Liberal Forum

I've been all over the board for days, troll, having a lot of fun. Yet you think it's all about you.Get over yourself.Yeah, I've seen you getting your *** handed to you over and over.You're right, it was a lot of fun, for me.

I've been all over the board for days, troll, having a lot of fun. Yeah, I've seen you getting your *** handed to you over and over. You're right, it was a lot of fun, for me. Who? Where? Can't you even tell believable lies?

If you've been having so much fun all over the forum, why are you hanging around here?

If you've been having so much fun all over the forum, why are you hanging around here? Oh gosh, I must have spent 30 second here.

Clem turns up like the proverbial bad penny.

Groups Targeted by I.R.S. Tested Rules on PoliticsWhen CVFC, a conservative veterans' group in California, applied for tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service, its biggest expenditure that year was several thousand dollars in radio ads backing a Republican candidate for Congress.The Wetumpka Tea Party, from Alabama, sponsored training for a get-out-the-vote initiative dedicated to the "defeat of President Barack Obama" while the I.R.S. was weighing its application.And the head of the Ohio Liberty Coalition, whose application languished with the I.R.S. for more than two years, sent out e-mails to members about Mitt Romney campaign events and organized members to distribute Mr. Romney's presidential campaign literature.Representatives of these organizations have cried foul in recent weeks about their treatment by the I.R.S., saying they were among dozens of conservative groups unfairly targeted by the agency, harassed with inappropriate questionnaires and put off for months or years as the agency delayed decisions on their applications.But a close examination of these groups and others reveals an array of election activities that tax experts and former I.R.S. officials said would provide a legitimate basis for flagging them for closer review."Money is not the only thing that matters," said Donald B. Tobin, a former lawyer with the Justice Departments tax division who is a law professor at Ohio State University. "While some of the I.R.S. questions may have been overbroad, you can look at some of these groups and understand why these questions were being asked."The stakes are high for both the I.R.S. and lawmakers in Congress, whose election fortunes next year will hinge in no small part on a flood of political spending by such advocacy groups. They are often favored by strategists and donors not for the tax benefits they typically do not have significant income subject to tax but because they do not have to reveal their donors, allowing them to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into elections without disclosing where the money came from.The I.R.S. is already separately reviewing roughly 300 tax-exempt groups that may have engaged in improper campaign activity in past years, according to agency planning documents. Some election lawyers said they believed a wave of lawsuits against the I.R.S. and intensifying Congressional criticism of its handling of applications were intended in part to derail those audits, giving political nonprofit organizations a freer hand during the 2014 campaign.After the tax agency was denounced in recent weeks by President Obama, lawmakers and critics for what they described as improper scrutiny of at least 100 groups seeking I.R.S. recognition, The New York Times examined more than a dozen of the organizations, most of them organized as 501(4) "social welfare" groups under the tax code, or in some cases as 501(3) charities. None ran major election advertising campaigns, according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group, the main activity of a small number of big-spending tax-exempt groups that emerged as major players in the 2010 and 2012 elections.But some organized volunteers, distributed pamphlets and held rallies leading up to the 2010 elections or the 2012 presidential election, as conservatives fought to turn out Mr. Obama.A report issued this month by the Treasury Departments inspector general, J. Russell George, found that inappropriate criteria, including groups policy positions, were used to flag some cases and that specialists in the I.R.S. office in Cincinnati, which reviews all tax-exemption requests, sometimes asked questions that were irrelevant to the application process.And agency officials have acknowledged that specialists inappropriately used keywords like "Tea Party" and "Patriots" in searching through applications.But some former I.R.S. officials disputed several of Mr. George's conclusions, including his assertion that it was inappropriate to ask groups about their donors, or whether their leaders had plans to run for public office. While unusual, the former officials said, such questions are not prohibited if relevant to an application under consideration.Page 2One Tea Party group called the Ohio Liberty Coalition sent out regular e-mails to members about Romney campaign events and organized anti-Obama protests around the state, canvassed neighborhoods, handed out Romney campaign 'door hangers' and distributed literature for the Romney campaign.The president of the group, Tom Zawistowski said that was not political activity, ROFL

Oh gosh, you caught a Repub making a carelessly worded remark. There's an Earth shattering issue. Meanwhile in the real world, the entire US risks national bankruptcy because of Obama's destructive leftist policies.Does the money for medicare part d figure into our impending collapse at all, Glory Holer?One Tea Party group called the Ohio Liberty Coalition sent out regular e-mails to members about Romney campaign events and organized anti-Obama protests around the state, canvassed neighborhoods, handed out Romney campaign 'door hangers' and distributed literature for the Romney campaign.The president of the group, Tom Zawistowski said that was not political activity, ROFLThat .gif is killing me. Seriously, I catch myself just staring and laughing at the little mexican man doing his hat dance.

