you have to apologize for thisMisty » 17 May 2017 4:19 pm » wrote: OIC, so he shared classified info with the two Russian (spies) guys and the guy from TASS.
BTW, was it his to share?
Did he have permission from the country who gave us that intel to share it with Russia?
How like a fascistic liberal.Huey » 29 Jun 2017 3:28 pm » wrote: And remove facts from this thread and bury them in peanut gallery. She did that to you today.
If pigs grow wings, they might fly.Misty » 15 Jun 2017 1:56 pm » wrote:Haven't you been paying attention?
Looks like he was trying to obstruct the investigation into Michael Flynn.
If Coates and Rogers tell Mueller that he asked them to get involved in quashing the investigation, he's toast.
Senate Judiciary Committee Starting to Focus on Obama Administration Surveillance and Unmasking
BY DEBRA HEINE
After months of investigating alleged Russian meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign, the Senate Judiciary Committee appears to be shifting its attention to the Obama administration's surveillance and “unmasking” of Trump campaign and transition officials.
Two top Republican senators have asked the FBI to turn over its applications for warrants to spy on Americans tied to its probe on Russia's election interference during the 2016 presidential election. The committee also reportedly held a closed door meeting on Wednesday, focused on the “unmasking” of Trump officials by the Obama White House.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/06/29 ... unmasking/




That's called "journalism," psycho.Misty » 30 Jun 2017 8:22 am » wrote:National Inquirer starts stalking Mika and her kids.
Misty » 30 Jun 2017 8:22 am » wrote:
'MORNING JOE' HOSTS ACCUSE TRUMP OF BLACKMAILING, THREATENING THEM OVER 'NATIONAL ENQUIRER' STORY
T-Bag now fighting with a cable show host on Twitter, because I'm sure he has nothing better to do.
If you read this thread what I was pushing very hard was the financial connections between 45, his associates and Russia, which Mueller seems to be looking into as well.Inglorious Bastards » 29 Jun 2017 9:49 pm » wrote:you must address this russian collusion...you were pushing it so bad....do i have to pull 100 of posts???....you need to address....
Yeah, I guess it had nothing to do with the fact that I went to NYC to be with my sister as she underwent surgery for breast cancer.Inglorious Bastards » 29 Jun 2017 9:49 pm » wrote:....funny how your break started about the time it was debunked.....it is so dishonest
Except that we are far from the only house that has been vandalized jackass.Inglorious Bastards » 29 Jun 2017 10:01 pm » wrote:sounds like you are the couple all the kids in the neighborhood hate....we had one as a kid....everyone has
"What a stupid thing to say."Misty » 30 Jun 2017 8:55 am » wrote: If you read this thread what I was pushing very hard was the financial connections between 45, his associates and Russia, which Mueller seems to be looking into as well.
I have many times said, "follow the money" and that I think that the real story is about money.
I have a question for all of you collusion deniers.
Why do you think that so many of T-Bag's associates have lied about their contacts with Russians, even on their security clearance forms, which is a felony?
Yeah, I guess it had nothing to do with the fact that I went to NYC to be with my sister as she underwent surgery for breast cancer.
What a stupid thing to say.
Believe it or not, sometimes real life takes precedence over this place.
That said, if I spend less time here than usual from now on, it will have more to do with the fact that I abhor you Trumplodytes than the fact that I am afraid of you.
I haven't much use for people who still support this narcissistic, thin-skinned vindictive bully with no impulse control, and I prefer not to associate with them.
BTW, who has 'debunked' the Russia collusion thing?
As far as I know the investigations are still going on.
From what I hear, the WSJ just posted a story about a GOP operative who said he was working with Michael Flynn in trying to obtain HRC's emails from Russian hackers.
And it's not an anonymous source.
The man is named in the story and was actually interviewed for it.
If that is true, I think that would constitute collusion.
Don't you?
my god i was only teasing....wtf happened to you??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Misty » 30 Jun 2017 9:17 am » wrote: Except that we are far from the only house that has been vandalized jackass.
If your could read you would see that I said that they like to 'throw eggs, fireworks and snowballs at people's houses.
That's 'houses' plural, as in not just ours.
1. I hardly even have any neighbors to hate on me, since most of the houses closest to us are summer people who don't live here year round, and.....
2. There are very few kids in this community, and none anywhere near our house.
Mostly retired folks.
I think the average age is around 52.
But keep talking out of your *** about things you know nothing about.
You're pretty good at it.
Why have you set up shop here in my thread anyway?
Isn't there some other place that you keep bragging about where you love to post now, that is so much better than this place?
ya know what...i am on a real board now....i come here out of loyalty of 10 yrs.........loyalty goes so far.............see yaMisty » 30 Jun 2017 9:17 am » wrote: Except that we are far from the only house that has been vandalized jackass.
If your could read you would see that I said that they like to 'throw eggs, fireworks and snowballs at people's houses.
That's 'houses' plural, as in not just ours.
1. I hardly even have any neighbors to hate on me, since most of the houses closest to us are summer people who don't live here year round, and.....
2. There are very few kids in this community, and none anywhere near our house.
Mostly retired folks.
I think the average age is around 52.
But keep talking out of your *** about things you know nothing about.
You're pretty good at it.
Why have you set up shop here in my thread anyway?
Isn't there some other place that you keep bragging about where you love to post now, that is so much better than this place?
"But keep talking out of your *** about things you know nothing about. You're pretty good at it."Misty » 30 Jun 2017 9:17 am » wrote: Except that we are far from the only house that has been vandalized jackass.
If your could read you would see that I said that they like to 'throw eggs, fireworks and snowballs at people's houses.
That's 'houses' plural, as in not just ours.
1. I hardly even have any neighbors to hate on me, since most of the houses closest to us are summer people who don't live here year round, and.....
2. There are very few kids in this community, and none anywhere near our house.
Mostly retired folks.
I think the average age is around 52.
But keep talking out of your *** about things you know nothing about.
You're pretty good at it.
Why have you set up shop here in my thread anyway?
Isn't there some other place that you keep bragging about where you love to post now, that is so much better than this place?

