Liberal Forum

Misty » 07 Jul 2017 3:07 pm » wrote: You have a very selective memory.
You mean actual violence like the kind that was committed by one of the newest Republican members of Congress, Greg Gianforte?

You know, the guy who body slammed the reporter?

That 'ugly behavior' was committed by the 'elected official' himself, not by one of his 'supporters.'

Republicans seem fine with the fact that they now have a member of Congress who pleaded guilty to assault.

Nope, not like that at all. Mystified in the Brain gas been spinning that one for a while. But the funny part is your pols are so weak and your ideology so rejected you guys couldn't beat him.

Huey » 08 Jul 2017 9:10 am » wrote: Nope, not like that at all. Mystified in the Brain gas been spinning that one for a while. But the funny part is your pols are so weak and your ideology so rejected you guys couldn't beat him.

Misty has a severe case of cognitive dissonance. She believes wholeheartedly that the leftwing moonbats are pure and gentle hearted. When facts prove otherwise this causes so much pain she just totally rejects facts and holds to her irrational beliefs. Poor mentally handicapped Misty..

Misty » 07 Jul 2017 6:44 pm » wrote:John Podesta replies to T-Bag's crazy Tweet.

How typical that you take a minor mistake or two and call them crazy.
While ignoring deep corruption in your party.

While Podesta never ran the DNC, The Washington Times reported that federal officials have not acquired the DNC's hacked computer server — only cybersecurity specialists from CrowdStrike, which the DNC hired to investigate the hack, have done so.


CrowdStrike has blamed Russia for the hack, and some critics say the evidence is thin. Members of Congress said they accept Russia's responsibility, but wonder why the DNC has not allowed federal investigators to look at the server, a key piece of evidence in the case.


So if Podesta was not connected to the DNC server scandal, why would people at G-20 be talking about him?


Last Thursday, Clinton's former campaign chairman lost his cool on Fox Business in an interview with host Maria Bartiromo.


"John, I've got to ask you about your own situation, your ties to Russian entities, you joined the board of a small energy company in 2011, two months later a Russian entity directly funded by the Kremlin invested $35 million in the company," Bartiromo noted. She also pointed out that he received 75,000 shares of stock and failed to disclose them when he went to work for President Obama.


Podesta responded defensively, declaring, "It's not a Russian company." When Bartiromo pressured him, "It's backed by the Kremlin," he shot back, "I did not have any stock in any Russian company, so go back and get your facts straight, Maria."


In March, Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of Clinton Cash, explained the connection — and Bartiromo was right.


"In 2011, John Podesta joins the board of this very small energy company called Joule Energy based out of Massachusetts," he noted. "About two months after he joins the board, a Russian entity called Rusnano puts a billion rubles — which is about 35 million dollars — into John Podesta's company."


Rusnano is not a private company, but a fund directly funded by the Kremlin. Schweizer noted that the Russian science minister called Rusnano "Putin's child." This funding happened while Podesta was an advisor to Hillary Clinton at the State Department.


But the scandal doesn't end there, Schweizer noted. In 2013, when Podesta went to work for the White House as a special counselor to Obama, he had to fill out a financial disclosure. In that disclosure, "he not only fails to disclose these 75,000 shares of stock that he has in Joule Energy, which is funded in part by the Russian government. He also fails to disclose that he is on one of the three corporate boards that this entity has."


While Podesta is not responsible for the fact that federal officials haven't accessed the DNC server, he is responsible for losing his cool when questioned about his Russia connections. If people at the G-20 summit in Hamburg really were talking about Podesta, it seems more likely this is the reason.


Ironically, the presidential candidate with the clearest ties to Russia actually lost the election last November, and amid this 21st century Red Scare Democrats are terrified to admit that their entire collusion narrative seems to be a massive case of projection. Now that's the real scandal.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/07/07 ... n-podesta/

Misty » 06 Jul 2017 7:52 pm » wrote:If you're just waking up, the president is on foreign soil attacking US intelligence patriots, the American free press and former presidents

Who cares that that hack says?

Trump is attacking the corrupt liberal MSM, illegal leakers and a president who has done the same, psycho. Is there any president in recent memory who blamed his predecessor for anything and everything than Obama did to Bush, the leftist liar?

.

Here's your unbiased MSM.

.

.

Huey » 30 Jun 2017 9:16 pm » wrote:My bad. I forgot you are not intellectually capable of discussing real issues.

You tend to hide from substantive questions. Like the questions on States Rights.
Attack away snowflake.

No, no, she's been on top of huge breaking scandals!

.

Termin8tor » 08 Jul 2017 11:38 am » wrote:Who cares what that hack says?

Who are you and what did you do with Clem?

Termin8tor » 08 Jul 2017 11:51 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 08 Jul 2017 11:38 am » wrote:

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 2:39 pm » wrote:
Anti-anti-Trumpism has become the new safe space for the right.

Here is how it works:

Rather than defend Trump's specific actions, his Conservative champions change the subject to......