Clem turns up like the proverbial bad penny. Yeah, trolls like you think objective Truth is bad. We know. One Tea Party group called the Ohio Liberty Coalition sent out regular e-mails to members about Romney campaign events and organized anti-Obama protests around the state, canvassed neighborhoods, handed out Romney campaign 'door hangers' and distributed literature for the Romney campaign. The president of the group, Tom Zawistowski said that was not political activity, ROFL As usual, little Miss Marxist manages to essentially reverses reality. The scandal isn't that IRS illegally bullied and intimidated ordinary Americans to keep them from participating in the democrat process. That Obama spurred and intended that to happen, an impeachable act. No, no, it's that occasionally one group might have tip toed over some line, like liberal groups do regularly. She's spouting the latest Democrat Talking Point Lie, as usual.

These three links are all from one website on one day.2-Year-Old Boy In Texas Dead After Shooting Himself In The FaceGun Goes Off In 3rd Graders Backpack At Minneapolis SchoolMan With Concealed Weapons Permit Forgot Loaded Gun On Disney World RideDon't you just love responsible gun owners?

That .gif is killing me. Seriously, I catch myself just staring and laughing at the little mexican man doing his hat dance.

As usual, little Miss Marxist manages to essentially reverses reality.The scandal isn't that IRS illegally bullied and intimidated ordinary Americans to keep them from participating in the democrat process. That Obama spurred and intended that to happen, an impeachable act.No, no, it's that occasionally one group might have tip toed over some line, like liberal groups do regularly.She's spouting the latest Democrat Talking Point Lie, as usual.The 'democrat' process? ROFLDidn't Frank Luntz tell you that when you use the term with a small D (not the political party) it's okay to add the IC?Talk about reversing reality.You have no proof that Obama 'spurred' or 'intended' this to happen.And of course you minimize what Republicans/Conservatives did by saying that 'occasionally one group might have tip toed over some line', and accuse liberal groups of doing it 'regularly' again with no proof whatsoever.Thousands of these so-called 'social welfare' groups just happened to crop up right before an election.What a coincidence, huh?Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS spent more than $70 million on federal political campaigns in the 2012 election.Tell me why it should be considered a 'social welfare' organization and qualify for tax exempt status?Now you're just making **** up. How sad.

Third ricin letter threatens Obama over 'God-given' gun rights.The Secret Service on Thursday reportedly intercepted the third in a series of ricin-tainted letters threatening violence over any new gun control measures.Two other letters were received by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Friday and the Bloomberg-supported Mayors Against Illegal Guns on Sunday.WNBC's Jonathan Dienst told MSNBC's Jonathan Roberts on Thursday that law enforcement officials had confirmed that a third letter had been intercepted by the Secret Service before it reached President Barack Obama. Dienst said that the same person in Shreveport, Louisiana appeared to be the sender of all three threats.According to the WNBC website, all three letters state: "You will have to kill me and my family before you get my guns. Anyone wants to come to my house will get shot in the face. The right to bear arms is my constitutional God given right and I will exercise that right till the day I die.""What's in this letter is nothing compared to what I've got planned for you," the mailings warn.The Violence Policy Center determined in 2010 that Louisiana had the highest rate of gunfire deaths in the nation.Watch the video at link in title.First of all, can someone tell me where in the Bible it says that gun rights are God-given?And second of all, if you are fighting for gun rights, how exactly does threatening violence help your cause?

Man killed in church after stone altar falls on him.Gunther Link, a devout Catholic, prayed to be saved after he was trapped in a lift (elevator), but was killed when he went to church to give thanks and the stone altar fell on him.Link, 45, died instantly as he was crushed under the ancient 860lb monument in the Weinhaus Church in Vienna, Austria.Roman Hahslinger, a police spokesman, said: "He was a very religious man and had been scared when he was trapped in the lift and had prayed for release."A short while later he was pulled out of the elevator and he went straight to the church to thank God."He seems to have embraced a stone pillar on which the stone altar was perched and it fell on him, killing him instantly."We have found his fingerprints on the pillar. We are now investigating the case further," he added.Link's body was found by parishioners attending Mass the next day after he had been reported missing by his cousin.Ain't that a bitch?