"loyalty"? You have no "loyalty": You are aInglorious Bastards » 30 Jun 2017 9:58 am » wrote: ya know what...i am on a real board now....i come here out of loyalty of 10 yrs.........loyalty goes so far.............see ya

.Misty » 30 Jun 2017 1:26 pm » wrote:
That but, but, but Obama, but, but, but Hillary crap doesn't work any more.Termin8tor » 30 Jun 2017 1:30 pm » wrote:Wow, huge scandal!![]()
![]()
![]()
Liberals preferred glib sociopathic liars/ criminals like Obama and Clinton.
Oh, so committing felonies and impeachable acts isn't "**** crazy?"Misty » 30 Jun 2017 1:43 pm » wrote: That but, but, but Obama, but, but, but Hillary crap doesn't work any more.
Nothing either of them ever did was as **** crazy as what Golf-T does.
Really and truly ironic and ridiculous coming from the psychopath who lied for years on behalf of a serial felon serial rapist.Misty » 30 Jun 2017 1:43 pm » wrote:The leader of your cult is a thin-skinned, vindictive bully with zero impulse control, who watches TV all day long and Tweets obsessively.
Anyone who defends the **** that T-Bag posted is just as repulsive as he is.
In case you haven't noticed many Republicans have denounced it.
Those who don't suffer from the same cult mentality that you do anyway.
See you in 2018, psycho.How long before you Trumplodytes drink the Kool-Aid?
Would you call a serial rapist like Bill Clinton "**** crazy?" Did you ever?Misty » 30 Jun 2017 1:43 pm » wrote: That but, but, but Obama, but, but, but Hillary crap doesn't work any more.
Nothing either of them ever did was as **** crazy as what Golf-T does.
T-Bag has used his friendship with David Pecker who owns The National Enquirer to go after his enemies before.Kushner Reportedly Used Threat of Enquirer Story to Solicit Apology From Morning Joe to Trump
On Friday, Morning Joe co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski wrote in the Washington Post that, earlier this year, "top White House staff members warned that the National Enquirer was planning to publish a negative article about us unless we begged the president to have the story spiked."
They say they did not end up speaking to Trump about the piece; for his part, though, Trump tweeted this morning that Scarborough asked him to "stop" the piece but that he refused.
(A short article about Scarborough and Brzezinski, who are engaged but used to be married to other people, did in fact run in the tabloid in early June.
Meanwhile, the fact that the president can control the National Enquirer's editorial agenda—Trump is known to be friendly with David Pecker, who runs the company that owns the tabloid—is, weirdly, a part of this story that everyone agrees on.)
New York reporter Gabe Sherman has now written an account of the situation based on "three sources familiar with the private conversations."
The key lines in Sherman's piece: So, that's pretty bad, if true: A top White House aide and member of Trump's family using a sleazy tabloid story as leverage in order to solicit a personal apology to the president from a critical pundit.
However, it's not clear from Sherman's story whether it was Kushner or Scarborough who initiated the text exchange; if it was Scarborough, it would seem like he could have been inviting the very kind of offer he's now decrying.
That said, we meanwhile don't know yet who was responsible for initiating the Enquirer hit piece in the first place, and perhaps Scarborough had merely texted Kushner—who has apparently worked as a peacemaker between Morning Joe and Trump in the past—to find out whether the White House had anything to do with it.
(Update, 2:50 p.m.: MSNBC says it is not, for some reason, planning to clear any of this up by releasing transcripts of exchanges between Scarborough and White House officials.)
In any case, the president should probably not be engaging on any level in National Enquirer-related favor trading with members of the press who cover his administation.