.

Hey psycho, 1) there is nothing to defend on the Russia-Trump-collusion ****, duuuh,

2) I and others have defended Trump in great, great detail on his policies and actions, though not all.

So you're mostly lying, as usual.

And unlike you leftist Dims, we don't need safe spaces. We don't avoid important questions, like you've done for years and years and years.

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 2:45 pm » wrote:Donald Trump in From Russia with Love

More fictional **** from a deranged Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Even your cartoons are lies.

Termin8tor » 08 Jul 2017 3:06 pm » wrote:More fictional **** from a deranged Democrat Talking Point Liar.
Even your cartoons are lies.

Termin8tor » 08 Jul 2017 3:06 pm » wrote: More fictional **** from a deranged Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Even your cartoons are lies.

She would have had a job as menial clerk in the Goebbels ministry of Propaganda writing what she was told to write.

Kinda like mind controlled drones that worked with Winston Smith.

Quick Misty, look up the characters name! Hell, she coulda been Julia.

Huey » 08 Jul 2017 3:24 pm » wrote: She would have had a job as menial clerk in the Goebbels ministry of Propaganda writing what she was told to write.

Kinda like mind controlled drones that worked with Winston Smith.

Quick Misty, look up the characters name! Hell, she coulda been Julia.

It has to be mental illness. I wouldn't spread lies like that for any amount of money in the world.

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 3:14 pm » wrote:

Here is Misty's delusional beliefs explained.

Understanding Trump Derangement Syndrome
David Kupelian on 2 huge reasons the left is going insane with rage, delusion, violence
Published: 06/10/2017 at 8:00 PM

http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/understandin ... -syndrome/

Recently, a long-time liberal reader of WND emailed me the following message – under the subject line, “The Real Republican Agenda.”

“Hello Mr. Kupelian! I just found this on Facebook, and it’s a perfect description of Donald Trump, his administration and the Republican Party. It shows why so many Americans are appalled and horrified by Donald Trump and his minions:

“You can’t round up the ill, the disabled, the undesirables and kill them in gas chambers. But you can take away their medicine and let them die.

“You can’t lynch a black man under a burning cross. But you can shoot him with a policeman’s gun.

“You can’t force a woman to wear a burqa and beat her if she steps outside. But you can rape her, fail to prosecute the rapist and deny her health care for the pre-existing rape, deny her an abortion for the resulting pregnancy, deny her maternity care, deny her maternity leave and pay, and block her avenues to rebuild her life.

“You can’t round up the foreign-born, confiscate their property, and imprison them in detainment camps in the American west (again). But you can block them at the border and deny them re-entry, deny them reunion with their families, homes and lives, even though they have legal immigration status.

“You can’t put the poor in labor camps. But you can tax them so heavily, and make the cost of education so burdensome, that they and further generations can never ever escape.

“You can’t go back to ‘separate but equal’ schools. But you can appoint Betsy DeVos and let her do this through funding.

“You can’t own a plantation that profits off the backs of little children. But you can look at the budget and say, ‘Oh, there’s no money for food stamps for hungry children, but there are bottomless tax cuts for the wealthiest white men.’

“You can’t appoint a Klansman. But you can appoint Jeff Sessions.

“You can’t appoint a Nazi. But you can get right up in the presidential administration as ‘Alt-Right.’

“The Republican Party is Evil, re-branded to succeed in our legal environment.

“You can’t be Hitler. But you can be Donald Trump.”

The sender, who has debated with me via email for years, signed off by saying, “Don’t like this? Well too bad. It’s absolutely true!”

Well, what’s “absolutely true” would be one of two opposing propositions: Either Donald Trump is a modern Hitler and his supporters the equivalent of Nazis, slave-owners and Klansmen as depicted in this colorful but basically accurate characterization of the left’s view of Trump’s presidency – or else the people claiming this are not just staggeringly delusional, but reckless as well.

Misty is obviously staggeringly delusional!!

Read more at the link.

Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.

Trump Team Met With Lawyer Linked to Kremlin During Campaign

They were talking about an adoption program?

Yawn!!!!!

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 5:28 pm » wrote:Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.
They were talking about an adoption program?

More from the article:

In his statement, Donald J. Trump Jr. said: “It was a short introductory meeting. I asked Jared and Paul to stop by. We primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children that was active and popular with American families years ago and was since ended by the Russian government, but it was not a campaign issue at the time and there was no follow up.”

He added: “I was asked to attend the meeting by an acquaintance, but was not told the name of the person I would be meeting with beforehand.”

No where in the rather lengthy article is there any evidence of election collusion.

Yet another long story designed to keep the collusion story alive and well.

Fodder for the twitter twits.

i'd love to slice malias cloritiris to shreds

Inglorious Bastards » 08 Jul 2017 6:14 pm » wrote:i'd love to slice malias cloritiris to shreds

And YOU are a FUKTUP DUDE

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 5:28 pm » wrote:Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.

.

You're deranged.

.