You have no proof that Obama 'spurred' or 'intended' this to happen. From the troll who denied that there was evidence in the boxes and boxes and boxes of EVIDENCE that Schippers, House Impeachment Managers and staff collected for months. Can't make stuff like that up. So much for your credibility on any of this. Of course Obama intended it to happen. I and other conservative have put together a patter of facts to all but prove it, and it completely fits his Modus Operandi going back many years. Thousands of these so-called 'social welfare' groups just happened to crop up right before an election. What a coincidence, huh? It's not a coincidence at all. Ordinary Americans were outraged at Obama-care and his $1 trillion deficits and organized properly to respond. And they were obstructed, delayed, bullied and intimidated in Chicago-thug manner by the fascistic Obama administration's IRS and other agencies. Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS spent more than $70 million on federal political campaigns in the 2012 election. Tell me why it should be considered a 'social welfare' organization and qualify for tax exempt status? For the same reason liberals groups are that behave in exactly the same way. That's the law. Never saw you complain about them.

WTF is 'a patter of facts?''To all but prove it?'I think you need to actually prove something in order to impeach him.Not 'all but prove it.'You sound like a nut.Jackhole.

WTF is 'a patter of facts?' 'To all but prove it?' I think you need to actually prove something in order to impeach him. Not 'all but prove it.' Bulls***. If the IRS for years abused its power and top Obama officials knew, if the abuse and complaints about it were in the news, it is Obama's obligation as Chief Law Enforcement Officer to investigate and stop it it. Instead, he, his allies and his backers instigated it and covered it up. Now that 75% of Americans want this properly investigated, we might actually learn most of the truth and hold him and others to account. But I know, this is in no way as serious a scandal as the black mold in military barracks about which you loudly bleated when Bush was president. You sound like a nut. Jackhole. What kind of mental case spends years dishonestly defending a serial felon/ serial rapist? Spreading every Democrat Talking Point Lie that's ever been written? Get some help, moonbat.

WTF is 'a patter of facts?' 'To all but prove it?' I think you need to actually prove something in order to impeach him. Not 'all but prove it.' You sound like a nut. Jackhole. Whatever the facts are behind this huge scandal, you'll be telling lies in Obama's defense. REPORT: IRS commish had most WH visits of Cabinet -- 157 times... FLASHBACK: Agency head visited Bush once in four years... http://dailycaller.c...cabinet-member/

**** YOU!

Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS spent more than $70 million on federal political campaigns in the 2012 election.Tell me why it should be considered a 'social welfare' organization and qualify for tax exempt status?For the same reason liberals groups are that behave in exactly the same way. That's the law.That's not the 'law' genius.The law on 501 C 4 groups says, "Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare."http://www.law.corne...ode/text/26/501Got that Puss? 'Exclusively' for the promotion of social welfare.None of these political organizations, left or right, should be tax exempt.

**** YOU! There's a rational thought. For the same reason liberals groups are that behave in exactly the same way. That's the law. That's not the 'law' genius. The law on 501 C 4 groups says, "Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare."http://www.law.corne...ode/text/26/501 Got that Puss? 'Exclusively' for the promotion of social welfare. None of these political organizations, left or right, should be tax exempt. Well gosh, you'd never lie, would you? Naaah! When is the last time you wrote a post complaining about the $1 billion Obama raised? Or about Democrat 501 (4)'s? liberal groups have operated for decades in the same way GPS does without Democrats complaining. Democrats were content to have 501(4) groups active as long as they were operating on behalf of liberals and their causes. For example, no Democratic leader demanded the IRS investigate the 501(4) arms of the League of Conservation Voters, National Abortion Rights Act League, VoteVets, NAACP, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and other liberal organizations that have spent millions excoriating Republicans, pushing liberal issues and registering voters. When Americans United for Change ran ads in 2007 slamming Republican senators up for re-election for supporting the surge of additional U.S. troops in Iraq, no Democratic lawmaker complained. Nor did Mr. Durbin gripe in 2011 when Bill Burton, his former staffer and an Obama White House official, organized Priorities USA, a 501(4) to help the president's cause. In addition, no Democratic leaders decried big money's influence when groups registered under section 501(5) of the federal code—the tax exemption for labor, agricultural or horticultural organizations—spent hundreds of millions from corporate treasuries on advocacy and political activity. That's because Democrats believe unions are more deserving of tax-exempt status than other organizations, and that corporate contributions are bad unless they come from unions' corporate treasuries. http://online.wsj.co...1200175592.html