn't SAY Jesus outright sanctified Memorial Day, because He didn't. What He did do, IN A SENSE, which is what I said and which is what you left out being the dishonest **** you are, was put Memorial Day in motion with what He SAID in John 15:13, that which you also ignored. If you want to get all pissy with a word ("sanctified") in your never ending attempts to be "right", go ahead, but you're lying.

I didn't lie at all - you wanted to argue ABOUT the argument, rather than argue the issue.

I didn't lie - you just admitted that.

You ar the dishonest ****, looking to quibble rather than debate, dick sucker.

larryc12 » 03 Jun 2017 7:39 am » wrote: Christ Almighty, man - two posts up from where I asked him for the quote is this:

Two posts up from the post you're responding to is the quote of you backing bilko - but you're pretending to be stupid, and bringing another poster into it, to muddy the water, you dishonest cretin.

Two posts up, cretin - two posts up.

Huey » 02 Jun 2017 7:25 pm » wrote:I guess it is ok to throw out accusations, remove rebuttals to peanut gallery, and then ABUSE moderator powers to lock both threads so the accused can't rebut your accusations. That is ****. If you do not have the integrity to face those you attack you should not be here.

You have already been told by one of the admins of this forum that locking my signature threads is NOT an abuse of my power, yet you continue to promulgate that lie.

Huey » 02 Jun 2017 7:36 pm » wrote: First, I don't recall saying what you claim. Maybe I did. So the **** what. I had no clue you were allegedly sensitive about anything because you whine about this being nothing but humor.

Huey » 26 May 2017 3:25 pm » wrote:It is actually the fourth or fifth. Being a ****** you have the other two on ignore.

Huey » 02 Jun 2017 7:36 pm » wrote:Second, you had me on ignore for how long? A couple of years? How the **** was I supposed to know the women that posts that kinda stuff was sensitive to any posts?

How does me having you on ignore stop you from reading my posts?
You could still see my posts, I just couldn't see yours.
You just admitted that you saw what I posted.
Try again.

Don't pretend that you did not know that I was sensitive about being accused of abusing my powers.
Who wouldn't be sensitive about being falsely accused of destroying a forum where they spent years posting?

About a year before those threads disappeared, I was asked by Chuck to help clean up a bunch of old unapproved threads that David wanted cleaned up, and I spent weeks doing that.
I specifically asked Chuck if I could delete the very old unapproved threads that had zero replies and he said that I could.
Then he used that against me to make it look like I deleted the threads that were lost a year later due to the virus.
And he did it for no reason that I could ever figure out, because he and I had no beef with each other.
I thought we were friends and he turned on me out of the blue.

So when you go around here saying that I am abusing my powers, and a bunch of your Mean Girls crew starts echoing you, I have no tolerance for that.
Once bitten, twice shy.

You know damn well it's a sore subject with me, even though you are now feigning ignorance.
That's exactly how you operate Huey.
You're a dirty fighter, who hits below the belt.

Huey » 02 Jun 2017 7:36 pm » wrote:Grow the **** up.

The only one who needs to grow the **** up is you.
How many times a day do you check my profile, you obsessive freak?

Huey » 26 May 2017 4:00 pm » wrote:Yes, she deserves any accusation thrown at her.

I fail to comprehend what any person on an internet forum could ever do to elicit so much hatred from you.
It's really not rational.

So tell me Huey, what was your end game?
To drive me off the forum, because it sure does look like that's what you're trying to do.
Ironically you're the person who talks about 'growing' the forum.

Huey » 22 May 2017 8:41 pm » wrote:Is this how we grow the forum?

I have been giving a lot of thought lately as to whether or not I want to continue to post here any more.
It doesn't seem to be as much fun as it used to be.

And by you falsely accusing me of abusing my powers, you have placed a big red check mark in the NO column.
IF I do continue to post here, it most likely won't be on any kind of a regular basis.

That should make you and the rest of your Mean Girls crew very happy.

Termin8tor » 02 Jun 2017 9:30 am » wrote:Is it too soon for conservatives to declare victory on this board?

Knock yourself out Clem.
You Trumpkins have driven away almost all the Libs.
Now you are free to jerk each other off in peace while you chant 'TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP.'

Misty » 03 Jun 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: You have already been told by one of the admins of this forum that locking my signature threads is NOT an abuse of my power, yet you continue to promulgate that lie.
How does me having you on ignore stop you from reading my posts?
You could still see my posts, I just couldn't see yours.
You just admitted that you saw what I posted.
Try again.

Don't pretend that you did not know that I was sensitive about being accused of abusing my powers.
Who wouldn't be sensitive about being falsely accused of destroying a forum where they spent years posting?

About a year before those threads disappeared, I was asked by Chuck to help clean up a bunch of old unapproved threads that David wanted cleaned up, and I spent weeks doing that.
I specifically asked Chuck if I could delete the very old unapproved threads that had zero replies and he said that I could.
Then he used that against me to make it look like I deleted the threads that were lost a year later due to the virus.
And he did it for no reason that I could ever figure out, because he and I had no beef with each other.
I thought we were friends and he turned on me out of the blue.

So when you go around here saying that I am abusing my powers, and a bunch of your Mean Girls crew starts echoing you, I have no tolerance for that.
Once bitten, twice shy.

You know damn well it's a sore subject with me, even though you are now feigning ignorance.
That's exactly how you operate Huey.
You're a dirty fighter, who hits below the belt.
The only one who needs to grow the **** up is you.
How many times a day do you check my profile, you obsessive freak?





I fail to comprehend what any person on an internet forum could ever do to elicit so much hatred from you.
It's really not rational.

So tell me Huey, what was your end game?
To drive me off the forum, because it sure does look like that's what you're trying to do.
Ironically you're the person who talks about 'growing' the forum.
I have been giving a lot of thought lately as to whether or not I want to continue to post here any more.
It doesn't seem to be as much fun as it used to be.

And by you falsely accusing me of abusing my powers, you have placed a big red check mark in the NO column.
IF I do continue to post here, it most likely won't be on any kind of a regular basis.

That should make you and the rest of your Mean Girls crew very happy.

Can you say obsession Misty? Three in a row for the unstable moderator.

Bring it on, butch.

Ps. *******, I know it bugs the **** out of you, LMMFAO! Even when you aren't posting you can't handle this place.

Misty » 03 Jun 2017 3:16 pm » wrote: Knock yourself out Clem.
You Trumpkins have driven away almost all the Libs.
Now you are free to jerk each other off in peace while you chant 'TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP.'

Yeah, we presented so much reality that your liberal moonbat buddies fled in terror.


Where are all the brilliant, logical, ejucated liberals, Dim?

Why can't you crush us stupid, ignorant conservatives?

Termin8tor » 03 Jun 2017 4:06 pm » wrote: Yeah, we presented so much reality that your liberal moonbat buddies fled in terror.

Where are all the brilliant, logical, ejucated liberals, Dim?

Why can't you crush us stupid, ignorant conservatives?

Don't respond to the coward on this thread. She will do a hit and run and lock the thread.

indago » 02 Jun 2017 10:09 pm » wrote: You spout the same over and over again, and she got tired of it.

Misty was right about you:

"You are an ignorant atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense about everything" — Sgt Bilko

"You are a vacuous simpleton shrieking the same claptrap and rubbish over and over like some kind of a deranged parrot." — Misty

Since you are the only one who is a very stupid person who spouts gibberish nonsense about your views of what you are doing for the Design of Life part in the world of a sudden I will. I will therefore be able to move those OEM copies of the paper for a few days and continued on the road!!

That is the only kind of talking you seem to understand!!!

Sgt Bilko » 04 Jun 2017 12:00 am » wrote: Since you are the only one who is a very stupid person who spouts gibberish nonsense about your views...

ALINSKYISM